A Ukrainian analyst has also confirmed what we have known all along: Brussels and Ukraine are working together to help Péter Magyar come to power.

Their goal is clear: they want Ukraine to become a member of the European Union as early as next year. However, this would pose unforeseeable economic and security risks for our country.

Only Viktor Orbán and the national government are capable of saying no to pressure from Brussels and Ukraine. We cannot allow foreign interests to decide the fate of Hungarians, our money, and our future.

In April, the stakes are enormous, and Fidesz is the only safe choice if we want to preserve our peace and security. 🇭🇺

The head of a Ukrainian research institute admitted that both Brussels and Ukraine are working to help Péter Magyar replace Viktor Orbán as prime minister in Hungary. They are doing this because they know that if Péter Magyar comes to power, Ukraine’s accession as the 27th member of the European Union could become a reality.

The situation is that almost every day there is news proving that there is indeed a plan in Brussels to sweep us aside in Hungary. They want to take control over our daily lives, but the national government will continue to say no every single day.

That is why it is important that we cast our votes in the right place. Today, apart from Viktor Orbán, there is no political force in Hungary capable of resisting these often very covert and aggressive attacks against Hungarian sovereignty with the same determination that he demonstrates.

He does this because he knows that it is not in Hungary’s interest to send our money to Ukraine, to send our sons into a war, or to worsen Europe’s already difficult economic situation through Ukrainian accession.

For us, Hungarian interests will always come first. That is why we fight against all kinds of forces in Brussels, no matter how they maneuver or align themselves with Tisza. We will stand firm in defense of Hungary and our clear position.

🔴 1️⃣ “A Ukrainian analyst confirmed it” – credibility anchor

📌 Technique: appeal to authority + vague sourcing

No name

No institution identified

No specific quotation

No verifiable context

👉 Invoking an “external Ukrainian source” creates the impression of insider confirmation.

🎯 Effect:
The claim appears not as an opinion, but as an “exposed plan.”

---

🔴 2️⃣ “Brussels and Ukraine are working together” – merged enemy coalition

📌 Technique: coalition framing + guilt by association

Two separate actors:

• European Union
• Ukraine

→ fused into a single coordinated power bloc.

🎯 Effect:
Domestic political competition is reframed not as party rivalry, but as a narrative of “external forces vs. the nation.”

---

🔴 3️⃣ “They want to sweep us out” – sovereignty threat framing

📌 Technique: external threat framing + identity activation

Key phrases:

• “They want to take control”
• “Foreign interests”
• “Pressure tactics”

👉 The conflict is no longer about policy differences, but about national self-defense.

🎯 Effect:
The voter does not deliberate — they defend.

---

🔴 4️⃣ “Only Viktor Orbán can protect us” – exclusivity framing

📌 Technique: false dilemma + leadership centralization

• “There is no force besides Viktor Orbán.”
• “Fidesz is the only safe choice.”

This introduces a leader-centered protection narrative.

🎯 Effect:
The election becomes simplified:

👉 Orbán = security
👉 Others = danger

---

🔴 5️⃣ Fear triad: money – war – economic collapse

📌 Technique: fear stacking

Three strong emotional triggers:

• “They will send our money away.”
• “They will send our sons to war.”
• “Economic decline.”

👉 Layered together, they intensify the sense of threat.

🎯 Effect:
Emotional overload → weakened rational evaluation.

---

🔎 Substantive note

The claim that the EU would admit Ukraine “as early as next year” is, under current political and legal realities, highly unlikely. EU accession requires:

• a multi-year negotiation process
• unanimous approval by all member states
• full legal harmonization

This is not a matter of an accelerated campaign decision.

---

🎯 Summary

The text does not primarily provide information; it:

• mobilizes emotionally
• constructs an external enemy image
• reinforces a leader-centered security narrative
• creates a binary electoral choice

This is classic sovereignty-based campaign communication.

Big business in here!
Péter Magyar has officially lined up behind the pro-war elite.

This week, the European left held talks in Munich. At the security policy conference hosted in the Bavarian capital, Péter Magyar was joined by Anita Orbán, who previously held key positions in well-known Soros-affiliated organizations.

The Hungarian left also said yes to the Munich alliance. They reaffirmed their unconditional support for Ukraine and their backing of the five-point Zelensky plan, and they also stated that a TISZA-led government would give up Hungary’s independent foreign policy room for maneuver and put the country on the war train.

This alone is already quite outrageous, since this is precisely what the national government has consistently rejected since the beginning of the war. But Péter Magyar went even further. After sealing this war deal, he stated that Brussels — which fuels the Western war hysteria — is merely a “non-existent ghost,” nothing more than an artificially constructed enemy image, so there is supposedly nothing to see here — let’s move along.

This is the same Péter Magyar who previously pointed out with his fingers how much sovereignty we would supposedly have to give up to fulfill Brussels’ demands. It is once again clear — and confirmed yet again — that Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to his bosses. For him, the priority is war and financing Ukraine — this is the Brussels path.

We on the right continue to believe in the Hungarian path, which advances our country along national interests even in the shadow of war. In times of danger, we remain committed to peace and security — before and after April — which is why Fidesz remains the safe choice.

---

This week, the TISZA Party and Péter Magyar practically made official what we had already seen everywhere. In Munich, Péter Magyar met with several Brussels and European leaders who speak very clearly when it comes to the war or Ukraine. He met with people such as Donald Tusk and many other European and Brussels leaders who openly support Ukraine’s rapid accession and openly advocate providing Ukraine with financial aid and even weapons shipments.

This means that Péter Magyar has clearly given up on pursuing a sovereign, Hungary-first foreign policy. Under his leadership, Hungary would fully align with the pro-war Brussels narrative — something the current Hungarian government has firmly resisted over the past years.

Moreover, Péter Magyar even went so far in an interview as to say that Viktor Orbán is fighting ghosts, and that Brussels itself is such a ghost — something that does not represent a real danger to Hungary. He claims that these are non-existent ghosts being fought. Orbán Viktor, according to him, is fighting Brussels as if it were imaginary.

Well, Péter, the truth is that this so-called non-existent Brussels and non-existent threat is the very force that continues to pressure and blackmail us to this day. It withholds our funds because, for example, we refuse to accept migrants — and we have been fined heavily because of this. It withholds our resources because we do not want to raise our children according to LGBTQ ideology. And it does everything in its power to remove the current Hungarian leadership — a government that is capable of and willing to firmly stand up for Hungarian interests — instead of submitting to Brussels’ pro-war agenda.

That is why in April we must support Fidesz, because Viktor Orbán is the only person in Hungary who is truly capable, willing, and determined to stand up against this Brussels war hysteria.

🔴 1️⃣ “Pro-war elite” – moral labeling

📌 Technique: enemy labeling + moral polarization

Keywords:

“pro-war elite”
“war wagon”
“war hysteria”

👉 What is happening?

The political debate is no longer about policy differences (what kind of support, under what conditions, within what diplomatic framework),
but is transformed into a moral category:

peace vs. war

🎯 Effect:
The opponent is not presented as advocating a different strategy, but as someone who “wants war.”

---

🔴 2️⃣ “Brussels as a blackmailing force” – external threat narrative

📌 Technique: external threat framing + sovereignty activation

Claims:

“withholding our money”
“blackmailing us”
“trying to remove the Hungarian leadership”

👉 The conflict is framed not as an intergovernmental or legal dispute,
but as national self-defense vs. external interference.

🎯 Effect:
The stakes of the election are elevated to an existential level.

---

🔴 3️⃣ “Non-existent ghost” – reality-conflict framing

📌 Technique: framing inversion

Core element of the text:

Péter Magyar claims that “Brussels is a non-existent ghost.”

The counter-argument:

“This is the Brussels that blackmails us.”
“This is the force that punishes us.”

👉 The debate thus shifts away from concrete decisions
to the question of whether the threat itself exists.

This is a classic
conflict over reality interpretation.

---

🔴 4️⃣ “His bosses” – agent framing

📌 Technique: agent framing + questioning loyalty

“He wouldn’t be able to say no to his bosses.”

👉 What does this imply?

The opponent is portrayed as:

not an autonomous political actor,
but an executor of external forces.

🎯 Effect:
It strips him of political independence.

---

🔴 5️⃣ Invoking specific names – guilt by association

The text mentions:

Magyar Péter
Donald Tusk
Orbán Viktor
Fidesz

📌 Technique: guilt by association

Different European actors → merged into a single bloc → “war elite.”

🎯 Effect:
The opponent is framed not as a Hungarian political alternative,
but as part of an external coalition.

---

🔴 6️⃣ “Only one man can protect us” – savior narrative

📌 Technique: leader centralization

“Orbán Viktor is the only person…”

👉 Instead of institutional guarantees,
security is personalized around a single leader.

🎯 Effect:
The election is framed not as a contest between parties,
but as:

security vs. collapse

---

🧠 Summary – structure of the narrative

The entire message is built on three pillars:

External war-driven elite
Internal agent (Magyar Péter)
Single protector (Orbán Viktor)

This is a classic siege-state framing:

external threat
internal betrayal
centralized leader

Do not let decisions be made over our heads! Brussels wants to disregard the opinion of 2 million Hungarians and already plans to bring Ukraine into the EU as early as next year.

Part of the so-called Zelensky plan is to allow Ukraine to influence decisions even before its full accession is completed. They want to interfere in the elections so that Viktor Orbán cannot stand in the way of Ukrainian demands. They would not even shy away from suspending Hungary’s voting rights.

No matter how they try, we will not give in to external pressure, and we will defend Hungarian interests. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

Right now, the issue is not Ukraine, Zelensky, or Macron. The real issue is that Brussels wants to bypass the opinion of two million Hungarians and push Ukraine into the EU. Now pay attention, because I can show you their plan. First comes partial membership — involving Ukraine in decision-making even before full accession. Then, if that sparks debate, they may attempt “reversed enlargement”: political integration first, with full membership rights addressed later. And if even that does not work, then comes Article 7 — suspending voting rights. Meanwhile, they continuously claim that the Hungarian veto is an obstacle, and that only a change of government can solve the issue. If that fails, they would apply Trump-style external pressure, arguing that there is precedent for it. So if a member state says no, and the response is to strip and reduce that state’s rights — is that still a community, or something else?

🔴 1️⃣ “2 million Hungarians” – Minimization through number framing

📌 Technique: selective quantification + narrowed legitimacy

The central element of the text is “the opinion of 2 million Hungarians.”

👉 What is actually happening?

It does not reference any official, verifiable, representative measurement.

It does not clarify what sample was used, what methodology, or when the data was collected.

A campaign-related figure is treated as if it were national consensus.

👉 The psychological objective:

“2 million” sounds like a large number on its own.
But as a proportion, it carries a very different meaning.

The number therefore serves a dual function:

It legitimizes (“we are many”).

And at the same time it relativizes (“this is the country’s opinion”).

The framing is intentional:
the debate is not about society as a whole, but about a politically mobilized segment.

This is subtle proportional distortion.

---

🔴 2️⃣ “Brussels is bypassing Hungarians” – Sovereignty drama

📌 Technique: external control framing + identity activation

“Let’s not allow decisions to be made over our heads.”

This is a classic sovereignty trigger.

👉 The mechanism:

EU institutional processes are portrayed as a personal attack.

The political debate is reframed as “national self-determination vs. external power.”

Anyone who disagrees is implicitly placed on the “external” side.

This is emotional mobilization, not legal analysis.

---

🔴 3️⃣ The “Zelensky plan” – Personalized conspiracy framing

📌 Technique: personalization + plan construction without evidence

The text repeatedly refers to a “plan”:

partial membership

reversed enlargement

Article 7

suspension of voting rights

👉 What is missing:

a concrete document

an official decision-making mechanism

a date

an institutional proposal

The word “plan” is emotionally powerful.
The rhetoric of “I will show you their plan” creates a sense of revelation.

But in reality, it is a chain of speculative scenarios.

---

🔴 4️⃣ Fear stacking

The narrative gradually escalates the stakes:

They bypass Hungarians

They interfere in elections

They suspend voting rights

They apply external pressure

👉 This is a classic threat spiral.

The more conditional future scenarios are presented,
the more the entire situation feels like an inevitable danger.

These are not proven events,
but layered possibilities built on top of each other.

---

🔴 5️⃣ The number as a political tool

The repetition of “2 million” is not data communication,
but an emotional anchor.

The number functions as:

apparent concreteness

moral undertone (“two million people are being ignored”)

activation of collective grievance

What is not provided:

representativeness

societal proportion

full context

Here, the number does not operate as a measurement,
but as an identity marker.

---

🔴 6️⃣ Final framing: “Only Fidesz is the safe choice”

📌 Technique: binary choice framing

The entire narrative ultimately leads to a single political conclusion:

→ external threat
→ national defense
→ one safe option

This follows classic crisis communication logic:
first construct danger,
then offer an exclusive solution.

---

Summary

The text does not engage in factual debate.
Instead, it relies on three main tools:

Proportion-distorting use of numbers

Dramatization of sovereignty threat

Chained speculative future scenarios

Here, “2 million” is not a statistical figure,
but a rhetorical anchor.

The goal:
to make the emotional weight of the number stronger
than its actual societal proportion.

👉 Threats are arriving daily from Ukraine — sometimes directed at Hungary, sometimes personally at Viktor Orbán.
🟠 But no matter the provocations, as long as there is a national government, we will remain on the path of peace. This is the Hungarian path that guarantees security.

Seriously, aren’t they ashamed? It’s getting to the point where hardly a week goes by without Hungary — or Viktor Orbán personally — receiving some kind of threat from Ukraine. One time they endanger our energy supply by attacking the Druzhba oil pipeline. Another time there are Ukrainian drones entering our airspace. And now they are threatening us with the 128th Brigade.

Do we even grasp the weight of that? A brigade-sized armed military unit means roughly 4,000 soldiers, around 120 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, two dozen self-propelled howitzers, air defense missile systems, hundreds of reconnaissance armored vehicles and support military vehicles, and nearly 1,000 infantry troops.

This is what they are threatening us with — us, from whom Ukraine still receives electricity and fuel.

Honestly, it makes your head spin.

And if that were not enough, Ukraine is now demanding another €1.5 trillion from Europe.

It is time to wake up — and for those threatening us to come to their senses.

🔴 1️⃣ “Threats arrive daily” – perpetual siege narrative

📌 Technique: repetition + creation of a constant sense of danger

“Daily”
“hardly a week goes by”

👉 What is happening?
The threat is normalized as permanent.
It is not about specific, verifiable incidents, but about creating an atmosphere of ongoing attack.

👉 Intended effect:
A continuous state of alert.
The audience should not weigh or analyze — but defend.

---

🔴 2️⃣ “They are threatening us” – activation of collective identity

📌 Technique: communal identification + emotional involvement

“us”
“Hungary”
“Viktor Orbán personally”

👉 What is happening?
A political conflict is reframed as a personal national insult.
It stops being a governmental dispute and becomes an attack on the community itself.

👉 Intended effect:
The reader becomes an involved party, not an outside observer.
Criticism feels like betrayal.

---

🔴 3️⃣ Military listing – visual fear amplification

📌 Technique: dramatized threat through numbers

“4,000 soldiers”
“120 tanks”
“self-propelled artillery”
“missiles”

👉 What is happening?
A brigade becomes a concrete imagined threat.
Not a political statement — but the image of an imminent invasion.

👉 Intended effect:
A physical fear reaction.
Rational evaluation moves into the background.

---

🔴 4️⃣ Moral outrage – “it makes your head spin”

📌 Technique: emotional escalation + moral superiority

👉 This is not analysis — it is indignation.

👉 Intended effect:
The audience should not question the claim.
Emotion legitimizes the argument.

---

🔴 5️⃣ Economic shock – “€1,500 billion”

📌 Technique: large number → disproportionate alarm

Missing context:
– How large compared to the full EU budget?
– In what form?
– Loan? Grant? Spread over how many years?

👉 Intended effect:
Shock value.
“They want to take our money.”

---

🔴 6️⃣ “National government = peace” – false binary

📌 Technique: two-pole moral mapping

Ukraine → threat
Us → peace
They → provocation
Us → security

👉 No middle ground.
No diplomatic nuance.

👉 Intended effect:
The choice is framed not as political preference, but as existential self-defense.

---

📌 Overall picture

The text does not primarily transmit information. It:

Builds a sense of constant threat

Dramatizes through military visualization

Activates collective identity

Introduces economic shock

Generates moral outrage

Finally offers a security shelter (“the Hungarian path”)

This is a classic fear stacking narrative.

This is what this election is about!

It is clearer than daylight that the oil business, the banking world, and the Brussels elite are preparing to form a government. If we allow the Tisza–Brussels–big capital coalition to come to power, they will pick the pockets of families.

As long as there is a national government, we will not send weapons, they will not take our money, and they will not take our young people to Ukraine.

Only Fidesz is the safe choice! Let 2026 be the year of victory!

14.956 billion forints. A huge amount of money. Between 2010 and 2025, this is how much we managed to keep at home and distribute to the Hungarian people in various forms — for example through family support programs, utility price reductions, the reintroduction of the 13th-month pension, and now even a 14th-month pension. This is the money that is badly missing today from the pockets of bankers and foreign multinational corporations — and they are sharpening their knives for it.

Their goal is not only to avoid paying the nearly 2,000 billion forints in taxes and burdens for 2026, but also to claw back this nearly 15,000 billion forints over the coming years. To achieve this, they need a team to lead Hungary that works for them, not one that puts Hungarian interests first.

That is what the April election will be about — that is what is at stake. This is what Viktor Orbán said today in his annual state-of-the-nation speech. He said that a coalition has come together consisting of Tisza, Brussels, and the world of multinationals, bankers, and oil lobbyists.

Everyone with whom Péter Magyar is preparing to govern has some kind of mission within this team. We can talk about Anita Orbán, whose task is to push for Ukraine’s rapid accession to the European Union. Or István Kapitány, whose role would be to detach Hungary from affordable, predictable Russian energy agreements, so that companies like Shell and others can make enormous profits — as they did during the years of the war. Or we can mention the Erste Bank candidate, András Kármán, whose obvious aim would be to ensure that banks no longer have to pay special taxes and can once again collect fat billions from Hungarians, as they did before 2010.

Well, this is what we will not allow. As long as Fidesz is in government, the Hungarian people’s money will remain in Hungary and will be spent on them — not according to the wishes of the Brussels elite or in service of foreign multinationals and bankers.

🔴 1️⃣ “The multinationals have occupied us” – construction of an external enemy

Technique: external threat framing + sovereignty threat

Keywords:

• “banking world”
• “Brussels elite”
• “big capital”
• “oil lobbyists”
• “multinationals”

👉 Domestic political competition is no longer framed as a contest between programs,
but as national self-defense vs. foreign occupation.

Intended effect:
Fear + identity activation → “we must defend the country.”

---

🔴 2️⃣ Merged enemy coalition – “Tisza–Brussels–big capital”

Technique: coalition framing + guilt by association

Three separate spheres:

• an opposition party
• EU institutions
• multinational corporations

→ fused into a single block.

👉 The opponent is no longer portrayed as an autonomous political actor,
but as an “agent of foreign interests.”

Intended effect:
Delegitimization without evidence.

---

🔴 3️⃣ Massive numbers – “14,956 billion forints”

Technique: number magnification + moralized cost framing

Nearly 15,000 billion forints is given emotional weight:

• “we kept it at home”
• “they want to take it away”
• “they are sharpening their teeth for it”

👉 The number does not appear as a budgetary item,
but as loot.

Intended effect:
Triggering loss aversion.

---

🔴 4️⃣ Attribution of intentions without evidence

Technique: intention attribution

Examples:

• “their task is to…”
• “their job is to…”
• “clearly their goal is to…”

Without citing any concrete document or decision,
motivations are assigned to actors.

Intended effect:
The audience treats assumptions as facts.

---

🔴 5️⃣ Energy fear + war framing

Technique: fear stacking

Layers stacked on top of each other:

• sending weapons
• taking away young people
• rising energy prices
• banking exploitation
• Ukraine’s EU accession

👉 Several separate issues → one single existential threat package.

Intended effect:
The reader does not weigh details,
but switches into defensive mode.

---

🔴 6️⃣ “Only Fidesz is the safe choice” – false binary

Technique: false dilemma framing

Two paths are presented:

Fidesz = peace, low utility costs, family protection

Opposition = bankers, war, taking people’s money

No middle option.
No nuance.
No policy debate.

Intended effect:
A moral choice between “good” and “bad.”

---

🔴 7️⃣ Bandwagon effect via annual speech authority

Technique: authority anchoring

Reference:
Orbán Viktor’s annual State of the Nation speech

👉 The message is not presented as an independent claim,
but as “the Prime Minister said so.”

Intended effect:
Legitimization through authority.

---

📌 Summary – What is actually happening?

This is not a policy debate about:

• the structure of energy imports,
• bank taxes,
• budgetary items,
• EU–Ukraine relations.

It is an emotional sovereignty narrative:

🇭🇺 “We protect Hungarian money”
vs.
🌍 “They want to take it away.”

Core mechanism:

Fear + identity + massive numbers + external enemy = mobilization.