Who is bringing politics into schools?? The Tisza-aligned teachers! Young people tell me every day what happens at school when they openly show their commitment to the right 👍
There really seems to be no limit to the arrogance of the Tisza, liberal, left-wing camp. HVG writes that I am the one bringing politics into schools. Why? Because in recent weeks they have seen that more and more young people come up to me at our public events to talk about politics. Some ask for selfies, some ask for autographs. A few days ago there was even a group that said they would take the signed leaflet into their school because several people had asked them to. I thought they were joking, and they swore they weren’t serious. And based on this, HVG writes that I am bringing politics into schools.
Dear EduLine, dear HVG, and all the other Tisza-supporting scribblers—do you know who actually brings politics into schools? The teachers who try to make life miserable for any child and their family whom they know, or even just suspect, to lean toward the right, toward Fidesz, toward the national forces and conservative values.
There are countless stories that young people tell me about how these liberal, Tisza-aligned teachers try to silence them in schools. They are the ones bringing politics into schools.
Right now they are loud, Tisza-aligned, self-styled freedom-fighter teachers. But after April 12, they too will fall silent.
1️⃣ Enemy Construction
Excerpt
“pro-Tisza teachers”
“pro-Tisza, liberal, left-wing arrogance”
“pro-Tisza scribblers”
Technique
The political opponent is not presented as individual actors but as a single hostile group:
- “Tisza supporters”
- “liberals”
- “the left”
- “teachers”
Different groups are merged into one negative category.
Goal
➡️ to create a clear “us vs. them” division
➡️ to delegitimize the opponent
Effect
The reader may feel that:
➡️ there is an organized hostile camp
➡️ working against the “national side”.
2️⃣ Victimhood Framing
Excerpt
“to ruin the lives of those children and their families”
“they want to silence them”
Technique
The text suggests that:
➡️ right-wing children are being persecuted or oppressed in schools.
This is victimhood framing.
Goal
➡️ to trigger emotional identification
➡️ to generate moral outrage
Effect
The reader may feel:
➡️ that an unjust system exists
➡️ that is attacking “our side”.
3️⃣ Generalization and Anecdotal Evidence
Excerpt
“there are many cases the children tell me about”
Technique
The text claims a systemic problem without presenting concrete evidence or data.
The source is:
➡️ “children tell me”.
Goal
➡️ to create the appearance of credibility
➡️ to persuade through stories and anecdotes
Effect
The reader may feel:
➡️ that “many such cases exist”,
even if no actual data is presented.
4️⃣ Media Discrediting
Excerpt
“HVG”
“EduLine”
“pro-Tisza scribblers”
Technique
Critical media outlets are presented as political enemies.
Instead of refuting the claim, the text attacks the source itself.
This is a classic ad hominem media framing.
Goal
➡️ to undermine the credibility of critical journalism
Effect
The reader may feel:
➡️ that the media is biased
➡️ therefore it should not be trusted.
5️⃣ Political Mobilization
Excerpt
“after April 12 they will also fall silent”
Technique
The text promises a coming political turning point.
This functions as an electoral mobilization message.
Goal
➡️ to motivate the supporter base
➡️ to increase voter participation
Effect
The reader may feel that:
➡️ the election will be a form of “justice being restored.”
6️⃣ Moral Framing
Excerpt
“national forces”
“conservative values”
Technique
The speaker’s own political side is presented using morally positive categories.
This implicitly suggests that:
➡️ the other side is not national.
Goal
➡️ to establish a sense of moral superiority
Effect
The reader may feel that:
➡️ one side represents the “good”
➡️ while the other is destructive.
7️⃣ Conflict Amplification
Excerpt
“to ruin their lives”
“to silence them”
Technique
Political disagreement is framed as a serious and dramatic conflict.
The expressions carry strong emotional weight.
Goal
➡️ to increase tension and outrage
Effect
The reader may feel that:
➡️ a serious injustice is taking place.
Summary
The text uses several typical political communication techniques:
Main techniques
- enemy construction
- victimhood framing
- generalization based on anecdotes
- media discrediting
- electoral mobilization
- moral framing
- conflict amplification
Communication objective
➡️ to strengthen the speaker’s political camp
➡️ to delegitimize the opponent
➡️ to trigger emotional identification among supporters.