Everyone should calm down and not fall for the lies of the “agent media.”

The police officer who fled into the arms of Péter Magyar had no insight whatsoever into the counterintelligence operation involving individuals under foreign influence, and even by his own admission, he cannot substantiate his claims with any evidence.

He is objecting to what is the most natural thing in the world: intelligence services carry out counterintelligence tasks. The IT specialists working for the Tisza Party were trained by Ukrainians and maintained contact with them. They had infiltrated. It would have been a crime if the services had not dealt with them.

The police officer is trying to turn this counterintelligence case into a political issue. What is truly alarming is that Ukrainians are conducting such extensive operational activities in Hungary. Hungary’s security must be protected—not those who are carrying out this defensive work.

Everyone should calm down and not fall for the lies of the “agent media.” The police officer, who is moving toward a political career and has aligned himself with Péter Magyar, had no insight into the fact that this was a counterintelligence operation, and he could not substantiate his own claims with any evidence.

He is objecting to what is the most natural thing in the world—namely, that intelligence services perform counterintelligence tasks. On the other hand, what we do know is that the IT specialists working within the Tisza Party were trained by Ukrainians and are in contact with them. In other words, they had infiltrated. It would have been a crime if the services had not addressed this.

The police officer is now trying to turn this counterintelligence case into a political issue, likely without even understanding what is happening. What is truly alarming is that Ukrainians are conducting such extensive operational activities in Hungary. Hungary’s security must be protected, not those who are carrying out this counterintelligence work.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = foreign (Ukrainian) influence + infiltration + danger”
• “Police officer = unreliable, manipulated”
• “Services = protectors”
• “Criticism = attack on national security”

👉 Underlying formula:

unproven claims + fear + enemy image + authority → “believe, don’t question”

🔍 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Presenting unproven claims as facts

👉 “the IT specialists were trained by Ukrainians”
👉 “they infiltrated”

Technique:
➡️ claim presented as established fact
➡️ no source, no evidence

Goal:
👉 don’t examine it, just accept it

Effect:
👉 “if this is true, it’s a huge problem” → immediate emotional reaction

2️⃣ Building an enemy image (foreign threat)

👉 “extensive operational activity by Ukrainians”

Technique:
➡️ external enemy (classic political tool)
➡️ framed as a national security threat

Goal:
👉 generate fear
👉 create a sense that “protection is needed”

Effect:
👉 rational thinking is pushed aside → security becomes the priority

3️⃣ Appeal to authority (security services)

👉 “the services carry out counterintelligence tasks”

Technique:
➡️ state institution = automatically right
➡️ “if they do it, it must be justified”

Goal:
👉 legitimize all actions
👉 exclude criticism

Effect:
👉 anyone who questions it = “against the system”

4️⃣ Discrediting the critic

👉 “had no insight”
👉 “cannot prove his claims”
👉 “doesn’t even understand what’s happening”

Technique:
➡️ character assassination
➡️ portraying incompetence

Goal:
👉 shift focus from claims → to the person

Effect:
👉 personal attacks replace actual debate

5️⃣ False dilemma

👉 “either defend the country OR attack those defending it”

Technique:
➡️ reducing to two options
➡️ no middle ground

Goal:
👉 automatically frame criticism as “betrayal”

Effect:
👉 anyone who doubts = already on the “wrong side”

6️⃣ Repetition (mantra effect)

👉 same message repeated twice with slight variation

Technique:
➡️ repetition increases perceived truth

Goal:
👉 imprint the message

Effect:
👉 “if I hear it often → it must be true”

7️⃣ Emotional framing (calm + fear combined)

👉 “everyone should calm down”
👉 while describing a serious threat

Technique:
➡️ dual messaging:

• surface: calm
• content: alarm

Goal:
👉 controlled fear
👉 guided interpretation

Effect:
👉 reader doesn’t feel manipulated → but still becomes fearful

8️⃣ “We protect” – protector narrative

👉 “Hungary’s security must be defended”

Technique:
➡️ government/services = protectors
➡️ others = danger

Goal:
👉 trigger loyalty

Effect:
👉 emotional alignment with the “protectors”

⚠️ What’s especially important in this text

👉 it does not prove → it asserts
👉 it does not debate → it labels
👉 it does not explain → it builds fear

This combination is the classic:

national security panic + enemy construction + authority

🎯 Summary

This text is a textbook propaganda example that:

• constructs an external enemy (Ukrainian connection)
• defines internal enemies (Tisza + the police officer)
• legitimizes power actions (services)
• excludes criticism (questioning = attack)

👉 Final outcome:

“don’t think → fear → and side with the ‘protectors’”

You cannot build a الوطن and a future on hatred, hostility, and incitement. Yet these are exactly what hold the Tisza camp together.

Now, when wars are raging around the world, a new wave of migration is threatening, and there is a global energy crisis, we cannot afford to take risks.

We need a government that does not give in either to foreign multinationals or to Ukrainian blackmail.

We need a government that is calm, proven, and always makes decisions based on the interests of Hungarians. That is why only Fidesz is the safe choice.

Go, Tisza! Go, Tisza! The Tisza is flooding! Tisza! Tisza! Tisza! The Tisza is flooding! Only now Fidesz! Death to Fidesz! Rot in hell! In times like these, it is better for the government to remain in safe hands. Two wars are underway, there is a global energy crisis, and only Fidesz is the safe choice.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main Narrative:

• “They (Tisza) = hatred, aggression, chaos”
• “The world = danger (war, migration, crisis)”
• “We (Fidesz) = stability, security, experience”
• “The choice = risk vs. safety”

👉 Hidden Formula:

fear + moral superiority + image of chaos + promise of stability → “don’t take risks” reflex

🔍 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Moral framing + hypocritical contrast

👉 “You cannot build a country on hatred and hostility…”

Technique:
➡️ adopting moral superiority
➡️ own side = “good”, other side = “bad”

Goal:
👉 define from the start who is “moral”
👉 avoid program-based debate

Effect:
👉 the reader doesn’t analyze → they identify
👉 “I’m not hateful → I belong here”

2️⃣ Enemy construction + simplification

👉 “This is what holds the Tisza camp together”

Technique:
➡️ labeling an entire group
➡️ complex political reality → reduced to one word: “hatred”

Goal:
👉 delegitimize the opponent without debate

Effect:
👉 no need to counter arguments
👉 enough to label them as “bad”

3️⃣ Fear stacking (classic campaign weapon)

👉 “wars… migration wave… energy crisis”

Technique:
➡️ layering multiple global threats
➡️ increasing intensity

Goal:
👉 maximize uncertainty
👉 create a “this is not the time to experiment” mindset

Effect:
👉 anxiety → search for safety
👉 reduced rational thinking

➡️ This is one of the strongest elements.

4️⃣ False causality (hidden manipulation)

👉 “in times like these we cannot take risks → therefore Fidesz”

Technique:
➡️ global crises → directly tied to a political choice

Goal:
👉 make it seem like a logical conclusion

Effect:
👉 “if there is danger → we need them”
👉 exclusion of alternatives

5️⃣ External enemy + sovereignty narrative

👉 “foreign multinationals”, “Ukrainian pressure”

Technique:
➡️ introducing external forces
➡️ framing as national defense

Goal:
👉 emotional identification (defending the homeland)
👉 opponent = “not in national interest”

Effect:
👉 strong “us vs. them” dynamic
👉 moral pressure

6️⃣ “Safe choice” framing (risk aversion)

👉 “only Fidesz is the safe choice”

Technique:
➡️ safety vs. risk dichotomy
➡️ false dilemma

Goal:
👉 simplify decision-making
👉 don’t evaluate → choose “safety”

Effect:
👉 especially powerful for undecided voters

7️⃣ Visualization of chaos (amplified shouting)

👉 “Death to Fidesz! Die!”

Technique:
➡️ highlighting extreme examples
➡️ opponent = aggressive mob

Goal:
👉 emotional shock
👉 evoke disgust

Effect:
👉 “I don’t want to belong to this group”

➡️ This is framing: not representative → but presented as such.

8️⃣ Repetition (hypnotic effect)

👉 “war… energy crisis… safe choice” repeated

Technique:
➡️ repeating key messages

Goal:
👉 embed the message
👉 create automatic responses

Effect:
👉 familiarity = perceived truth

⚠️ Overall Picture

This text is no longer classic persuasion, but:

👉 “endgame campaign mode”

Characteristics:

• no program
• no specifics
• pure emotion
• strong polarization
• forced decision

🧩 What does this actually show?

👉 it’s not about what they offer
👉 it’s about:

• generating fear
• shutting down critical thinking
• activating the “don’t change anything” reflex

💡 In short

This is:

👉 a fear-based stability narrative
👉 reinforced by moral superiority
👉 combined with an artificially simplified choice

= classic “don’t take risks” propaganda

Urban development that never happened – a fairy tale written by Karácsony Gergely.

Karácsony Gergely didn’t just receive an award this time for his enthusiasm for rainbow causes, but for something he simply did not accomplish.

Reclaiming public spaces – does the mayor mean that today you can’t even sit down in a square because of the homelessness situation?

Digital development of transport – maybe it worked virtually, but certainly not in reality. Traffic jams, potholes, air pollution, and such dirt that tourists have voted Budapest the dirtiest city in Europe.

Instead of boasting about fake awards, it would be time for the mayor to finally start working for the people of Budapest!

Now let’s read a fairy tale together, titled “The development that never was.”

Once upon a time, according to the jury’s evaluation, one of Budapest’s greatest strengths was its ability to think in systems: the integration of physical and digital transport networks, the reclaiming of public spaces, and the restoration of the natural environment all appearing simultaneously in its developments. So wrote Karácsony Gergely.

But this time, Karácsony Gergely didn’t receive an award for a “gender parade,” but for something he quite simply did not do at all.

Reclaiming public spaces – what does the mayor mean by that? Perhaps that nowadays you can’t sit down in a square because they are full of homeless people?

Digital development of transport – maybe it has improved digitally, but in reality, it certainly hasn’t. The roads are full of potholes, people spend hours stuck in traffic while breathing in exhaust fumes.

The city is so dirty that, shamefully, tourists have voted Budapest the dirtiest city in Europe.

I don’t know what Karácsony Gergely deserves for this—but it’s certainly not an award.

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Karácsony Gergely = incompetent + lying + has done nothing”
“Award = fake + ridiculous”
“Budapest = deteriorating, unlivable city”

👉 Hidden formula:
delegitimization + mockery + fear + exaggeration → rejection

🔍 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Mockery and ridicule (framing)

👉 “a fairy tale written by Karácsony Gergely”
👉 “bragging about fake awards”

Technique: discrediting through humor / cynicism
Goal: don’t take it seriously → undermine credibility from the start
Effect: the reader doesn’t analyze, but laughs

➡️ Very powerful because it doesn’t argue → it labels

2️⃣ Total denial of performance (nullification)

👉 “something he simply did not do”
👉 “did not do at all”

Technique: denial of any achievement (black-and-white framing)
Goal: remove nuance → everything = failure
Effect: distorted reality (no partial successes allowed)

➡️ Classic: what matters is not what happened, but that “nothing happened”

3️⃣ Rhetorical questions → implied answers

👉 “does he mean…?”
👉 “what does the mayor mean?”

Technique: leading questions
Goal: make it seem like the reader reaches the conclusion themselves
Effect: internal reinforcement → “I think the same”

➡️ In reality, it doesn’t ask → it asserts

4️⃣ Bundling negative phenomena

👉 “homelessness”
👉 “traffic jams, potholes”
👉 “air pollution”
👉 “dirt”

Technique: stacking problems
Goal: tie all negatives to one person
Effect: overload → “everything is bad at once”

➡️ This is not analysis, but emotional pressure

5️⃣ Unproven claims presented as facts

👉 “the dirtiest city in Europe”
👉 “tourists voted it so”

Technique: imitation of certainty
Goal: prevent questioning
Effect: illusion of credibility

➡️ No source → still sounds like a fact

6️⃣ Strawman (distortion)

👉 “maybe digitally it worked, but in reality it didn’t”

Technique: simplification + distortion
Goal: make complex developments look ridiculous
Effect: original claims become caricatures

7️⃣ Indirect construction of an enemy

👉 “you can’t sit down because of homeless people”

Technique: projecting social tension onto a politician
Goal: channel frustration → attach it to a person
Effect: scapegoating

8️⃣ Repetition (reinforcement)

Same patterns repeated:

• “did nothing”
• “dirt”
• “chaos”

Technique: repetition = increased sense of truth
Goal: fixation
Effect: familiar → more believable

9️⃣ Moral judgment at the end

👉 “he certainly does not deserve an award”

Technique: closed judgment
Goal: leave no room for doubt
Effect: no debate → final conclusion

⚠️ Why it feels like propaganda

Because the text:

• does not weigh
• does not prove
• does not nuance
• but aims to trigger an emotional reaction

👉 main tools:

• mockery
• exaggeration
• repetition
• negative imagery
• “everything is bad” narrative

🧩 Short summary

This text does not analyze urban development, but:

👉 destroys character
👉 simplifies reality
👉 generates emotion (anger, disgust)

➡️ Classic political formula:
ridicule + problem stacking + certainty → rejection

❗ Share this so Tisza supporters also face the truth! The Tisza “agent scandal” has escalated into a Ukrainian espionage scandal.

The report of the National Security Committee clearly states: the Tisza Party’s IT specialists were not only working for them – but also for Ukrainians.

Regular contact with the Ukrainian embassy in Budapest.
Connections with foreign intelligence services.
Cooperation with hacker groups.
Attempts to acquire spyware and military-grade equipment.

This goes far beyond political debate – it is a serious national security issue.

👉 One of those involved had previously been investigated for blackmail and cybercrime.
The other was directed by a foreign intelligence operative and built connections in Ukraine.
They visited the Ukrainian embassy in Budapest multiple times.
They communicated through encrypted channels.
Foreign actors were seeking Hungarian domestic political information.

This is unacceptable!

Hungary’s future cannot be a plaything of foreign interests.
Decisions about us must not be made in Ukraine, in Brussels, or in intelligence backroom deals.

🇭🇺 Hungarians have the right to security.
🇭🇺 Hungarians have the right to sovereignty.

Anyone who relies on people with such connections is putting the country at risk.

The stakes of the election are clear: order, security, and national sovereignty – or chaos and foreign influence.

Share this video so the truth reaches all Tisza supporters. According to the National Security Committee, the Tisza Party’s IT specialists were not only working for the party, but astonishingly also for Ukrainians. There was regular cooperation with the Ukrainian embassy in Budapest, foreign intelligence services, and hacker groups. They even planned to acquire spyware and military-grade equipment.

This is far more than a simple political debate – it is a serious national security issue for every Hungarian.

One of those involved had already been under investigation for blackmail and cybercrime. The other was directed by a foreign intelligence operative, alongside the connections built in Ukraine.

So let’s make it clear: it is unacceptable that foreign actors attempted to gain access to Hungarian domestic political information with the help of the Tisza Party. That is why it is important that…

1️⃣ Unproven or unverifiable claims are presented as facts

The text doesn’t say “it was alleged,” “reportedly,” or “according to a report.”
It presents everything as if it were already fully proven:

• “Ukrainian spy scandal”
• “foreign intelligence connections”
• “cooperation with hacker groups”
• “spyware and military equipment”

This creates disgust because it leaves no room for thinking.
The text judges first, and only then suggests “facts.”

Technique: pre-made judgment + imitation of certainty
Goal: don’t evaluate—react immediately with outrage
Effect: mental pressure, internal resistance, “this is too much” feeling

2️⃣ Shock stacking

It throws in the strongest possible words one after another:

• Ukrainians
• intelligence services
• hackers
• spyware
• military technology
• blackmail
• foreign control
• domestic political data

This is no longer a simple political message—it’s a shock cocktail.

Technique: information overload + threat stacking
Goal: prevent the reader from examining individual claims
Effect: anxiety, disgust, paralysis, even nausea

3️⃣ It merges individuals, a party, and national collapse into one narrative

The logic roughly becomes:

two individuals with suspicious ties → the entire Tisza party is suspicious → foreign influence → Hungary is in danger

This is a classic propaganda leap.

Technique: guilt transfer / collective responsibility
Goal: turn a specific case into a stigma for an entire political group
Effect: in the reader’s mind, “Tisza” becomes associated with “treason” and “espionage”

4️⃣ It doesn’t offer debate—it creates moral panic

The text doesn’t say “this should be investigated,” but instead:

• “this is unacceptable”
• “it puts the country at risk”
• “the stakes of the election are clear”
• “order and security – or chaos and foreign influence”

So the whole issue becomes an existential choice.

Technique: false dilemma
Goal: leave only two options in the reader’s mind
Effect: the gray zone disappears—everything becomes black and white

5️⃣ It uses the word “truth” for emotional pressure

“Share this so the truth reaches everyone.”

This is strong manipulation, because anyone who doesn’t share it is implied to be:

• against the truth
• covering it up
• indifferent to national security

Technique: moral pressure + forced sharing
Goal: turn the reader into a free distributor
Effect: guilt + tribal mobilization

6️⃣ It appropriates the nation

“The Hungarian people have the right to security.”
“The Hungarian people have the right to sovereignty.”

These statements sound valid on their own, but here they are framed so that the reader subconsciously links them to one political side.

Technique: national appropriation
Goal: if you’re with us = patriot; if not = suspicious
Effect: illusion of moral superiority

7️⃣ The whole text functions like an indictment

Its rhythm is built like this:

• short, punchy statements
• stacked accusations
• little nuance
• many exclamations
• ends with a call to action

This is not information—it’s an emotion-driven accusatory speech.

Technique: prosecutorial tone
Goal: make the reader react like a juror, not a citizen
Effect: the brain stops evaluating and starts judging

8️⃣ You feel physically bad because it triggers cognitive disgust

The text is simultaneously:

• too certain
• too severe
• too much
• too one-sided

This creates a sense that something is off, even if you can’t immediately explain why.
Many people literally experience this as nausea or “cringe.”

Technique: exaggerated threat framing
Effect: psychological repulsion

In short, the hidden formula:

fear + treason + foreign actors + intelligence services + nation
= vote for us, or there will be consequences

That’s why it feels so bad to read.
Not because it contains “strong truth,” but because it applies maximum emotional pressure to push a political conclusion.