alexa

We do not accept that Ukrainian services are trying to influence the Hungarian elections.
We call on Zelenskyy to recall his hounds! There will be no pro-Ukrainian government here.

Kyiv has turned Hungary into an operational field for intelligence services; Ukrainian agents are coming and going, infiltrating the Tisza Party and carrying out intelligence operations. We do not accept that Ukrainian manipulation should influence the outcome of the Hungarian elections. Show more respect for Hungary—we will decide for ourselves what kind of government we want.

The stakes of the election are whether Hungary will have a national government or a pro-Ukrainian one. If we end up with a pro-Ukrainian government, we will be dragged into the war and Hungarian families will be stripped of their money. If, however, we have a national government, we will say no to the war and protect Hungarians’ money.

We call on Zelenskyy to recall his hounds! There will be no pro-Ukrainian government here.

Good morning to everyone—except those who cozy up to Ukrainian and other intelligence services against the Hungarian people.

🧠 Quick Situation Overview

👉 Main narrative:

  • “Tisza = Ukrainian intelligence / foreign influence”
  • “Ukraine = threat + war + looting”
  • “We = national protection”
  • “Election = survival vs. betrayal”

👉 Underlying formula:

fear + external enemy + betrayal + existential stakes
→ “if you don’t vote for us, the country will be in danger”

🔍 Influence Techniques (in points)

1️⃣ Conspiracy framing

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukrainian spies are coming and going… they have infiltrated the Tisza Party”

👉 Technique:

  • specific but unproven claims
  • “intelligence services” = automatic escalation
  • reference to a closed, unverifiable system

👉 Goal:
👉 make it impossible to refute (“secret” → cannot be proven)

👉 Effect:
👉 paranoia + distrust toward the opponent

2️⃣ Enemy construction (external threat)

👉 Excerpt:
“Kyiv has turned Hungary into an operational field”

👉 Technique:

  • framing a country as an active aggressor
  • shifting from politics → to “intervention”

👉 Goal:
👉 elevate the conflict into an international threat

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is no longer politics → this is pre-war territory”

3️⃣ Dehumanizing language

👉 Excerpt:
“call back his hounds”

👉 Technique:

  • reducing the opponent to an animal level
  • emotional shock

👉 Goal:
👉 morally justify hostility

👉 Effect:
👉 increased aggression, reduced empathy

4️⃣ False causality (oversimplification)

👉 Excerpt:
“pro-Ukrainian government → dragged into war → families looted”

👉 Technique:

  • linear, simplified chain
  • no evidence, no alternatives

👉 Goal:
👉 force quick decision-making

👉 Effect:
👉 “if X happens, catastrophe is guaranteed”

5️⃣ False dichotomy

👉 Excerpt:
“national or pro-Ukrainian government”

👉 Technique:

  • only two options presented
  • no middle ground

👉 Goal:
👉 narrow thinking

👉 Effect:
👉 “if you’re not with us → you’re against us”

6️⃣ Fear framing (existential threat)

👉 Excerpt:
“they will drag us into war… loot Hungarian families”

👉 Technique:

  • personal level (family, money)
  • future threat

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger immediate emotional reaction

👉 Effect:
👉 rational evaluation shuts down

7️⃣ Repetition (propaganda reinforcement)

👉 Excerpt:
“We do not accept… We do not accept… We call on…”

👉 Technique:

  • repeating key phrases

👉 Goal:
👉 imprinting

👉 Effect:
👉 “it feels true because you hear it often”

8️⃣ “We decide” – sovereignty framing

👉 Excerpt:
“we will decide what kind of government we want”

👉 Technique:

  • positive framing (independence)
  • built on top of fear narrative

👉 Goal:
👉 legitimize the message

👉 Effect:
👉 harder to oppose (“who would be against sovereignty?”)

⚖️ Overall Picture (very important)

This message is not meant to inform, but to:

👉 create an emotional state:

  • fear
  • anger
  • distrust
  • “us vs. them”

👉 and force a decision:

“security = them
danger = everyone else”

🧩 What makes it especially strong

This is no longer simple campaigning, but:

  • intelligence conspiracy
  • external enemy
  • internal traitor
  • war-level threat

➡️ This is a classic full-spectrum propaganda package

🧠 Reality check (brief, objective)

  • claims of this magnitude require concrete evidence
  • “intelligence service” references are often unverifiable
  • the linear “they will drag us into war” logic → political oversimplification

🔚 In short

👉 This message is:

  • strongly fear-based
  • built on conspiracy framing
  • constructs an enemy image
  • and forces a binary choice