Big business in here!
Péter Magyar has officially lined up behind the pro-war elite.
This week, the European left held talks in Munich. At the security policy conference hosted in the Bavarian capital, Péter Magyar was joined by Anita Orbán, who previously held key positions in well-known Soros-affiliated organizations.
The Hungarian left also said yes to the Munich alliance. They reaffirmed their unconditional support for Ukraine and their backing of the five-point Zelensky plan, and they also stated that a TISZA-led government would give up Hungary’s independent foreign policy room for maneuver and put the country on the war train.
This alone is already quite outrageous, since this is precisely what the national government has consistently rejected since the beginning of the war. But Péter Magyar went even further. After sealing this war deal, he stated that Brussels — which fuels the Western war hysteria — is merely a “non-existent ghost,” nothing more than an artificially constructed enemy image, so there is supposedly nothing to see here — let’s move along.
This is the same Péter Magyar who previously pointed out with his fingers how much sovereignty we would supposedly have to give up to fulfill Brussels’ demands. It is once again clear — and confirmed yet again — that Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to his bosses. For him, the priority is war and financing Ukraine — this is the Brussels path.
We on the right continue to believe in the Hungarian path, which advances our country along national interests even in the shadow of war. In times of danger, we remain committed to peace and security — before and after April — which is why Fidesz remains the safe choice.
This week, the TISZA Party and Péter Magyar practically made official what we had already seen everywhere. In Munich, Péter Magyar met with several Brussels and European leaders who speak very clearly when it comes to the war or Ukraine. He met with people such as Donald Tusk and many other European and Brussels leaders who openly support Ukraine’s rapid accession and openly advocate providing Ukraine with financial aid and even weapons shipments.
This means that Péter Magyar has clearly given up on pursuing a sovereign, Hungary-first foreign policy. Under his leadership, Hungary would fully align with the pro-war Brussels narrative — something the current Hungarian government has firmly resisted over the past years.
Moreover, Péter Magyar even went so far in an interview as to say that Viktor Orbán is fighting ghosts, and that Brussels itself is such a ghost — something that does not represent a real danger to Hungary. He claims that these are non-existent ghosts being fought. Orbán Viktor, according to him, is fighting Brussels as if it were imaginary.
Well, Péter, the truth is that this so-called non-existent Brussels and non-existent threat is the very force that continues to pressure and blackmail us to this day. It withholds our funds because, for example, we refuse to accept migrants — and we have been fined heavily because of this. It withholds our resources because we do not want to raise our children according to LGBTQ ideology. And it does everything in its power to remove the current Hungarian leadership — a government that is capable of and willing to firmly stand up for Hungarian interests — instead of submitting to Brussels’ pro-war agenda.
That is why in April we must support Fidesz, because Viktor Orbán is the only person in Hungary who is truly capable, willing, and determined to stand up against this Brussels war hysteria.
🔴 1️⃣ “Pro-war elite” – moral labeling
📌 Technique: enemy labeling + moral polarization
Keywords:
“pro-war elite”
“war wagon”
“war hysteria”
👉 What is happening?
The political debate is no longer about policy differences (what kind of support, under what conditions, within what diplomatic framework),
but is transformed into a moral category:
peace vs. war
🎯 Effect:
The opponent is not presented as advocating a different strategy, but as someone who “wants war.”
🔴 2️⃣ “Brussels as a blackmailing force” – external threat narrative
📌 Technique: external threat framing + sovereignty activation
Claims:
“withholding our money”
“blackmailing us”
“trying to remove the Hungarian leadership”
👉 The conflict is framed not as an intergovernmental or legal dispute,
but as national self-defense vs. external interference.
🎯 Effect:
The stakes of the election are elevated to an existential level.
🔴 3️⃣ “Non-existent ghost” – reality-conflict framing
📌 Technique: framing inversion
Core element of the text:
Péter Magyar claims that “Brussels is a non-existent ghost.”
The counter-argument:
“This is the Brussels that blackmails us.”
“This is the force that punishes us.”
👉 The debate thus shifts away from concrete decisions
to the question of whether the threat itself exists.
This is a classic
conflict over reality interpretation.
🔴 4️⃣ “His bosses” – agent framing
📌 Technique: agent framing + questioning loyalty
“He wouldn’t be able to say no to his bosses.”
👉 What does this imply?
The opponent is portrayed as:
not an autonomous political actor,
but an executor of external forces.
🎯 Effect:
It strips him of political independence.
🔴 5️⃣ Invoking specific names – guilt by association
The text mentions:
Magyar Péter
Donald Tusk
Orbán Viktor
Fidesz
📌 Technique: guilt by association
Different European actors → merged into a single bloc → “war elite.”
🎯 Effect:
The opponent is framed not as a Hungarian political alternative,
but as part of an external coalition.
🔴 6️⃣ “Only one man can protect us” – savior narrative
📌 Technique: leader centralization
“Orbán Viktor is the only person…”
👉 Instead of institutional guarantees,
security is personalized around a single leader.
🎯 Effect:
The election is framed not as a contest between parties,
but as:
security vs. collapse
🧠 Summary – structure of the narrative
The entire message is built on three pillars:
External war-driven elite
Internal agent (Magyar Péter)
Single protector (Orbán Viktor)
This is a classic siege-state framing:
external threat
internal betrayal
centralized leader