We were talking with Young G about the online hatred coming from fake Tisza supporter profiles.
Calmly but firmly, we also have to stand up for what we believe is right.
🟠 This is what we need to show on April 12 as well!
So here we are at a rather special occasion, a traditional pig feast in Zugló. Earlier we were talking about how active you are on social media — I always see you online too. I can see that you’re not afraid to share your opinions, even on public issues. You told me that sometimes the comments you receive are brutal. Could you talk a bit about what you and your family experience because you voice your opinion on certain important matters?
The problem is that the level of racism, hatred, humiliation — it’s extreme. People literally wish death upon my children, they threaten to rape my wife. And I have proof — I always screenshot everything on my phone. I also think it’s important to point out that these people don’t show up in real life, out on the street or in public spaces, because there are consequences there. Online, they hide behind fake profiles. Anyone can create a fake account and hide behind it.
This has never happened to me before. And it’s been going on for a while now. I’ve seen it on my own platforms too. Once I made a video — I didn’t even say which side I belong to. I was simply disturbed by the level of aggression in Hungarian public life. I made just one video, expressing an opinion. I asked: “Don’t you see this?”
From that moment on, I’ve been judged to such an extent that it’s unbelievable. They try to make my life impossible on social platforms, they attack my Google reviews, my businesses are being damaged because of this. They don’t think about the scale of the harm they’re causing — to a person, to businesses. They can ruin lives. And they don’t consider that the person they target might have employees whose livelihoods are also at risk.
What they’re doing is outrageous. I know the silent majority is out there. But I ask that silent majority to finally be present online as well, and stand up for us. Because if we don’t… then things only get worse.
If we take a stand publicly — whether as public figures or just ordinary people — then let everyone openly stand for where they belong. I think the outcome would be the same either way. But support matters. It’s important that those who spread this aggression realize that what they are doing is wrong and unacceptable.
Thank you for raising your voice even in the face of opposition and explaining why it’s important to think carefully in the coming two months about what is at stake in this election.
And I encourage everyone: in the face of enormous aggression and hate — excuse the expression — let us remain gentle but firm, and say what we think. Because if we don’t defend our homes and our country, no one else will do it for us.
🔴 1️⃣ Severe violent claims → without evidence
Technique: emotional shock framing + unverifiable testimony
“They wish death upon my children,” “they want to rape my wife”
This is the strongest emotional shock that can be used in communication.
❌ There is no:
- police report
- case number
- presented screenshots
- named platform
- time or context
📌 As a result, this is not a fact, but an emotional bomb.
👉 Effect:
- instant empathy
- critical thinking shuts down
- “anyone who questions this is insensitive”
🔴 2️⃣ “I have evidence” – but we never see it
Technique: claim of evidence without disclosure
“I have concrete evidence, I took screenshots”
This is a classic communication trick:
- claims evidence exists
- does not present it
📌 Psychological effect:
“If there is evidence, it must be true – I don’t see it, but someone else did”
This is not proof, but a request for belief.
🔴 3️⃣ “Fake profiles, fake accounts” – collective guilt
Technique: guilt by association + dehumanization
“some random person hiding behind a fake account”
What happens here?
- no specific perpetrator is named
- an entire group is held responsible
- an anonymous, faceless “they” is created
📌 This prepares the ground for:
- demonizing the opponent
- later justification: “anything is allowed against them”
🔴 4️⃣ Economic harm → political mobilization
Technique: victim-to-action framing
“my businesses are being destroyed,” “X employees”
This is no longer a complaint, but a shift of political responsibility:
“if you don’t stand with me, other people’s lives are at risk”
📌 Classic emotional blackmail:
- responsibility is not placed on the perpetrators
- but on the listening audience
🔴 5️⃣ Appealing to the “silent majority”
Technique: silent majority myth
“the silent majority…”
This is an entity that is never measured and never proven.
👉 Its function:
- to suggest “they are with us”
- they just “don’t dare speak up yet”
📌 In reality:
- it manufactures legitimacy
- it pressures those who were previously neutral
🔴 6️⃣ Moral superiority as closure
Technique: moral high ground + savior framing
“let us be gentle but firm”
“if we don’t defend our homeland…”
This is the final frame:
- we = morality
- they = aggression
- the debate becomes moral, not factual
📌 From this point on:
- dissent = “not defending the country”
- criticism = “supporting the aggressors”
🎯 SUMMARY – WHAT IS THIS REALLY?
This is not a conversation and not “sharing experiences,” but:
✅ emotional shock
✅ victim narrative
✅ evidence-free accusations
✅ collective enemy construction
✅ political mobilization with a date
👉 classic campaign propaganda, disguised as a “civilian conversation.”