Zelenskyy and Brussels have put Hungary in their crosshairs, while we have taken Hungary into our hearts.

The Ukrainians want to bleed Hungarians dry with an oil blockade, their spies have infiltrated the Tisza Party, and Péter Magyar is being pulled by the strings of pro-war leaders in Brussels and foreign multinational corporations.

Meanwhile, Tisza supporters fail to recognize that Ukrainian and Brussels-backed plans would cause severe damage to every Hungarian, and instead they join this blind hatred.

Without cheap Russian energy, every Hungarian household would lose half a million forints per year just on utility costs, fuel would cost over 1,000 forints, massive inflation would follow, and tens of thousands of jobs would disappear.

Hungary is in danger; we are living in an age of crises and wars. At such times, we must choose a leader who is strong, experienced, and stands up for Hungarians—even when his children and grandchildren are put in the crosshairs.

On April 12, let us unite against war and hatred!

Let us stand for Hungary’s peace and security!

Fidesz is the safe choice!

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

“ Hungary = under attack ”
“ Enemy = Volodymyr Zelenskyy + Brussels + Tisza + multinationals ”
“ We = protection, security ”
“ Election = life-or-death decision ”

👉 Hidden formula:

fear + conspiracy + economic panic + heroic leader
→ “everything will collapse, only we can save you”

👉 Why is this ‘flailing’ (kapálózás)?

➡️ too many claims at once
➡️ extreme wording (“bleed out,” “crosshairs,” “their spies”)
➡️ chained narrative without evidence
➡️ mixture of panic + mobilization

---

🔍 Influence techniques (in bullet points)

1️⃣ Total threat framing (fear overload)

👉 Example:
“Hungary has been put in the crosshairs,” “bleed out,” “is in danger”

👉 Technique:

• stacking extreme threats on top of each other
• no concrete evidence

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger immediate fear

👉 Effect:
👉 rational thinking shuts down

---

2️⃣ Conspiracy chaining

👉 Example:
“Ukrainians + Brussels + multinationals + Tisza + Péter Magyar”

👉 Technique:

• merging multiple actors into a single “hidden force”
• unproven connections

👉 Goal:
👉 push all opponents into one camp

👉 Effect:
👉 feeling that “everyone is against us”

---

3️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Example:
“their spies have infiltrated,” “they are being controlled like puppets”

👉 Technique:

• political opponent = foreign agent
• dehumanizing language

👉 Goal:
👉 don’t see a debate partner → see a threat

👉 Effect:
👉 emotional rejection

---

4️⃣ Economic fear framing

👉 Example:
“every household would lose 500,000 HUF,” “fuel would be over 1000 HUF”

👉 Technique:

• specific numbers → illusion of credibility
• extreme negative future scenario

👉 Goal:
👉 personal fear (wallet impact)

👉 Effect:
👉 “I can’t risk this”

---

5️⃣ False causality

👉 Example:
“without Russian energy → collapse”

👉 Technique:

• oversimplified economic model
• ignoring alternatives

👉 Goal:
👉 present themselves as the only solution

👉 Effect:
👉 narrowed thinking

---

6️⃣ Moral binary framing

👉 Example:
“war and hatred vs. peace and security”

👉 Technique:

• moral dichotomy
• own side = good

👉 Goal:
👉 moralize the election

👉 Effect:
👉 “if you don’t choose them → you’re on the wrong side”

---

7️⃣ Strong leader framing

👉 Example:
“a leader who stands firm even if his children are targeted”

👉 Technique:

• leader = victim + hero
• personalization

👉 Goal:
👉 emotional attachment to the leader

👉 Effect:
👉 increased loyalty

---

8️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Example:
“Fidesz = security” (implicit: others = danger)

👉 Technique:

• reducing reality to two options

👉 Goal:
👉 eliminate alternatives

👉 Effect:
👉 binary thinking

---

⚠️ Why is this specifically “flailing”?

This is no longer “simple propaganda,” but overloaded defensive communication:

🔴 1. Too many enemies at once

• Zelenskyy
• Brussels
• multinationals
• Tisza
  → sign of a fragmented narrative

🔴 2. Over-the-top language

• “bleed out”
• “crosshairs”
• “spies”

→ panic communication

🔴 3. All layers at once

• geopolitics
• economy
• personal threat
• morality

→ not focused → but chaotic

🔴 4. Defense + attack mixed

• “we protect you”
• “they attack”
• “vote for us”

→ classic late-campaign tension

---

🧩 Summary

👉 This text:

• does not build a stable narrative
• instead stacks fear → forces fast decision-making

👉 The essence of “flailing” here:

➡️ too many claims
➡️ too many enemies
➡️ exaggerated stakes
➡️ emotional overload

→ “not a controlled message, but panic-driven mobilization”

How is it possible that money is flowing out of wartime Ukraine? According to a declassified American report, this is not a new phenomenon: during the 2022 U.S. midterm election campaign, a similar pattern allegedly emerged, when significant funds were sent to Ukraine, and according to the report, part of that money was redistributed to finance the Democrats’ campaign.

Now we are seeing another attempt of Ukrainian interference in the Hungarian election campaign. Ukrainians are no longer even hiding that they are supporting the Tisza Party, which is loyal to them, by all possible means.

Money is flowing out of Ukraine. How is this possible? I think it could be happening roughly the same way as in the 2022 U.S. campaign. Back then, as has now been declassified in an American document, the process allegedly worked like this: in 2022, hundreds of millions of dollars were sent to Ukraine in the form of various supports and grants, even though it was known that some of these applications would likely not be properly fulfilled. The expectation was that by the time this became clear, the money would already be untraceable. The alleged agreement was that, in return, Ukraine would send back 90% of these funds to support Joe Biden and the Democrats.

So what happened? Essentially the same thing that we may now be seeing again: that Ukraine attempted to interfere in U.S. elections in order to ensure that a Ukraine-friendly government would lead the United States. That plan did not succeed, and I hope that Hungarian people will remain clear-headed now as well, and will not support a Ukraine-friendly government in Hungary either, which in this narrative is represented by the Tisza Party.

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Ukraine = money laundering + interference”
“Tisza = Ukrainian tool”
“Election = foreign manipulation vs. Hungarian interest”

👉 Hidden formula:

conspiracy + money + external enemy + election fear
→ “the game isn’t clean, they are manipulating → only we can protect you”

---

🔍 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Conspiracy framing

👉 Excerpt:
“a declassified American report”, “90% is sent back”

👉 Technique:

• vague, unverifiable source
• specific numbers create an illusion of credibility
• no evidence or references

👉 Goal:
👉 create the appearance of proof

👉 Effect:
👉 “there must be something behind it” feeling

---

2️⃣ False causality

👉 Excerpt:
“money went to Ukraine → sent back → used to fund campaigns”

👉 Technique:

• turns sequence into cause-and-effect
• no proven connection

👉 Goal:
👉 simplify complex issues into a single story

👉 Effect:
👉 easy to understand → easy to believe

---

3️⃣ “Concrete claims without evidence”

👉 Excerpt:
“hundreds of millions of dollars”, “90% returned”

👉 Technique:

• precise numbers = illusion of credibility
• but no source

👉 Goal:
👉 prevent questioning

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is too specific to be fake”

---

4️⃣ Linking external enemy with internal traitor (enemy coalition)

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukrainians are helping the Tisza Party”

👉 Technique:

• connects foreign enemy with domestic opponent
• “not just wrong → serving foreign interests”

👉 Goal:
👉 delegitimize the opponent

👉 Effect:
👉 not a political debate → “betrayal”

---

5️⃣ Repetition loop

👉 Excerpt:
“money is flowing out of Ukraine” (repeated)

👉 Technique:

• repeats the same claim
• replaces evidence with repetition

👉 Goal:
👉 imprint the message

👉 Effect:
👉 “I’ve heard this many times → must be true”

---

6️⃣ False analogy

👉 Excerpt:
“the same thing is happening now as in the 2022 US elections”

👉 Technique:

• applies an unproven story to the present
• analogy replaces evidence

👉 Goal:
👉 provide a familiar pattern

👉 Effect:
👉 “if it happened there, it can happen here”

---

7️⃣ Fear framing

👉 Excerpt:
“interference attempt”, “they don’t even hide it anymore”

👉 Technique:

• suggests external manipulation
• questions democratic legitimacy

👉 Goal:
👉 create a sense of threat

👉 Effect:
👉 emotional reaction → reduced rational thinking

---

8️⃣ Assertion without evidence

👉 Excerpt:
“we are now seeing a Ukrainian interference attempt”

👉 Technique:

• states opinion as fact
• no supporting proof

👉 Goal:
👉 make it sound unquestionable

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is already a proven fact”

---

9️⃣ “Us vs. them” polarization

👉 Excerpt:
“Hungarian people vs. a Ukraine-friendly government”

👉 Technique:

• identity-based framing
• political choice → moral choice

👉 Goal:
👉 divide into camps

👉 Effect:
👉 compromise becomes impossible

---

⚠️ What makes it especially strong

👉 three layers at once:

• financial corruption narrative
• foreign interference
• internal betrayal

👉 Together this creates a powerful emotional mix:

• anger (money theft)
• fear (foreign interference)
• distrust (opposition)

---

🧠 Summary

This message:

👉 does not inform
👉 it builds a narrative

Its core message:

“the election is not a political competition, but a foreign-manipulated process where the opponent is not legitimate”

Hello, Manfred! More bikes, in more locations—and for the first time in Budapest, electric shared bikes are also waiting for you!

The Karácsony–Tisza city leadership has even managed to ruin the one capital service that everyone loved: due to their own mistakes, there will be no Bubi until June.
So the people of Budapest have taken matters into their own hands, and now here’s the solution: Manfred is launching!

The Municipality of Budapest effectively excluded Csepel Works from the tender for the new Bubi bikes, ensuring that the bikes would come from foreign manufacturers.
Both the design and the spirit of the bicycles pay tribute to the world-famous Weiss Manfréd, as innovation and development are key elements of the system. Csepel Works has been a defining symbol of Hungarian industry and local identity for nearly a century—something every Budapest resident can rightly be proud of.

In the first phase of the multi-stage project, 120–150 modern, GPS-equipped, Csepel-manufactured ELECTRIC bicycles will be launched in Csepel and then across the city.
In addition, around 2,500 traditional bikes will be available throughout Budapest!

You can always count on Manfred—not like Karácsony and Tisza! 😉

---

Surprise, surprise! I’m going to say good things about Manfred. Well, not Weber—but the newest Csepel bikes. Let me show you more closely what they look like: there’s an electric version and a regular, traditional one.

So what happened is that Karácsony Gergely and his team excel at making sure their friends get the right amount of premium benefits and money—but they’re far less capable when it comes to launching the Bubi 3 tender on time. As a result, we now have the unfortunate situation that there will be no Bubi until summer.

To make matters worse, the tender was written in such a way that Hungarian manufacturers—like Csepel, which produced the previous Bubi bikes and is now present on the streets with Manfred—couldn’t even participate. So supposedly, new Bubi bikes will arrive sometime in the summer from a foreign manufacturer.

But the people at Csepel are not the kind to just let this slide. Instead, they came up with what you can see behind me now in multiple parts of Budapest: electric and traditional Csepel bikes that essentially function as a shared bike system very similar to Bubi, allowing us to ride through the summer—and hopefully well beyond.

What’s more, one of its advantages—besides the electric bikes—is that it’s available much more widely across Budapest. It’s not just focused on the city center like Bubi was; it’s also accessible in suburban areas. So I think this is a fantastic innovation.

I’m really happy that it’s Hungarian, so get out there and ride it as much as you can! Just be careful how you navigate Budapest, because those bike lanes painted by Karácsony’s team aren’t always the safest.

So—go cycling, go Manfred! 🚴‍♂️

👉 Main narrative:

“We = Hungarian, functional, innovative, people-friendly”
“Karácsony–Tisza = incompetent, serving cronies, anti-Hungarian”
“Manfred = the solution”
“Bubi shortage = the opponent’s fault”

👉 Underlying formula:

national pride + enemy image + political blame + marketing
→ “what they ruin, we fix with Hungarian hands”

---

🔍 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Advertising disguised as political propaganda

👉 Excerpt:
“now here’s the solution: Manfred is launching!”

👉 Technique:
not a simple product introduction, but marketing built on attacking a political opponent
the service is presented as if it were a public salvation

👉 Goal:
don’t see the bike as a bike, but as a political statement

👉 Effect:
if you use or support it, you’re already “on the right side”

---

2️⃣ False contrast: “they destroy, we solve”

👉 Excerpt:
“because of their own mistakes there will be no Bubi until June”
“so the people of Budapest took matters into their own hands”

👉 Technique:
sharp opposition:

they = incompetent
we = capable

cuts out the complexity of reality
no nuance, no systemic explanation, no administrative context
just a moral story

👉 Goal:
create a simple villain and a simple hero

👉 Effect:
people won’t ask what actually happened
but rather: “who is to blame and who is the savior”

---

3️⃣ Turning a product into national identity

👉 Excerpt:
“Hungarian manufacturers”
“Csepel Works”
“Weiss Manfréd”
“a defining symbol of Hungarian industry and local identity”

👉 Technique:
the bike is no longer just transport, but a national cause
the brand is linked to:

Hungarian industry
historical memory
local patriotism
pride

👉 Goal:
criticizing it should feel like attacking Hungarian industry itself

👉 Effect:
an emotional shield forms around the project

---

4️⃣ Implied conspiracy / exclusion narrative

👉 Excerpt:
“the Municipality practically excluded them”
“so that the bikes would definitely be foreign”

👉 Technique:
assigns intent
doesn’t say the tender had certain conditions
but suggests a deliberate move against Hungarian producers

👉 Goal:
make the opponent seem not only incompetent but biased and anti-national

👉 Effect:
triggers anger:
“they’re not just incompetent, they’re selling us out to foreigners”

---

5️⃣ “Voice of the people” trick

👉 Excerpt:
“the people of Budapest took matters into their own hands”

👉 Technique:
presents a specific initiative as if it were spontaneous public will
even though it’s clearly a politically communicated project

👉 Goal:
legitimize it as the will of the people

👉 Effect:
opposing it feels like opposing the people of Budapest

---

6️⃣ Patriotic consumption

👉 Excerpt:
“I’m really happy that it’s Hungarian”
“ride it as much as you can”

👉 Technique:
turns usage into a patriotic act
not just “this is good”
but “this is Hungarian, so supporting it is morally right”

👉 Goal:
turn consumer choice into an identity decision

👉 Effect:
choosing the service becomes a loyalty test, not a practical decision

---

7️⃣ Continuous subtle discrediting of the opponent

👉 Excerpt:
“they deliver premiums and money to their buddies”
“but are less capable of launching a tender on time…”

👉 Technique:
corruption insinuation + incompetence framing
no proof, just loaded keywords:

cronies
money
bonuses
incompetence

👉 Goal:
make the opponent seem not just ineffective, but morally corrupt

👉 Effect:
audience concludes: “they both steal and are incompetent”

---

8️⃣ Negative campaigning wrapped in positivity

👉 Excerpt:
“fantastically good innovation”
“go cycling, go Manfred!”

👉 Technique:
on the surface it’s positive and enthusiastic
but structurally built on attacking the opponent

👉 Goal:
sell a negative campaign in a friendly, upbeat tone

👉 Effect:
feels less like mudslinging, even though it is

---

9️⃣ Casual, friendly tone as a manipulation tool

👉 Excerpt:
“Surprise, surprise!”
“I’m going to say good things about Manfred”
“well…”

👉 Technique:
informal, influencer-style tone
makes it feel more natural and authentic
like a spontaneous opinion

👉 Goal:
hide the deliberate political framing

👉 Effect:
propaganda is easier to absorb because it doesn’t sound official

---

🔟 Turning a transport issue into a culture war

👉 Excerpt:
“not like Karácsony and Tisza”
“foreign bikes”
“Hungarian manufacturer”

👉 Technique:
transforms a city mobility issue into an identity conflict:

Hungarian vs foreign
people vs elite
functioning vs incompetence

👉 Goal:
turn the bike into a political symbol

👉 Effect:
people don’t evaluate a service — they pick a side

---

🎯 Overall picture

This text is not simply promoting Manfred.

It’s a classic political communication package where:

• product marketing
• mobilization of national sentiment
• framing the opponent as incompetent and anti-Hungarian
• and the “we fix what they break” narrative

are fused together.

The key trick is that it elevates a bike project into a moral-political issue.
So the question is no longer whether the system is good, functional, affordable, or well-designed —
but whether you stand on the “Hungarian side” or with those who “push Hungarians out.”

---

🧷 In one sentence

This follows the same Fidesz-style communication pattern: take a real (or partly real) problem, frame it in national-emotional terms, build an enemy around it, and present your own project as the solution.

Hungarian in the crosshairs.

Zelensky and his soldiers are issuing deadly threats against Viktor Orbán, his children, and his grandchildren. They want to destroy Hungary and the lives of all Hungarians through an oil blockade.

Ukrainians have infiltrated the Tisza Party, while Péter Magyar is being manipulated by pro-war leaders in Brussels and foreign multinationals.

Meanwhile, Tisza supporters are joining in the hatred and are themselves drawing a crosshair on Orbán Viktor’s poster.

People! Don’t you understand that what the Ukrainians are doing, and what Tisza is preparing for, is bad for every Hungarian?

That without Russian oil and gas, with MOL being dismantled and Shell LNG replacing it, every Hungarian household would lose half a million forints a year just on utility bills? That petrol would cost 1,000 forints, triggering brutal inflation? That expensive energy would destroy jobs?

Let’s come to our senses. Let’s listen to our minds, our wallets, and our Hungarian hearts: let’s vote for Fidesz!

Well, this is what the so-called Tisza “country of love” looks like in practice. This poster is out here with a message saying, “let’s unite.” And then a crosshair gets drawn onto the Hungarian prime minister’s forehead. This comes after the Ukrainians had, almost literally, put a crosshair on the prime minister’s forehead. President Zelensky, together with a Ukrainian lieutenant general, threatened the Hungarian prime minister, even mentioning his grandchildren and children. I believe such things should never be used, not in politics and not in a campaign. And in light of what has happened in recent weeks and months on the Ukrainian side, even less so. So enough of this Tisza hate-mongering already, and let real unity finally begin.

1️⃣ Total threat framing (fear overload)

👉 “deadly threats,” “crosshairs,” “war,” “destroying the country”

Technique:
➡️ stacking extreme dangers on top of each other
➡️ no evidence, only strong, emotionally charged words

Goal:
👉 immediate emotional shock (fear + anger)

Effect:
👉 the brain switches into “threat mode” → no rational evaluation

---

2️⃣ Conspiracy narrative (conspiracy framing)

👉 “Ukrainians have infiltrated,” “they’re being controlled like puppets,” “foreign multinationals”

Technique:
➡️ invisible background forces
➡️ unverifiable claims

Goal:
👉 make every opponent automatically suspicious

Effect:
👉 distrust → “there must be something behind everything”

---

3️⃣ Economic panic (economic fear framing)

👉 “fuel at 1000 HUF,” “half a million in utility costs,” “jobs will disappear”

Technique:
➡️ extreme numbers without context
➡️ oversimplified cause-and-effect

Goal:
👉 trigger fear through personal finances

Effect:
👉 “if this happens → I’m ruined”

---

4️⃣ Enemy + betrayal (enemy framing)

👉 “pro-Ukrainian,” “foreign interests,” “Tisza = danger”

Technique:
➡️ political opponent = external enemy
➡️ not a debate → framed as “betrayal”

Goal:
👉 moral rejection instead of rational discussion

---

5️⃣ Emotional overload (overload)

👉 everything at once:

• war
• death
• economic collapse
• betrayal
• threat to family

This is the key.

Goal:
👉 overwhelm processing → force reaction

Effect:
👉 exactly what you described:
👉 “nausea,” “mental overload”

---

🧩 The hidden formula

👉 fear + enemy + conspiracy + financial shock + urgency
➡️ “if you don’t vote for us, you’ll be in danger”

---

⚠️ What’s especially important

👉 This is not an informational text, but:
➡️ emotional manipulation

👉 Exaggeration is not a mistake, it’s intentional:
➡️ the more extreme, the stronger the effect

👉 The fact that “everything is mixed together”:
➡️ is a deliberate technique (stacking)

---

🧠 Why it feels so bad

Because:

• too many negative stimuli at once
• no logical anchor
• constant sense of threat
• made personal (family, money, future)

👉 This is essentially psychological pressure

---

🧾 In short (very briefly)

👉 This text doesn’t aim to prove anything—it aims to scare you and push you into an emotional political decision.

Do you know that joke where Gergely Karácsony suddenly starts worrying about “foreign interference”?

There are moments when you are simply left searching for words.

This is one of them: hearing “sincere concern” from a mayor whose name has been linked to donation boxes, rolling dollars and euros, and who is deeply tied to the Bajnai-era DatAdat scandal together with Action for Democracy.

It is a bit strange to hear these concerns from him of all people, especially since Karácsony himself was the one who built up the opposition campaign with these vaguely sourced foreign funds. Mr. Mayor, silence is sometimes golden, and perhaps you would do better to sweep in front of your own house first.

Gergely Karácsony really does have skin as thick as a rhinoceros, because now he is the one pretending to worry about foreign interference — though, of course, not about Ukrainian foreign interference, just so there is no misunderstanding. And all this is being said by the very same Gergely Karácsony whose name is associated with donation boxes, rolling dollars and euros, and the Bajnai-style DatAdat scandal together with Action for Democracy. So I think Karácsony would do better, once again, to start by cleaning up around his own house.

👉 Main narrative:

Karácsony Gergely = hypocritical, “a man of foreign money”
“We” = morally cleaner, more credible side
“He” = untrustworthy, corrupt, ridiculous

👉 Underlying formula:
delegitimization + mockery + insinuation of corruption
→ “don’t take what he says seriously”

---

🔍 Influence Techniques (in points)

1️⃣ Mockery and Ridicule (mockery framing)

👉 Example:
“Do you know the joke…”, “he’s searching for words”

👉 Technique:

• the statement is framed as a “joke” from the start
• this instantly strips the target of seriousness

👉 Goal:
👉 don’t think about it → laugh at it

👉 Effect:
👉 the audience doesn’t look for arguments, but looks down on the person

---

2️⃣ Hypocrisy Attack (tu quoque)

👉 Example:
“he’s the one worrying about foreign interference”

👉 Technique:

• “you did it too → you have no right to talk”
• classic tu quoque fallacy

👉 Goal:
👉 total delegitimization without real debate

👉 Effect:
👉 focus shifts from the issue → to the person

---

3️⃣ Insinuation Without Evidence

👉 Example:
“rolling dollars”, “money of unclear origin”

👉 Technique:

• strong imagery without concrete proof
• “where there’s smoke, there must be fire”

👉 Goal:
👉 create a sense of corruption

👉 Effect:
👉 the audience connects the dots in their head, even without evidence

---

4️⃣ Guilt by Association

👉 Example:
Bajnai Gordon, DatAdat, Action for Democracy

👉 Technique:

• linking multiple negatively framed actors
• implicit message: “they’re part of the same network”

👉 Goal:
👉 build the image of a large, suspicious system

👉 Effect:
👉 increased distrust → “something isn’t right”

---

5️⃣ Moral High Ground Framing

👉 Example:
“he should clean up his own house”

👉 Technique:

• moral judgment instead of political argument
• “we are clean, he is not”

👉 Goal:
👉 legitimize one’s own side

👉 Effect:
👉 emotional identification (“we are better”)

---

6️⃣ Repetition (reinforcement)

👉 Technique:

• repeating the same claims multiple times
  (foreign money, DatAdat, etc.)

👉 Goal:
👉 imprinting

👉 Effect:
👉 the audience starts treating it as a “fact”

---

⚠️ What Matters

This text is not trying to inform, but to:

• trigger emotions (disgust, anger)
• build an enemy image
• discredit a person, not an argument

And it worked → it triggered anger. That’s exactly the goal.

---

🧩 In Short

👉 This is a classic character attack + mockery + insinuation combo
👉 Zero concrete evidence, strong emotional imagery
👉 Not a debate → but emotional manipulation