👉 Anyone who thinks that the Tisza party would at least stand with Hungarians in the current tense geopolitical situation is greatly mistaken. In one and a half minutes, here is how Tisza and Brussels are working together.

And anyone who thinks that the Tisza party might come to its senses in this current situation — or if not come to its senses, then at least have a little Hungarian blood flowing in its veins — must unfortunately be disillusioned. Nothing can be expected from them that would place Hungarian interests ahead of all other interests.

In the European Parliament there was a proposal stating that all European countries should move away from all forms of Russian energy as soon as possible. From everything: oil, gas, and even the fuel elements necessary for operating the Paks nuclear power plant would be affected.

The representative of Péter Magyar voted in favor of this proposal together with all the other members of the European People’s Party. His name is clearly there, black and white, next to the vote and the proposal.

So they are continuing to work and lobby for Hungary to abandon Russian energy — energy that currently allows Hungarian families to benefit from reduced utility costs and allows the economy to function in a predictable way.

They oppose this. If Hungary were to do this immediately, fuel prices would instantly skyrocket, and household energy costs would also rise sharply. But that seems to concern them very little. Most likely their own political standing would rise in parallel, and they would receive approval and praise from Brussels and Ukraine.

It appears that this matters more to them than whether it is good or bad for the Hungarian people.

1️⃣ Enemy Construction

Excerpt

“about the cooperation between Tisza and Brussels”
“nothing can be expected from them that would stand up for Hungarian interests”

Technique

The communication divides the political space into two sides:

“we” → Hungarians / Hungarian interests
“they” → Tisza + Brussels

The Tisza party is not presented as a legitimate political opponent but as an actor serving external interests.

Goal

• delegitimize the opponent
• suggest that the political opponent does not represent their own country

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ there is a political camp cooperating with external forces
➡️ which works against Hungarian interests.

---

2️⃣ Patriotic Framing

Excerpt

“at least a little Hungarian blood should flow in their veins”

Technique

The political debate is framed not as a policy disagreement, but as a question of national loyalty.

The implied logic:

• those who disagree with the government
• are not truly Hungarian.

Goal

• trigger an emotional reaction
• morally discredit the political opponent

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ the debate is not political, but a question of patriotism.

---

3️⃣ Economic Fear Framing

Excerpt

“fuel prices would immediately skyrocket”
“utility costs would immediately explode”

Technique

The text links a political decision directly to personal financial loss.

The communication uses a simplified causal chain:

EU decision
→ end of Russian energy
→ drastic rise in fuel and utility prices.

Goal

• create economic fear
• mobilize voters.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ the political opponent directly threatens people’s livelihood.

---

4️⃣ Scapegoating

Excerpt

“they continue to work to make Hungary abandon Russian energy”

Technique

A complex geopolitical and economic issue (energy dependence) is attributed to a specific political group.

Goal

• identify a clear culprit
• simplify a complicated issue.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ the problems are caused by a specific political actor.

---

5️⃣ Foreign Approval Framing

Excerpt

“they would receive pats on the head from Brussels and Ukraine”

Technique

The communication suggests that the political opponent:

• acts in order to gain foreign approval
• rather than acting in the interest of their own country.

Goal

• undermine the opponent’s credibility
• reinforce the narrative of serving foreign interests.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ the political opponent works for foreign support and recognition.

---

6️⃣ Oversimplified Causality

Excerpt

“if we did this, prices would immediately skyrocket”

Technique

A complex energy policy issue is reduced to a single direct consequence.

In reality, energy transitions are:

• long-term processes
• influenced by multiple market factors.

Goal

• create an easily understandable narrative
• trigger a quick emotional reaction.

Effect

For the reader, the issue becomes a simple and clear choice.

---

✅ Summary

The main communication techniques used in the text are:

• enemy construction
• patriotic emotional framing
• economic fear messaging
• scapegoating
• foreign influence narrative
• simplified cause-and-effect logic

These are classic political mobilization propaganda techniques, aimed at strengthening emotional identification with one side while weakening the credibility of the political opponent.

🟠 Let’s meet on March 15 at the largest Peace March ever! It will be the biggest if everyone brings as many people as possible – and I will do the same.

In such a tense geopolitical situation as the current one, we must stand together to defend Hungary’s peace. When Zelensky allegedly issues life-threatening threats against the Hungarian prime minister, when Ukrainians are said to be blackmailing us by refusing to reopen the Druzhba pipeline, and when they are accused of cooperating with the Tisza Party to bring a pro-Ukrainian government to power in Hungary, we cannot remain silent.

👥 Everyone who wants Hungary to remain a free and sovereign country should be at the Peace March — with a national government that represents Hungarian interests.

Let us be as many as possible and show that Fidesz is the only reliable choice!

How many people will you bring with you to the Peace March?

A lot. And I ask everyone to bring as many people as they can — not just one, but as many as possible. We want this to be the biggest Peace March ever.

And the name itself is great, isn’t it? That we stand together for peace — something that is urgently needed in the current situation.

We see that Ukrainians do not hesitate to issue life-threatening threats against the Hungarian prime minister. They shut down the oil pipeline and support Péter Magyar because they want a pro-Ukrainian government in Hungary.

But those who stand on the side of freedom, those who want Hungary to have a sovereign government that protects Hungarian interests — their place is at the Peace March.

This weekend, let’s gather in as great numbers as possible at the Peace March.

1️⃣ Mass Mobilization Narrative (mass mobilization framing)

Excerpt

“Let’s meet on March 15 at the largest Peace March ever!”

Technique

The text frames a political event as a historically significant moment:

• “the largest ever”
• “everyone should bring as many people as possible”

This is a classic mass-mobilization rhetorical strategy.

Goal

• attract as many participants as possible
• demonstrate political strength
• activate supporters

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ “a historic moment is happening”
➡️ “I should be there too.”

---

2️⃣ Fear-based geopolitical narrative (threat framing)

Excerpt

“a tense geopolitical situation”
“Zelensky has issued a death threat against the Hungarian prime minister”

Technique

The text portrays the political conflict as a security threat.

Key elements:

• war-like atmosphere
• reference to personal danger
• presence of an external enemy

Goal

• trigger an emotional reaction
• frame the political issue as a national security matter

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ Hungary is in danger
➡️ therefore strong leadership is needed.

---

3️⃣ Construction of an external enemy (external enemy construction)

Excerpt

“the Ukrainians are blackmailing us”
“they refuse to reopen the Druzhba pipeline”

Technique

A foreign country is portrayed as a hostile actor.

According to the narrative, Ukraine:

• threatens
• blackmails
• interferes in Hungarian politics.

Goal

➡️ create national unity
➡️ present the conflict as originating from external pressure.

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ Hungary is under external pressure.

---

4️⃣ Creation of an internal enemy (internal enemy framing)

Excerpt

“they are collaborating with the Tisza Party”

Technique

The political opponent is portrayed as serving foreign interests.

This follows a classic propaganda structure:

external enemy + internal traitor.

Goal

• delegitimize the political opponent
• turn political competition into a moral conflict

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ the opposition does not represent national interests.

---

5️⃣ False dilemma (false dichotomy)

Excerpt

“only Fidesz is the safe choice”

Technique

The political choice is reduced to two options:

• Fidesz = security and sovereignty
• others = danger

Goal

➡️ create a simplified decision framework.

Effect

For the reader, the political choice becomes:

➡️ “either with us or against us.”

---

6️⃣ Mobilizing national identity (patriotic framing)

Excerpt

“so that Hungary remains a free and sovereign country”

Technique

Political support is framed as a patriotic duty.

Key concepts:

• freedom
• sovereignty
• national government

Goal

➡️ trigger emotional identification.

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ participating in the event is a patriotic act.

---

7️⃣ Repetition and crowd psychology (repetition & bandwagon)

Excerpt

“let’s be as many as possible”
“everyone should bring as many people as possible”

Technique

The text repeatedly emphasizes the importance of large numbers.

This is the classic bandwagon effect:

“everyone will be there.”

Goal

➡️ create social pressure.

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ if they do not attend, they will miss out.

---

Brief overall picture

The text represents a classic political mobilization narrative.

Its main structure:

1️⃣ external threat (Ukraine)
2️⃣ internal enemy (the opposition)
3️⃣ national defense (Fidesz)
4️⃣ mass mobilization (Peace March)

This framework relies primarily on emotional and identity-based political mobilization.

❌ Those who don’t march in step won’t get euros by evening.

The Croatian prime minister — a European People’s Party ally of Péter Magyar — has just reintroduced conscription. Today, hundreds of young Croatians began their military service, which will last for several months.

The same thing is happening in Germany and Poland, where similar measures are being introduced and where young people are holding large demonstrations against them.

🗣 But this does not concern the pro-war politicians.

This is what is expected within the European People’s Party, this is Manfred Weber’s dream. This is also what Romulusz Ruszin-Szendi has repeatedly promised to Hungarian youth.

🚨 If Tisza comes to power, conscription will come as well, because Péter Magyar cannot say no to Brussels’ war demands.

“Those who don’t march in step won’t get euros by evening.”
That is what Péter Magyar’s European People’s Party ally could have said, because the Croatian prime minister has now introduced conscription, the result of which is that Croatian young people have already begun their several-month military service.

And it’s not only Croatia. Everywhere where there is a Brussels-friendly government, something similar is happening. Just look at Poland or Germany, where young Germans are even taking to the streets to protest against conscription.

We do not want this. We do not want conscription.

But Romulusz Ruszin-Szendi has already said that if they come to power, then if necessary everyone will be pulled into the army.

This is what can be expected from pro-war leaders in Europe, and this would also be our fate if a pro-war Tisza government were to lead Hungary.

We will not allow this.
That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice.

1️⃣ Fear Framing

Excerpt

“If TISZA comes, conscription will come as well.”

Technique

The text activates a very strong personal fear:

➡️ compulsory military service
➡️ young people being “dragged” into the army

This is one of the strongest political fears in Europe.

Goal

• to frighten young people and parents
• to trigger an emotional reaction

Effect

The reader may develop the feeling:

➡️ “If we vote the wrong way, young people will be taken into the army.”

---

2️⃣ False Causality

Excerpt

“If TISZA comes, conscription will come as well.”

Technique

The text automatically links two things together, even though there is no evidence that they are connected.

Logical chain presented in the text:

European People’s Party → TISZA → conscription

In reality:

• there is no EU rule requiring conscription
• each country decides independently about its military system.

Goal

A simple political message:

➡️ “If they come to power → there will be trouble.”

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ a political change represents a direct danger.

---

3️⃣ Puppet Framing (External Control Narrative)

Excerpt

“Péter Magyar cannot say no to Brussels’ demands.”

Technique

The political opponent is portrayed as someone who:

➡️ is not independent
➡️ is controlled by Brussels

This is a classic sovereignty narrative.

Goal

• to weaken the legitimacy of the opponent
• to mobilize national sentiment

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ the opponent serves foreign interests.

---

4️⃣ Enemy Construction

Excerpt

“pro-war politicians”

Technique

A political bloc is described using a single negative label.

Instead of individual actors, the text presents one homogeneous group:

• Brussels
• the European People’s Party
• TISZA
• “pro-war leaders”

Goal

Create a clear political divide:

WE vs THEM
peace vs war

Effect

The reader may more easily identify with the “home side”.

---

5️⃣ Overgeneralization from Examples

Excerpt

“everywhere where there is a Brussels-friendly government, similar things are happening”

Technique

Examples from a few countries are used to present a general European trend.

In reality:

• each country decides on military policy for different reasons
• many EU member states do not have conscription.

Goal

Build the narrative:

➡️ “Europe is becoming militarized.”

---

6️⃣ Authority Framing

Excerpt

“Ruszin-Szendi promised it…”

Technique

A statement by a single person is framed as if it were a confirmed political plan.

Goal

Make the message appear more credible.

---

7️⃣ Final Political Mobilization

Excerpt

“only Fidesz is the safe choice”

Technique

The text ends with a classic campaign structure:

danger → fear → solution

The “solution,” of course, is the political party being promoted.

---

The Actual Structure of the Text

1️⃣ building fear
2️⃣ presenting an external enemy
3️⃣ demonizing the opponent
4️⃣ projecting a future threat
5️⃣ offering a political solution

This is a classic campaign communication template.

---

💡 Why it may feel nauseating

Probably because:

• it relies on strong emotional manipulation
• the narrative is highly simplified
• there is no real fact-based debate

This type of text is typically not informational content, but mobilizing propaganda.

LOOK AT THIS! Ukrainians already want to attack Hungary!

There is always a new low. Another Ukrainian threat has been made against Hungary. According to Ukrainian influencer Volodymyr Petrov, Ukraine’s president could launch an attack against Hungary at any time.

He stated: “If Zelensky decides tomorrow to start a war against Hungary, I will support it with both hands.”

The wave of hatred directed at Hungary from Ukraine is astonishing. While they are knocking on the door of the EU, seeking membership and demanding money, threats are arriving almost daily. Most recently, Zelensky even issued a death threat against Viktor Orbán.

At the same time, they continue to blackmail Hungary by refusing to reopen the Druzhba oil pipeline, even though we know very well that there is no technical obstacle to doing so.

Meanwhile, Péter Magyar may try to pretend otherwise, but from his earlier statements and telling silence we know exactly that he wants to represent Ukrainian interests. He would let them join the EU by 2027 and would send them money and weapons to continue the war.

As long as there is a national government, this cannot happen. We will not give in to Ukrainian blackmail, we will defend Hungary’s sovereignty, and we will continue to follow the path of peace.

That is why Fidesz is the only reliable choice.

1️⃣ Construction of a Threat Narrative (Threat Amplification)

Excerpt

“The Ukrainians already want to attack Hungary!”
“A new Ukrainian threat against Hungary has emerged.”

Technique

An individual opinion (a statement by an influencer) is framed as if it were:

• the official position of Ukraine, or
• a real military threat.

Expressions such as “attack,” “threat,” and “tsunami of hatred” suggest a serious security danger.

Objective

• to create a sense of fear
• to mobilize voters
• to frame a political conflict as a security issue

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ Hungary is under threat from an external attack
➡️ therefore strong leadership is needed.

---

2️⃣ Generalization of an Individual Statement (Overgeneralization)

Excerpt

“According to Ukrainian influencer Volodymyr Petrov…”

followed by

“The Ukrainians already want to attack Hungary.”

Technique

The opinion of one influencer is presented as if it reflected the intentions of an entire country.

This represents a logical leap:

one influencer → the whole of Ukraine

Objective

to portray the opponent as a collective enemy.

Effect

The reader no longer sees an individual speaker, but rather:

➡️ “the Ukrainians” as a whole.

---

3️⃣ Construction of an Enemy Image (Enemy Construction)

The text connects several actors into a single hostile bloc:

• Ukraine
• Zelensky
• Péter Magyar
• EU accession
• arms shipments

Technique

The communication creates one unified political enemy camp:

Ukraine + opposition + EU

Objective

to create a clear “us vs. them” division.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ a coordinated political bloc is working against Hungary.

---

4️⃣ Emotional Escalation

Excerpt

“a tsunami of hatred”

Technique

A highly emotional expression that evokes:

• anger
• a sense of threat
• a feeling of injustice.

Objective

to provoke an emotional reaction instead of rational evaluation.

---

5️⃣ Political Association Framing

Excerpt

“Péter Magyar … wants to represent Ukrainian interests.”

Technique

The text links a Hungarian politician to the interests of a foreign state without presenting evidence.

Objective

to delegitimize the political opponent.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ the opposition is working against national interests.

---

6️⃣ Binary Political Choice (False Dilemma)

Excerpt

“Therefore Fidesz is the only safe choice.”

Technique

The political field is simplified into two options:

Fidesz = security and peace
everyone else = danger

Objective

to turn the election into a moral decision rather than a political debate.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ there is only one “safe” political choice.

---

7️⃣ Lack of Concrete Evidence

The text contains no:

• official Ukrainian statements
• military threats
• NATO or EU reactions
• verifiable sources.

The narrative is built around a single influencer’s statement.

---

Summary

The communication structure of the text follows this pattern:

1. Construction of an external threat
2. Amplification of an individual statement
3. Creation of an enemy bloc
4. Emotional mobilization
5. Linking the opposition to the threat
6. Political conclusion: there is only one “safe” choice

This is a classic campaign communication model in which:

• security threats
• geopolitics
• energy issues
• national sovereignty

are combined with electoral mobilization.

In the coming days, fuel prices will rise sharply across Europe, which is why the government decided at today’s meeting to introduce a protected price for fuel starting tomorrow.

While Viktor Orbán is taking action, the leader of the left continues his hypocritical political theater.

It is worth remembering that Péter Magyar and his representatives in Brussels have already voted at least six times to ban cheap Russian oil and gas, thereby—hand in hand with Kyiv—risking the energy security of Hungarian families.

They are also the ones who quietly support Zelensky’s oil blockade, and who constantly lobby against Hungary’s utility price reduction policy.

It is crystal clear that everything TISZA has voted for in Brussels so far has served Ukrainian interests without exception, because they simply cannot say no to the instructions they receive.

The national government will continue—both before and after April—to protect Hungarian pensioners, farmers, families, and young people from the TISZA party’s austerity package and from the Ukrainian oil blockade, because Hungary comes first for us.

These are the reasons why fuel prices are rising across Europe.

So what has the government done in response? It has now introduced protected fuel prices.

The truth is that Hungary would be in a much better situation if Zelensky and the TISZA party had not decided—almost as if it were a game—to shut down the Druzhba pipeline. But even so, there is no cause for concern, because Hungary has a government that is capable of thinking ahead.

We have strategic reserves, which we have already begun to release. Therefore, there will be no supply shortages, and there will be enough gasoline and diesel everywhere.

However, it must be clearly seen that what the TISZA party represents—namely abandoning Russian energy sources—is a very problematic idea, because many European countries are already suffering from supply problems due to the war in the Middle East. And this is not only true for oil, but also for gas—though we won’t go into that now.

The key point is that Viktor Orbán once again did what the Hungarian people need. We will protect Hungarian businesses, Hungarian families, and those working with agricultural machinery. Every Hungarian citizen can continue to rely on us.

1️⃣ Enemy Construction

Excerpt

“the leader of the left”
“TISZA’s austerity package”
“they voted in Brussels to ban cheap Russian oil and gas”

Technique

The political opponent is presented as a single, negative group:

➡️ “the left”
➡️ “TISZA”
➡️ “Brussels”

The communication does not discuss different viewpoints or political debates, but instead portrays a unified hostile bloc.

Goal

➡️ to create a clear “us vs. them” division
➡️ to delegitimize the political opponent

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ there is a political camp working against Hungarian interests.

---

2️⃣ External Enemy and Geopolitical Threat (external threat framing)

Excerpt

“in cooperation with Kyiv”
“Zelensky’s oil blockade”
“Brussels representatives”

Technique

The political conflict is framed by introducing external actors:

➡️ Ukraine
➡️ Zelensky
➡️ Brussels

These actors appear in the text as forces acting against Hungary.

Goal

➡️ to create a sense of danger
➡️ to justify government measures

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ Hungary is under external pressure
➡️ therefore strong government action is necessary.

---

3️⃣ Causal Simplification

Excerpt

“this is why fuel prices are rising across Europe”

Technique

The text links the rise in fuel prices to a few specific political decisions:

➡️ the Ukrainian “oil blockade”
➡️ TISZA votes
➡️ decisions made in Brussels

In reality, oil prices are influenced by many factors:

• global supply and demand
• OPEC decisions
• geopolitical conflicts
• transportation routes
• speculation on futures markets

Goal

➡️ to transform a complex economic phenomenon into a simple political narrative.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ there are clear political actors responsible for rising energy prices.

---

4️⃣ Strong Leader Framing

Excerpt

“While Viktor Orbán takes action…”
“the government introduces protected fuel prices”

Technique

The communication presents the prime minister as an active and decisive leader.

The framing is:

➡️ Orbán Viktor = acting, protecting
➡️ opposition = hypocrisy, political theatre

Goal

➡️ to emphasize leadership competence
➡️ to strengthen political trust

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ the government is capable of protecting the country during a crisis.

---

5️⃣ National Protection Narrative (national protection framing)

Excerpt

“we will protect Hungarian pensioners, farmers and families”

Technique

Government measures are presented as acts of national protection.

Key phrases include:

“we will protect”
“Hungarian families”
“Hungary comes first”

Goal

➡️ to create emotional identification
➡️ to legitimize government decisions

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ political decisions directly protect their personal security and livelihood.

---

6️⃣ Moral Framing / Moral Superiority

Excerpt

“for us, Hungary comes first”

Technique

The political position is framed as a moral category.

The narrative becomes:

➡️ government = Hungary’s interests
➡️ opposition = foreign interests

Goal

➡️ to elevate the political debate to a moral level.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ those who oppose the government are not representing national interests.

---

✅ Summary

The text uses several classic political communication techniques:

• enemy construction
• external threat framing
• causal simplification
• strong leader framing
• national protection narrative

Together, these techniques create a narrative in which:

➡️ external and internal enemies threaten the country,
➡️ while the government acts as the defender of Hungarian citizens.