Yesterday, at one of Tisza’s events, one of their candidates literally attacked and locked in a car the person who tried to use a drone to show that the so-called “flood” was actually just drying up.
These are rather peculiar methods from the representatives of the supposedly “loving country of Tisza,” but what else can we expect from people who know only how to sneer and insult, while not being willing for a single moment to stand up for Hungarian interests?
In 16 days, on April 12, let us vote for love, choose the safe option, choose Fidesz!
The “loving country” of Tisza has now reached the point where, yesterday, one of their candidates attacked the person who tried to send up a drone at their event precisely in order to show how many Tisza supporters were actually there. They surrounded him and would not let him leave. I do not understand what the problem of the Tisza supporters is. Are they afraid that the photos will reveal that perhaps they are not as many as they like to claim? Are they afraid that it will become clear that more and more people are raising their voices and standing up against the blackmail, and against the foreign influence that Tisza, backed by the Ukrainians and Brussels, wants to impose here together until April 12?
Well, I think that the majority of people still want calm, sober, predictable, and safe leadership, and not madmen who are aggressive, who shout, and who physically abuse someone simply because that person thinks differently about the world than they do.
🧠 Quick Overview
👉 Main narrative:
“Tisza = violent, aggressive, dishonest”
“We (Fidesz) = calm, safety, love”
“Election = safety vs. danger”
👉 Underlying formula:
fear + anger + enemy construction + moral superiority
→ “don’t think, just reject them”
🔍 Manipulation Techniques (in points)
1️⃣ Amplifying a single case (generalization)
👉 Excerpt:
“one of their candidates attacked…”
👉 Technique:
a single (unproven / decontextualized) incident
→ projected onto the entire group
👉 Goal:
👉 “they are all like this”
👉 Effect:
👉 distorted perception → sense of collective guilt
2️⃣ Dramatization of violence
👉 Excerpt:
“attacked and locked him in a car”
👉 Technique:
strong, shocking wording
no evidence, no details
👉 Goal:
👉 trigger emotional shock
👉 Effect:
👉 fear + disgust → rational thinking shuts down
3️⃣ Demonization of the opponent
👉 Excerpt:
“they can only snarl and insult”
“crazy, aggressive”
👉 Technique:
dehumanizing labels
moral degradation
👉 Goal:
👉 not a political opponent → but a “dangerous group”
👉 Effect:
👉 increased hatred and rejection
4️⃣ “We = good, they = bad” (false dichotomy)
👉 Excerpt:
“let’s vote for love… choose the safe option”
👉 Technique:
artificial choice:
- one side = love
- the other = violence
👉 Goal:
👉 eliminate middle-ground options
👉 Effect:
👉 oversimplified worldview → easier manipulation
5️⃣ Fear framing + security framing
👉 Excerpt:
“safe leadership vs. lunatics”
👉 Technique:
election framed as a question of physical safety
👉 Goal:
👉 not a political decision → but self-defense
👉 Effect:
👉 instinctive reaction (avoid “danger”)
6️⃣ Attribution of intent (mind reading)
👉 Excerpt:
“they are afraid it will be revealed…”
“they won’t let him go…”
👉 Technique:
assigning motives without evidence
👉 Goal:
👉 discredit the opponent
👉 Effect:
👉 reader treats assumptions as facts
7️⃣ Conspiracy framing
👉 Excerpt:
“together with Ukrainians and Brussels”
👉 Technique:
involving foreign actors
“hidden power” narrative
👉 Goal:
👉 create a sense of betrayal
👉 Effect:
👉 strong emotional reaction (anger + distrust)
8️⃣ Repetition (core propaganda technique)
👉 the same story told twice
👉 Technique:
repetition = illusion of truth
👉 Effect:
👉 “if I hear it often → it must be true”
⚠️ Why it feels disgusting
Not by accident:
👉 because the text:
doesn’t inform → it agitates
doesn’t prove → it asserts
doesn’t nuance → it builds a black-and-white world
👉 and meanwhile:
generates anger
creates fear
manufactures an enemy
This combination creates strong psychological pressure → that’s why you feel that “nausea”.
🧩 In short (essence)
👉 This is not information, but:
- emotional manipulation
- enemy construction
- fear-based mobilization
👉 goal:
to extract votes through emotional reaction, not rational decision-making