alexa

🚨 From the leaked economic plan of the Tisza Party we know that they would make healthcare paid and reduce the number of hospital beds — something Zoltán Tarr has also spoken about.

The national government, however, believes that healthcare should not be dismantled but further developed. We are using both domestic and European Union funds for this purpose, and this will continue in the future as well. For us, what is good for Hungarians is what matters — both in healthcare and in Hungary’s future.

🟠 That is why Fidesz is the reliable choice.

According to the Tisza Party’s program — their leaked program — they would reintroduce a paid component into healthcare and place greater emphasis on it, while also reducing the number of hospital beds, as Zoltán Tarr has stated.

We believe this is not the right direction. We believe the Hungarian healthcare system must continue to be developed. It is such a large system that the work will never truly be finished — there will always be improvements to make. What we want is to move forward step by step in developing it.

For this, we use both domestic resources and European Union funds, and this will continue to be the case in the future as well.

Propaganda and Influence Techniques in the Text

1️⃣ “Leaked plan” narrative (leaked plan framing)

Excerpt

“From the leaked economic plan of the Tisza Party we know that…”

Technique

The communication refers to an allegedly leaked document.

Key elements

  • “leaked plan”
  • “we know that”

This is a common political rhetorical tool used to:

➡️ create the appearance of evidence
➡️ legitimize a claim without a verifiable source

The word “leaked” creates the impression of secret insider information, which increases perceived credibility even if the content itself is not verified.

Goal

  • to present the claim as a fact
  • to frame the opponent’s intentions negatively

Effect

Readers may think:

“If it was leaked, it must be true.”


2️⃣ Fear framing through the loss of healthcare

Excerpt

“they would make healthcare paid”
“they would reduce the number of hospital beds”

Technique

The communication exploits one of the strongest social fears:

➡️ loss of healthcare access
➡️ deterioration of medical services

This is a typical campaign tool because:

  • it affects every voter
  • it is particularly sensitive for older voters.

Goal

  • create a sense of existential threat
  • mobilize voters emotionally.

Effect

Readers may think:

“If they come to power, we will have to pay for hospitals.”


3️⃣ Enemy vs. protector framing (protector narrative)

Excerpt

“The national government believes that healthcare should not be dismantled but further developed.”

Technique

The communication constructs two opposing poles:

EnemyProtector
Tisza PartyGovernment
dismantlingdevelopment
paid healthcareimproved healthcare

This is one of the most classic propaganda frameworks.

Goal

Present the election as a good vs. bad choice.

Effect

Readers may perceive:

“They destroy – we build.”


4️⃣ Appeal to authority

Excerpt

“Tarr Zoltán also spoke about this.”

Technique

The message refers to a person as supporting evidence.

However:

  • no quotation is provided
  • no context is given
  • no exact source is cited.

This represents the logical fallacy of appeal to authority.

Goal

Increase the perceived credibility of the claim.

Effect

Readers may think:

“If someone said it publicly, it must be true.”


5️⃣ Repetition framing

The text repeats the same claims multiple times:

  • “leaked program”
  • “paid healthcare”
  • “reducing hospital beds”

Technique

Repetition is one of the strongest propaganda tools.

In communication psychology this is known as the:

illusory truth effect

➡️ the more often people hear something
➡️ the more likely they are to believe it.

Goal

Embed the claim deeply in voters’ minds.


6️⃣ National interest framing

Excerpt

“What is good for us is what is good for Hungarians.”

Technique

The communication equates the government’s political position with the national interest itself.

This is a very common rhetorical strategy in politics.

Goal

  • create moral superiority
  • implicitly delegitimize the opponent

Effect

Readers may perceive:

“Anyone opposing them is opposing the interests of Hungarians.”


7️⃣ Binary election framing

Excerpt

“That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.”

Technique

The communication simplifies the political decision.

The framework becomes:

Bad choiceGood choice
TiszaFidesz

This is known as binary framing.

Goal

Reduce political complexity and eliminate nuance in voter decision-making.


8️⃣ Development promise narrative

Excerpt

“31 billion forints”
“50 institutions will be renewed”

Technique

The communication uses specific numbers and investments.

Numbers create the impression of precision and credibility, even when the broader context is missing.

Goal

Emphasize government performance and investment.


The Overall Communication Narrative

The text constructs a classic campaign structure:

Narrative structure

1️⃣ Enemy
➡️ “paid healthcare”

2️⃣ Threat
➡️ “reduction of hospital beds”

3️⃣ Protector
➡️ “the national government”

4️⃣ Solution
➡️ “Fidesz is the safe choice”

This is a typical campaign propaganda framework.


Summary

The text uses at least seven classic propaganda techniques:

  • leaked plan narrative
  • fear framing around healthcare
  • enemy vs. protector framing
  • appeal to authority
  • repetition framing
  • national interest framing
  • binary election framing

alexa

The health of Hungarians must not become a subject of political bargaining!

On April 12, we will not only decide the direction of our country, but also the future of our health. The government has now decided that nearly 86,000 square meters of 50 healthcare institutions can be renovated in Budapest and across the country. More than 31 billion forints will be invested to renew institutions such as the North-Buda St. John’s Centrum Hospital, the Budapest St. Francis Hospital, and the Bethesda Children’s Hospital.

👉 In contrast, we can see what the Tisza Party is preparing for. Their leaked program and the statements of their experts have revealed their real intentions. Péter Magyar and his allies would bring back the era of paid healthcare. And they would not stop there: they would take away free healthcare for our children and impose a brutal dismantling of healthcare services in rural areas.

While they pose in T-shirts with Ukrainian flags, vote to ban cheap Russian energy, and lobby against Hungarian funding, the government is taking action. In our view, instead of sending money to Ukraine, there would be a better place for that money in Budapest’s healthcare institutions.

In recent years, through the Healthy Budapest Program, the government has spent more than 133 billion forints on hospitals and outpatient clinics in Budapest and its surrounding region.

🟠 Hungary needs a government that protects free healthcare and continues to build and develop our hospitals. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

It is truly a joyful moment to once again be able to report to you about another healthcare development in Budapest. This is not the first and it will not be the last, because in recent years the government has continuously developed healthcare in Budapest and the surrounding region through the Healthy Budapest Program. Healthcare institutions worth 133 billion forints have been renewed or are currently being renewed.

One might think that regardless of political affiliation, we could all agree that if healthcare improves—if Hungarian people can receive better-quality medical care in better institutions—then that is something to celebrate. Yet the developments of recent months have shown that this is not necessarily the case.

The Tisza Party, it seems, believes that the worse things are for Hungarian people, the better it is politically for them. One of their representatives in the capital, Kinga Kollár, even spoke smilingly about how they are pleased when hospital developments in Hungary are delayed, because they expect this to help the Tisza Party win.

I believe Hungarian people can tell the difference between those who genuinely want what is good for them and those who see them only as an opportunity for political gain. And they will make their decision accordingly in April.

Because in April we are not only choosing our fate — we are choosing our future.

1. Fear Appeal and Raising Existential Stakes

Excerpt:
“On April 12, we will decide not only the direction of our country, but also the future of our health.”

Technique:
The election is framed not as a normal political decision but as a vital turning point. This is a classic fear framing and high-stakes framing technique.

Goal:
To make the reader feel that “everything is at risk,” leaving no room for uncertainty or criticism.

Effect:
The audience may become more likely to decide emotionally rather than through calm, rational evaluation.

The fact that April 12, 2026 is indeed the date of the Hungarian parliamentary election is officially listed on the election website.


2. Own Side as Protector, Opponent as Destroyer

Excerpt:
“the government is acting”
vs.
“Péter Magyar and his allies would bring back the era of paid healthcare”

Technique:
A sharp good–bad dichotomy. One side builds, develops, and protects; the other destroys, takes away, and dismantles.

Goal:
To morally simplify the political landscape:

  • us = care and protection
  • them = danger

Effect:
The text leaves no room for nuance or policy debate. The political choice becomes a moral choice.


3. Healthcare as an Emotional Shield

Excerpt:
“The health of Hungarians cannot be a subject of political bargaining!”

Technique:
Healthcare is framed as a topic that stands above any political debate. This is a form of claiming the moral high ground.

Goal:
Anyone who questions the message can more easily be portrayed as someone speaking against people’s health.

Effect:
Delegitimization of criticism: disagreement may appear immoral rather than a legitimate policy argument.


4. Credibility Built with Numbers

Excerpt:
“50 healthcare institutions”
“nearly 86 thousand square meters”
“more than 31 billion forints”
“133 billion forints”

Technique:
This creates the appearance of data-driven persuasion. Numerous concrete figures suggest objectivity and seriousness.

Goal:
To make the text appear more credible, even if the political conclusions drawn from those numbers are not demonstrated.

Effect:
Readers may accept the narrative more easily because the numbers create a “fact-based atmosphere.”

The healthcare development narrative partly refers to real public programs: the Healthy Budapest Program, where investments in the tens of billions—and the 133 billion figure—also appear in official government and municipal documents.


5. Building an Enemy Image of the Tisza Party

Excerpt:
“the veil has fallen from their real intentions”
“paid healthcare”
“they would take away our children’s free care”
“they would unleash brutal healthcare cuts on the countryside”

Technique:
Classic enemy framing and demonization. The opponent is not simply presented as having different policies but as harboring hidden, harmful intentions.

Goal:
To generate fear and distrust toward the opposition.

Effect:
The voter is no longer choosing between programs but is instead “defending” against a supposed threat.

Important: the text makes very strong claims here, but these appear as accusations, not as proven policy analyses. From a propaganda perspective, this makes them especially powerful.


6. Involving Children as Emotional Pressure

Excerpt:
“they would take away our children’s free healthcare”

Technique:
Referring to children is one of the strongest emotional triggers. This is protect-the-children framing.

Goal:
To provoke an immediate emotional reaction, especially among parents and grandparents.

Effect:
The audience may question the claim less because the statement activates an instinctive protective response.


7. Linking an External Enemy to the Internal Opponent

Excerpt:
“While they pose in Ukrainian flag T-shirts…”
“There would be a better place for that money in Budapest hospitals than in Ukraine…”

Technique:
This combines foreign enemy framing with an internal traitor narrative. The domestic opponent is portrayed as serving foreign interests.

Goal:
To present the Tisza Party not merely as a political rival but as a force aligned with external interests.

Effect:
Domestic political competition becomes framed as a struggle over sovereignty or national defense.


8. The Narrative: “We Build, They Obstruct”

Excerpt:
“the government is acting”
“they are happy when hospital developments are delayed”

Technique:
A combination of victim framing and active leadership framing. One side is responsible and constructive, the other cynical and harmful.

Goal:
To position the government as a caring force and the opponent as malicious.

Effect:
Readers may feel the issue is not a normal political disagreement but a question of who truly wants what is good for the Hungarian people.


9. Simplifying the Election to a Single Correct Choice

Excerpt:
“We need a government that…”
“That is why Fidesz is the safe choice!”

Technique:
This is false dilemma framing combined with certainty framing. It suggests that only one safe and responsible option exists.

Goal:
To eliminate uncertainty and reduce deliberation.

Effect:
Undecided voters may be pulled toward the message of the “safe choice.”


10. Alternating Good News and Threat

Excerpt:
“This is a truly joyful moment…”
then immediately:
“but… the Tisza Party… the worse things are for Hungarians…”

Technique:
This relies on emotional fluctuation:

  • first positive pride
  • then outrage
  • then fear
  • finally reassurance: “Fidesz is the safe choice.”

Goal:
To strengthen the message by intensifying emotional engagement.

Effect:
The text does not primarily inform; it guides the reader emotionally through a pre-designed narrative path.


Overall Picture

From a propaganda perspective, the strength of this text lies in how it combines several layers at once:

  • positive self-image: we build, develop, and protect
  • fear appeal: healthcare is in danger
  • enemy image: Tisza = dismantling and paid healthcare
  • external threat: Ukraine, Brussels
  • emotional triggers: children, rural healthcare, free care
  • single-solution narrative: Fidesz = the safe choice

In other words, it is not simple information but a complete political persuasion package.


The Core Propaganda Formula (in One Sentence)

Fear appeal + moral pressure + enemy construction + numbers that simulate factual credibility + the message that “only we can protect you.”

alexa

Your blood will flow into the Danube sooner than oil flows through the Druzhba pipeline.

👉 Are you also fed up with the threats? Then come to the Peace March!

As the elections approach, various forms of Ukrainian blackmail have become an everyday occurrence. Analysts, soldiers, and even Zelenskyy himself have threatened the Hungarian Prime Minister and, with him, the whole of Hungary with the taking of his life. These threats must be rejected in the strongest possible terms.

We are not simply facing a vote now — we are choosing our fate and our future.
If the national government remains, we can continue to stand up for Hungarian interests and for the peace of our country. That is why we must show strength this Sunday.

Now everyone is needed — our place is at the largest Peace March ever held.

Our blood will sooner flow in the Danube than oil through the Druzhba pipeline,” said this notorious Ukrainian lieutenant general.
This is the kind of message the Ukrainians — the allies of Péter Magyar — are sending us.

But we will not bow to blackmail, and we are not afraid of threats.
We will continue to stand up for Hungarian interests — that is why so many of us will be there on Sunday at the largest Peace March ever.

1️⃣ Quoting a shocking threat (fear appeal)

Excerpt

“Your blood will flow into the Danube sooner than oil will flow through the Druzhba pipeline.”

Technique

The communication opens with an extremely violent and shocking sentence.
Such quotes are intended to trigger an immediate emotional reaction from the reader.

The method

  • dramatic quotation
  • violent imagery
  • a threat directed at the nation

Goal

➡️ to provoke shock and fear
➡️ to present the political conflict as an existential danger

Effect

The reader may begin to think:

  • “Hungary is being threatened”
  • “we must defend ourselves”

This is classic fear framing.


2️⃣ Constructing an external enemy (external enemy framing)

Excerpt

“Ukrainian blackmail”
“Zelensky threatened the Hungarian prime minister with death.”

Technique

The communication identifies a foreign enemy:

  • Ukraine
  • Zelensky
  • Ukrainian military leaders

The conflict is therefore framed not as domestic politics, but as a matter of national defense.

Goal

➡️ to frame the election as national self-defense
➡️ to delegitimize criticism of the government

Effect

Readers may come to believe:

  • “foreign actors are attacking us”
  • “we must close ranks”

3️⃣ Linking the internal enemy to the external one (traitor framing)

Excerpt

“This is the message the Ukrainians are sending us through the allies of Péter Magyar.”

Technique

This is a very strong propaganda pattern:

external enemy
+
connection to domestic opposition

The opposition is therefore presented not as a political rival but as a representative of foreign interests.

Goal

➡️ to discredit the opposition
➡️ to construct a betrayal narrative

Effect

Readers may start to think:

  • “the opposition serves foreign interests”
  • “nation vs. traitors”

This is internal enemy framing.


4️⃣ National destiny narrative (existential framing)

Excerpt

“We are not just facing a vote — we are choosing our fate and our future.”

Technique

The election is presented as an existential historical decision.

Key words

  • fate
  • future
  • nation
  • peace

Goal

➡️ to maximize the perceived stakes of the election
➡️ to emotionally mobilize voters

Effect

Readers may feel:

“everything will be decided now.”


5️⃣ Bandwagon effect (bandwagon mobilization)

Excerpt

“Our place is at the biggest Peace March ever.”

Technique

The communication suggests that:

  • everyone will be there
  • a historic crowd is expected

This is the classic bandwagon effect.

Goal

➡️ to increase participation
➡️ to create social pressure

Effect

Readers may think:

“If everyone else is going, I should go too.”


6️⃣ Repetition for reinforcement (message reinforcement)

The text repeatedly emphasizes:

  • threats
  • blackmail
  • standing up
  • not being afraid
  • Hungarian interests

Technique

Repetition increases the perceived credibility of a message, even when no new information is added.

This is one of the most common tools of propaganda.


7️⃣ Heroic resistance narrative (hero / resistance framing)

Excerpt

“We are not afraid of threats.”
“We will stand up.”

Technique

The political camp is portrayed as heroically resisting pressure.

Structure

enemy → threat → brave resistance

Goal

➡️ identity building
➡️ strengthening group pride


Summary

The text is a classic campaign mobilization message combining several communication techniques.

Main techniques

  • fear-inducing quotation
  • construction of an external enemy
  • internal traitor narrative
  • dramatization of historical stakes
  • bandwagon mobilization
  • repetition
  • heroic resistance framing

Strategic goal

➡️ emotional mobilization
➡️ delegitimizing the opposition
➡️ increasing electoral participation.

alexa

🟠 Margit Bridge is also getting ready at full steam for the biggest Peace March yet.
The situation is clear: Zelenskyy is deliberately endangering our country’s energy security. Hungary and Viktor Orbán are being blackmailed and threatened because they want to force a pro-Ukrainian puppet government on us — something we do not want to hear about at all.

🇭🇺 Now it is our turn! On our national holiday, we must show together — to the Ukrainians and to the left as well — that we are not intimidated by any threat. We will not give in to blackmail, and we will stand up for Hungary’s peace.

Let there be as many of us as possible at Sunday’s Peace March. Our homeland needs us!

For now, Margit Bridge is still filled mostly with cars, but on Sunday there will be tens of thousands of us, because I believe there are many people who want to raise their voices and stand up against the blackmail that Hungarians have been experiencing from Ukraine in recent weeks. Just think, for example, of the oil blockade, or of the threats directed at the Hungarian people and at Viktor Orbán or his family in recent days. We do not want a government that is directed from Ukraine and serves Ukrainian and Brussels interests. We remain committed to the principle that Hungary must continue to be a country that operates according to Hungarian interests, and we will do everything we can for that. So we are waiting for everyone to join us on Sunday, so that together we can stand up in as great numbers as possible on the Hungarian side.

1️⃣ Mass Effect and the “Everyone Is Already Coming” Narrative (Bandwagon Framing)

Excerpt

“Margaret Bridge is already preparing at full speed for the biggest Peace March.”
“On Sunday, tens of thousands of us will be there.”

Technique

The communication suggests that the event is already massive.

Key elements

  • “the biggest”
  • “tens of thousands”
  • “preparing at full speed”

Goal

➡️ Increase people’s willingness to join.

Effect

The reader may start thinking:

  • “Many people are going, so I should go too.”
  • “This will be a historic event.”

This is the bandwagon effect: people are more likely to join something if they believe a large crowd is already doing it.


2️⃣ Construction of an External Enemy (External Enemy Framing)

Excerpt

“Zelenskyy is deliberately endangering Hungary’s energy security.”

Technique

A specific external actor — Ukraine / Zelenskyy — is framed as the main cause of the conflict.

Keywords

  • endangering
  • blackmail
  • threats

Goal

➡️ Frame the situation as an international attack against Hungary.

Effect

The reader may feel:

  • “Hungary is under attack.”
  • “We must defend ourselves.”

3️⃣ Linking the Internal Enemy to the External One (Enemy Coalition Framing)

Excerpt

“They want to impose a pro-Ukrainian puppet government on us.”

Technique

The communication links two enemies together:

  • Ukraine
  • the Hungarian left

This is a classic campaign strategy.

Goal

➡️ Delegitimize the opposition.

Effect

The reader may conclude:

  • “The opposition serves foreign interests.”

4️⃣ Fear Framing Through Energy Security (Security Fear Framing)

Excerpt

“He is endangering our country’s energy security.”

Technique

The political conflict is framed as an existential issue.

Energy security is connected to:

  • utility costs
  • the economy
  • everyday life

Goal

➡️ Trigger a strong emotional reaction.

Effect

The reader may think:

  • “This affects my wallet.”
  • “Our livelihood is at risk.”

5️⃣ Mobilizing National Identity (Patriotic Mobilization)

Excerpt

“On our national holiday we must show together…”

Technique

The political event is framed as a national duty.

Key elements

  • national holiday
  • the Hungarian side
  • our country needs us

Goal

➡️ Turn participation into a moral obligation.

Effect

The reader may feel:

  • “If I don’t go, I’m not standing up for my country.”

6️⃣ Direct Mobilization (Call-to-Action Propaganda)

Excerpt

“Let’s be as many as possible at the Peace March on Sunday!”

Technique

The text directly calls for action.

It does not just express an opinion, but asks for:

➡️ physical presence on the streets.

Goal

➡️ Organize a mass demonstration.

Effect

The reader may feel motivated not only to think, but to act.


7️⃣ “Us vs. Them” Political Framing (Polarization Framing)

Excerpt

“Let us stand up on the Hungarian side.”

Technique

The political conflict is simplified into two opposing camps:

  • the Hungarian side
  • Ukraine + the left

Goal

➡️ Simplify the political debate.

Effect

The reader may feel:

  • they must choose between the two sides.

The Overall Narrative of the Communication

The text constructs a three-step mobilization narrative:

1️⃣ Threat

Ukraine is blackmailing Hungary.

2️⃣ Internal betrayal

The Hungarian left cooperates with them.

3️⃣ Response

Hungarians must stand up in large numbers at the Peace March.


Why Does the Message Push for “As Many People As Possible”?

From a political communication perspective, a large crowd provides:

1️⃣ Legitimacy for the government
2️⃣ A show of strength toward the opposition
3️⃣ A powerful media image: “mass public support”

For this reason, every element of the message is optimized to maximize participation.

alexa

How exactly can – and why would – a foreign bank try to influence a country’s election?

One of the senior figures of Erste Bank is a key member of the Tisza Party – that much we know. Clearly, his task would be to abolish the bank tax if they came to power (this tax currently helps fund utility price protection, family support programs, and the 13th and 14th month pensions – which is precisely why Péter Magyar and his allies want to eliminate them).

So the direct influence seems obvious. But how does the indirect influence work?

Well, Erste Bank has a foundation called Erste Stiftung. The bank channels substantial funds into it, and the foundation then redistributes that money – you’ll never guess where and for what purposes.

For example, to the Civitates funding hub, which also receives money from the Soros foundations.

After receiving funding from Erste and Soros, Civitates then passes money on to outlets such as 444, Átlátszó, and Direkt36, as well as other foreign pressure organizations like the Soros-linked Amnesty, TASZ, and the Helsinki Committee.

Erste euros also flow toward organizations such as Political Capital and the Háttér Society.

In return for this funding, these actors push the agenda of the Tisza Party, promote a pro-war stance, and also spread their narratives on Ukraine, gender issues, and migration.

And it’s not just about money. The Erste Stiftung itself is also active. A few weeks ago, for instance, they invited Ákos Hadházy to Vienna to speak at one of their events about what a “post-Orbán Hungary” might look like.

Erste Bank has traditionally been linked to the Austrian Socialists, and even the Financial Times has referred to it as the “bank of the Austrian left.”

They organize events, finance media outlets, background institutions, and political actors – all in order to ensure that their own globalist interests are represented in Hungarian politics as well.

After all, they cannot defeat Viktor Orbán directly. The national government serves the Hungarian people and requires foreign banks to contribute to Hungary’s prosperity. It also refuses to yield to Ukrainian and pro-war pressure, and rejects migration and gender ideology.

This is why they want to overthrow the national government from abroad and replace it with an easily manipulated puppet government that obeys Brussels and is willing to push Hungary into the pro-Ukraine, pro-war mainstream.

The Erste Stiftung is just one of many foreign financial centers interfering in Hungarian domestic affairs. Others include the European Commission, the Soros foundations, the embassies of most Western European liberal countries, and countless pressure groups hidden behind opaque networks.

That is why we must stand up for Hungary more firmly than ever before and send them the same message we did in the 2022 election.

Hungary is not for sale. Hungarians cannot be blackmailed. Only we can decide our own future – not foreign bureaucrats, agents, banks, or energy giants.

On April 12, Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.

1️⃣ Foreign interference narrative (foreign interference framing)

Excerpt

“Yet how can and why would a foreign bank want to interfere in a country’s election?”

Technique

Already in the first sentence, the text establishes a sovereignty threat.

The question is rhetorical – it does not present evidence but implies an assumption as if it were a fact.

Goal

  • to construct an external enemy
  • to frame the election as national self-defense

Effect

The reader may conclude:

  • “foreign actors are controlling politics”
  • “the country must defend itself”

This is a classic sovereignty-framing technique.


2️⃣ Building a conspiracy chain (conspiracy chaining)

Excerpt

Erste → Stiftung → Civitates → media → NGOs → opposition.

Technique

The communication constructs a long funding chain that links all actors into a political conspiracy.

Key characteristics:

  • no concrete evidence
  • only a listing of connections

This is known as:

association-chain propaganda

Goal

  • to delegitimize opposition actors
  • to portray civil organizations as part of a foreign network

Effect

In the reader’s mind:

“all of them are part of the same network.”


3️⃣ Creating an enemy coalition (enemy coalition framing)

Actors mentioned

  • Soros
  • media
  • civil organizations
  • banks
  • the EU
  • embassies

Technique

The text merges many separate actors into one single hostile bloc.

In propaganda theory this is called:

enemy coalition framing

Goal

  • to simplify a complex political landscape
  • to create a “us vs. them” worldview

Effect

The reader may feel:

“everyone is working against Hungary.”


4️⃣ Scapegoating

Excerpt

“They want to abolish the bank tax.”

Technique

Economic and political conflicts are projected onto a specific actor.

This is a typical:

scapegoat narrative

Goal

  • to simplify economic debates
  • to discredit the political opponent

5️⃣ Moral panic framing

Key themes

  • migration
  • gender
  • war
  • Ukraine

Technique

These topics appear as strong emotional triggers.

Importantly, the text blends these issues together with the opposition.

Goal

emotional mobilization.


6️⃣ “Puppet government” narrative (puppet government framing)

Excerpt

“an easily manipulated puppet government”

Technique

The opposition is portrayed not as an independent political actor, but as a tool controlled from abroad.

This is a classic delegitimization technique.

Goal

to undermine the legitimacy of the opponent.


7️⃣ Defensive nationalism narrative (defensive nationalism)

Excerpt

“Hungary is not for sale.”

Technique

The campaign frames the election as national self-defense.

Key elements:

  • sovereignty
  • foreign pressure
  • national resistance

Goal

to transform the election into a question of national identity and loyalty.


8️⃣ Fear framing

Threats suggested in the text

  • foreign banks
  • Brussels
  • Soros
  • NGOs
  • Ukraine
  • migration
  • gender

Technique

Multiple different threats are linked to a single political decision.

This is known as:

fear stacking.


9️⃣ Campaign closure (political call-to-action)

Excerpt

“On April 12, Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.”

Technique

The entire narrative culminates in a direct electoral message.

This is a classic propaganda structure:

  1. danger
  2. enemy
  3. conspiracy
  4. solution = the speaker’s political camp

The overall propaganda structure of the text

The communication follows a very typical campaign formula:

1️⃣ foreign threat
2️⃣ financial network
3️⃣ demonization of civil organizations
4️⃣ delegitimization of the opposition
5️⃣ moral-panic topics
6️⃣ national defense narrative
7️⃣ electoral mobilization


Summary

The text represents classic populist campaign communication, simultaneously using:

  • enemy framing
  • conspiracy narratives
  • fear mongering
  • scapegoating
  • moral panic framing
  • nationalist framing
  • campaign mobilization

The goal is not primarily to inform, but to:

➡️ emotionally mobilize the audience
➡️ construct an enemy image
➡️ increase electoral support.

alexa

The left is just laughing about the Ukrainian blackmail…

Zelenskyy has now kept the Druzhba (Friendship) oil pipeline, which supplies Hungary, closed for 43 days because Hungary’s anti-war national government irritates them. When asked about the oil blockade, Romulusz Ruszin-Szendi, a politician from the TISZA Party, did not even attempt to stand up for Hungarian interests or for low household energy prices; instead, he simply laughed mockingly.

So this is how Zelenskyy cooperates with people on the Hungarian left…

Ukraine would like to see a change of government here, and they already have their man for it. Péter Magyar simply would not be able to say no to orders coming from Kyiv. If it were up to him, our money could be sent to the war, to multinationals, or to banks without objection—whenever such demands were made of him.

On Sunday we must show together that we will not give in to blackmail, because we stand for Hungary’s peace and security.

Let’s meet at the Peace March—our country needs us now!


According to Ruszin-Szendi, it is actually quite funny that Zelenskyy shut down the Druzhba oil pipeline. Do you also find that very funny? I find it extremely outrageous. And it is deeply sad that TISZA Party politicians are laughing about Hungary being put in a difficult position.

The Druzhba pipeline has not been restarted from the Alamindron direction. Do you have a connection with Ukraine? With the Zelenskyy administration?

But I know why they like this situation. Quite simply because they have aligned themselves with Zelenskyy in order to remove us from power so that Ukraine’s interests can be fulfilled and served. For example:

  • Ukraine’s EU accession
  • Cutting Hungary off from Russian gas
  • Sending our money and weapons to Ukraine

We, however, do not support this and will continue to oppose it.


1️⃣ Construction of an External Enemy (enemy framing)

Excerpt

“Zelenskyy has now kept the Druzhba oil pipeline supplying Hungary closed for 43 days.”

Technique

The communication presents an external actor – Ukraine and Zelenskyy – as the main cause of the conflict.

Key elements

  • “Ukrainian blackmail”
  • “oil blockade”
  • “Zelenskyy shut it down”

Goal

➡️ to present the political conflict as an international threat
➡️ to trigger a defensive reaction in the reader

Effect

The reader may develop the perception that:

  • “Hungary is under attack”
  • “external forces are trying to pressure us”

2️⃣ Designation of an Internal Enemy (internal enemy framing)

Excerpt

“The left is just laughing at the Ukrainian blackmail.”

“They have teamed up with Zelenskyy.”

Technique

The text portrays domestic political opponents as serving foreign interests.

Key elements

  • “pro-Ukrainian left”
  • “teamed up with Zelenskyy”
  • “their man”

Goal

➡️ to undermine the legitimacy of the opposition
➡️ to frame the election as a question of national loyalty

Effect

The reader may perceive that:

  • “they do not represent Hungarian interests”
  • “they serve foreign powers”

3️⃣ Betrayal Narrative (traitor framing)

Excerpt

“Péter Magyar simply would not be able to say no to orders coming from Kyiv.”

Technique

The opposition politician is portrayed as a figure controlled by foreign actors.

Key elements

  • “orders from Kyiv”
  • “would not be able to say no”

Goal

➡️ to damage personal credibility
➡️ to portray the opponent as acting against national sovereignty

Effect

The reader may think:

  • “he is not an independent politician”
  • “he represents external interests”

4️⃣ Economic Fear Framing

Excerpt

“Our money could be sent to the war.”

“banning Russian gas”

Technique

The communication paints a picture of potential economic losses.

Key elements

  • “our money going to war”
  • “cheap utility costs”

Goal

➡️ to trigger fear about financial security
➡️ to frame the election as a cost-of-living issue

Effect

The reader may think:

  • “if they win, everything will become more expensive”

5️⃣ Moral Outrage Framing

Excerpt

“Do you think this is funny? I think it’s extremely outrageous.”

Technique

The communication attempts to provoke a strong emotional reaction.

Key elements

  • “they are laughing”
  • “outrageous”

Goal

➡️ to mobilize the reader’s anger

Effect

The reader may enter an emotional state:

  • “this is unacceptable”

6️⃣ “Us vs Them” Narrative (polarization framing)

Excerpt

“But we continue to reject this.”

Technique

The political landscape is divided into two camps:

  • “we” = the national side
  • “they” = the pro-Ukrainian left

Goal

➡️ to strengthen political group identity

Effect

The reader more easily identifies with the “we” group.


7️⃣ Mobilization (mobilization framing)

Excerpt

“Let’s meet at the Peace March.”

Technique

At the end of the message, there is a direct call to action.

Goal

➡️ to turn emotionally mobilized supporters into political participants


Overall Structure of the Communication

The message follows a typical campaign communication structure:

1️⃣ external threat – Ukraine
2️⃣ internal traitor – the left / opposition
3️⃣ economic danger – utilities, money, war
4️⃣ moral outrage – “they are laughing at us”
5️⃣ group identity – “us vs them”
6️⃣ mobilization – Peace March

This structure is a very common model in political propaganda communication.

alexa

Miskolc is on board! 💪🏻🇭🇺

Katalin Csöbör needs no introduction!
Kati is a true Miskolc amazon who tirelessly fights for the people of Miskolc, for those in Upper and Lower Zsolca, and she never leaves anyone in her district on their own.

Miskolc also has a lot to lose. Miskolc has every reason to stay out of a war. In 1944, the homes of people living here were destroyed when 100 bomber aircraft dropped 200 tons of explosives.

And they did not aim precisely: the civilian population also suffered from the bombing. Altogether, the planes destroyed 170 residential buildings, 177 civilians and 29 soldiers lost their lives, 420 people were injured, and in the following weeks another 37 of the wounded died.

Today, the price of a single new modern tank is roughly 6 billion forints.

Meanwhile in Miskolc, the government funded the renovation and development of seven schools with 100% support. The total cost was 1.25 billion forints, and even the complete redevelopment of the Szentpáli school, including a new sports hall, was completed for 3.5 billion.

What I want to say with this is that when we see trains in Western Europe loaded with tanks heading to the Ukrainian front, each of those trains carries enough taxpayer money to renovate the educational infrastructure of Miskolc, a city of 145,000 people.

On those trains are rushing away the last crumbs of European prosperity.

This is the direction Brussels is heading in, led by the European People’s Party, whose leaders Manfred Weber and Ursula von der Leyen want to bring Péter Magyar to power so that Hungary abandons Viktor Orbán’s anti-war policy. They want us to send our money and weapons to Ukraine, and of course to ban the cheap Russian energy that guarantees low utility prices.

This is what we must stay out of. Miskolc must stay out of it, and every Hungarian city as well.

Viktor Orbán and Kati Csöbör are the guarantee of that.
That is why on April 12 in Miskolc as well: Fidesz is the safe choice!

Go Kati! Thank you for the invitation! 🫶🏻


1️⃣ Building a local hero (hero framing)

Excerpt

“Csöbör Katalin needs no introduction… a true Miskolc amazon…”

Technique

At the beginning of the text, a personality cult is built around a local politician.

Key elements:

  • “amazon”
  • “fights relentlessly”
  • “never leaves anyone behind”

This is hero framing: the politician is portrayed as a heroic protector.

Goal

  • create emotional attachment
  • build personal loyalty

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ “she is fighting for us”
➡️ “she is our person”


2️⃣ Evoking historical trauma (historical fear framing)

Excerpt

“In 1944, 100 bomber aircraft… 200 tons of explosives…”

Technique

The communication recalls the bombing of Miskolc during World War II, which is a powerful historical trauma.

This is fear framing:
the destruction of war is connected to present-day political decisions.

Goal

To portray the current geopolitical conflict as an existential threat.

Effect

The reader may think:

➡️ “if we get involved, similar destruction could happen again”


3️⃣ War-related fear appeal (fear mongering)

Excerpt

“Miskolc has every reason to stay out of a war.”

Technique

The message suggests that

➡️ the political opponent
➡️ would drag the country into a war.

This is fear mongering: using fear to influence electoral decisions.

Goal

To frame the election as a security decision rather than a political debate.

Effect

The reader may think:

➡️ “if they win, there will be war”


4️⃣ Misleading economic comparison (false equivalence)

Excerpt

“A modern tank costs around 6 billion forints… from that money the schools of Miskolc could be renovated.”

Technique

The message uses a simple but misleading cost comparison.

This is a classic false equivalence:

tank price
VS
educational investment

In reality, these belong to completely different budgetary systems.

Goal

To portray military spending or support for Ukraine as the enemy of social welfare.

Effect

The reader may think:

➡️ “because of the war there is no money for schools”


5️⃣ Constructing an external enemy (enemy framing)

Excerpt

“Brussels… Manfred Weber… Von der Leyen…”

Technique

The message creates an external power bloc:

➡️ Brussels
➡️ the EU elite
➡️ the European People’s Party

This is enemy framing.

Goal

To portray the political conflict as a struggle for national sovereignty.

Effect

The reader may think:

➡️ “Hungary is being controlled from outside”


6️⃣ Scapegoating

Excerpt

“They want to put Péter Magyar in power…”

Technique

The opposition is portrayed as serving foreign interests.

This is scapegoating.

Goal

To turn political competition into a national vs. foreign conflict.

Effect

The reader may think:

➡️ “the opposition is not on Hungary’s side”


7️⃣ “Us vs. them” framing (polarization framing)

Excerpt

“Orbán Viktor and Kati Csöbör are the guarantee.”

Technique

By the end of the message, the narrative leaves a binary choice:

➡️ Fidesz = peace
➡️ the opponent = war

This is polarization framing.

Goal

To reduce the electoral decision to a simple moral choice.

Effect

The reader may conclude:

➡️ “there are only two sides”


8️⃣ Campaign closing mobilization (call-to-action propaganda)

Excerpt

“On April 12… Fidesz is the safe choice.”

Technique

The text ends with a classic campaign mobilization message.

Goal

  • mobilization
  • encouraging people to vote

Summary

The message follows a typical modern political propaganda structure:

1️⃣ building a local hero
2️⃣ evoking historical trauma
3️⃣ war-related fear appeals
4️⃣ simplified economic comparison
5️⃣ constructing an external enemy
6️⃣ delegitimizing the opposition
7️⃣ “us vs them” polarization
8️⃣ campaign mobilization

This communication is not a policy debate, but rather a campaign message built on emotional mobilization.

alexa

Fidesz is leading in key districts!

We’ve kicked off the campaign, and Fidesz is ahead by 6 percentage points in Gyöngyös, by 6 points in Vác as well, and by an even more confident margin of 22 points in Körmend and Vasvár over the TISZA Party.

It is no surprise that Hungarian people want nothing to do with the left wing that is colluding with Zelenskyy.

Péter Magyar simply would not be able to say no to pro-Ukrainian, pro-war demands, whether it is about Kyiv’s accession to the European Union or banning cheap Russian gas.

Hungarians can see through the deception, and through TISZA as well. They know who stands on the side of peace, low utility costs, and sovereignty, and who stands with Ukraine.

In April, we should only place our trust in a responsible and experienced leader who, even in this age of dangers, is able to say no to these demands and stand up for Hungarian interests. That is why Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice!

Vác, Gyöngyös, Vasvár, Körmend — are we moving forward everywhere? Yes, we are doing better and better everywhere. I was looking too, and fresh opinion polls have just come out from these constituencies. And the situation is that I can see Hungarian people have had enough of the Ukrainian blackmail that Péter Magyar is carrying out together with Zelenskyy, complemented by Brussels. And more and more people do not want Ukraine telling us what to think about the world here, or Brussels telling us either. We are perfectly capable of deciding for ourselves whether we want war or not, whether we want to give our money to Ukraine or not, whether we want to maintain utility price cuts or not. I think by now everyone slowly knows the right answers, and that is why we will be more and more numerous, and stronger and stronger. And if we really want to show that we stand against blackmail, against threats, and that we stand by the Hungarian prime minister and Hungarian interests, then come and join the Peace March this Sunday!

1️⃣ Victory narrative (bandwagon / inevitability framing)

Excerpt

“Fidesz is leading in key districts… by 6 percent… by 22 percent ahead of the TISZA Party.”

Technique

The communication presents its own side as the winner already at the very beginning of the text.

Key elements

  • percentages
  • specific cities
  • “we are leading”

This is the bandwagon effect: it suggests that the outcome is already decided.

Goal

  • to create the perception of strong support
  • to pull undecided voters toward the “winning side”

Effect

Readers may start to think:

➡️ “They’re going to win anyway.”
➡️ “It’s worth joining the winners.”


2️⃣ Construction of an external enemy (enemy framing)

Excerpt

“the left wing cooperating with Zelensky”
“pro-Ukrainian, pro-war commands”

Technique

The political conflict is framed not as a domestic political debate, but as a struggle against foreign interests.

Enemy bloc

  • Ukraine
  • Zelensky
  • Brussels
  • the Hungarian opposition

Goal

To portray the opposition as anti-national or serving foreign interests.

Effect

Readers may conclude:

➡️ “The opposition is not on Hungary’s side.”


3️⃣ Guilt by association

Excerpt

“Péter Magyar… together with Zelensky… supplemented by Brussels”

Technique

The communication does not criticize concrete policies or programs, but instead links the opponent to external actors.

This is a classic propaganda method:

opponent
→ foreign politician
→ geopolitical conflict

Goal

To discredit the opponent without engaging in policy debate.

Effect

Readers stop evaluating programs and instead think:

➡️ “They represent foreign interests.”


4️⃣ False dilemma

Excerpt

“who stands on the side of peace, low utility costs and sovereignty, and who stands with Ukraine”

Technique

The communication reduces politics to two choices:

Side A

  • peace
  • low utility costs
  • sovereignty

Side B

  • Ukraine
  • war

In reality, political positions are far more complex.

Goal

To turn the election into a moral choice.

Effect

Readers may think:

➡️ “If not Fidesz, then war.”


5️⃣ Fear framing (security / threat framing)

Excerpt

“in the age of dangers”

Technique

The election is framed as a security decision made during a crisis.

Key words

  • danger
  • blackmail
  • threats
  • war

Goal

To transform political competition into a security issue.

Effect

Readers may feel:

➡️ “Now is not the time to take risks.”


6️⃣ National sovereignty narrative (sovereignty framing)

Excerpt

“They want to tell us from Ukraine… they want to tell us from Brussels”

Technique

The communication frames the political conflict as a defense of national self-determination.

Goal

To present the speaker’s side as the protector of national interests.

Effect

Readers may think:

➡️ “They are defending Hungary.”


7️⃣ Majority illusion

Excerpt

“more and more people are…”

Technique

The communication suggests that most of society already thinks this way.

Goal

  • to create conformity pressure
  • to influence undecided voters

Effect

Readers may feel:

➡️ “If everyone thinks this, it might be true.”


8️⃣ Mobilization call (movement mobilization)

Excerpt

“come to the peace march”

Technique

At the end of the message, the propaganda calls for concrete political action.

This follows the classic campaign structure:

  • emotional build-up
  • enemy construction
  • then mobilization

Goal

To encourage supporters to participate in demonstrations or political activity.

Effect

The reader receives not only an opinion, but also a call to act:

➡️ “I should join the movement.”


Summary

The text follows a typical campaign propaganda structure, built on the following main techniques:

1️⃣ victory narrative
2️⃣ construction of an external enemy
3️⃣ guilt by association
4️⃣ false dilemma
5️⃣ fear framing
6️⃣ sovereignty narrative
7️⃣ majority illusion
8️⃣ mobilization

The aim of the communication is not primarily to inform, but to:

➡️ trigger emotional reactions
➡️ delegitimize the opponent
➡️ mobilize supporters.

alexa

On the way home from the nationwide tour: people in Miskolc know too that in an age of dangers and wars, Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice!

What are you up to? Where were you today? That’s my question for you. You know where I was too, because you were with me all day everywhere. Right now we’re on our way home from Miskolc. We were at a forum in Csöbörkati. It was a very substantial afternoon and evening, because before that we also went to see an important and useful development in Miskolc, the Y Bridge, and afterwards we went door to door. There were some people we definitely managed to convince, and there are others who I think are still thinking about it, but we spoke with them too, fortunately in a human tone. So that was great, and now where are we in the count? Four out of five stops on the nationwide tour, and next week there will be another one like this.

This text is also a very typical campaign-communication pattern. If we break it down rhetorically, several propaganda and influence techniques are layered on top of each other.

The communication structure of the text

1️⃣ Crisis framing

Excerpt

“in an age of dangers and wars, Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice”

Technique

The political message is built on a narrative of global danger and instability.

Keywords

  • dangers
  • wars
  • an uncertain world

Goal

To frame the election as a security issue rather than a political debate.

Effect

In the reader’s mind, the following perception may form:

➡️ “This is not the time for experimentation.”
➡️ “Only the current leadership can provide security.”


2️⃣ “We are already on the road” campaign atmosphere (mobilization framing)

Excerpt

“We are just heading home from Miskolc.”

“We held a forum in Csöbörkati.”

“After that we went door-to-door.”

Technique

The politician appears as part of a constantly moving campaign team.

This is the classic nationwide tour narrative.

Goal

To create the impression that they:

  • are working actively
  • are meeting people
  • maintain direct contact with voters

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ “They are close to ordinary people.”
➡️ “They are traveling around the country and working.”


3️⃣ Local development as legitimacy (achievement anchoring)

Excerpt

“to see an important and useful development in Miskolc, the Y-bridge”

Technique

The text references a specific infrastructure project.

This is a classic campaign tool:

➡️ project
➡️ investment
➡️ development

Goal

To connect government performance to visible, tangible results.

Effect

The reader may conclude:

➡️ “The country is being built.”
➡️ “There are concrete achievements.”


4️⃣ Victory narrative (momentum framing)

Excerpt

“There were people we definitely managed to convince.”

“There are others who are still thinking about it.”

Technique

The campaign is presented as a continuous process of success and expansion.

Two categories appear:

  • already convinced voters
  • voters who are still persuadable

Goal

To portray the political contest as an advancing victory.

Effect

The reader may feel:

➡️ “Support is growing.”
➡️ “The campaign is gaining momentum.”


5️⃣ Direct conversational style (informal intimacy framing)

Excerpt

“What are you up to? Where were you today?”

“You already know where I was…”

Technique

The text is written as if it were a personal conversation with the voter.

This is one of the core tools of Facebook-style political communication.

Goal

To present the politician as direct, relatable, and everyday.

Effect

The reader may find it easier to identify with the speaker.


The overall narrative in short

The post follows a classic campaign structure:

1️⃣ A dangerous world
2️⃣ We are actively working across the country
3️⃣ We show developments and achievements
4️⃣ We are persuading more people
5️⃣ Therefore we are the safe choice

This is a very typical election communication formula.

alexandra szentkiralyi and putin love…

🗣️ Share this so it reaches the fake-news-producing Tisza media too! ❗
The Ukrainians are threatening Hungary again — this time they want to bleed our country dry economically.
They have launched multiple attacks against the TurkStream gas pipeline in Russia after also refusing to reopen the Druzhba oil pipeline toward Hungary. Incredible.
All this because we are not willing to pay for their war, and we do not want them to join the EU either.
And Péter Magyar is colluding with the very same Zelensky who keeps trying to blackmail Hungary and Orbán Viktor personally.
As long as there is a national government, we will not give in to blackmail, we will keep energy prices low, and we will preserve peace. That is also why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

The Ukrainians want to bleed the Hungarian people dry economically. Ukraine has launched multiple attacks against critical infrastructure elements of the TurkStream gas pipeline. Quite simply because we are not willing to finance and support their war. Because what is happening now? They have already cut off the oil, they are no longer allowing the Russian gas destined for us to pass through, and now the latest news says that the Russian section of TurkStream is also under attack. So this is the Zelensky government that, surrounded by Brussels, wants Péter Magyar to become Hungary’s prime minister. And they want this precisely because they rightly believe that as long as we are in government, we will not give in to Ukrainian blackmail and Ukrainian demands, we will not give up utility cost reductions, and we will not send weapons or money to finance Ukraine’s war. Péter Magyar, on the other hand, would obviously open the way to all of this, would send money to Ukraine as well — our money — and would cut us off from cheap Russian energy.

Sure. This text is almost textbook propaganda: fear-mongering, enemy construction, scapegoating, and in the end a party-political conclusion. On top of that, it repeatedly blurs the line between verified facts, disputed claims, and campaign conclusions.

Briefly about the reality:
There is indeed a Hungarian–Ukrainian dispute around the shutdown of the Druzhba (Friendship) pipeline. However, the current situation is linked to damage that occurred in January, which the Ukrainian side says was caused by a Russian attack. Zelensky also said last week that technically the pipeline could be restarted in roughly a month and a half. Meanwhile, reports about attacks on Russian facilities connected to TurkStream have mainly come from Russian/Gazprom sources, and Gazprom claimed the attacks were repelled.

In other words, the campaign message turns this complex situation into a finished narrative: “Ukraine is deliberately trying to economically bleed Hungary dry.”

The main structure of the message:

crisis → external enemy → internal traitor → savior leader → “the only safe choice”.


Propaganda analysis

1. Construction of an existential threat (crisis framing)

Excerpt:
“they want to economically bleed our country dry”,
“critical infrastructure”,
“they shut it off”,
“they won’t allow it through”.

Technique:
The issue is not framed as an energy market dispute or wartime infrastructure problem, but as a national survival issue.

Goal:
Prevent the reader from weighing the facts and instead trigger a sense of danger.

Effect:
The audience may feel that this is no longer diplomacy or energy policy but a direct attack on the livelihood of Hungarians.


2. Attribution of intent without evidence (intent attribution)

Excerpt:
“Simply because we are not willing to finance and support their war.”

Technique:
The text presents Ukraine’s supposed motivation as an established fact.

Goal:
Push every event into a single moral frame: Ukraine is acting out of revenge.

Effect:
Readers stop asking what actually happened and instead accept that “they are deliberately punishing us.”


3. Oversimplification of cause and effect (false cause)

Excerpt:
“they already shut off the oil… they no longer allow Russian gas to reach us… now they are attacking TurkStream as well.”

Technique:
Several separate and complex issues are presented as one linear action plan.

Goal:
Create the impression of a coordinated siege.

Effect:
The reader imagines a single Ukrainian operation against Hungary, even though in reality the situation involves a mixture of technical, military, political, and communication factors.


4. External enemy + internal agent narrative

(enemy framing + internal traitor framing)

Excerpt:
“Surrounded by Brussels, they want Péter Magyar to become Hungary’s prime minister.”

Technique:
Foreign actors and domestic opponents are merged into a single political bloc.

Goal:
Present the opposition not as a legitimate alternative but as agents of foreign interests.

Effect:
In the voter’s mind the opponent becomes not a rival but a threat.


5. Scapegoating through energy prices (scapegoating)

Excerpt:
“we will not give up the utility price cuts”.

Technique:
Energy prices are framed not as an economic or market issue but as part of an identity struggle.

Goal:
Pre-assign blame for possible price increases to Ukraine, Brussels, and the opposition.

Effect:
If economic uncertainty grows, the audience already has a ready-made culprit.


6. False exclusivity (false dilemma)

Excerpt:
“Fidesz is the only safe choice.”

Technique:
The political landscape is reduced to two options:

Fidesz = security
everyone else = chaos / war / higher prices.

Goal:
Close down critical thinking.

Effect:
The election appears not as a comparison of programs but as a survival decision.


7. Total division between “us” and “them” (tribal polarization)

Excerpt:
“we will not…”,
“they want…”,
“they are blackmailing…”

Technique:
Strong tribal language.

Goal:
Create emotional identification with the speaker’s political camp.

Effect:
Political judgment is replaced by loyalty reflex.


8. Presenting speculation as fact (speculative certainty)

Excerpt:
“Péter Magyar would obviously open the door to all this and send money to Ukraine…”

Technique:
A hypothetical political assumption about the future is presented as a certainty.

Goal:
Discredit the opponent in advance.

Effect:
The audience forms a negative political profile without evidence.


What is the most manipulative element?

Not the criticism of Ukraine itself.

The manipulation lies in the fact that the text:

  • turns every event into a single hostile Ukrainian plan,
  • reduces a complex energy-policy situation to campaign slogans,
  • portrays domestic opponents as agents of foreign powers,
  • and then uses all of this to deliver a clear electoral instruction.

This is not analysis, but a fear-based mobilization message.


In one sentence:

The post uses the uncertainty surrounding war and energy security to portray Ukraine as an enemy, the opposition as collaborators, and Fidesz as the only possible savior.