Author: sneff

Brussels, Péter Magyar, and every politician of the Tisza party want to phase out—and even ban—Russian energy resources.
Yet Europe’s lowest utility costs for Hungarians can only be guaranteed if we do not do this.

That is why we will take Brussels’ latest illegal decision to court, which would ban the import of Russian gas and oil starting next year.
When it comes to protecting utility prices, Hungarians can rely only on us. The Tisza party and their Western oil-multinational politicians would simply obey Brussels and dump triple utility bills onto Hungarian families.

Only Fidesz is the safe choice!

If it were up to Brussels and the Tisza party, next year people would be turning down their radiators, because today they adopted—by an absolutely illegal procedure, which is why we will sue them at the European Court—a decision stating that from 2027 it would no longer be allowed to import Russian gas into the European Union.

This would mean that Hungarian families would no longer be entitled to the extremely low heating utility costs that every Hungarian family currently enjoys.
Tisza and Brussels are on the same side, while we are on the side of the Hungarian people—now, as always. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

1️⃣ False merging (Brussels = Tisza = Péter Magyar)

“Brussels, Péter Magyar and every politician of the Tisza…”

👉 In a single sentence, three different things are fused together — without any evidence.

• The European Union ≠ a Hungarian opposition party
• The Tisza Party ≠ concrete EU decision-making
• Fidesz deliberately sets itself up in opposition to all of them

🎯 Goal:
Don’t think about them separately — see only one single “enemy package”.

---

2️⃣ Fear-mongering without numbers

“They would slap triple utility prices on Hungarian families”

👉 No source. No calculation. No model.

It is never clarified:

• triple compared to what,
• from when,
• relative to which price level,
• with what compensations.

🧠 This is not an economic claim, but emotional shock tactics.

---

3️⃣ “Illegal decision” – legal fog

“in an absolutely illegal way… we will sue at the European Court”

👉 A classic trick:

• it never says
  • which law is being violated,
  • which competence is missing,
  • which procedure was breached.

🎭 The word “we will sue” reassures — it does not inform.

---

4️⃣ Temporal distortion (2027 → tomorrow)

“If it were up to them, next year they could turn down the radiators…”

👉 While the speaker themselves says the change would be from 2027.

📌 This is deliberate:

• a distant decision is presented as an immediate threat,
• leaving no time for rational thinking.

---

5️⃣ False exclusivity: “only us”

“When it comes to protecting utility costs, Hungarians can only rely on us”

👉 This is not an argument, but a loyalty test.

• It doesn’t say what exactly we will do
• It says: if you don’t choose us, there will be trouble

This is emotional blackmail, not public policy.

---

6️⃣ The final frame: “them vs. us”

“Tisza and Brussels on one side, we are on the side of the Hungarian people”

🎯 This is the endpoint of propaganda:

• them = foreign, dangerous, obedient
• us = protection, security, nation

At this point, truth no longer matters —
only which side you belong to.

---

🧠 In short

This text is not about energy policy, but about:

• maintaining fear,
• demonizing the opponent,
• triggering reflexes instead of thinking.

👉 If you’re afraid, you don’t ask questions.
If you don’t ask questions, you are controllable.

🧠 How do they try to influence people in this text?

🎯 1️⃣ Fear-based pressure to decide

Throughout the text, the message is:

“If it’s not us, there will be trouble.”

It will be cold,
it will be expensive,
your family will be in danger.

👉 This is not information, but the creation of a stress situation.
Under fear, people do not weigh options — they look for something to cling to.

🧠 2️⃣ Triggering thinking through emotional reflexes

They do not provide data, but emotional anchors:

“triple utility bills”
“they’ll turn down the radiators”
“illegal decision”
“orders from Brussels”

👉 These are keywords, not claims.
The brain does not calculate — it detects threat.

🧩 3️⃣ Simplifying the enemy image

Multiple actors are merged into a single threat:

Brussels
Tisza
Péter Magyar

👉 This way, you don’t have to think about them separately.
It’s enough to know: “they are bad.”

This reduces mental load — and with it, critical thinking.

⏳ 4️⃣ Creating time pressure

Although they talk about 2027, the effect is:

“This could happen tomorrow.”

👉 Urgency blocks questioning.
If danger feels immediate, there is no time to “look it up later.”

🧠 5️⃣ Offering false security

After frightening the audience, they also provide the solution:

“You can rely only on us.”

👉 Psychologically, this is powerful:

first they take away your sense of security,
then they give it back — conditionally.

This is classic emotional dependency building.

🧪 6️⃣ Closing the us–them frame

By the end, the question is no longer whether it’s true, but:

“Which side are you on?”

If you’re with us: a good Hungarian
If not: dangerous, foreign, obedient

👉 At this point, debate ends.
This is identity-based manipulation.

🧠 In summary

This statement does not inform — it:

generates fear,
oversimplifies,
creates urgency,
and then demands loyalty.

👉 If you are afraid, you don’t ask questions.
If you don’t ask questions, you are easy to control.

Even people from Tisza are now fleeing from Péter Magyar. Well, well, well. More and more are leaving Tisza. They believed in them, worked for Péter Magyar, and then they ran. Why? Because they too realized that empty promises without substance will not lead to governing. Hungary deserves more than yet another real-life experiment, so never forget to look behind the scenes. Because…

Members of their own ranks are abandoning the sinking ship of Tisza one by one.
Most recently, Balázs Csercsa announced that he will not continue as head of the Tisza Party’s church affairs working group, because he does not agree with the party’s methods.

They cannot tolerate Péter Magyar’s aggressive style and the command-and-control system that prevails within Tisza.

Especially now, in times of danger, the country needs a strong and calm prime minister. That is why Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.

1️⃣ “They are fleeing” – manufacturing a panic narrative

“fleeing,” “sinking ship,” “abandoning it”

This is not a fact-based claim, but emotional framing.
No numbers, no proportions, no timeline — only dramatic verbs.

👉 Function:

• to generate a sense of panic,
• to destabilize undecided voters:
  “if others are leaving, I shouldn’t stay either.”

This is classic bandwagon manipulation, just in its negative form.

---

2️⃣ A single departure → systemic collapse

“Csercsa Balázs… will not continue”

From one personal decision, the narrative suddenly constructs:

• a “command-and-control system,”
• “aggressive leadership,”
• a “disintegrating party.”

👉 This is unjustified generalization.
There is no:

• internal documentation,
• multiple independent sources,
• structural evidence.

Only a narrative.

---

3️⃣ Character assassination without evidence

“Magyar Péter’s aggressive style”

This is labeling, not an argument.
No quotes, no concrete situations, no context.

👉 Purpose:

• to provoke an emotional reaction,
• to shift the debate from policies to personality.

---

4️⃣ Artificial crisis framing

“especially now, in these dangerous times”

Once again, nothing is specified:

• what danger,
• when,
• from whom,
• how it is measured.

👉 This creates a permanent state of alert:
if you are afraid → you don’t ask questions → you cling to the “familiar.”

---

5️⃣ False conclusion: “therefore Orbán Viktor”

At the end, there is no real conclusion — just a jump:

“Therefore, Orbán Viktor and Fidesz are the safe choice.”

❌ No logical chain
❌ No comparison
❌ No program

Only: fear → reflex

This is where the manipulation closes.

---

🧠 Short overall picture

This text:

• does not inform,
• does not analyze,
• does not prove,

but instead sets a mood, so that:

• the undecided stop thinking,
• supporters feel reassured,
• critics become exhausted.

Daniel Freund, the Hungary-hating German Green, was strongly rooting for Péter Márki-Zay and the DK four years ago. Now he is strongly rooting for Péter Magyar…

According to him, Kyiv would be very happy about a TISZA victory, and Brussels would also be more “able to act.”

Well, that is exactly why Fidesz is the safe choice!

Hungary does not need a government that is welcomed in Ukraine and Brussels, but one that defends the interests of the Hungarian people and opposes the war!

Daniel Freund says people in Ukraine would be very happy about a TISZA victory. I can believe that they would indeed be very happy about it in Ukraine. Daniel Freund also said that EU decisions could then be made much more efficiently. Of course—because the Hungarian government would no longer be there to block insane ideas like giving our money to Ukraine and going to war, getting dragged into a war.

So we understand Daniel Freund and his lobbying, but we continue to stand by the position that we must not give our money to Ukraine and must not be drawn into a war. That is precisely why Fidesz is the safe choice.

🎭 1️⃣ Creating an external enemy

“Hungary-hating German Green politician”

This is not information. It’s labeling.

👉 What does it do?

• It doesn’t analyze what Daniel Freund says
• It doesn’t debate his arguments
• It turns him into an enemy figure

This is dehumanization + nationalist emotional triggering.

The subconscious message:

“He’s not someone to debate. He’s an enemy.”

Once that happens, his arguments feel suspicious before you even hear them.

---

🧠 2️⃣ Guilt by association

“Freund → Brussels → Kyiv → TISZA”

This is an emotional chain, not a logical one.

The trick:

• It doesn’t explain what TISZA would actually do
• It focuses on who would be happy about them

Psychologically this is stronger than argumentation.

The deep message:

“If they like it, it must be bad for you.”

This activates tribal thinking, not political reasoning.

---

⚠️ 3️⃣ False dilemma

“We need a government that defends Hungarians, not one that Brussels would be happy about.”

As if those two things can’t coexist.

In reality:

• A country can represent its interests and be an EU member
• Someone can be against war without blocking everything internationally

But the message simplifies the world:

🟢 Fidesz = peace + national interest
🔴 Others = war + Brussels

That’s emotional black-and-white framing.

---

🔥 4️⃣ Fear activation

Key phrases:

• “dragged into war”
• “our money to Ukraine”
• “being pulled in”

This targets existential fear (security + money).

When fear is activated, the brain:

• stops analyzing
• stops questioning
• switches to defense mode

And in defense mode, people choose the one who seems strong — not the one with better arguments.

---

🧩 5️⃣ What’s missing

There’s no mention of:

• specific EU decisions
• which funds
• what mechanisms
• what legal processes

Only emotions:
enemy, war, money, outside forces.

This is not information.
This is emotional steering.

---

🎯 The real goal

The goal isn’t understanding.

The goal is that you feel:

“Foreign forces want control, we’re in danger, only they can protect us.”

This builds protective loyalty, not political awareness.

---

🧠 Psychologically summarized

Tool	Effect
Enemy image	Shuts down rational debate
Guilt by association	No need to prove anything
False dilemma	Narrows thinking
Fear	Activates survival brain
Lack of details	Prevents verification

Brussels expects Hungarians to pay for Ukraine’s operation, the costs of the war, and soaring energy prices — 1.4 million forints per family.

With the national petition, we say no to financing the war with Hungarian taxpayers’ money.
We say no to financing Ukraine’s operation from Hungarian taxpayers’ money for the next ten years.
And we also say no to higher household utility bills caused by the war.

We are living in an age of danger, and we are deciding our own future — Fidesz, the safe choice!

No, no, and no. Three noes indeed: through the National Petition we will say no to financing the war, no to financing Ukraine’s operation over the next ten years, and no to Hungarian families’ utility costs rising because of the war.
Tell us what you think about this as well.

Thank you. Hi, hello! I’ll comment on the post! I usually do, because… I recommend that you watch the latest video as well. Yes? Alright, let’s take a look.

András writes that it simply doesn’t make sense: we are members of the European Union, Ukraine is not, so on what basis does it receive support at all? Those who are members, their issues should be resolved, because peace is better.

So András is questioning on what grounds we, the European member states, are giving Ukraine—especially a country at war—the money of European citizens. I think European citizens themselves would also be very interested in the answer to this question.

However, this answer never arrives from Brussels, because in Brussels, and in countries led in this Brussels-style way, they don’t like asking people what they actually want: whether they want migrants, whether they want to go to war, whether they want to give money to a war. Because then answers might be born like the one revealed recently in a survey—that European citizens do not support sending soldiers and weapons to Ukraine at all.

So I very much understand this argument.

🎭 What is really happening in this statement?

1️⃣ “We are the only ones” – false exceptionalism

“Viktor Orbán’s government is the only one in Europe…”

This is classic exceptionalism.
It doesn’t prove anything—it simply declares that we are better than everyone else.

👉 Its function:

• to create moral superiority,
• to pre-empt criticism (“if no one else does this, then they must be worse”).

---

2️⃣ “We asked the people” – façade democracy

The so-called “national petition” is not a referendum,
has no legal consequences,
and contains no verifiable, neutral questions.

👉 Rhetorical trick:

• it labels a one-way political campaign as democracy,
• while offering no real decision-making power.

This is emotional validation, not a rule-of-law mechanism.

---

3️⃣ “Brussels doesn’t ask” – straw man

“In Brussels they don’t like asking people.”

Here, “Brussels” is not an institution but an enemy figure.

👉 What this does:

• it reduces a complex, multi-actor decision-making system to a single villain,
• so there’s no need to explain data, treaties, or legal grounds.

---

4️⃣ The money-number magic: “800 + 700 billion”

There is no context:

• over what time period,
• from which sources,
• under what legal framework,
• whether it’s refundable,
• whether it’s national or joint funding.

👉 The number is not information—it’s shock value.

---

5️⃣ “Golden toilets” – anger activation

“Flushing our future down golden toilets.”

This is visual rage-bait:

• luxury = corruption,
• Ukraine/Brussels = thieves,
• you = the victim.

👉 At this point, there is no debate—only emotional mobilization.

---

6️⃣ Quoting a comment (“András”) – fake dialogue

A single comment is highlighted,
one that says exactly what the narrator wants.

👉 This is the theatre of “the people’s voice”:

• no counterarguments,
• no debate,
• only reinforcement.

---

7️⃣ “According to surveys” – source-free validation

“It turned out that European citizens do not support…”

❗️ There is no:

• research institute,
• methodology,
• date.

👉 This is an appeal to authority without data.

---

🧠 In summary – what is the REAL function?

This text is not about informing people about Ukraine, the EU, or money.

🎯 The real goal:

• to deepen the us vs. them divide,
• to trigger anger and fear,
• to shut down critical thinking with the claim:
  “we asked the people, they didn’t.”

This is identity-reinforcing propaganda, not political debate.

The stakes are rising, and more and more people are openly joining the election campaign — but after last week, everyone can see things clearly.

👉🏻 The Tisza Party first didn’t even dare to attend the vote on removing von der Leyen, and then this week they expanded their team with a Shell executive, who stated in his very first interview that if they come to power, utility price cuts will be over.

👉🏻 They also made another signing — straight from a Soros-affiliated organization and from alongside Gordon Bajnai. She is the woman who is deeply embedded with the Biden-style Democrats. From this point on, we can be certain that they would replace our current peace-oriented, sovereign public policy with Brussels’ pro-war madness.

❗️ And speaking of madness: Zelensky in Davos, and his foreign minister as well, have openly begun threatening Hungarians. They see that Hungarians are still unwilling to die for Ukraine or hand over all their money to Kyiv. They don’t like this at all, so they are using every possible means to topple the anti-war, national government and install a Brussels-aligned, Ukraine-friendly government to serve their interests.

Hungarians, however, will not let themselves be pushed around. The government is launching a national petition against the plans of Brussels and the Ukrainians, according to which every Hungarian family would have to give millions to Zelensky’s circle. We want no part of this — and we made that crystal clear on Saturday at yet another successful, sold-out anti-war rally.

If the images didn’t speak for themselves, the numbers certainly do: according to the polling firm that most accurately predicted the 2022 election, Fidesz is already leading Tisza by 10 percentage points. And according to a leaked internal Tisza poll, in Kaposvár the Fidesz candidate is leading by 15 percentage points — potentially matching the result from four years ago!

So things are taking shape: we are more numerous, we are stronger — but the bulk of the work is still ahead.

On April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice! 🧡💪🏻🇭🇺

🎭 What is really happening in this text?

1️⃣ “The stakes are rising” – an artificially created emergency

“the stakes are rising,” “everyone can now see clearly”

This is crisis framing.
It doesn’t provide data — it suggests:

👉 “you’re either with us or against us”
👉 “anyone who isn’t with us is dangerous”

This is the combination of time pressure + fear.

---

2️⃣ Guilt by association

“Shell executive” → end of utility price cuts
“Soros organization” → anti-national
Gordon Bajnai → demonized past
“Biden-style Democrats” → foreign power

👉 It never explains what the person did, said, or proposed.
👉 It only says: “they come from a bad place.”

This is not argumentation — it’s character assassination.

---

3️⃣ Projecting external enemies onto domestic politics

Ursula von der Leyen
Volodymyr Zelensky
“Brussels”
“the Ukrainians”
“pro-war madness”

👉 Classic siege mentality:

“They are attacking us → only we can protect you.”

Important:
❗ No concrete threat, no quotation, no decision is named.
There is no fact — only emotion.

---

4️⃣ Fear stacking

All poured into a single text:

war
death
loss of money
utility costs
foreign forces
betrayal
destruction

👉 At this point, the brain no longer verifies — it defends itself.

This is intentional.

---

5️⃣ The “national petition” – false participation

“the government launches a petition”

This is controlled release:

first, create fear,
then present the “only way out.”

👉 Not a real choice.
👉 Not a debate.
👉 A pre-selected answer.

---

6️⃣ Numbers as authority — without evidence

“according to the firm that predicted the election most accurately”
“according to a leaked internal poll”

📌 Missing:

company name
methodology
sample size
date

This is appeal to authority without data.
Here, numbers are not information — they are a calming drug for the in-group.

---

7️⃣ Closing: identity + loyalty

“we are more and more”
“we are getting stronger”
“the safe choice”

This is the final message:
👉 “Don’t think. Belong.”

The orange heart 💪🇭🇺 is not decoration — it is an emotional anchor.

---

🧠 Short summary – what are they doing to you?

❌ They are not informing
❌ They are not proving
❌ They are not debating

✅ They create fear
✅ They designate enemies
✅ They pre-write the “correct” answer

This is not politics.
This is psychological influence.