war war war war war war…

According to expectations in the Ukrainian press, Hungary would immediately enter the war after a change of government. Unfortunately, they are right!!

I read that Hungary would provide combat aircraft to Ukraine. What is this supposed to mean? Yes, the Ukrainian press writes this, and the Hungarian press picked it up from there. But how does that even make sense?

There is a dispute in the Czech Republic. The Czech president is pro-war and promised Zelenskyy that he would sell him combat aircraft, but the new government—the Babiš government—blocked this. Because of this, the Ukrainian press is writing that unfortunately the Prague deal did not go through, but how great it would be that there will be a change of government in Hungary in April.

A new government would come, a pro-war, Ukraine-friendly government, and then combat aircraft could come from Hungary.

This is what must be prevented.

1️⃣ “According to the Ukrainian press” – shifting responsibility

“According to expectations in the Ukrainian press…”

This is not evidence, but a shield of external attribution.

✔️ There is no:

specific article
date
headline
quotation

👉 Function:
“Not me saying it, they are” – allowing the speaker to evade accountability.

2️⃣ Rumor → “Unfortunately, they are right!!”

“Unfortunately, they are right!!”

This is one of the most important tricks.

🔴 It skips the burden of proof.
A speculation is turned into a fact purely through emphasis and emotion.

👉 This is not analysis, but emotional closure:

“Don’t ask any further questions, we’ve already decided for you.”

3️⃣ Czech story → Hungarian war (logical fallacy)

The narrative chain:

There is a dispute in the Czech Republic
Miloš Zeman is pro-war (claim)
Andrej Babiš blocked the deal

❗ From this, the conclusion is drawn that Hungary would enter a war.

👉 This is a classic logical error:
a domestic political conflict in another country is used to manufacture a Hungarian future scenario.

4️⃣ “There will be a change of government in April” – pre-fabricated panic

“…how great it is that there will be a change of government in Hungary in April.”

At this point, it is no longer a prediction, but scare tactics.

🧠 What does it do?

It frames the election not as a political choice,
but as a wartime risk.

👉 This is emotional blackmail:

“If you vote differently, there will be blood on your hands.”

5️⃣ “This must be prevented” – fear → command

This is the final step.

no debate
no alternatives
no nuance

❌ Only one message remains:

“Be afraid – and obey.”

🎯 Summary

This statement does not inform. Instead, it:

sells rumors as facts
cites foreign media without evidence
uses another country’s story to instill fear
distorts an election into a wartime decision

This is fear management, not politics.

Orbán’s propaganda is a display of nonstop, no-limits insults.

What’s everyone’s experience with this?
Is it really true that only uneducated, crude people vote for Fidesz, while intelligent geniuses vote for Tisza, as left-leaning researchers claim?? 😂🤡

Once again, opinion pollsters are misleading people—this time with the illusion that unskilled, uneducated, poor “louts” are Fidesz–KDNP supporters, while the elite (the group it’s supposedly fashionable to belong to)—the intelligent, educated, degree-holding, wealthy class—are mostly Tisza supporters.

First of all, we’ve been hearing this narrative continuously since 2002. Second, it’s quite strange, because in my own surroundings it’s exactly the opposite. And there…

🎭 What is this statement really?

This is not a sharing of experiences and not a debate starter—it is judgmental framing.

1️⃣ False social division (elite vs. “louts”)

The narrative looks like this:

“uneducated, poor, crude” → Fidesz–KDNP
“intelligent, degree-holding, wealthy elite” → Tisza Party

👉 This is not description, but labeling.
The goal is not to understand voter motivations, but to establish a moral hierarchy.

2️⃣ Pseudo-empiricism: “according to researchers”

Watch the trick:

“left-wing researchers”
“they claim”
“according to them”

❌ There is no:

methodology
sample
data
source

✔️ There is:

prejudice
irony
mockery

This is an appeal to authority without evidence.

3️⃣ Personal experience as a shield

“In my environment, it’s exactly the opposite.”

This is not an argument, but a defensive sentence:

it exempts the speaker from having to prove anything,
asks for emotional identification,
implies: “anyone who says otherwise is lying.”

👉 Classic anecdotal relativization.

4️⃣ The real goal: identity warfare

This statement is not really about Tisza or Fidesz. It’s about this:

“Where do you belong socially?”

If you vote for Fidesz → you are looked down on
If you vote for Tisza → you can be part of the “elite”

This is shame-based and vanity-based manipulation at the same time.

🧠 What is the reality instead?

Actual research (the kind that really exists) generally shows that:

there is no party split based on intelligence

There is a split based on:

age
place of residence
media environment
existential security
political identity

👉 The “smart vs. stupid” divide is propaganda language, not social science.

🎯 The essence in one sentence

This is not analysis.
This is political self-justification wrapped in contempt.

Alexandra is lying.

What are we reading?
Well, it turns out that an internal poll from the Tisza party has been leaked, specifically from a constituency in Somogy County, and the situation is that we are leading by a lot. Attila Gevencsér, the Fidesz candidate, stands at 44.7%, while the Tisza candidate is at 29.2%.

This proves that the Tisza politicians themselves know perfectly well that the opinion polls they produce—claiming that they are way ahead—are absolutely not real. They themselves know that they are distorting reality.

It’s also worth taking a look at the latest figures from the Hungarian Society Research Institute, which was the most accurate in predicting the final result of the 2022 elections as well. According to them, Fidesz is also clearly in the lead. So I think we should base our conclusions on this, and not on the opinion polls paid for by the Tisza party.

This is a real exposure. The internal constituency poll of Tisza in Kaposvár has been leaked, and it turns out that Fidesz could reproduce its 2022 result locally and is leading the Tisza candidate by more than 15 percentage points.

This is in line with the latest survey by Magyar Társadalomkutató, the company that most accurately predicted the 2022 election, according to which Fidesz is leading nationwide 51–41.

Therefore, Péter Magyar and his team, hand in hand with left-wing polling firms, are lying straight to the faces of the Hungarian people without batting an eye.

That’s why: Fidesz is the safe choice!

🎭 What is actually happening in this text?

This is not information—it’s trust manipulation combined with a pre-manufactured sense of victory.

1️⃣ “Leaked internal poll” – an unverifiable claim

“the Tisza party’s internal poll has leaked”

🔴 Problem:

no document
no methodology
no data source
no independent confirmation

👉 Function:

illusion of secret knowledge
“we know more than you do”
instant appearance of credibility

This is a classic propaganda device: inside information that cannot be verified, yet is emotionally powerful.

2️⃣ One constituency → nationwide “exposure”

Kaposvár / Somogy / a single electoral district

👉 Trick:

local data → national conclusion
statistical nonsense

It’s like saying:

“It’s raining in Kaposvár, therefore there’s a storm across the entire country.”

This is deliberate distortion, not a professional mistake.

3️⃣ “They know they are lying” – attribution of intent without evidence

“they themselves know they are distorting reality”

🔴 What’s missing:

internal emails
statements
proof

👉 What’s present:

projecting intent onto the opponent
constructing moral superiority
delegitimizing the opponent’s character

This is not a rebuttal—it’s character assassination.

4️⃣ “Magyar Társadalomkutató = truth”

“they were the most accurate in 2022”

⚠️ Manipulative move:

one past hit → absolute credibility

No mention of:

margins of error
methodological changes
who commissioned the research
current uncertainty

👉 This is an authoritarian argument:

“Believe us because we say so—and once we were right.”

5️⃣ “51–41” as an emotional sedative

“nationwide 51–41”

This is not information, but:

reassurance
elimination of doubt
the feeling that “it’s already decided”

🎯 Goal:

don’t ask
don’t doubt
don’t think further

6️⃣ Conscious deception, not a mistake

And this is where what you said comes in—and it’s crucial:

Alexandra cannot tell the truth about the polls,
and this has been confirmed by her superiors.

👉 Conclusion:

This is not analysis.
Not “bad interpretation.”
Not “exaggeration.”

🔴 This is a narrative executed on instruction.

She does not measure.
She does not analyze.
She transmits a message.

7️⃣ Closing line = political advertisement

“That’s why: Fidesz is the safe choice!”

This exposes everything.

The entire text is nothing more than:

a pre-fabricated justification
a lead-in to a campaign slogan
“if you’re not with us, you’re believing lies”

🧠 Short summary

This text is:

❌ not data-driven
❌ not verifiable
❌ not methodological
❌ not professional

✅ But it is perfect propaganda:

illusion of secret knowledge
false certainty
demonization of the opponent
shutdown of thinking

orban propaganda change brussel to ukrajna…

Zelensky says Ukraine is ready to start accession talks and will happily become a member of the European Union in 2027 🤡

The president is quite the comedian 🤣
We Hungarians will decide that, okay? 😉

Author
I am Balázs Németh

Péter Szijjártó was right — a new phase of the domestic election campaign has indeed begun. Ukrainians are doing everything they can to bring about a change of government, because they know exactly that Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to Brussels.

Alexandra’s brainwashing level is 1000.

We remember what things were like before 2010. The austerity measures, when Gordon Bajnai and the banks dictated the terms and Hungarian families paid the price. When household utility costs didn’t matter, jobs didn’t matter—only that the numbers looked good in Brussels.

Now it seems the left would bring back the very same recipe, just wrapped in different packaging.

The politicians of the Tisza Party are familiar faces with familiar backgrounds: they come from the world of globalist multinationals. People who have spent their careers chasing profits for international corporations or representing globalist interests in politics. What they all have in common is that they have never stood on the side of Hungarian families.

Let’s not be fooled: people like István Kapitány and Anita Orbán were not sent here by accident. They are here so that these power and financial circles come out on top. So that Western banks and major energy companies can once again freely squeeze Hungarians, without having to contribute to the common good.

And we also know where this would lead if they came to power: utility cost reductions would be scrapped, support schemes would be cut back, and taxes would be raised. We’ve already seen this movie before.

Hungarians deserve far more than this. That’s why the Fidesz is the safe choice.

🎭 What is actually happening in this text?

1️⃣ Designated scapegoats → personalization

“Kapitány Istváns and Orbán Anitas were not sent here by accident.”

Here, the speaker uses specific names (e.g. Kapitány István, Orbán Anita), but does not attribute concrete actions to them — only roles.

👉 Function:

abstract “power and financial interests” are given a human face
it’s easier to hate people than to analyze systems
guilt is implied without evidence

This is not exposure — it’s labeling.

2️⃣ Demonization of external forces

“Western banks and large energy companies”

This is a classic enemy bundle:

foreign
wealthy
faceless
“them” vs “us”

👉 The trick:
It never specifies

which bank,
which company,
which decision,
when, or how.

It only delivers the feeling:
⚠️ “They’re coming to drain us.”

3️⃣ Future fear scenario (conditional scaremongering)

“Utility price cuts would go down the drain, subsidies would be slashed, taxes would be raised.”

This is not a fact, but a conditional future narrative.

👉 Key point:

no program quote
no legislation
no budget calculation

Just a familiar fear checklist we’ve heard many times before.

4️⃣ “We’ve seen this movie before” – false memory appeal

This is one of the strongest psychological tools in the text.

👉 What does it do?

it does not prove anything
it tries to trigger memory
but never says where, when, or exactly what

The brain fills in the gaps with its own fears.

5️⃣ Moral closure + political command

“Hungarians deserve much more than this.”
“That’s why the Fidesz is the safe choice.”

The text does not end with reasoning, but with instruction.

👉 The logic:

if you’re afraid → that’s bad
if it’s bad → change is dangerous
if it’s dangerous → stay where you are

This is a promise of safety, not a decision framework.

🧠 Overall picture – what is this really?

❌ Not an economic policy debate
❌ Not a program critique
❌ Not a fact-based analysis

✅ An emotional escape route
✅ Fear + nostalgia + “steady hand”
✅ Triggering reflexes instead of thinking

In one sentence:

This text does not want you to understand the electoral alternatives — it wants you to fear change, and therefore stop asking questions.

propaganda not need words

István Forgács, an expert on Roma affairs.
Why is it important for civic governance to continue? Because a civic government provides opportunities for everyone who wants to move forward. That is why we must continue on this path without hesitation. It is very important that the future destiny of Budapest is shaped in North Pest, and in this process Balázs Németh will be the guarantee. It is a responsibility—but I accept it. Work, work, work. Together, we will succeed.

orban propaganda

Orbán-haters are now celebrating the fact that banning Russian gas will make utility costs more expensive. Bravo!

What I’m thinking about is this: the very same Orbán-haters who are now celebrating the Brussels decision—which practically bans EU member states from purchasing Russian natural gas with immediate effect—are the ones who have always gone on and on about the absolute supremacy of the free market.

And now they’re celebrating that Brussels is directly вмешing in the market and restricting purchasing options, which, according to basic market rules, inevitably leads to higher prices.

As a result, utility bills at home will rise too: district heating, gas prices—everything.

But they don’t care at all. As long as Orbán isn’t proven right.

They really are that simple.

1️⃣ Projecting false joy onto the opponent (“they’re celebrating higher prices”)

“Orbán-haters are celebrating that utility costs will become more expensive.”

This is a straw man.

🔹 No one is “celebrating” higher energy prices.
🔹 The debate is not about price increases, but about:

how risky it is to rely unilaterally on Russian gas,
how sustainable politically subsidized utility price cuts really were,
what happens when that model inevitably collapses.

👉 This assigns an emotion to the opponent in order to morally discredit them.

2️⃣ Distorting “pro-market” arguments

“Those who used to praise the free market are now celebrating Brussels’ intervention.”

This is a false contradiction.

🔹 Energy has never been a pure free market:

state contracts,
geopolitical deals,
politically set prices,
subsidies and price caps.

👉 Russian gas itself was not “free market” energy, but a political dependency.

So the novelty here is not market intervention,
but the attempt to reduce dependence on an authoritarian supplier.

3️⃣ Oversimplified causality (“ban = immediate price increase”)

“According to market laws, prices will rise.”

This is a deliberate oversimplification.

🔹 Prices are shaped by multiple factors, including:

alternative supply routes,
LNG capacity,
joint procurement mechanisms,
storage levels,
state compensation measures.

👉 The narrative of “automatic and immediate price hikes” is fear-mongering, not economics.

4️⃣ “They don’t care, as long as Orbán isn’t right”

This is classic loyalty blackmail.

🔹 The real questions are not about who is right, but:

whether the model works long term,
what it actually costs,
who pays the difference,
how it behaves in a crisis.

👉 The debate is reduced to personal hatred to avoid discussing how the system actually functions.

One-sentence summary

This statement is not about energy policy at all, but about pushing this message:

“If you criticize utility price cuts or Russian energy dependence, you must be happy about higher prices.”

That is emotional coercion, not an argument.

alexandra wakeup and start propaganda

❗ The statement made by the Tisza-affiliated host “it’s-fine-like-this” Ádám is unacceptable and disgusting.
But what do we expect from a political group whose leader wiretapped, blackmailed, and abused his own wife?

❌ You cannot talk about women like this.
According to them, a woman can’t be successful on her own, can’t run in an election, and can’t work for the Hungarian people?

👉 Because of people like Tóta W., Péter Magyar, and Ádám Nagy, women are afraid to step into politics.
And it’s exactly because of statements like these that we will defeat them again and again and show that we women are not intimidated by them.

Now, if last time anyone felt uneasy hearing the statements of the Tisza activist “it’s fine like this” Ádám, I think now everyone will be even more shocked. Especially girls, especially those who might have public ambitions. Because “it’s fine like this” Ádám explained, in the beloved language of the Tisza camp, that in order for someone to achieve anything in politics, well… how should this be phrased delicately… you need certain “skills” that are not exactly related to the job itself.

Just listen to what he said:
“You put in all this time and energy — how many asses you licked, how many dicks you sucked.”
“I don’t think I should apologize just because someone might feel offended by something.”

Well, it’s precisely because of statements like these that the women — or rural people, or the elderly — whom Ádám may have called stupid in that earlier video you mentioned, will not find their place with Tisza. Because where people think about them like this, where a political community’s leader or main influencer thinks about them this way, you have no place there.

🎯 The communication pattern of the “Alexandra-style” statement

This style is not an opinion — it is a recognizable political method.

1️⃣ Moral shock → immediate political translation

Starting point:
an unacceptable, vulgar statement.

Up to this point, it could simply be a clear condemnation.

BUT here comes the leap:

specific remark → characterization of an entire political side

This is the first trick:
turning an individual case into a systemic judgment.

2️⃣ Building an emotional shield (defense of women)

It introduces an undeniably strong moral theme:

👩 “You cannot speak about women like this”
👩 “This is why women are afraid to enter politics”

This does two things at once:

elevates the speaker to moral high ground
builds a protective shield around them

From this point on, anyone who questions the logical leap can be made to look as if they are minimizing misogyny.

This is a debate-closing technique, not a debate-opening one.

3️⃣ Guilt by association

The pattern:

one influencer’s statement
→ the party leader’s past
→ “these people are like this”
→ “you don’t belong there”

This is classic guilt by association.

It does not prove:

organizational culture
official positions
systemic patterns

It relies only on emotional logic:
👉 “if a person like this is there → the whole environment is corrupt”

4️⃣ Fear directed at a target group

Primary audience: women, young girls.

The deep structure of the message:

“That is a dangerous environment for you.”

This appeals to protective instincts, not rational evaluation.

This is identity-based mobilization:
the question becomes not what they do politically,
but where you belong morally.

5️⃣ Moral delegitimization of the political opponent

The final claim is not:

“This statement is unacceptable.”

It becomes:

“This political community is morally unacceptable.”

That’s a crucial difference.

This is no longer criticism — it is an exclusionary moral judgment.

🧠 Why is this so powerful?

Because it activates three levels at once:

Level	Effect
Emotional	outrage
Moral	good vs. bad
Identity	“which side are you on?”

In this state, the brain does not analyze facts — it chooses sides.

⚠️ What’s the trap?

If someone responds by:

getting personal
relativizing
attacking harshly

then the speaker’s narrative gets confirmed:
👉 “See? This is what they’re like.”

💡 In one sentence

This statement is not about the issue itself —
it’s about turning a moral topic into a political tribal boundary line.

Kakadu, Orbán, Ukraine, and Alexandra… oh God, what is coming by April 12?

Viktor Orbán has asked Péter Szijjártó to summon the Ukrainian ambassador. There are limits to everything. Ukraine cannot threaten Hungarians or interfere in Hungarian elections—no matter how much it would like to see a Ukraine-friendly puppet government formed with the Tisza Party.

The situation is that even patience has its limits, and that limit has now been reached. More precisely, Viktor Orbán has instructed Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó to have the Ukrainian ambassador summoned. The reason for this is that in recent days and weeks, serious threats and extremely harsh remarks have been coming to Hungary from Ukraine.

We understand what is driving this. Clearly, Ukraine would much prefer to see a government in Hungary that obediently fulfills all Ukrainian demands, sends Hungarian money to Ukraine, or supports Ukraine’s accession to the European Union without any conditions. But we will not give in to this.

The reality is that we do not ignore what the national security services suspect lies behind this action—namely, that Ukrainians are attempting to interfere in the Hungarian elections. We do not ignore this. We will defend Hungarian sovereignty, and we will protect the Hungarian people and their money as well.

We do not want Hungarian elections to be influenced from abroad, resulting in a government being imposed on us that, without any scruples, carries out whatever is good for Ukraine. And it is clear that the Ukrainians are hoping for precisely such a government—one that would do everything Ukraine wants—formed under the leadership of the Tisza Party.

Well, we will also have a word or two about this. And first and foremost, that word will come directly from Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó, who will summon the Ukrainian ambassador.

1️⃣ Reframing the Enemy: Brussels → Ukraine

Previously, the main “villain” was Brussels.
Now the narrative escalates: Ukraine appears as an active, attacking external enemy.

👉 Function:

to refresh the threat (“aren’t you bored of Brussels yet?”),
to pull domestic politics into a wartime context,
to designate a more emotionally powerful, more frightening opponent.

This is not a change in facts, but a narrative update.

2️⃣ “Puppet government” + “Tisza” = classic guilt by association

The Tisza Party is not presented as an independent political actor, but as:

“pro-Ukrainian”
“servile”
an “executor”

👉 Important:
They do not cite a single concrete decision, statement, or document.
They only apply labels.

This is not evidence, but character-assassination framing.

3️⃣ “National security” as a magic word

“What the national security services suspect…”

This is one of the strongest rhetorical tricks.

What does it do?

says nothing concrete,
cannot be verified,
yet is presented as unquestionable.

👉 If you ask for details:
“It’s a national security matter, not public.”

This is a textbook case of appealing to authority without proof.

4️⃣ Symbolic show of force: “we summon the ambassador”

Orbán Viktor → gives the order
Péter Szijjártó → “summons” the ambassador

👉 Its communication role:

“we are strong,”
“we will protect you,”

even if the concrete issue itself is unclear.

This is theater for a domestic audience, not a diplomatic solution.

5️⃣ Preparing the delegitimization of the election

When they say:

“Ukraine wants to interfere in the Hungarian elections,”

they are not only attacking the opponent, but also:

👉 pre-emptively relativizing the election result.
If they lose:

“there was foreign interference,”
“it wasn’t really the people’s decision.”

This is narrative insurance in advance.

🧠 What is the overall effect on you?

Fear (war, external attack)
Distrust toward any alternative
A sense of “now is not the time to experiment”
Loyalty reflex instead of critical thinking

This is not information.
This is emotional mobilization plus political panic-mongering.

🎯 The whole thing in one sentence:

It’s not about Ukraine.
It’s not about Tisza.
It’s about justifying the defense of internal power positions by invoking an external enemy — the closer April gets, the louder it becomes.

alexa propaganda…

I see that the left-wing press is now spinning on the claim that the government is still “searching for a solution” regarding the January utility price cap. This is the usual attempt to create uncertainty.

Let’s be clear: the government is not searching — it has already decided. The principled decision has been made, and the support will be provided to every Hungarian family. The cost of the extraordinary cold will not be paid by the people.

Experts are currently working on the technical details to ensure that the assistance reaches everywhere, from Budapest’s panel apartment blocks to detached houses. This is responsible, meticulous work.

While the left looks for faults even where there are none, the national government is delivering real solutions — including to homes in Budapest.

That is the difference between work and empty talk. Our job is action, not argument. We will protect Budapest’s families.

🎯 The real impact of this statement

This text does not present a solution — it performs psychological damage control.

🧠 1️⃣ Reassurance in uncertainty

When they say “we’ve already decided,” that is not information, but a calming phrase.
The goal is not for you to know what will happen, but to make sure you stop asking questions.

Effect:

anger decreases,
accountability fades,
the feeling remains that “they’ll handle it anyway.”

🧓 2️⃣ Retroactive reframing of the pensioners’ bonus

Earlier, the message was:

they received extra money,
they are “protected,”
they should be grateful.

Now it turns out:

the bonus does not cover utility costs,
it doesn’t even cover one week of extreme cold.

👉 The effect is not admitting a mistake, but rewriting its meaning:

it’s not that the system is insufficient,
it’s that “the weather was extraordinary.”

This is cognitive displacement:
the promise wasn’t false — reality simply became “unusual.”

❄️ 3️⃣ Shifting blame to an external cause: “the cost of the cold”

Cold weather is framed as a natural disaster, not a foreseeable, manageable risk.

Effect:

responsibility disappears,
decision-makers become “protectors,”
citizens are reduced to passive sufferers.

🧩 4️⃣ “Experts are working on it” = buying time

This phrase does not signal a solution, but implies:

don’t calculate yet,
don’t ask questions,
don’t compare.

Effect:

the current shortfall becomes normalized,
people burn through their own reserves in the meantime.

🔒 5️⃣ Closing the debate on moral grounds

“We act, others argue.”

This shuts down thinking.

Effect:

those who ask questions are labeled “nitpicky,”
those who complain are “ungrateful,”
the real problem becomes unspeakable.

🧠 Overall effect

This statement is not about utility costs. It is about making people:

accept that the extra money is not enough,
stop treating that as a problem,
and be grateful that “at least they got something.”

👉 This is not solution-focused communication.
It is the deliberate lowering of expectations.