balazska

In Kaposvár, the Fidesz candidate is confidently in the lead! Go, Attila Gelencsér 🇭🇺👍

Sorry, Tisza supporters—am I the one bringing the bad news again? As if yesterday’s Balmazújváros defeat wasn’t enough, a fresh poll from Kaposvár has just come out. I’ll drop the link.

The lead is huge. Gelencsér Attila, the Fidesz–KDNP candidate, is miles ahead of the Tisza candidate.

And there will be a few more like this.

🔴 4️⃣ Balmazújváros → Kaposvár – false generalization

Technique: false extrapolation + narrative chaining

Two local events are linked together:

  • Balmazújváros
  • Kaposvár

📌 From this, a national trend is implied:

“There will be a few more like this.”

This is not analysis — it is a pre-manufactured narrative.


🔴 5️⃣ “There will be more like this” – inevitability framing

Technique: inevitability framing

He doesn’t say might, he says will.
This psychologically closes the future.

👉 Effect:

  • passivity on one side
  • euphoria on the other

🔴 6️⃣ Person + party + flag – identity fusion

Technique: identity fusion

Gelencsér Attila
Fidesz–KDNP
🇭🇺 emoji

📌 Not program, not performance, but:

“if you’re Hungarian, you belong here.”


🧩 THE REAL FUNCTION — SUMMARY

This message does not inform. It:

  • normalizes victory
  • demoralizes the opponent
  • ridicules doubt
  • pre-writes the April narrative

🎯 IMPORTANT: WHAT IS COMPLETELY MISSING?

❌ concrete numbers
❌ source
❌ methodology
❌ comparison with earlier measurements

📌 What remains: emotion management.

balazska

The Tisza supporters want to take away the 13th and 14th month pensions!
Let’s have no doubts about it: if they came to power, they would take them away immediately.

I received a Messenger message about pensions at just the right time, because the February pension arrives on the 12th, and on the 13th the 13th-month and 14th-month pensions are paid. And the question — the Tisza-style question — is why there is any need for a 13th and 14th month pension at all; that it’s all just propaganda, handouts, financed by loans, and so on.

So let’s look once again at what the situation with pensions actually is.

When Viktor Orbán began governing, he reached an agreement with pensioners that every year pensions would increase by at least enough to preserve their purchasing power — meaning that the value of the pension, what it is worth in shops, would not decrease.

On top of that, because the Hungarian economy was performing well, the 13th-month pension was introduced, which amounts to an annual increase of about 8%. And on top of that, the 14th-month pension is now being introduced in several steps, which overall represents another roughly 8% increase.

So that is why, dear Tisza questioner, the 13th and 14th month pensions exist: to make life easier for pensioners.
It’s that simple.

🔴 1️⃣ “They want to take away the 13th and 14th month pensions” – fear-mongering without evidence

Technique: fear framing + future threat

❌ There is no:

  • draft legislation
  • policy proposal
  • official statement
  • concrete quotation

📌 This is not a fact, but a panic-inducing claim, deliberately timed to payments:

  • February 12 – regular monthly pension
  • February 13 – extra pension transfers

👉 Intended psychological effect:

“You just received it → tomorrow it will be taken away → vote correctly.”


🔴 2️⃣ “I received a Messenger message” – fake grassroots validation

Technique: anonymous source + folksy framing

A classic trick:

  • “I’m not the one saying it”
  • “I’m just passing it on”
  • “a pensioner asked the question”

📌 In reality:
👉 a controlled narrative, not a spontaneous question.


🔴 3️⃣ False dilemma: “propaganda or goodwill”

Technique: false dichotomy

The question is deliberately distorted:

  • either we give
  • or they take away

❌ What is left out:

  • the scale of inflation
  • loss of real value
  • EU-record food inflation
  • the real purchasing power of pensions

📌 “An easier life” is asserted, not proven.


🔴 4️⃣ Numbers trick: “8% + 8% = a gift”

Technique: numerical framing

👉 What is not mentioned:

  • the 13th month pension is not a bonus, but a partial restoration of a previously taken benefit
  • the 14th month pension is not a legal guarantee
  • inflation has erased these “increases” in many years

📌 Nominal ≠ real value


🔴 5️⃣ “We made an agreement with pensioners” – retroactive myth-building

Technique: moral contract myth

This so-called “agreement” is:

  • not a contract
  • not a constitutional guarantee
  • not an enforceable right

👉 Purely a communication device:

“Anyone who criticizes this violates the moral order.”


🔴 6️⃣ A pre-manufactured enemy: “the Tisza supporter asking the question”

Technique: scapegoating + delegitimization

The “questioner”:

  • is not a real person
  • cannot be quoted
  • cannot be verified

📌 Function:
👉 stigmatizing doubt itself.


🎯 SUMMARY – WHAT IS THE REAL MESSAGE?

Not this:

“Pensioners’ lives have improved.”

But this:

“If you don’t vote for us, what you have now will be taken away.”

This is:

  • not pension policy
  • not economic reasoning
  • but an electoral fear-engineering technique.

If you want, I can also:

  • tighten this into a short international policy brief
  • adapt it for media fact-checking
  • or cut it down to a shareable social-media format

Just say the word.

balazska propaganda

The Tisza supporters want to take away the 13th and 14th month pensions!
Let’s have no doubts about it: if they came to power, they would take them away immediately.

I received a Messenger message about pensions at just the right time, because the February pension arrives on the 12th, and on the 13th the 13th-month and 14th-month pensions are paid. And the question — the Tisza-style question — is why there is any need for a 13th and 14th month pension at all; that it’s all just propaganda, handouts, financed by loans, and so on.

So let’s look once again at what the situation with pensions actually is.

When Viktor Orbán began governing, he reached an agreement with pensioners that every year pensions would increase by at least enough to preserve their purchasing power — meaning that the value of the pension, what it is worth in shops, would not decrease.

On top of that, because the Hungarian economy was performing well, the 13th-month pension was introduced, which amounts to an annual increase of about 8%. And on top of that, the 14th-month pension is now being introduced in several steps, which overall represents another roughly 8% increase.

So that is why, dear Tisza questioner, the 13th and 14th month pensions exist: to make life easier for pensioners.
It’s that simple.

🔴 1️⃣ „El akarják venni a 13. és 14. havi nyugdíjat” – bizonyítás nélküli félelemkeltés

Technika: fear framing + future threat

❌ Nincs:

  • törvényjavaslat
  • programpont
  • nyilatkozat
  • konkrét idézet

📌 Ez nem tény, hanem riasztó állítás, időzítve:

  • február 12. – havi nyugdíj
  • február 13. – extra utalások

👉 Tudatos pszichológiai hatás:

„Most kaptad meg → holnap elveszik → szavazz jól.”


🔴 2️⃣ „Kaptam egy messenger üzenetet” – ál-népi hitelesítés

Technika: anonymous source + folksy framing

Ez klasszikus trükk:

  • „nem én mondom”
  • „csak továbbítom”
  • „egy nyugdíjas kérdezte”

📌 Valójában:
👉 kontrollált narratíva, nem spontán kérdés.


🔴 3️⃣ Hamis dilemma: „propaganda vagy jóindulat”

Technika: false dichotomy

A kérdés szándékosan eltorzítva:

  • vagy mi adunk
  • vagy ők elveszik

❌ Kimarad:

  • infláció mértéke
  • reálérték-csökkenés
  • EU-rekorder élelmiszer-infláció
  • nyugdíjak vásárlóereje

📌 A „könnyebb élet” nem igazolva, csak kijelentve.


🔴 4️⃣ Számtrükk: „8% + 8% = ajándék”

Technika: numerical framing

👉 Amit nem mond el:

  • a 13. havi nem plusz, hanem korábban elvett juttatás részleges visszaadása
  • a 14. havi nem jogszabályi garancia
  • infláció sok évben megette ezt az „emelést”

📌 Nominal ≠ reálérték


🔴 5️⃣ „Megállapodtunk a nyugdíjasokkal” – utólagos mítoszgyártás

Technika: moral contract myth

A „megállapodás”:

  • nem szerződés
  • nem alkotmányos garancia
  • nem visszakérhető jog

👉 Csak kommunikációs fogás:

„Aki kritizál, az megszegi az erkölcsi rendet.”


🔴 6️⃣ Előre gyártott ellenség: „tiszás kérdező”

Technika: scapegoating + delegitimization

A kérdező:

  • nem egy személy
  • nem idézhető
  • nem ellenőrizhető

📌 Funkció:
👉 a kételkedés megbélyegzése


🎯 ÖSSZEFOGLALVA – MI A VALÓDI ÜZENET?

Nem az, hogy:

„javult a nyugdíjasok élete”

Hanem ez:

„Ha nem ránk szavazol, elveszik, amid most van.”

Ez:

  • nem nyugdíjpolitika
  • nem gazdasági érvelés
  • hanem választási félelemtechnika

alexa again…

According to a Ukrainian analyst (who has appeared several times on Telex), it must be said openly that it is in Ukraine’s interest for the Tisza party to win, because Péter Magyar supports Ukraine’s accession to the European Union.

They see this clearly — and so do we.

They would not be able to say no to Brussels, and Ukraine would already be on our necks next year.

We, however, are able to say no — just as Hungarians have clearly said no to Ukraine’s EU membership in the VOKS2025 vote.

That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

Take a look at what a Ukrainian analyst says about what would truly be good for Ukraine. He says that it would be a Tisza government, a government led by Péter Magyar. We believe that this would by no means be good for Hungary. It may be good for Ukraine, but our task is to represent the interests of the Hungarian people, not those of Ukrainians.

We do not want Ukraine, through a forced fast-track accession, to become a member of the European Union as early as 2027 — that is, next year. On the one hand, this would have terrible economic consequences; on the other hand, it would mean importing the war together with Ukraine into the European Union.

So I say to everyone: you don’t need to listen to Fidesz politicians — listen to the words of this Ukrainian analyst, and then decide in April.

In Ukraine, they clearly see that a Tisza government led by Péter Magyar would be their gateway into the EU. We, on the other hand, currently represent the barrier — and this will remain so as long as we are in government. Until then, nothing will happen that is not in the interest of the Hungarian people.

🔴 1️⃣ “According to a Ukrainian analyst” – instrumentalizing external authority

Technique: appeal to foreign authority + cherry-picking

“According to a Ukrainian analyst (who has appeared several times on Telex)…”

❌ Not specified:

  • their name
  • the exact quote
  • the context
  • whether this is analysis, opinion, or political preference

📌 The trick:
What matters is not the analyst’s credibility, but their origin:

“a Ukrainian says it → it must be good for Ukraine → therefore bad for us”

This is not an argument, but an emotional compass.


🔴 2️⃣ Ukraine’s interest = working against Hungary

Technique: zero-sum framing (what’s good for them is bad for us)

“It is in Ukraine’s interest for Tisza to win…”

📌 Embedded message:

  • if you vote for Tisza → you serve foreign interests
  • domestic political debate → reframed as a national security issue

This is classic loyalty framing:

“You’re either with us – or against us.”


🔴 3️⃣ “They wouldn’t be able to say no to Brussels”

Technique: mind-reading + inevitability narrative

“They wouldn’t be able to say no to Brussels…”

❌ There is no:

  • decision
  • vote
  • document
  • concrete commitment

📌 This is prediction, not fact.
The goal:
👉 to strip people of the sense of control over the future
👉 “if they come to power → there’s no stopping it”


🔴 4️⃣ “Ukraine would already be on our necks next year”

Technique: fear acceleration + temporal compression

This distorts reality on multiple levels:

  • EU accession is not a fast-track sprint
  • there is no “next year”
  • there is no automatic import of war

📌 But in communication terms:

  • fast
  • frightening
  • irreversible

This is panic production, not information.


🔴 5️⃣ VOKS2025 – pseudo popular mandate

Technique: manufactured consent + false mandate

“Hungarians have clearly said no…”

📌 Problems:

  • not legally binding
  • not representative
  • a political campaign tool

👉 Yet it is framed as if:

“the nation has already decided – anyone who disagrees is going against the people”

This is a debate-closing device, not a democratic argument.


🔴 6️⃣ “Listen to the Ukrainian analyst – and then decide”

Technique: pseudo-pluralism (fake openness)

This is the most cynical part.

On the surface:

“don’t listen to Fidesz politicians”

In reality:

  • only one, pre-interpreted narrative is allowed
  • the conclusion is predefined

This is guided thinking, not choice.


🔴 7️⃣ “We are the barrier” – savior role

Technique: savior framing + existential dependency

“We represent the barrier…”

📌 Message:

  • without us → catastrophe
  • with us → nothing bad can happen

This is not governance, but a dependency narrative.


🧩 SUMMARY – WHAT IS THIS, OVERALL?

This message simultaneously:

  • 🇺🇦 points to an external enemy
  • 🧠 accelerates fear
  • 🗳 shuts down democratic debate
  • 🧱 presents itself as the only protective wall

👉 It is not about what is good for Hungary.
👉 It is about ensuring that there is no alternative.

alexa

“The national petition is about to be submitted, because I am also among those who do not want our money to be sent to Ukraine, do not want our money to be spent on the war, or to see Hungarian families’ utility costs increase because of the war. So, quite simply, this is how we in Hungary can say no to the horrors of war.”

🔴 1️⃣ “National petition” – legitimization and collective authority

Technique: authority framing + collective legitimacy

The phrase “national petition” suggests that:

  • it is backed by broad social consensus,
  • it carries moral and national weight,
  • anyone who disagrees is “not with the nation.”

📌 The trick:
It is not disclosed:

  • who initiated it,
  • who signed it,
  • how many people did so,
  • what legal or political consequences it actually has.

👉 The word “national” shuts down debate before it even begins.


🔴 2️⃣ “Our money” – emotional ownership framing

Technique: ownership framing + loss aversion

  • “our money” is repeated multiple times,
  • it creates a sense of personal loss:
    • as if money were being taken directly from you,
    • as if immediate financial harm were occurring.

📌 Reality:
It is never stated:

  • what money is being referred to,
  • how much money,
  • whether it is direct or indirect,
  • what the actual decision-making mechanism is.

👉 The goal is not understanding, but triggering gut-level resistance.


🔴 3️⃣ War = utility price hikes – causal short-circuit

Technique: false causality + fear linkage

“…to see Hungarian families’ utility costs increase because of the war”

This sentence conflates:

  • the war,
  • energy prices,
  • government decisions.

📌 Missing elements:

  • alternative causes,
  • market factors,
  • the role of domestic energy policy.

👉 This allows responsibility to be shifted outward:
“We are not raising prices — the war is.”


🔴 4️⃣ “Quite simply” – devaluing thinking

Technique: simplification framing

“So, quite simply…”

A complex geopolitical and economic issue
→ is reduced to an emotional, moral choice.

📌 Implicit message:

  • no need to think,
  • no need to ask questions,
  • the morally correct answer is already given.

👉 Anyone who tries to add nuance becomes:
“pro-war,” “insensitive,” or “overcomplicating.”


🔴 5️⃣ “We in Hungary” – identity appropriation

Technique: in-group framing / us vs. them

  • “we in Hungary”
  • implies that:
    • there is one “true” Hungarian position,
    • those who disagree are outside of it.

📌 This is no longer framed as a difference of opinion,
but as a matter of identity and loyalty.

👉 The debate turns into a loyalty test.


🔴 6️⃣ “The horrors of war” – emotional closure

Technique: moral shock framing

The phrase “the horrors of war” serves as:

  • maximum emotional charge,
  • a moral shield.

📌 Its function:

  • to close the discussion,
  • to block further questions:
    • “how?”
    • “what is the alternative?”
    • “what are the consequences?”

👉 Anyone who asks is accused of
“relativizing the horrors.”


🧩 Overall picture

This message does not inform. Instead, it:

  • links fear to money,
  • claims moral superiority,
  • appropriates collective identity,
  • and offers a false binary choice:

Either you are with us → or you are with the war.

alexa…

The war in Ukraine is escalating: in Transcarpathia, daily power outages now last up to 18 hours.
Meanwhile, violent forced conscription continues. In recent days, numerous videos have surfaced showing the aggressive methods used by recruiters. Draft officers surround their chosen targets with overwhelming force and, without regard for methods, shove them into darkened vans.

Those who try to help people are arrested—as happened to our Hungarian compatriot who attempted to help five people escape to Hungary. The Consulate General in Berehove is providing him with all possible assistance.

War is horrific—we all know this and we all see it. That is precisely why it is so frightening to hear pro-war rhetoric from the NATO Secretary General, chiefs of staff, and EU leaders, who fantasize about deploying European troops to Ukraine.

Have you seen the situation in Transcarpathia? I mean the latest developments. I came across news reporting that power outages there are now extremely long. For most of the day, there is practically no electricity or energy, and heating is obviously extremely problematic in many places. But these are not the only shocking reports. For example, those who help people who do not want to die in this war and try to evade forced conscription are fired upon and threatened with very severe reprisals.

These two stories—just small examples among countless others—show how horrific war truly is, how tragic it can become, and that no sane person could ever wish for it to spread here as well. And yet, unfortunately, many European and Brussels-based politicians, including Tisza politicians, are pushing the country in exactly this direction. That is why how we decide in April is so important—because we are not choosing our fate for four years, but for the coming decades.

The Brussels war madness has its representatives in Hungary as well. Their captured man is here—the one they want to bring to power. Péter Magyar simply would not be able to say no to his superiors.

Since the outbreak of the war, the national government has consistently pursued a policy of peace. As long as there is a national government, we will send neither weapons nor soldiers into the war—that is why Fidesz remains the safe choice.

🧠 WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN THIS TEXT?

🔴 1️⃣ Shocking anecdotes → presented as general reality

Technique: emotional shock framing + anecdotal evidence

“18-hour power outages”

“darkened vans”

“surrounding the victims”

“anyone who helps gets arrested”

📌 Problem:
There is no:

  • date
  • source
  • official data
  • verifiable report

👉 Effect:
The brain doesn’t question—it reacts: fear, anger, empathy.


🔴 2️⃣ “There are countless such stories” – massification without evidence

Technique: unverifiable generalization

“this is just one small story among many”

📌 A classic trick:
If there are “so many,” why prove even one?

👉 Message:
“Don’t ask—this is already a settled fact.”


🔴 3️⃣ Humanitarian framing → political pivot

Technique: empathy hijacking

Start: suffering, cold, fear
Turn: “that’s why what’s being said in Brussels is so frightening”

📌 This is where emotional redirection happens:
the tragedy in Transcarpathia → European political decisions → Hungarian domestic politics

👉 There is no logical link—only an emotional one.


🔴 4️⃣ Deliberate distortion of military statements

Technique: semantic distortion + future certainty framing

NATO Secretary General
Chiefs of Staff
EU leaders

📌 Military language actually refers to:

  • preparedness
  • scenarios
  • deterrence

📌 Propaganda translation:
👉 “they are fantasizing about deploying European troops”

This is not a declaration of war, but a discourse about defense.


🔴 5️⃣ “Those who help are persecuted” – a moral trap

Technique: moral blackmail

those who help = good
those who don’t = inhumane
those who question = insensitive

📌 Goal:
moral closure → no debate → no nuance


🔴 6️⃣ Timed election panic

Technique: high-stakes framing

“we are not deciding for four years, but for decades”

📌 Classic elements:

  • the decision is fatal
  • there is no way back
  • now or never

👉 This is psychological pressure, not argumentation.


🔴 7️⃣ “Brussels’ puppet” – loyalty accusation

Technique: guilt by association + loyalty framing

“their captive man”
“he wouldn’t be able to say no”
“his bosses”

📌 There is no:

  • concrete instruction
  • document
  • vote
  • decision

👉 An identity-based attack, not a political debate.


🔴 8️⃣ False exclusivity

Technique: false dilemma

“As long as there is a national government… that’s why only Fidesz is the safe choice”

Message:

  • either them
  • or war

📌 This is not democracy, but a two-pole fear framework.


🎯 SUMMARY – WHAT IS THE REAL GOAL?

Not to:

  • help you understand the situation in Transcarpathia
  • give you a clear view of NATO policy
  • enable a nuanced decision

But to make you feel this:

“If I don’t vote for them, there will be war.”

This is emotional coercion, not information.

balazska

Could it be that Tisza is not leading by 16%?? 🤡😂
A Fidesz tour de force in Balmazújváros!

Even though the pro-Tisza press was getting very ready ✌️

“Balma is the new city,” everyone should be saying — Fidesz won a by-election there yesterday in a district where a Fidesz candidate last managed to win back in 2014.

So maybe Tisza isn’t leading by 16% after all?
Maybe Péter Magyar is lying about this too — just like on taxes, pensions, the war, and migration?

Could be.

🔴 1️⃣ False conclusion drawn from an irrelevant event

“Fidesz triumph in Balmazújváros”

👉 The problem is:
the Tisza Party DID NOT RUN in that by-election.

📌 If someone does not run:

  • they do not win
  • they do not lose
  • they cannot be measured

Therefore, this result cannot be used to draw conclusions about nationwide support or to refute a supposed “16% lead.”


🔴 2️⃣ Strawman + mockery framing

“Could it be that Tisza isn’t leading by 16%?? 🤡😂”

Technique: mockery framing + strawman

  • no poll is cited
  • no indication of who, where, or when measured it
  • it simply mocks a claim that is neither proven nor disproven

📌 This is not an argument, but psychological pressure:

“If you think this, you’re ridiculous.”


🔴 3️⃣ Local victory → national narrative

“Fidesz won in a district where it last won in 2014”

This may be news in itself, but:

  • ❌ not a national election
  • ❌ not a party-list vote
  • ❌ not a Tisza–Fidesz comparison

📌 Projecting a local by-election result onto national power relations = deliberate distortion.


🔴 4️⃣ Character assassination without evidence

“Magyar Péter is lying again… about taxes, pensions, war, migration”

Technique: character assassination + issue stacking

  • not a single concrete quote
  • no rebuttal
  • no source

📌 The goal is not truth, but association:

“If he’s lying about this, he’s lying about everything.”


What is REALLY happening?

This message is not about Tisza at all. It is about:

  • ✅ reassuring one’s own camp
  • ✅ maintaining the feeling of “we won”
  • ✅ suppressing uncertainty through mockery

📌 Classic internal propaganda:
it is not meant to convince skeptics, but to keep supporters in line.


The truth in one sentence

It boasts about the result of an election in which the opponent did not even run—and then draws nationwide conclusions from it.

This is not analysis.
This is not debate.
This is a communication trick.

balazska wakup

The Fidesz victory on Sunday shocked the Tisza supporters. What will happen to them in April??? 😱 Get well soon! 🤷‍♂️

This country is hopeless and lost, there are so many sheep in Hungary. The Tisza bubble is spinning very, very fast; they really can’t understand what happened after yesterday’s Fidesz victory in Balmazújváros and the news about Tisza’s Zakó.

That’s when I realize that I’m living in a bubble too—could it be that we’re being fooled? asks a sobering-up Tisza supporter.

Unfortunately, rural people aren’t very smart. Congrats to your rough mothers, people of Balmazújváros—this is the usual Tisza-style level of hatred.

And finally, no problem, according to most opinion polls the opposition won again—that’s enough for us, indeed it is, and it’s better for Hungary this way too.

Get well soon to all Tisza supporters!

🔴 1️⃣ “There was no Tisza candidate” – post-hoc reframing

Technique: framing + damage control

Balázska presents himself as if he were:

  • an outsider,
  • merely an “observer,”
  • not personally involved.

📌 In reality:
This is post-hoc narrative salvage. The goal is:

“This wasn’t a political defeat — it was the other side’s mistake.”


🔴 2️⃣ “It shocked the Tisza supporters” – collective psychologizing

Technique: mind-reading + group stereotyping

❌ There is:

  • no specific person,
  • no quotation,
  • no concrete reaction,
  • no verifiable data.

📌 Claim: “they are shocked”
📌 Reality: this is his assertion about them — not their own words.

👉 Message to the audience:

“Don’t listen to them — they’ve already collapsed.”


🔴 3️⃣ Pseudo self-criticism: “Maybe I live in a bubble?”

Technique: false introspection / performative doubt

This is not genuine self-reflection, but a dramaturgical trick:

  • he asks a question,
  • immediately answers it for them,
  • then returns to mockery.

📌 The question doesn’t open thinking — it shuts it down.


🔴 4️⃣ “Rural people aren’t very smart”

Technique: dehumanization + elitism

This is open contempt:

  • “sheep”
  • “not very smart”
  • “a hopeless country”

📌 This is not a political opinion, but:

the stigmatization of a social group.

👉 Classic inciting rhetoric, just wrapped in a “jokey” tone.


🔴 5️⃣ “This is the usual Tisza hatred” – projection

Technique: projection

The text:

  • insults,
  • mocks,
  • talks down,
  • labels collectively,

then concludes by declaring:

“this is the level of Tisza hatred.”

📌 He accuses the other side of exactly what he himself is doing.


🔴 6️⃣ Opinion polls as a psychological sedative

Technique: cherry-picking + consolation framing

“Most opinion polls were won by the opposition again.”

📌 Function:

  • relativizing failure,
  • calming supporters,
  • shifting perception of reality.

👉 “It doesn’t matter that it didn’t work out this time — emotionally, we won.”


🎯 OVERALL PICTURE

This text simultaneously:

  • mocks,
  • stigmatizes,
  • sows doubt,
  • excuses its own side,
  • collectively demeans,
  • while posing as a victim.

💡 And most importantly:
Balázska is not speaking as a Tisza supporter, but as a propagandist, pushing a narrative from behind the pose of:

“I’m just observing.”

alexa wakeup

We were talking with Young G about the online hatred coming from fake Tisza supporter profiles.
Calmly but firmly, we also have to stand up for what we believe is right.
🟠 This is what we need to show on April 12 as well!

So here we are at a rather special occasion, a traditional pig feast in Zugló. Earlier we were talking about how active you are on social media — I always see you online too. I can see that you’re not afraid to share your opinions, even on public issues. You told me that sometimes the comments you receive are brutal. Could you talk a bit about what you and your family experience because you voice your opinion on certain important matters?

The problem is that the level of racism, hatred, humiliation — it’s extreme. People literally wish death upon my children, they threaten to rape my wife. And I have proof — I always screenshot everything on my phone. I also think it’s important to point out that these people don’t show up in real life, out on the street or in public spaces, because there are consequences there. Online, they hide behind fake profiles. Anyone can create a fake account and hide behind it.

This has never happened to me before. And it’s been going on for a while now. I’ve seen it on my own platforms too. Once I made a video — I didn’t even say which side I belong to. I was simply disturbed by the level of aggression in Hungarian public life. I made just one video, expressing an opinion. I asked: “Don’t you see this?”

From that moment on, I’ve been judged to such an extent that it’s unbelievable. They try to make my life impossible on social platforms, they attack my Google reviews, my businesses are being damaged because of this. They don’t think about the scale of the harm they’re causing — to a person, to businesses. They can ruin lives. And they don’t consider that the person they target might have employees whose livelihoods are also at risk.

What they’re doing is outrageous. I know the silent majority is out there. But I ask that silent majority to finally be present online as well, and stand up for us. Because if we don’t… then things only get worse.

If we take a stand publicly — whether as public figures or just ordinary people — then let everyone openly stand for where they belong. I think the outcome would be the same either way. But support matters. It’s important that those who spread this aggression realize that what they are doing is wrong and unacceptable.

Thank you for raising your voice even in the face of opposition and explaining why it’s important to think carefully in the coming two months about what is at stake in this election.

And I encourage everyone: in the face of enormous aggression and hate — excuse the expression — let us remain gentle but firm, and say what we think. Because if we don’t defend our homes and our country, no one else will do it for us.

🔴 1️⃣ Severe violent claims → without evidence

Technique: emotional shock framing + unverifiable testimony

“They wish death upon my children,” “they want to rape my wife”

This is the strongest emotional shock that can be used in communication.

❌ There is no:

  • police report
  • case number
  • presented screenshots
  • named platform
  • time or context

📌 As a result, this is not a fact, but an emotional bomb.

👉 Effect:

  • instant empathy
  • critical thinking shuts down
  • “anyone who questions this is insensitive”

🔴 2️⃣ “I have evidence” – but we never see it

Technique: claim of evidence without disclosure

“I have concrete evidence, I took screenshots”

This is a classic communication trick:

  • claims evidence exists
  • does not present it

📌 Psychological effect:

“If there is evidence, it must be true – I don’t see it, but someone else did”

This is not proof, but a request for belief.


🔴 3️⃣ “Fake profiles, fake accounts” – collective guilt

Technique: guilt by association + dehumanization

“some random person hiding behind a fake account”

What happens here?

  • no specific perpetrator is named
  • an entire group is held responsible
  • an anonymous, faceless “they” is created

📌 This prepares the ground for:

  • demonizing the opponent
  • later justification: “anything is allowed against them”

🔴 4️⃣ Economic harm → political mobilization

Technique: victim-to-action framing

“my businesses are being destroyed,” “X employees”

This is no longer a complaint, but a shift of political responsibility:

“if you don’t stand with me, other people’s lives are at risk”

📌 Classic emotional blackmail:

  • responsibility is not placed on the perpetrators
  • but on the listening audience

🔴 5️⃣ Appealing to the “silent majority”

Technique: silent majority myth

“the silent majority…”

This is an entity that is never measured and never proven.

👉 Its function:

  • to suggest “they are with us”
  • they just “don’t dare speak up yet”

📌 In reality:

  • it manufactures legitimacy
  • it pressures those who were previously neutral

🔴 6️⃣ Moral superiority as closure

Technique: moral high ground + savior framing

“let us be gentle but firm”
“if we don’t defend our homeland…”

This is the final frame:

  • we = morality
  • they = aggression
  • the debate becomes moral, not factual

📌 From this point on:

  • dissent = “not defending the country”
  • criticism = “supporting the aggressors”

🎯 SUMMARY – WHAT IS THIS REALLY?

This is not a conversation and not “sharing experiences,” but:

✅ emotional shock
✅ victim narrative
✅ evidence-free accusations
✅ collective enemy construction
✅ political mobilization with a date

👉 classic campaign propaganda, disguised as a “civilian conversation.”

alexandra

Magyar Péter and his allies have presented their fake program, but their own “experts” had already let the truth slip earlier.
Beneath the glossy surface lies the old left-wing recipe: austerity, scrapping utility price caps, cutting family benefits and pensions, tax hikes, and rising fuel prices.
No one should have any doubts that Tisza, in line with Brussels’ expectations, would send Hungarians’ money to Ukraine.
Tisza’s own experts had already authenticated their real intentions earlier — let’s not fall for the circus!
For them, Brussels comes first; for us, Hungary comes first!
That’s why Fidesz is the only safe choice! 🇭🇺


It takes quite some nerve to pull this off.
Magyar Péter and his people have unveiled their FAKE program — all after materials had already leaked earlier, materials that Tisza-affiliated experts themselves had authenticated with their own signatures. A former Tisza insider who later broke away also stated clearly that yes, the previously leaked document is the real one, while what they are now producing is essentially a shop-window brochure for the circus audience.

This is extraordinarily disingenuous and brazen, because over the past months every single Tisza expert, at various “Tisza islands” events and in interviews, has openly said they are preparing to raise taxes, cut pensions, slash family support, and that utility price caps are “nonsense” and “unsustainable,” and so on.

Meanwhile, Mr. Weber speaks on behalf of Tisza whenever Tisza politicians are supposed to keep quiet, openly stating that within the EPP there is only room for those who are firmly pro-Ukraine. So let no one be misled: this is a fake program. From Magyar Péter and Tisza, we can expect exactly what is dictated to them from Brussels.

With Magyar Péter and Tisza, war is coming, the abolition of utility price caps is coming, fuel prices will rise, family benefits will be cut — because all that money, every last bit of it, will be needed for Ukraine.

🔴 1️⃣ “Fake program” – pre-emptive delegitimization

Technique: dismissive labeling / delegitimization

The word “fake” is not evidence — it’s a label.

❌ no quotation from the program
❌ no concrete policy points
❌ no document reference

👉 Goal: don’t read it → reject it reflexively.
This is classic cognitive closure.


🔴 2️⃣ “Experts have let it slip” – reference without evidence

Technique: appeal to anonymous authority

Who are these “experts”?
Where did they speak?
What exactly did they say?
Where is the signed document?

📌 Not a single name is mentioned — only insinuation.
This is not a fact, but a suggestion.


🔴 3️⃣ “Leaked material” – conspiracy-style validation

Technique: conspiracy framing

“leaked”
“real material”
“showcase program”

👉 If it can’t be seen: it’s because it’s secret.
👉 If it can’t be proven: it’s because it’s being covered up.

This is a self-sealing narrative, not an argument.


🔴 4️⃣ Fear stacking: everything at once

Technique: fear stacking

Packed into a single block:

  • tax increases
  • pension cuts
  • cuts to family benefits
  • abolition of utility price caps
  • fuel price hikes
  • war

📌 No order, no causality, no weighing of options.
👉 Goal: emotional overload → panic → loyalty.


🔴 5️⃣ “Brussels dictates” – identity substitution

Technique: semantic hijacking + us vs. them framing

Tisza Party = Brussels
Brussels = Ukraine
Ukraine = war
War = your money

👉 All intermediate steps disappear; political decisions are turned into an automatic chain reaction.


🔴 6️⃣ “Mr. Weber” as a proxy mouthpiece

Technique: proxy villain framing

Manfred Weber is not a politician of the Tisza Party,
yet in the narrative he speaks ‘on their behalf.’

📌 Logical trick:
“If he said it → they want it.”

This is guilt by association, not fact.


🔴 7️⃣ False binary at the end

Technique: false dilemma + savior framing

The choice is framed as:

❌ Tisza = Brussels, war, austerity
✅ Fidesz = Hungary, peace, security

📌 No third option
📌 No debate
📌 No verifiable claim

This is a political creed, not analysis.


🎯 WHAT IS THE REAL FUNCTION OF THIS TEXT?

Not to persuade — but to:

  • pre-empt thinking
  • trigger emotional reflexes
  • lock in loyalty through fear

That’s why it’s long, repetitive, and overheated.
This text does not inform — it conditions.