Daniel Freund, the Hungary-hating German Green, was strongly rooting for Péter Márki-Zay and the DK four years ago. Now he is strongly rooting for Péter Magyar…
According to him, Kyiv would be very happy about a TISZA victory, and Brussels would also be more “able to act.”
Well, that is exactly why Fidesz is the safe choice!
Hungary does not need a government that is welcomed in Ukraine and Brussels, but one that defends the interests of the Hungarian people and opposes the war!
Daniel Freund says people in Ukraine would be very happy about a TISZA victory. I can believe that they would indeed be very happy about it in Ukraine. Daniel Freund also said that EU decisions could then be made much more efficiently. Of course—because the Hungarian government would no longer be there to block insane ideas like giving our money to Ukraine and going to war, getting dragged into a war.
So we understand Daniel Freund and his lobbying, but we continue to stand by the position that we must not give our money to Ukraine and must not be drawn into a war. That is precisely why Fidesz is the safe choice.
🎭 1️⃣ Creating an external enemy
“Hungary-hating German Green politician”
This is not information. It’s labeling.
👉 What does it do?
- It doesn’t analyze what Daniel Freund says
- It doesn’t debate his arguments
- It turns him into an enemy figure
This is dehumanization + nationalist emotional triggering.
The subconscious message:
“He’s not someone to debate. He’s an enemy.”
Once that happens, his arguments feel suspicious before you even hear them.
🧠 2️⃣ Guilt by association
“Freund → Brussels → Kyiv → TISZA”
This is an emotional chain, not a logical one.
The trick:
- It doesn’t explain what TISZA would actually do
- It focuses on who would be happy about them
Psychologically this is stronger than argumentation.
The deep message:
“If they like it, it must be bad for you.”
This activates tribal thinking, not political reasoning.
⚠️ 3️⃣ False dilemma
“We need a government that defends Hungarians, not one that Brussels would be happy about.”
As if those two things can’t coexist.
In reality:
- A country can represent its interests and be an EU member
- Someone can be against war without blocking everything internationally
But the message simplifies the world:
🟢 Fidesz = peace + national interest
🔴 Others = war + Brussels
That’s emotional black-and-white framing.
🔥 4️⃣ Fear activation
Key phrases:
- “dragged into war”
- “our money to Ukraine”
- “being pulled in”
This targets existential fear (security + money).
When fear is activated, the brain:
- stops analyzing
- stops questioning
- switches to defense mode
And in defense mode, people choose the one who seems strong — not the one with better arguments.
🧩 5️⃣ What’s missing
There’s no mention of:
- specific EU decisions
- which funds
- what mechanisms
- what legal processes
Only emotions:
enemy, war, money, outside forces.
This is not information.
This is emotional steering.
🎯 The real goal
The goal isn’t understanding.
The goal is that you feel:
“Foreign forces want control, we’re in danger, only they can protect us.”
This builds protective loyalty, not political awareness.
🧠 Psychologically summarized
| Tool | Effect |
|---|---|
| Enemy image | Shuts down rational debate |
| Guilt by association | No need to prove anything |
| False dilemma | Narrows thinking |
| Fear | Activates survival brain |
| Lack of details | Prevents verification |