alexa

👉 Well, here is the reality: because of the Ukrainian oil blockade and the war in the Middle East, crude oil prices have shot up to record levels. And when energy becomes more expensive, everything becomes more expensive.

According to Viktor Orbán, two things are needed now.

The first: the Brussels sanctions banning Russian energy must be suspended.
The second: we must prevent prices from rising to unbearable levels.

The government will hold a meeting this afternoon, and decisions are expected. We will not allow Hungarian families to suffer the consequences of Kyiv’s political blackmail.

And let’s say it clearly:
whoever supports Ukraine’s war efforts,
whoever supports energy sanctions,
whoever supports cutting Europe off from Russian energy,
and whoever supports Zelensky’s oil blockade — is politically responsible for rising fuel and energy prices.

Péter Magyar would do better to remain silent for now and let the national government do its job.

The reality has caught up with us: because of the Ukrainian oil blockade and the war in the Middle East, energy prices have skyrocketed. Viktor Orbán said that in a situation like this two things are necessary. First, sanctions against Russia in Europe must be lifted immediately. Second, the rise in prices must be curbed, because rising crude oil prices inevitably cause price increases everywhere.

As for Péter Magyar, he should stop pretending to be innocent and remain silent after the Tisza Party supported cutting Hungary off from all Russian energy sources and supports Ukraine’s war efforts. They did not speak out for weeks when the Ukrainians blocked the oil supply. From this point on, they clearly stand on Zelensky’s side, so Péter Magyar would do better to stay quiet in this situation.

1️⃣ Causal Simplification

Excerpt

“the Ukrainian oil blockade and the Middle Eastern war – oil prices have shot up to record highs”

Technique

The text reduces a highly complex global energy-market process to two specific causes:

  • the Ukrainian “oil blockade”
  • the war in the Middle East

In reality, oil prices are influenced by many factors, such as:

  • global supply and demand
  • OPEC decisions
  • speculation on futures markets
  • refinery capacity
  • transportation routes
  • strategic reserves

Goal

➡️ To transform a complex economic phenomenon into a simple political narrative.

Effect

Readers may feel that:

➡️ the rise in energy prices has a clear political cause and a clear party responsible.


2️⃣ External Scapegoating

Excerpt

“Kyiv’s political blackmail”
“Zelensky’s oil blockade”

Technique

The communication assigns responsibility for economic problems to an external actor.

Key words

  • blackmail
  • blockade
  • Kyiv
  • Zelensky

Goal

➡️ To link economic tensions to an external political actor.

Effect

Readers may develop the perception that:

➡️ Hungary is the victim of an external attack or pressure.


3️⃣ Domestic Scapegoating

Excerpt

“whoever supports energy sanctions … is politically responsible for rising energy prices”

Technique

The communication links economic problems to domestic political opponents.

Specific actors

  • Péter Magyar
  • the Tisza Party

Goal

➡️ To transform economic consequences into political responsibility.

Effect

Readers may feel that:

➡️ the opposition is directly responsible for rising prices.


4️⃣ “Us vs. Them” Political Polarization

Excerpt

“let the national government do its job”
“they stand on Zelensky’s side”

Technique

The communication divides the political landscape into two camps.

“Us”

  • the national government
  • protection of Hungarian families

“Them”

  • Zelensky
  • the opposition
  • politicians supporting sanctions

Goal

➡️ To create a strong political dividing line.

Effect

Readers may feel that:

➡️ they must choose between two opposing camps.


5️⃣ Economic Fear Framing

Excerpt

“if energy becomes more expensive, everything becomes more expensive”
“prices will rise to unbearable levels”

Technique

The communication appeals to everyday economic fears:

  • fuel prices
  • household utility costs
  • inflation

Goal

➡️ To provoke an emotional reaction among voters.

Effect

Readers may feel that:

➡️ the situation directly threatens their family budget.


6️⃣ Political Delegitimization

Excerpt

“Péter Magyar would do better to stay silent now”

Technique

Instead of debating the opponent’s arguments, the message undermines their legitimacy.

Rather than presenting arguments, it uses:

  • personal criticism
  • calls for silence

Goal

➡️ To weaken the political credibility of the opponent.

Effect

Readers may feel that:

➡️ the opponent is not a legitimate participant in the debate.


✅ Summary

The text combines several classic political communication techniques:

  • causal simplification
  • external scapegoating
  • domestic scapegoating
  • “us vs. them” polarization
  • fear-based economic framing
  • delegitimization of the opponent

Together, these elements create a strongly mobilizing campaign communication framework, in which economic problems are transformed into political responsibility and blame.

alexa

👉 This Sunday will be the largest Peace March ever — but we need you there too!

In recent weeks, Hungary’s sovereignty has come under serious attack when the President of Ukraine tried to blackmail and threaten our country. We cannot allow foreign interests to decide for us about war, energy, or how the Hungarian people’s money should be spent!

Let’s gather in large numbers at the Peace March and show that Hungary cannot be blackmailed and that we will not be dragged into a war.

🟠 Let’s meet on March 15 and stand up for Hungary!

This week the largest Peace March ever will take place, but for it to truly become the biggest, it is also necessary that you are there as well.

1️⃣ External Threat Framing

Excerpt

“a serious attack has hit Hungary’s sovereignty”

“the President of Ukraine has blackmailed and threatened our country”

Technique

The communication portrays an external political actor as a direct threat to Hungary.

Key words in the text:

  • attack
  • blackmail
  • threat
  • sovereignty

These are expressions that strongly activate security and defensive instincts.

Goal

➡️ create a sense of danger
➡️ justify political mobilization

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ Hungary has been attacked
➡️ therefore people must close ranks and stand together


2️⃣ Patriotic Mobilization

Excerpt

“let us stand up for Hungary”

“let us show”

“let us be as many as possible”

Technique

The text calls for collective action and frames participation as a patriotic duty.

The “we” form dominates throughout:

  • let us show
  • let us stand up
  • let us be

This is classic movement-style language.

Goal

➡️ increase mass participation
➡️ turn the political event into a demonstration of collective strength

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ if they do not attend, they are missing a national stand or national moment.


3️⃣ Moral Framing

Excerpt

“we cannot allow foreign interests to decide for us”

Technique

The political debate is turned into a moral dilemma.

Two sides are presented:

  • Hungary’s interests
  • foreign interests

The middle ground disappears.

Goal

➡️ simplify a complex political conflict
➡️ frame participation as a moral choice

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ anyone who does not support this position may be standing with foreign interests.


4️⃣ Fear Framing

Excerpt

“we will not be dragged into the war”

Technique

The communication implicitly introduces the threat of war.

It does not explicitly claim that war will happen, but suggests that:

➡️ someone wants to drag Hungary into it.

Goal

➡️ evoke fear
➡️ present the political position as a defensive reaction

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ participation helps protect peace.


5️⃣ Symbolic Timing (Historical Symbolism)

Excerpt

“Let’s meet on March 15”

Technique

The event is linked to a powerful historical symbol.

March 15 in Hungary symbolizes:

  • freedom
  • revolution
  • national independence

Goal

➡️ present the event as historically significant

Effect

The gathering appears not simply as a political demonstration, but as:

➡️ a national stand.


Summary

The text combines several classic political communication techniques:

  • external threat framing
  • patriotic mobilization
  • moral framing
  • fear framing
  • historical symbolism

Together these create strong emotional mobilization, framing participation as a patriotic duty and national

alexa

For five years we have been saying: if Brussels bans cheap and predictable Russian energy from the European market, it is taking a huge risk and ultimately digging a hole beneath itself. Unfortunately, this is exactly what is happening now — with the vote of the Tisza Party.

The war in the Middle East is becoming increasingly severe, airstrikes are intensifying, and the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz is also a serious concern. This is the maritime route through which roughly one third of the world’s seaborne oil shipments and about one fifth of global natural gas shipments pass. Any disruption here would shake the entire global energy market.

However, Europe’s situation is even more difficult. While the Middle Eastern conflict is already reducing the amount of oil and gas reaching global markets, the European Union has previously made a political decision to exclude a significant portion of Russian energy resources as well. As a result, the European market is now facing a tightening of supply from two directions at the same time.

And we know exactly what this means: when there is less of something, it becomes more expensive. Rising energy prices then push up the prices of everything else.

That is why Brussels should now focus on reality instead of ideological debates. In the interest of the European economy and European citizens, immediate steps are needed, and the bans on Russian energy resources should be lifted. If this does not happen, Europe could face dramatic price increases and serious economic damage.

We understand that admitting such a fatal mistake may be difficult. But it is time for Ursula von der Leyen and Manfred Weber to set aside their arrogance and finally put the interests of European citizens first. The same applies to the Tisza Party, whose representatives in Brussels have voted six times against Russian energy — most recently two weeks ago, when a representative of Péter Magyar voted to accelerate the exclusion of Russian energy from Europe.

Energy security is not an ideological issue — it is the foundation of the everyday livelihood of European families and businesses.

This is the principle we act on. That is why Fidesz and Viktor Orbán remain the safe choice.

1️⃣ Causal simplification

Excerpt

“If Brussels bans cheap Russian energy… energy prices will rise.”

Technique

A highly complex global energy-market process is reduced to a single political decision.

In reality, prices are shaped by many factors:

  • global supply and demand
  • OPEC decisions
  • geopolitical conflicts
  • market speculation
  • the LNG market
  • transportation routes
  • refining capacity

However, the communication highlights only one cause:

➡️ “Brussels banned Russian energy.”

Goal

To provide a simple explanation for a complex economic process.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ “there is a clear culprit behind rising energy prices.”


2️⃣ External scapegoating

Excerpt

“Brussels’ ideological decision”
“Ursula von der Leyen and Manfred Weber”

Technique

Responsibility is shifted to external actors:

  • Brussels
  • EU leaders

This is a classic political strategy:

➡️ presenting the problem as caused by an external power.

Goal

To reduce the perceived responsibility of domestic political actors.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ “this is not the fault of domestic politics.”


3️⃣ Linking the political opponent to an external decision (association framing)

Excerpt

“with the vote of the Tisza Party”

Technique

An EU-level decision is linked to a domestic political party.

The narrative becomes:

Brussels’ decision

Tisza’s support

rising energy prices

Goal

To present the domestic political opponent as directly responsible.

Effect

The reader may conclude that:

➡️ “if Tisza were in power, energy would be even more expensive.”


4️⃣ Crisis framing

Excerpt

“dramatic risk”
“dramatic price increases”
“serious economic damage”

Technique

The situation is presented as a severe crisis.

Rhetorical elements include:

  • dramatic
  • severe
  • risk
  • shaking the world

Goal

To trigger a strong emotional reaction.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ immediate political action is necessary.


5️⃣ Appeal to authority + moral framing

Excerpt

“We act in the interest of European families.”

Technique

The political position is elevated into a moral category.

Narrative structure:

  • us = protecting families
  • opponents = ideology

Goal

To transform a political debate into a moral choice.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ anyone opposing this stance is acting against families.


6️⃣ Use of a simple economic rule as rhetoric

Excerpt

“if there is less of something, it becomes more expensive”

Technique

A simple economic principle is used to justify the entire narrative.

This is rhetorically effective because it is:

  • intuitive
  • easy to understand
  • difficult to challenge in debate

In reality, the energy market is far more complex due to:

  • long-term contracts
  • strategic reserves
  • price caps
  • alternative supply sources

Goal

To make the political message appear logical and self-evident.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ “this is completely obvious.”


7️⃣ Campaign closure message

Excerpt

“That is why Fidesz and Viktor Orbán are the safe choice!”

Technique

At the end of a geopolitical explanation, a campaign conclusion appears.

Structure:

crisis

responsible actors

solution

vote

Goal

To convert economic fear into political support.

Effect

In the reader’s mind, the following association may emerge:

➡️ stability = government
➡️ uncertainty = opposition


Summary

The main communication structure of the text is:

1️⃣ presenting a crisis
2️⃣ identifying an external culprit (Brussels)
3️⃣ linking the domestic opponent to that culprit
4️⃣ amplifying economic fear
5️⃣ offering a political solution

This follows the classic campaign narrative:

crisis → scapegoat → savior.

balazska

Because of the Zelensky–Magyar Péter oil blockade and the Iranian crisis, global oil prices have surged. The government is holding an extraordinary meeting ❗️

Important news: the government will hold an extraordinary meeting on Monday afternoon because global oil prices have surged due to the Ukrainian oil blockade — the Zelensky–Magyar Péter oil blockade — and the Iranian crisis. This will certainly have, or may have, an impact on domestic fuel prices as well. The government needs to make an important decision on this matter. It is worth following.

1️⃣ Causal simplification

Excerpt

“Because of the Zelensky–Péter Magyar oil blockade and the Iranian crisis, the price of crude oil has skyrocketed.”

Technique

The text links a complex global market process to two specific actors:

  • Zelensky
  • Péter Magyar

In reality, oil prices are influenced by many factors:

  • global supply and demand
  • OPEC decisions
  • tensions in the Middle East
  • shipping and transport routes
  • market speculation

Goal

➡️ To turn a complex economic process into a matter of political responsibility.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ “someone specific is responsible for fuel becoming more expensive.”


2️⃣ Political association (association framing)

Excerpt

“the Zelensky–Péter Magyar oil blockade”

Technique

Two actors are linked together in a joint action, even if:

  • there is no proven joint decision
  • there is no proven coordination

This is a classic campaign communication tool.

Goal

➡️ To connect a domestic political actor to an external conflict.

Effect

In the reader’s mind it may create the impression that:

➡️ “Péter Magyar serves foreign interests.”


3️⃣ Crisis framing

Key phrases

  • “the price of crude oil has skyrocketed”
  • “extraordinary government meeting”
  • “important decision”

Technique

The text creates a sense of urgency and crisis.

Goal

➡️ To present the government’s reaction as crisis management.

Effect

The reader may perceive that:

➡️ “there is a serious danger and immediate decisions are needed.”


4️⃣ External threat framing

The communication constructs a picture of external pressure:

  • Ukraine (oil blockade)
  • Iran (crisis)

Goal

➡️ To present the economic problem as the result of external forces.


5️⃣ Message repetition (reinforcement)

The text repeats twice:

“the government is holding an extraordinary meeting”

This is a deliberate communication technique.

Goal

➡️ To reinforce the key message.


About the Iranian part

In the text, the “Iranian crisis” does not appear as a specific event but rather as a general geopolitical tension.

This is a common communication pattern:

➡️ referring to global conflicts to explain market price movements.


Summary

The communication builds three main narratives:

  1. Fuel price increases have identifiable political culprits.
  2. External forces are putting pressure on Hungary.
  3. The government appears as a crisis manager responding to the situation.

balazska

Let’s stand together against unprecedented hatred!!
#northpest #pestujhely #kaposztasmegyer #rakospalota #ujpalota

What Tisza supporters are doing is brutal. Several people who attended the poster event here, or who help our work as activists, have reported it. Those who appeared in videos and photos say that an unprecedented wave of hatred has been directed at them. They are being humiliated, harassed, intimidated, and mocked.

Fortunately, many have also said that despite all of this, they do not regret standing with us. I sincerely thank everyone for that.

At the same time, I would like to offer that if there are people who, despite all this—or even because of it—are proud to stand with the national forces and proudly call themselves patriots, then write to me at nemethbalazsvagyok@gmail.com, and let’s make a joint video or photo.

Let’s show that there are many of us, and that those who are being targeted and intimidated are not alone.

1️⃣ Building a victim narrative (victimhood framing)

Excerpt

“an unprecedented wave of hatred has been unleashed on them”
“they are humiliated, harassed, terrorized, and mocked”

Technique

The text portrays one political camp as a collective victim.

Strong emotional words:

  • wave (tsunami)
  • terrorized
  • humiliated
  • harassed

Goal

➡️ to trigger emotional identification
➡️ to create a sense of moral superiority

Effect

The reader may feel that:

  • “they are victims”
  • “they must be defended”

2️⃣ Creating an enemy image (enemy construction)

Excerpt

“what the Tisza supporters are doing”

Technique

The political opponent is presented as a collective group.

Not individual people, but:

➡️ “the Tisza supporters”

Goal

To create a simple conflict:

  • us
  • them

Effect

Polarization.


3️⃣ Emotional exaggeration (emotional amplification)

Key words

  • brutal
  • unprecedented
  • tsunami
  • terror

Technique

The text strongly dramatizes the situation.

It is not framed as:

  • debate
  • conflict
  • criticism

but as:

➡️ “terror”.

Goal

To provoke an immediate emotional reaction.

Effect

Rational evaluation is pushed into the background.


4️⃣ Collective mobilization (mobilization framing)

Excerpt

“Let’s show that there are many of us”

Technique

This is a classic movement-style call to action.

The message shifts:

from complaint
➡️ to mobilization.

Goal

To build group identity.

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ “I should join”.


5️⃣ Strengthening group identity (identity framing)

Excerpt

“supporters of the national forces”
“patriots”

Technique

A political stance becomes a moral identity.

It is not simply:

  • supporting a party

but rather:

➡️ patriotism.

Goal

To turn a political choice into a moral question.

Effect

Anyone outside this group is implicitly framed as:

➡️ “not a patriot”.


6️⃣ Self-justifying narrative (self-justification loop)

The logic of the text:

  1. “They attack us”
  2. “We are victims”
  3. “This proves that we are right”
  4. “Therefore we must unite even more strongly”

This creates a closed communication loop.


🧠 The psychological pattern behind the text

This follows a classic political mobilization formula:

1️⃣ threat
2️⃣ victim narrative
3️⃣ identity
4️⃣ mobilization

Structure:

enemy → victim → community → action


⚠️ Why it may feel like “they accuse others of what they themselves do”

Because it reflects a common phenomenon called:

projective propaganda (projection)

This means:

➡️ accusing the opponent
➡️ of the very techniques used in one’s own communication.

Examples:

ClaimActual communication pattern
“wave of hatred”strong emotional polarization
“terror”political dramatization
“they harass us”amplification of conflict

📌 In short

The text does not primarily provide information. Instead, it:

  • generates emotion
  • builds identity
  • mobilizes supporters.

That is why it feels like propaganda.

havent got words

VOTE

I call on the city leadership — Gergely Karácsony and the Tisza faction of the Budapest City Council — to immediately remove the Ukrainian flag from City Hall.

How can the Ukrainian flag still be flying on the building of the nation’s capital after Volodymyr Zelensky allegedly issued a deadly threat against Viktor Orbán, after Ukrainians have been blackmailing Hungary for weeks over the Druzhba oil pipeline, and after they also threatened us because we brought home two Hungarian prisoners of war from Russian captivity?

❌ Meanwhile, Gergely Karácsony is begging the Ukrainians for “forgiveness” because the Hungarian government took countermeasures against Zelensky’s blackmail — yet he seems unconcerned about what Budapest residents pay for fuel and how much they have to pay for it.

Karácsony says he is “ashamed” that Hungary uses cheap Russian gas — so he must also be ashamed that Budapest residents pay some of the lowest utility bills in Europe.

🚨 According to Karácsony, Ukraine’s accession to the EU is a “first-rate national interest” — but the fact that this would effectively bring the war into the European Union and drag us into it apparently does not concern him.

Most likely, Gergely Karácsony has lost his sense of reality — or he is simply carrying out orders from Brussels.

🗣 When our fellow Hungarians in Transcarpathia are forcibly conscripted and beaten to death by Ukrainians, he was strangely not this talkative.

The left, together with Péter Magyar, has made a pact with Brussels for the sake of Ukraine.

🟠 In April, the only safe choice is Fidesz!

Hungary Seizes Ukrainian “Gold Convoy” Assets as Parliament Fast-Tracks Security Bill 2026.03.09

Fidesz parliamentary group leader Máté Kocsis has submitted a bill concerning the assets seized from the Ukrainian savings bank. The Hungarian Parliament will discuss the proposal under an extraordinary procedure, as was revealed during the public portion of Monday’s meeting of the National Security Committee. Although the committee otherwise held a closed session, its members moved to another room to discuss Kocsis’s bill, where the meeting was briefly open to the public.

When explaining the proposal, Kocsis said that many aspects of the case known as the “Ukrainian gold convoy” remain unclear. The proposal concerns the “unusual amount” of cash and gold transported through Hungary. Kocsis suggested that the assets seized last week should remain confiscated until the end of the procedure initiated by Hungary’s National Tax and Customs Administration (NAV). The Fidesz member of the committee said that authorities are examining how the purpose and intended use of the transported assets could affect national security. However, he stated that the method of transportation and the identities of the individuals involved pose a national security risk to Hungary.

The proposal was debated by MPs in a very short time. Zsolt Molnár of the Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) objected to why Kocsis submitted the proposal now, just before the elections, and why it had been introduced so quickly. Zoltán Sas, the Jobbik chairman of the committee, also criticized the speed with which the proposal was prepared, saying there had been no time to examine it in detail. Sas also said the proposal raises concerns about retroactive legislation. At the same time, they agreed that the case may indeed pose a national security risk.

Kocsis briefly responded to their concerns, saying that although the issue of retroactive effect may indeed arise, the proposal specifically concerns this particular case, and legislation is therefore necessary. He apologized for submitting the proposal in such a short time but explained that Parliament will only meet on Monday and Tuesday before the elections, so a decision on the proposal must be made urgently.

Kocsis’s proposal was approved by the committee with four votes in favor and two abstentions. Jobbik’s Zoltán Sas and MSZP’s Zsolt Molnár abstained. The committee members voted the same way on recommending to Parliament that the bill be debated under an extraordinary procedure.

On Sunday, the Ukrainian Savings Bank announced that it would demand the return of the cash and gold seized from the armored transport vehicles by Hungarian authorities. On March 6, it was revealed that Hungarian authorities had intercepted two Ukrainian cash transport vehicles on the M0 ring road, on the section between the M4 and M5 motorways, near the Alacska rest area. On that same day, the National Tax and Customs Administration (NAV) announced that it had launched a criminal investigation on suspicion of money laundering in connection with the Ukrainian cash transports seized in Hungary.

The case, which could dominate the election campaign, has been summarized in detail in our article.

Photo: István Huszti / Telex

https://telex.hu/belfold/2026/03/09/kocsis-mate-ukran-penzszallito-takarekbank-aranykonvoj-nemzetbiztonsagi-bizottsag-javaslat

balazska

Those who want order, peace, and stability should vote for Fidesz on April 12!

Let me show you something interesting from the 8th district. This is what it looks like when the filthy streets of the 8th district under the local liberal left-wing mayor meet the world of Tisza — trash scattered everywhere, Tisza newspapers all over the place. But honestly, the whole area has looked disgusting ever since there has been a left-wing mayor here in the 8th district.

Anyone who wants order, anyone who wants peace, anyone who wants stability will of course vote for Fidesz on April 12.

There is no other solution. Oops!

1️⃣ Order–Chaos Framing

Excerpt

“Whoever wants order, peace and calm should vote for Fidesz.”

Technique

The political choice is simplified into two extremes:

  • Fidesz = order, peace, stability
  • the opponent = chaos

This is a classic binary framing technique.

Goal

To turn the election into a moral choice, rather than a debate about policies.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ anyone who does not vote for Fidesz is voting against order.


2️⃣ Scapegoating

Excerpt

“the dirty streets of the 8th district under the local liberal left-wing mayor”

Technique

A complex urban issue (cleanliness, public space management) is attributed to a single political actor.

Goal

To provide a simple explanation:

➡️ “left-wing leadership = dirt and disorder”.

Effect

The voter may feel that:

➡️ local problems are caused by one political side alone.


3️⃣ Negative Emotional Framing (Disgust Framing)

Keywords

  • “dirty”
  • “scattered everywhere”
  • “disgusting”

Technique

The communication uses physical disgust to strengthen a political message.

Goal

To trigger a strong emotional reaction.

Effect

The reader:

➡️ reacts emotionally rather than rationally.


4️⃣ Guilt by Association

Excerpt

“the dirty street of the left-wing mayor meeting the world of Tisza”

Technique

Two unrelated things are linked together:

  • a dirty street
  • the Tisza party

without proving a direct connection.

Goal

To transfer a negative image from one actor to another.

Effect

In the reader’s mind it may create the impression that:

➡️ “Tisza = disorder.”


5️⃣ Repetition Technique

Excerpt

“whoever wants order, whoever wants peace, whoever wants calm…”

Technique

The same message is repeated in several variations.

This is a classic campaign communication tool.

Goal

To embed the core message in the audience’s mind.

Effect

Because of repetition, the statement may feel:

➡️ more familiar
➡️ therefore more believable.


6️⃣ False Dilemma

Excerpt

“There is no other solution.”

Technique

The political choice is narrowed down to two options:

  • Fidesz
  • the wrong decision

Goal

To eliminate the perception of legitimate political alternatives.

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ there is no valid alternative choice.


📊 Summary

The text follows a classic campaign propaganda pattern.

Core narrative

“Order vs. Chaos.”

Tools used

  • emotional manipulation
  • scapegoating
  • guilt by association
  • repetition
  • false dilemma

Communication goal

➡️ to make voters decide not based on political programs,
but based on emotional identity and perceived moral alignment.

alexa

🚨 The largest Ukrainian public-affairs influencer, who has 13 million followers, has outlined the six points of the “Zelensky plan,” which allegedly aims to replace Viktor Orbán with Péter Magyar.

  1. Every political reaction should “serve Orbán’s defeat.”
  2. Hungary should not be attacked directly; instead, pressure should be applied through Brussels.
  3. Péter Magyar should be allowed to freely criticize Ukraine, but this would only be a performance until the elections: “time must be given to Magyar to criticize us; we have to play along with him.”
  4. Influence Hungarian voters in Transcarpathia so that they either vote for Tisza or do not vote at all.
  5. Achieve the same among the Hungarian minority in Transylvania, together with the Romanian government, where there is already “experience in cooperation.”
  6. Conduct information warfare by amplifying anti-Orbán narratives, scandals, and fake news in the Hungarian public sphere.

Outrageous and scandalous. Tisza is deeply in the Ukrainians’ pocket. On April 12, we must defend our country’s independence and stand up for peace!

🟠 Only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice!


One of the Ukrainian public influencers with the largest reach spoke about this six-point plan describing how they should coordinate with Péter Magyar’s camp. The information contains critical claims.

According to him, in order to create a situation where Hungary would have a Ukraine-friendly government instead of the current national government, this man openly says that Péter Magyar should be allowed during the election period—while implicitly coordinating with Ukraine—to criticize certain Ukrainian positions. But this would only serve the purpose of helping Péter Magyar come to power in Hungary.

After that, all the things that Viktor Orbán and the current government are currently blocking would supposedly be implemented together with Péter Magyar—for example allowing Ukraine to join the European Union from 2027, or sending Hungarian taxpayers’ money to Ukraine.

This is exactly what we do not want to allow.

1️⃣ Construction of a Conspiracy Narrative (conspiracy framing)

Excerpt

“Six points of the Zelensky plan… how to cooperate with Péter Magyar.”

Technique

The text claims the existence of a secret political plan in which:

  • foreign actors
  • an opposition politician
  • international organizations

are allegedly working together to replace the Hungarian government.

Problem

The text:

  • does not provide a specific source
  • does not quote a verifiable statement
  • does not present the full context

Goal

To create suspicion and distrust.

Effect

The reader may feel that

➡️ a secret international conspiracy is taking place against Hungary.


2️⃣ Building an External Enemy Image (external enemy framing)

Excerpt

“a Ukrainian-friendly government”
“they are in the Ukrainians’ pocket”

Technique

The political opponent is portrayed as representing foreign interests.

Goal

To transform the political debate into a national defense issue.

Effect

Voters may perceive that

➡️ the election is not a political competition
➡️ but rather “the defense of Hungary.”


3️⃣ Guilt by Association

Excerpt

“Tisza is deeply in the Ukrainians’ pocket.”

Technique

A political party is linked to a foreign power without evidence.

This is a common propaganda method:

  • “Brussels’ man”
  • “Soros’ man”
  • “Russian agent”
  • “Ukrainian puppet”

Goal

To question the loyalty of the opponent.

Effect

The reader may feel that

➡️ the opponent does not represent their own country.


4️⃣ Selective Information and Vague Source (vague source technique)

Excerpt

“the biggest Ukrainian influencer… with 13 million followers”

Technique

The text suggests credibility, but provides no:

  • name
  • precise quotation
  • link
  • full video
  • context

Goal

To make the source difficult to verify, while still appearing credible.

Effect

The reader may think:

➡️ “If such a big influencer said it, it must be true.”


5️⃣ Political Theater Narrative (strategic deception framing)

Excerpt

“Péter Magyar may criticize Ukraine, but it is only a performance.”

Technique

This is an immunizing propaganda tactic.

The logic:

  • if he criticizes → that is proof
  • if he does not criticize → that is also proof

Goal

To present every possible behavior of the opponent as manipulation.

Effect

For the reader:

➡️ there is no information that could disprove the narrative.


6️⃣ Information Warfare Rhetoric (information warfare framing)

Excerpt

“information warfare with anti-Orbán narratives”

Technique

Political criticism is framed as warfare.

Goal

To elevate political debate into a security issue.

Effect

The reader may feel that

➡️ criticism is not democratic debate
➡️ but rather an attack.


7️⃣ Electoral Mobilization (electoral mobilization framing)

Excerpt

“on April 12 we must defend the independence of our country”

Technique

The entire narrative ends in an electoral call to action.

This is a classic campaign structure:

  1. presenting a threat
  2. identifying an enemy
  3. offering a solution

Solution

“Only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.”


📊 The Overall Propaganda Formula of the Text

The communication follows this logic:

1️⃣ foreign conspiracy
2️⃣ opposition = foreign puppet
3️⃣ secret plan against Hungary
4️⃣ information warfare
5️⃣ election = defense of the country

This structure is one of the most common narratives in modern campaign propaganda.


Important note

A propaganda analysis does not claim that a statement is true or false.

Instead, it examines:

➡️ how the text attempts to influence the reader.

balazska

This is all Tisza can do! They would tear the country apart, bringing hostility, hatred, and conflict! That’s why the sensible majority will send them packing in April.

Tisza aggressors. While they were putting up their Tisza posters. Is there a problem? Yes, there is a problem, because this Tisza gang is irritating and the country has absolutely no need for people like them. Meanwhile, on International Women’s Day I brought flowers to the Tisza volunteers, and they tore down all the posters.

The lying Péter Magyar said they wouldn’t even put up posters, because it would be environmental pollution, a waste of money, propaganda, and all that nonsense. And now we’ve reached the point in North Pest where only Tisza posters are out, because they put them on the poles in place of the Fidesz posters. They cut down all the “Balázs Németh – The Safe Choice” posters and put up their own. You can check the photos and the videos.

Tisza aggressors. While putting up their Tisza posters, they yanked, damaged, pushed up, and rendered unusable the Balázs Németh poster underneath. And I also received news that they cut down the DK posters as well — the Balázs Barkóczi ones too. Here there’s hardly any Barkóczi posters left either, because from the Balázs Németh ones there’s only a single piece remaining.

These Tisza people are not decent people — they are criminals.

1️⃣ Dehumanization (dehumanization framing)

Excerpt

“They are not people, these Tisza supporters — they are criminals.”

Technique

The political opponent is presented not as a political actor, but as a group placed outside the category of normal human community.

Goal

  • create moral distance
  • remove the opponent’s legitimacy
  • justify hostility or aggression toward them

Effect

The audience may feel that

➡️ the opponent does not simply hold a different opinion
➡️ but belongs to a “bad” or “dangerous” group.

This is one of the strongest polarization tools in political communication.


2️⃣ Moral labeling

Keywords

  • “criminal gang”
  • “criminals”
  • “aggressors”

Technique

The political opponent is placed into a criminal category without concrete evidence or legal context.

Goal

  • morally delegitimize the opponent
  • transform political disagreement into a moral conflict

Effect

The reader may perceive that

➡️ this is not a political debate
➡️ but a conflict between “good people vs criminals.”


3️⃣ Emotional escalation

Excerpt

“They are wrecking the country, bringing hostility, hatred, and warmongering.”

Technique

Strongly exaggerated and dramatized language.

Keywords

  • wrecking the country
  • hatred
  • warmongering

Goal

to trigger emotional reactions such as:

  • anger
  • fear
  • outrage

Effect

The audience becomes less likely to evaluate the situation rationally.


4️⃣ Moral self-elevation (moral contrast)

Excerpt

“I brought flowers for the volunteers on Women’s Day…”

Technique

The speaker builds a moral contrast.

own sideopponent
brings flowerstears down posters
peacefulaggressive

Goal

to construct a narrative where

➡️ “we are the good ones”
➡️ “they are the bad ones”.


5️⃣ Aggressive labeling (labeling)

Keyword

“Tisza aggressors”

Technique

An entire political group is reduced to one negative label.

Goal

  • simplify the opponent into a single category
  • create an easily repeatable political narrative

Effect

The political group appears uniformly dangerous.


6️⃣ “Sensible majority” narrative (majority framing)

Excerpt

“That is why the sensible majority will drive them out in April.”

Technique

The speaker portrays their political side as representing the majority.

Goal

to create the perception that

➡️ anyone who disagrees
➡️ stands outside the “sensible majority.”


7️⃣ Reinforcing the enemy image (enemy construction)

The text repeatedly uses expressions such as:

  • “Tisza aggressors”
  • “criminal gang”
  • “criminals”

Technique

Repetition.

Goal

to fix the enemy image in the audience’s mind.


⚠️ Overall picture

From a communication perspective, the text represents a classic polarizing campaign message.

Main elements

1️⃣ dehumanization
2️⃣ criminal labeling
3️⃣ emotional exaggeration
4️⃣ moral contrast (“we are good – they are bad”)
5️⃣ majority legitimacy (“the sensible majority”)

This combination typically serves to

➡️ provoke strong emotional reactions
➡️ strengthen tribal political identity
➡️ reduce rational debate.