We do not accept that Ukrainian services are trying to influence the Hungarian elections.
We call on Zelenskyy to recall his hounds! There will be no pro-Ukrainian government here.

Kyiv has turned Hungary into an operational field for intelligence services; Ukrainian agents are coming and going, infiltrating the Tisza Party and carrying out intelligence operations. We do not accept that Ukrainian manipulation should influence the outcome of the Hungarian elections. Show more respect for Hungary—we will decide for ourselves what kind of government we want.

The stakes of the election are whether Hungary will have a national government or a pro-Ukrainian one. If we end up with a pro-Ukrainian government, we will be dragged into the war and Hungarian families will be stripped of their money. If, however, we have a national government, we will say no to the war and protect Hungarians’ money.

We call on Zelenskyy to recall his hounds! There will be no pro-Ukrainian government here.

Good morning to everyone—except those who cozy up to Ukrainian and other intelligence services against the Hungarian people.

🧠 Quick Situation Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = Ukrainian intelligence / foreign influence”
• “Ukraine = threat + war + looting”
• “We = national protection”
• “Election = survival vs. betrayal”

👉 Underlying formula:

fear + external enemy + betrayal + existential stakes
→ “if you don’t vote for us, the country will be in danger”

🔍 Influence Techniques (in points)

1️⃣ Conspiracy framing

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukrainian spies are coming and going… they have infiltrated the Tisza Party”

👉 Technique:

• specific but unproven claims
• “intelligence services” = automatic escalation
• reference to a closed, unverifiable system

👉 Goal:
👉 make it impossible to refute (“secret” → cannot be proven)

👉 Effect:
👉 paranoia + distrust toward the opponent

2️⃣ Enemy construction (external threat)

👉 Excerpt:
“Kyiv has turned Hungary into an operational field”

👉 Technique:

• framing a country as an active aggressor
• shifting from politics → to “intervention”

👉 Goal:
👉 elevate the conflict into an international threat

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is no longer politics → this is pre-war territory”

3️⃣ Dehumanizing language

👉 Excerpt:
“call back his hounds”

👉 Technique:

• reducing the opponent to an animal level
• emotional shock

👉 Goal:
👉 morally justify hostility

👉 Effect:
👉 increased aggression, reduced empathy

4️⃣ False causality (oversimplification)

👉 Excerpt:
“pro-Ukrainian government → dragged into war → families looted”

👉 Technique:

• linear, simplified chain
• no evidence, no alternatives

👉 Goal:
👉 force quick decision-making

👉 Effect:
👉 “if X happens, catastrophe is guaranteed”

5️⃣ False dichotomy

👉 Excerpt:
“national or pro-Ukrainian government”

👉 Technique:

• only two options presented
• no middle ground

👉 Goal:
👉 narrow thinking

👉 Effect:
👉 “if you’re not with us → you’re against us”

6️⃣ Fear framing (existential threat)

👉 Excerpt:
“they will drag us into war… loot Hungarian families”

👉 Technique:

• personal level (family, money)
• future threat

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger immediate emotional reaction

👉 Effect:
👉 rational evaluation shuts down

7️⃣ Repetition (propaganda reinforcement)

👉 Excerpt:
“We do not accept… We do not accept… We call on…”

👉 Technique:

• repeating key phrases

👉 Goal:
👉 imprinting

👉 Effect:
👉 “it feels true because you hear it often”

8️⃣ “We decide” – sovereignty framing

👉 Excerpt:
“we will decide what kind of government we want”

👉 Technique:

• positive framing (independence)
• built on top of fear narrative

👉 Goal:
👉 legitimize the message

👉 Effect:
👉 harder to oppose (“who would be against sovereignty?”)

⚖️ Overall Picture (very important)

This message is not meant to inform, but to:

👉 create an emotional state:

• fear
• anger
• distrust
• “us vs. them”

👉 and force a decision:

“security = them
danger = everyone else”

🧩 What makes it especially strong

This is no longer simple campaigning, but:

• intelligence conspiracy
• external enemy
• internal traitor
• war-level threat

➡️ This is a classic full-spectrum propaganda package

🧠 Reality check (brief, objective)

• claims of this magnitude require concrete evidence
• “intelligence service” references are often unverifiable
• the linear “they will drag us into war” logic → political oversimplification

🔚 In short

👉 This message is:

• strongly fear-based
• built on conspiracy framing
• constructs an enemy image
• and forces a binary choice

🗣 István Kapitány admitted that TISZA would abolish protected prices and utility cost reductions!

A TISZA government coming to power would mean the end of utility price caps and protected fuel prices. This would bring brutal price increases—fuel prices reaching 1,000 forints per liter and household utility bills tripling, punishing Hungarian families.

👉 TISZA’s billionaire energy lobbyist, István Kapitány, openly stated that, representing multinational companies’ interests, he would abolish price caps and special taxes, which the national government uses to finance pensions and family support. This policy would undermine the livelihoods of Hungarian people and serve Brussels’ interests instead of Hungary’s.

We must not allow Péter Magyar’s pro-Brussels and pro-Ukraine policies to ruin Hungarian families!

🟠 As long as the national government remains in power, we guarantee Hungary’s peace, security, and low energy prices—that is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

That’s why it’s not easy to be a TISZA supporter. Imagine having to call Fidesz liars all day, claiming that TISZA would not abolish protected prices, price caps, or utility cuts.

But then this is exactly what was said by the “Shell captain” himself. He said the state needs to be simplified, with much less intervention, fewer special taxes, and far fewer price caps.

What do you think about that?

He’s essentially saying what we already know about TISZA’s plans: even in their previously denied program, it became clear—they want to phase out extra taxes on multinationals, eliminate price caps, and bring in 1,000-forint fuel.

People will also think about their wallets when they vote, so hopefully on April 12 they will make a smart decision—and vote for Fidesz.

🧠 Quick situation overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = will abolish price caps → brutal price increases”
• “We (Fidesz) = protect low prices”
• “Election = your wallet vs. risk”

👉 Hidden formula:

fear + financial shock + simplified cause-effect
→ “if you don’t vote for us, you’ll become poorer”

🔍 Influence techniques (in points)

1️⃣ Fearmongering with concrete numbers

👉 Example:
“1000 HUF fuel”, “triple utility bills”

👉 Technique:
➡️ throwing in extreme numbers
➡️ no context (market prices, global factors, taxes)

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger immediate emotional reaction (panic)

👉 Effect:
👉 people stop calculating → they just fear

2️⃣ False cause-effect (oversimplification)

👉 Message:
“price cap removed → everything becomes brutally expensive”

👉 Reality:
➡️ prices are not determined only by the state
➡️ global market, taxes, exchange rate, demand all matter

👉 Technique:
➡️ reducing everything to a single factor

👉 Goal:
👉 simple but distorted explanation

3️⃣ Enemy construction

👉 Example:
“multinational companies”, “Brussels”, “pro-Ukraine”

👉 Technique:
➡️ external enemy + internal “traitor”

👉 Goal:
👉 emotional alignment:
👉 “us vs. them”

4️⃣ Stating intentions without evidence

👉 Example:
“they want to introduce 1000 HUF fuel”

👉 Technique:
➡️ assumption presented as fact

👉 Goal:
👉 don’t question → just accept

5️⃣ Amplifying a cherry-picked quote

👉 What was said:
“less price caps, less intervention”

👉 Reframed as:
👉 “they will abolish them → brutal price increases”

👉 Technique:
➡️ partial quote → extreme conclusion

6️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Message:

• either Fidesz → low prices
• or Tisza → price explosion

👉 Reality:
➡️ multiple economic policy options exist

👉 Goal:
👉 simplify the decision

⚖️ Economic part (this is the key)

Now comes what you said — and this is not propaganda, but economics.

✔️ Effect of price caps

👉 In short:

• short term: lower prices → popular
• long term: market distortion

👉 Typical consequences:

• shortages (e.g. fuel)
• loss-making providers
• hidden costs elsewhere
• state budget burden

✔️ What happens if they are removed?

👉 Short term:
➡️ prices may increase

👉 Long term:
➡️ market stabilizes
➡️ supply recovers
➡️ shortages disappear

✔️ The “1000 HUF fuel” claim

👉 This is not an automatic outcome

Prices depend on:

• global oil prices
• exchange rate (HUF)
• taxes (this is the biggest factor!)
• government policy

👉 So:
➡️ it’s a combination of politics + market forces

🧠 Summary

👉 What you’re saying:

✔️ yes, price caps are economically distortive
✔️ they are unsustainable in the long run

👉 What the message does:

❌ oversimplifies the issue
❌ adds a “catastrophe narrative”
❌ builds a political fear campaign on top of it

🔥 Bottom line

• Price caps are not “good or bad”
  👉 they are a short-term political tool
• Their removal:
  👉 does NOT automatically mean collapse
• The communication:
  👉 is deliberately exaggerated and dramatized

Yesterday, at one of Tisza’s events, one of their candidates literally attacked and locked in a car the person who tried to use a drone to show that the so-called “flood” was actually just drying up.

These are rather peculiar methods from the representatives of the supposedly “loving country of Tisza,” but what else can we expect from people who know only how to sneer and insult, while not being willing for a single moment to stand up for Hungarian interests?

In 16 days, on April 12, let us vote for love, choose the safe option, choose Fidesz!

The “loving country” of Tisza has now reached the point where, yesterday, one of their candidates attacked the person who tried to send up a drone at their event precisely in order to show how many Tisza supporters were actually there. They surrounded him and would not let him leave. I do not understand what the problem of the Tisza supporters is. Are they afraid that the photos will reveal that perhaps they are not as many as they like to claim? Are they afraid that it will become clear that more and more people are raising their voices and standing up against the blackmail, and against the foreign influence that Tisza, backed by the Ukrainians and Brussels, wants to impose here together until April 12?

Well, I think that the majority of people still want calm, sober, predictable, and safe leadership, and not madmen who are aggressive, who shout, and who physically abuse someone simply because that person thinks differently about the world than they do.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza = violent, aggressive, dishonest”
“We (Fidesz) = calm, safety, love”
“Election = safety vs. danger”

👉 Underlying formula:
fear + anger + enemy construction + moral superiority
→ “don’t think, just reject them”

🔍 Manipulation Techniques (in points)

1️⃣ Amplifying a single case (generalization)

👉 Excerpt:
“one of their candidates attacked…”

👉 Technique:

a single (unproven / decontextualized) incident
→ projected onto the entire group

👉 Goal:
👉 “they are all like this”

👉 Effect:
👉 distorted perception → sense of collective guilt

2️⃣ Dramatization of violence

👉 Excerpt:
“attacked and locked him in a car”

👉 Technique:

strong, shocking wording
no evidence, no details

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger emotional shock

👉 Effect:
👉 fear + disgust → rational thinking shuts down

3️⃣ Demonization of the opponent

👉 Excerpt:
“they can only snarl and insult”
“crazy, aggressive”

👉 Technique:

dehumanizing labels
moral degradation

👉 Goal:
👉 not a political opponent → but a “dangerous group”

👉 Effect:
👉 increased hatred and rejection

4️⃣ “We = good, they = bad” (false dichotomy)

👉 Excerpt:
“let’s vote for love… choose the safe option”

👉 Technique:

artificial choice:

• one side = love
• the other = violence

👉 Goal:
👉 eliminate middle-ground options

👉 Effect:
👉 oversimplified worldview → easier manipulation

5️⃣ Fear framing + security framing

👉 Excerpt:
“safe leadership vs. lunatics”

👉 Technique:

election framed as a question of physical safety

👉 Goal:
👉 not a political decision → but self-defense

👉 Effect:
👉 instinctive reaction (avoid “danger”)

6️⃣ Attribution of intent (mind reading)

👉 Excerpt:
“they are afraid it will be revealed…”
“they won’t let him go…”

👉 Technique:

assigning motives without evidence

👉 Goal:
👉 discredit the opponent

👉 Effect:
👉 reader treats assumptions as facts

7️⃣ Conspiracy framing

👉 Excerpt:
“together with Ukrainians and Brussels”

👉 Technique:

involving foreign actors
“hidden power” narrative

👉 Goal:
👉 create a sense of betrayal

👉 Effect:
👉 strong emotional reaction (anger + distrust)

8️⃣ Repetition (core propaganda technique)

👉 the same story told twice

👉 Technique:

repetition = illusion of truth

👉 Effect:
👉 “if I hear it often → it must be true”

⚠️ Why it feels disgusting

Not by accident:

👉 because the text:

doesn’t inform → it agitates
doesn’t prove → it asserts
doesn’t nuance → it builds a black-and-white world

👉 and meanwhile:

generates anger
creates fear
manufactures an enemy

This combination creates strong psychological pressure → that’s why you feel that “nausea”.

🧩 In short (essence)

👉 This is not information, but:

• emotional manipulation
• enemy construction
• fear-based mobilization

👉 goal:
to extract votes through emotional reaction, not rational decision-making

Well, here it is — the “Ukraine-loving country.” These video thumbnails can be seen on a Ukrainian YouTube channel with more than half a million subscribers.

Péter Magyar is shouting, while behind him Zelensky is watching with satisfaction.
There’s constantly a crosshair on Viktor Orbán’s head.
Elsewhere, Péter Magyar is shouting a battle cry together with Ursula, and again there’s a crosshair on the prime minister’s head.

So, I think there are no more questions.

According to the Ukrainians themselves, Péter Magyar is a man of Brussels and Zelensky, while Viktor Orbán — even according to the Ukrainians — will never allow Hungary’s money to be taken to Ukraine.

This is what we are deciding on April 12. If we get dragged into financing Ukraine and the war, Hungarian young people will be paying the price for decades.

Unless Viktor Orbán remains in power. That’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.

Here is a Ukrainian news channel with roughly half a million subscribers. I collected some thumbnails for you to show how they illustrate their videos. You can see Orbán Viktor with a crosshair on his head, a smiling Zelensky, the “favorite candidate,” the Ukrainian candidate Péter Magyar, and once again a crosshair on Orbán’s forehead.

So after this, I don’t think anyone can really have questions about who the Ukrainians are rooting for in this election. So what if, on April 12, we vote instead to keep a Hungarian government — not one directed from Ukraine?

🧠 Quick Situation Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza / Péter Magyar = Ukrainian / Brussels puppet”
“Ukraine = danger, money drain, war”
“Orbán = protector who stops this”
“Election = a matter of national survival”

👉 Underlying formula:

fear + external enemy + betrayal + savior
→ “if you don’t vote for us, the country will be in danger”

🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Visual manipulation → illusion of “evidence”

👉 Example:
“YouTube thumbnails… crosshair on Orbán’s head”

Technique:

• cherry-picked images
• no context
• visual shock (crosshair = violence, threat)

Goal:
👉 trigger emotional reaction (outrage, fear)

Effect:
👉 “if they do this to him → they are enemies”

➡️ This is not evidence, but an emotional trigger

2️⃣ False generalization

👉 Example:
“according to the Ukrainians…”
“who Ukrainians support”

Technique:

• one YouTube channel → “all Ukrainians”
• homogenizing an entire nation

Goal:
👉 create a simple black-and-white picture

Effect:
👉 critical thinking shuts down
👉 “they are all on the same side”

3️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 Example:
“Péter Magyar behind Zelensky”
“together with Ursula”

Technique:

• linking people through images, not facts
• presenting political actors as “one bloc”

Goal:
👉 “if he’s with them → he’s against us”

Effect:
👉 you don’t evaluate programs → you look at “who they stand with”

4️⃣ Construction of an external enemy

👉 Example:
“a government controlled from Ukraine”

Technique:

• threat to sovereignty
• image of foreign control

Goal:
👉 activate national defense reflex

Effect:
👉 fear + anger
👉 “we must defend ourselves”

5️⃣ Fearmongering (economic + war)

👉 Example:
“Hungarian youth will be paying for decades”

Technique:

• projecting a future catastrophe
• without concrete evidence

Goal:
👉 generate anxiety

Effect:
👉 “this is too risky → better not change anything”

6️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Example:
“Hungarian government OR Ukrainian control”

Technique:

• presenting only two options
• eliminating all alternatives

Goal:
👉 force a simple choice

Effect:
👉 “if not A → then B (bad)”

7️⃣ Savior narrative (protector framing)

👉 Example:
“Orbán won’t allow it…”
“only he can protect”

Technique:

• leader = shield
• person = nation

Goal:
👉 tie sense of safety to one person

Effect:
👉 stronger loyalty, less criticism

8️⃣ Repetition + reinforcement

👉 keywords:

• Ukraine
• crosshair
• war
• money

Technique:

• repeating the same frame multiple times

Goal:
👉 imprinting

Effect:
👉 “familiar → feels true”

⚠️ What really matters

This text does not prove anything, it:

• suggests through images
• generalizes
• creates fear
• tells a simple story

👉 it doesn’t tell you what is true
👉 it tells you what to feel

🧩 Why it still works

It is effective on people who:

• feel uncertain (war, money, future)
• don’t verify sources
• want quick, simple answers

👉 in this state, the brain:
doesn’t analyze → it defends

💬 Short, raw summary

👉 This is a textbook propaganda mix:

• visual shock (crosshair)
• external enemy (Ukraine)
• betrayal narrative (Tisza)
• fear (money + war)
• savior (Orbán)

→ it doesn’t inform, it directs

More and more, and increasingly disturbing, recordings are emerging in connection with the drug-fueled house parties of Péter Magyar and Márk Radnai.

At a time when the question is who should govern our country in an era of dangers, crises, and wars, we must choose someone who is calm, experienced, and reliable. That person is Viktor Orbán.

The leadership of Tisza proves every day that they cannot maintain order even in their own lives and within their own party.

How could we entrust the country to them?

LSD, cocaine, each other, three-way surveillance, shady cases — these recordings about the president of Tisza and Radnai are spreading. Why is this important? It was good, wasn’t it? It was good, right, so more and more. Because I feel like it was good. Because I don’t think that people like this should be leading the country in such turbulent times, when there are two wars ongoing, when there is an energy crisis, when there is migration pressure on us, when we are being blackmailed from Ukraine.

So I don’t think that people like this should be leading the country — people who, on the one hand, are unreliable, because let’s face it, someone who uses drugs is not a stable person, and on the other hand, drug use makes a person vulnerable to blackmail.

We can see even now what kinds of attempts at interference are coming from abroad toward Hungary. I don’t think this will decrease in the coming years, so we should not entrust our country and our lives to people who are unable to keep their own lives in order.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = drug users + blackmailable + unreliable”
• “World = crisis, war, danger”
• “Leadership = only stable, controlled individuals are fit”
• “They = unfit → should not gain power”

👉 Underlying formula:

scandal + fear + national security + moral judgment
→ “they must not be trusted with the country”

🔍 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Unproven claims presented as facts

👉 “LSD, cocaine, recordings, wiretapping”

Technique:

• presented as established facts without concrete evidence
• “recordings are circulating” → vague sourcing

Goal:
👉 don’t question → accept immediately

Effect:
👉 shock + instant distrust

2️⃣ Scandal + moral labeling (character assassination)

👉 “anyone who uses drugs is not a stable person”

Technique:

• behavior → projected onto the entire personality
• no nuance, no context

Goal:
👉 morally disqualify the opponent

Effect:
👉 you don’t judge policies → you judge a “bad person”

3️⃣ Blackmail narrative (security fear framing)

👉 “if someone uses drugs, they are blackmailable”

Technique:

• personal claim → escalated into a national security risk

Goal:
👉 turn a personal issue into a state-level threat

Effect:
👉 “this is not just about them, it affects all of us”

4️⃣ Crisis stacking (fear amplification)

👉 “two wars + energy crisis + migration + pressure from Ukraine”

Technique:

• multiple global crises layered together

Goal:
👉 maximize the sense of threat

Effect:
👉 “this is not the time for risk”

5️⃣ False causality (logical leap)

👉 “drugs → unreliable → unfit to lead the country”

Technique:

• linear conclusion from a single claim
• no evidence for the connection

Goal:
👉 simplify the decision

Effect:
👉 “this is obvious, no need to think further”

6️⃣ “Our lives depend on it” framing

👉 “don’t entrust them with our country and our lives”

Technique:

• elevates the decision to an existential level

Goal:
👉 dramatize the stakes

Effect:
👉 fear + urgency

7️⃣ Competence = ability to manage private life

👉 “those who can’t manage their own lives…”

Technique:

• private life → political competence

Goal:
👉 create a simple, intuitive rule

Effect:
👉 easy identification (“yes, that sounds logical”)

⚠️ Overall picture (very important)

This text:

👉 does not prove → it implies
👉 does not debate → it labels
👉 does not nuance → it simplifies

🎯 Why it works

Because it combines:

• 🔥 scandal (drugs, wiretapping)
• 😨 fear (war, crisis)
• 🛡️ security (leadership suitability)
• ⚖️ moral judgment (good vs bad person)

👉 Together this is very powerful:
emotion → judgment → decision

🧩 In short (concise summary)

👉 This is a classic campaign message that:

• starts with scandal
• builds fear
• applies a moral label
• then draws a “seemingly logical” conclusion

➡️ it doesn’t want you to evaluate
➡️ it wants you to feel: they must not be trusted with power

👥 Tisza is crawling with Ukrainian spies!
Hungary’s election is decisive from the perspective of the pro-war camp. They will do everything they can to bring down Viktor Orbán, because he is the only one who can say no to Brussels’ and Ukraine’s financial demands.

🚨 Hungary is a dangerous example to them, because it has shown that it is possible — and worthwhile — to resist this madness. That is exactly why they are doing everything they can to replace the national government in Hungary. They know perfectly well: if Viktor Orbán wins again, Brussels and Zelensky lose.

The Hungarian people do not want a Ukrainian agent government imposed on them. That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

We are swarming with spies, especially in the Tisza Party, though other intelligence services are also active. Hungary’s election is also decisive from the perspective of the pro-war camp, because they know perfectly well that Viktor Orbán is the one resisting Brussels’ madness and also resisting Ukraine’s financial demands. That is why they are doing everything they can to remove the national government from power. Orbán Viktor is a dangerous example for Europe’s pro-war leaders, because he has shown that it is possible — and necessary — to resist the war pressure coming from Brussels. If Viktor Orbán wins, then Brussels and Zelensky lose. That is why only Fidesz is the safe choice if we do not want a foreign agent government imposed on us.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza = Ukrainian spies / foreign interests”
“The world = pro-war pressure (Brussels + Ukraine)”
“Orbán = the only one resisting”
“The election = a decisive battle”

👉 Hidden formula:
fear + foreign enemy + betrayal + savior leader
→ “only Fidesz can save you”

🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Unproven claims presented as facts

👉 “Tisza is swarming with Ukrainian spies”

Technique:

• no evidence
• no sources
• yet stated as a proven fact

Goal:
👉 don’t think → accept immediately

Effect:
👉 shock + distrust toward the opponent

2️⃣ Enemy construction (foreign = danger)

👉 “Ukrainian financial demands”
👉 “Brussels”
👉 “pro-war leaders”

Technique:

• external enemy + internal “agents”
• classic “besieged fortress” narrative

Goal:
👉 create a “us vs. them” divide

Effect:
👉 fear + internal cohesion on one side

3️⃣ Conspiracy chaining

👉 “Brussels + Zelenskyy + Tisza + intelligence services”

Technique:

• linking unrelated actors together
• presenting it as a “hidden plan”

Goal:
👉 simplify a complex world into an evil network

Effect:
👉 everything gets an “explanation” → critical thinking shuts down

4️⃣ Fear appeal + existential stakes

👉 “decisive election”
👉 “a puppet government forced on us”

Technique:

• exaggerated consequences
• apocalyptic tone

Goal:
👉 create urgency (“you must decide now!”)

Effect:
👉 emotional, irrational decision-making

5️⃣ False dilemma

👉 “Fidesz or a foreign puppet government”

Technique:

• presenting only two options
• excluding all alternatives

Goal:
👉 narrow down perceived choices

Effect:
👉 forced decision

6️⃣ Protector framing (savior leader)

👉 “only he can say no”

Technique:

• leader = nation
• leader = protection

Goal:
👉 tie safety to a single person

Effect:
👉 loyalty increases, criticism decreases

7️⃣ Repetition (very important!)

The text repeats the same elements:

• “decisive”
• “resistance”
• “Brussels”
• “Ukrainian”

Technique:
➡️ repetition = feeling of truth

Effect:
👉 over time it starts to feel like “obvious reality”

⚠️ Reality vs. claims

👉 The text provides no concrete evidence:

• no names
• no documents
• no verifiable data

👉 Therefore, this is not factual reporting, but:
➡️ emotional influence

🧩 Why does this work on people?

Because it combines:

• fear (“spies”)
• anger (“foreign interference”)
• identity (“we Hungarians”)
• security (“only he protects us”)

👉 This is a very powerful psychological mix

💬 In short (concise summary)

This text:

• doesn’t prove → it asserts
• doesn’t explain → it suggests
• doesn’t debate → it labels

👉 its goal is not to inform, but:
➡️ emotional mobilization + gaining votes