The upcoming election is not just about the next four years. In an age of dangers, careful decisions must be made — this is not the time for experimentation.
Since 2015, we have consistently rejected Brussels’ migration plans; from the very first moment the war broke out, we have emphasized the importance of peace; and from the beginning we have supported Hungarian families, pensioners, and young people alike.
We must not take risks — we must stay on the Hungarian path! On April 12 as well, Fidesz is the safe choice!
I honestly believe that this will be an election where, if we make a mistake now — and unfortunately Hungarian history has often had moments when, at the time, people did not necessarily feel they were making history, but in hindsight everyone knew that that generation, those people, had decided something — whether in political life or in society, they made history. And I think this will be one of those elections, even if many do not feel it right now.
Everyone should think about this when they mark the X on the ballot, or when they talk to someone about politics and argue their case: every single ink mark, every single word spoken, can tilt things one way or the other, like a grain of sand on the two sides of a scale. Migration cannot be undone, war-related decisions cannot be undone, and gender issues — which we haven’t even talked about yet, though I think they are very important — cannot be undone either. They cannot be reversed.
This is not about four years. It is not about who will give the March 15 speech. It is about whether what happens in Hungary is what is good for us — or what is dictated from Brussels. And I would be very, very afraid for ourselves and for the next generations if we were to move in the latter direction.
🎯 Central Narrative
“This is not an election, but a historic turning point: either Fidesz = security, or Brussels = doom.”
The purpose of the speech is not to encourage consideration, but to emotionally prevent the idea that the choice is “merely” between political alternatives.
🔧 Techniques Used
1️⃣ Historical Pathos and Generational Pressure
“people did not necessarily feel at the time that they were making history”
🔹 Technique: elevation through historical grandeur
🔹 Effect:
– anyone who chooses differently is placed on the wrong side of history
– the moral weight of the decision is exaggerated
👉 Trick: no concrete historical parallel is given, only suggestion.
2️⃣ False Exclusivity (False Dilemma)
“either what is good for us happens, or what is dictated from Brussels”
🔹 Technique: binary trap
🔹 Effect:
– political pluralism disappears
– every opponent automatically becomes “Brussels’ agent”
👉 Trick: no third option, no nuance.
3️⃣ Fear Stacking (Stacked Fear)
migration + war + gender = irreversible catastrophe
🔹 Technique: accumulation of threats
🔹 Effect:
– constant anxiety
– rational evaluation is shut down
👉 Trick: repeating “it cannot be undone” acts as a psychological lock.
4️⃣ Moral Blackmail Through Individual Action
“every ink mark… every single word”
🔹 Technique: individualized responsibility
🔹 Effect:
– voters can be blamed personally for the future
– pressure on conscience
👉 Trick: systemic responsibility disappears, individual guilt remains.
5️⃣ Self-Legitimizing Reference to the Past
“consistently since 2015…”
🔹 Technique: self-justification
🔹 Effect:
– the past is used to automatically validate the future
– no current evidence is required
👉 Trick: consistency ≠ correctness.
🧠 Summary – What Is Actually Happening?
This speech is:
❌ not policy-based
❌ not open to debate
❌ not built on verifiable claims
✔️ it demands emotional loyalty
✔️ it produces fear
✔️ it applies moral pressure
The final message, simplified:
“If you don’t vote for us, you endanger the future.”
This is not argumentation — it is campaign psychology