👉 Living in Hungary today is much safer than in Western Europe, as there is no wave of migrants here, no terrorism, and we can live in peace.
The contrast was experienced firsthand by Szilvia’s children, who studied abroad—one in Amsterdam and two in Manchester. The latter two both witnessed terrorist attacks.
🟠 As long as there is a national government, Hungary will not become a country of migrants, and we can live in safety. That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!
They were there during two terrorist attacks. Okay. I have three children as examples in my own family—they also went abroad to study, which was good, but we let them go with the understanding that they would come home, and there was never any question about it—they all came back.
They saw what it was like—two studied in Manchester, one in Amsterdam—and they came home very quickly. In Manchester, two of them were there during two terrorist attacks. Early in the morning, the phone rang: “Mom, I’m okay.” I think it was after an Ariana Grande Manchester Arena bombing concert, if I remember correctly, and they called from there saying they were safe. At that point, I didn’t even know what had happened yet, because it was early morning.
So they really saw what it’s like there—and that it’s not as ideal as it might seem from the outside.
1️⃣ Personal story = illusion of credibility
👉 Excerpt: “my three children… Manchester… Amsterdam… they were there during the attack”
👉 Technique:
builds on personal experience
“I saw it → therefore it’s true”
👉 Goal: ➡️ don’t question it ➡️ create emotional identification
👉 Effect: ➡️ “if it happened to them, then it must be general”
2️⃣ Rare event → presented as general reality
👉 Excerpt: experience of a terror attack → “that’s what it’s like there”
👉 Technique:
generalizes a unique, extreme event
ignores proportions and context
👉 Reality:
terrorist attacks are very rare events
they do not describe everyday life in a city or country
👉 Effect: ➡️ distorted worldview (“the West = dangerous”)
Listen to your heart, watch your wallet, vote for Fidesz!
If Tisza were to come to power, they would implement their energy plan, cut us off from cheap Russian gas, and we would see triple utility prices and fuel costing 1,000 forints per liter.
But if it’s up to us, utility price cuts will remain, fuel will stay at protected prices, family support will continue, and everything else we have built over the past 16 years will be preserved. That’s why Fidesz is the only safe choice!
We’re out here in the countryside, in the fresh air. This is the smell of victory. What would you say to those who are still undecided about whether to go vote?
On the one hand, this is something we can only do once every four years—directly influence public affairs—so I think we should take advantage of it.
On the other hand, my message to everyone is to listen to your mind and your heart, and to pay attention to your wallet—and vote accordingly for Fidesz. Because if it’s up to us, low utility costs will remain, fuel will stay cheap, family support will continue, and the 13th and 14th month pensions will remain.
But if Tisza wants to give our money to Ukraine, then none of this will remain. So let’s not trust them—we’ve seen this before 2010, and we shouldn’t fall for it again.
Let’s vote for Fidesz, because that is the safe choice.
People living in Buda know exactly that everything which seems natural today – the numerous benefits, tax reductions for young people, families and mothers, the 13th and even 14th month pension, reduced utility costs, continuous developments, full employment, and the strict migration policy that guarantees security – are all thanks solely to the Orbán governments.
It is important to understand what is at stake: if the country does not have a national government, these measures would disappear in an instant. This would hurt everyone – even supporters of TISZA. Let’s not allow our security to be put at risk!
In the next 9 days, let’s talk to everyone and remind them of the achievements that we must preserve!
On April 12, only Fidesz is the safe choice, and in Hegyvidék and West Újbuda, Attila Steiner is the right choice!
Good day! You know, make sure you’re well provided for by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. We are waiting for you for the elections on July 12. Of course. We really need all the support, we count on every bit of it. There’s no need to convince us. We receive benefits, we get various tax reductions. Pensioners receive the 13th and 14th month pension. Utility cost reductions – there’s a lot that could be listed.
They don’t even think about it. Because if we want our sons and sons-in-law to be taken away as soldiers, and to receive no support at all, then we should just go the other way. Thank you very much! Thank you!
1️⃣ “We gave you everything good” (total appropriation)
👉 “everything is thanks to the Orbán governments”
Technique: 100% appropriation of achievements Reality: the economy, EU funds, global processes → completely omitted
Effect: ➡️ “without them, nothing exists”
2️⃣ Fear: “everything will disappear”
👉 “they would disappear in an instant”
Technique: catastrophe narrative
Goal: ➡️ don’t think, just fear
Effect: ➡️ “if you don’t vote for them → things will get worse for you”
3️⃣ False dilemma
👉 “if it’s not a national government → everything is lost”
Technique: no middle ground
Reality: political systems don’t work like this
Effect: ➡️ narrows thinking
4️⃣ “Even the opposition would suffer”
👉 “even TISZA supporters”
Technique: psychological pressure
Message: ➡️ “everyone wants the same thing → don’t stand out”
Effect: ➡️ conformity
5️⃣ Safety + war (implicitly)
👉 “security”, “they will take your sons to the army”
Technique: existential fear
Link: politics → war → family in danger
Effect: ➡️ strongest emotional trigger
6️⃣ Mass mobilization
👉 “let’s talk to everyone”, “9 days”
Technique: campaign activation
Goal: ➡️ don’t just vote → spread the message
7️⃣ Direct “reward” narrative
👉 “they receive benefits, tax cuts”
Technique: dependency framing
Message: ➡️ “we give → therefore you must vote for us”
🔍 Why is it so irritating?
Because it:
underestimates your intelligence (over-simplifies everything)
relies on fear instead of facts
manipulates instead of informing
uses emotional pressure (family, security, money)
This combination is one of the strongest → that’s why it triggers a “disgust” reaction.
🧾 Short summary
👉 This is not an informational text 👉 This is a classic propaganda formula:
benefits + fear + simplification + “we protect you” → “vote for us or things will go badly”
If I had to list the things I consider important in raising a child, one would definitely be sports. Sport is not just physical activity. It is education, development, and a safe way to experience both success and failure, as well as a sense of belonging to a community. This is how I spent my own childhood, and I experienced all of this myself.
Panni trains three times a week, just like tens of thousands of children who have been doing sports since a very young age.
What today costs a few thousand or tens of thousands of forints per month could easily rise to hundreds of thousands if the current sports support system were abolished.
Everyone understands what that would mean, right? A large portion of children who are currently active in sports would lose the opportunity to experience everything that sport can offer.
Amid major issues, we may pay less attention to these things, even though they are very important. On April 12, we will also be deciding on the future of sports.
Fidesz is the safe choice!
🧠 Quick Overview
👉 Main narrative:
“sport = value, development, community”
“this is under threat”
“only we can protect it”
“election = your child’s future”
👉 Underlying formula:
emotion + child + fear + simplification → “if you don’t vote for us → your child loses”
People are even coming home from Norway to vote!! We all need to be there! Hungary’s independence and the wallets of Hungarian families are at stake!
So meanwhile, the new hit song is spreading — Attila Gelencsér’s campaign song, “Zselic Has Turned Green” — and at the same time, a letter arrived from Norway. “We will travel home from Norway to Tatabánya to vote for Fidesz. We would really like to receive a Fidesz mug, or any item that the signers could win by spinning the wheel. In North Pest, we had a prize wheel where people could play while chatting, and participants won small Fidesz gifts. Even if you don’t send anything, I will remain a Fidesz supporter. Go Fidesz! I hope you win.” — this is how the letter ends.
Have a safe journey home from Norway to Tatabánya. On April 12, we will surely meet in spirit in the voting booths, and of course the mug will be sent to Tatabánya — because with this government and with Fidesz, everyone wins, including you.
🧠 Quick overview
👉 Main narrative:
“everyone supports us (even from abroad)”
“Hungary is in danger”
“Fidesz = everyone wins”
“the election = a national duty”
👉 Underlying formula:
bandwagon effect + fear + reward + emotional identification → “join + go vote + you’ll make the right decision”
🔍 Influence techniques
1️⃣ Bandwagon / social proof
👉 Excerpt: “People are even coming home from Norway to vote!!”
👉 Technique:
suggests that it’s worth it even from abroad
implicit message: “if they do it, you should too”
👉 Goal: ➡️ social pressure ➡️ “you can’t stay out of this”
👉 Effect: ➡️ conformity (you fall in line)
2️⃣ Existential threat (fear framing)
👉 Excerpt: “Hungary’s independence and the wallets of Hungarian families are at risk!”
👉 Technique:
two strongest triggers:
nation
money / livelihood
👉 Goal: ➡️ create fear ➡️ create urgency
👉 Effect: ➡️ emotional decision instead of rational thinking
3️⃣ “Letter from an ordinary person” (anecdotal framing)
👉 Excerpt: “a letter arrived from Norway…”
👉 Technique:
one story presented as a general phenomenon
“voice of the average person”
👉 Goal: ➡️ illusion of authenticity ➡️ identification
👉 Effect: ➡️ “this feels real, not propaganda”
4️⃣ Reward / small gifts (behavioral trigger)
👉 Excerpt: “Fidesz mug”, “wheel of fortune”, “gifts”
👉 Technique:
political participation → linked to reward
gamification (spinning, prizes)
👉 Goal: ➡️ create positive emotional association ➡️ encourage participation
❗ The situation is clear—not only here at home, but also in Brussels and Kyiv. Everyone knows that two completely different worlds are facing each other.
One side would do anything on Brussels’ orders: they would take away the support provided by the national government, burden Hungarians with extra costs, and drag Hungary into war.
🇭🇺 We, on the other hand, stand for the interests, peace, and security of the Hungarian people, in opposition to the will of Brussels. And since they have not been able to break us over the past years—neither through pressure nor blackmail—they are now turning to new tools.
They are doing everything they can to interfere in the Hungarian elections. What we have seen in recent weeks is all about that.
🟠 The stakes are simple: either we preserve our right to decide our own future, or we allow others to dictate how we should live.
Because if they couldn’t defeat us over the past 16 years—if no amount of pressure or scheming could bring us down—then their master plan is simply to remove us. If necessary, by interfering in Hungarian elections.
Everything you have seen in recent weeks and months has been about one thing: foreign actors trying to influence your decision. They want to take away your right to decide what kind of country you want to live in.
When Volodymyr Zelenskyy shuts off the Druzhba oil pipeline and places Hungary under an oil blockade—not for technical reasons, but as a political decision—it is, in my view, clearly about influencing Hungarian elections.
And when reports emerge about gold and large cash convoys crossing Hungary, and a former Ukrainian intelligence officer claims that this is Zelenskyy’s “black money,” from which billions allegedly reach Péter Magyar and his allies every week—then again, this narrative is about foreign interference in Hungary’s elections.
At Easter, many of us set off to visit our families and relatives we haven’t seen in a long time, and many also attend gatherings with friends. Some people may even drive up to a thousand kilometers over the four days of the holiday, so it really matters how much we pay for fuel.
Fuel prices have skyrocketed across Europe due to the wars, and Hungary is also affected by the Ukrainian oil blockade. Yet we won’t have to pay huge amounts during our Easter travels, because thanks to the government, we can refuel at protected prices—the cheapest in Europe. Right now, we pay 595 forints per liter of petrol, but without the protected price and cheap Russian energy, fuel prices could rise to as much as 1,000 forints per liter.
If TISZA were in government this Easter, we would have to dig much deeper into our pockets, as their energy plan would cut Hungary off from cheap Russian crude oil. And this is just one holiday weekend—just imagine that over the course of a month, an average Hungarian family would pay 48,000 forints more per month on fuel alone.
But we will not allow Hungarians to be made to pay for the war, nor will we allow foreign oil companies to profit at the expense of Hungarian families! We stand for low fuel prices. Next Sunday, Fidesz is the safe choice!
❗️Suburban (i.e. mostly immigrant) youths are rioting in London. This will not end well!
Due to the emerging brutal European energy crisis and the domestic campaign, it has barely made the news here—but it is still important: a teenage uprising has broken out in London.
(Here at home, “rebellious” young people criticize Fidesz out of boredom / because they have it too good / because it’s fashionable / for no reason. In London, meanwhile, they are rampaging in the streets. We’re still better off😉)
The center of the unrest was in South London, around Clapham High Street (if you search for the street name on social media, you’ll find plenty of videos).
❗️Young people, mostly between the ages of 13 and 18, looted s
🧠 Quick Overview
👉 Main narrative:
“West = chaos, violence”
“immigrants = danger”
“Hungary = safety”
“election = order vs. chaos”
👉 Underlying formula:
fear + comparison + distortion + enemy construction → “if you don’t vote for us → this will happen here too”
🔍 Manipulation techniques
1️⃣ Fear framing
👉 Excerpt: “this won’t end well!” “they set fires”, “they are rioting”
👉 Technique:
stacking negative, threatening imagery
projecting danger into the future (“this is just the beginning”)
👉 Goal: ➡️ create anxiety ➡️ “this must be avoided”
👉 Goal: ➡️ create a scapegoat ➡️ “they are responsible”
👉 Effect: ➡️ strengthening prejudice ➡️ social division
3️⃣ Selection bias
👉 Excerpt: “you can find plenty of videos”
👉 Technique:
highlighting isolated, sensational cases
no context (how frequent? what are the causes?)
👉 Goal: ➡️ turn exceptions into general perception
👉 Effect: ➡️ feeling that “this is happening everywhere”
4️⃣ False comparison
👉 Excerpt: “Here they only complain… in London they riot”
👉 Technique:
comparing two fundamentally different phenomena
oversimplification
👉 Goal: ➡️ present Hungary in a positive light
👉 Effect: ➡️ distorted perception of reality
5️⃣ Ridicule framing
👉 Excerpt: “out of boredom / because they have it too good / for fashion”
👉 Technique:
trivializing the motivations of political opponents
mocking tone
👉 Goal: ➡️ discredit opponents
👉 Effect: ➡️ “they are not worth taking seriously”
6️⃣ Authority undermining
👉 Excerpt: “they laugh at the police”, “they don’t dare to act”
👉 Technique:
portraying authorities as weak or incompetent
“liberal media” as a restricting force
👉 Goal: ➡️ discredit Western systems
👉 Effect: ➡️ “there is no order there”
7️⃣ Slippery slope
👉 Excerpt: “it could spread to other cities”
👉 Technique:
present event → future widespread chaos
👉 Goal: ➡️ amplify perceived danger
👉 Effect: ➡️ panic, urgency
8️⃣ “Us vs. them” (binary framing)
👉 Excerpt: “the Hungarian path is good for us”
👉 Technique:
contrasting two worlds:
“they” = chaos
“we” = order
👉 Goal: ➡️ identity building
👉 Effect: ➡️ emotional alignment
9️⃣ Call to action (political closure)
👉 Excerpt: “on April 12… we will preserve it”
👉 Technique:
compressing the entire narrative into a voting decision
👉 Goal: ➡️ influence behavior (voting)
👉 Effect: ➡️ “if you don’t vote this way → safety is at risk”
⚠️ Most severe distortions / manipulations
❗ isolated riots → presented as general Western reality ❗ “immigrant = violence” oversimplification ❗ implied causality without evidence ❗ idealization of Hungary without context ❗ emotional manipulation instead of facts
🧩 Summary
This text is a classic fear-based campaign message, where:
👉 a foreign event is exaggerated 👉 an enemy is constructed 👉 and then linked to a domestic political decision
➡️ Real goal: not to inform, but to trigger emotional reactions and influence voting behavior
Audio recording proves: by his own admission, Szabolcs Panyi—the TISZA-linked “journalist” agent—has been in contact with three European intelligence services.
Kyiv and Brussels are doing everything they can to bring down the national government. We will not let that happen!
☝️ It is increasingly being reported in more and more places that several Tisza candidates may step down, including Anna Müller in North Pest, who is performing very poorly in the opposition’s internal race against DK’s Balázs Barkóczi. This would be particularly bad news for North Pest and the patriots living here, because it would make it very difficult to defeat Balázs Barkóczi. 9 days to go! Go North Pest! Go Fidesz! 🇭🇺✌️
This is bad news for Fidesz and for the patriots of North Pest—I’m honestly not calm about it. In recent days, it’s been reported more and more often that Anna Müller—my fellow Tisza candidate, I won’t call her my opponent because my real opponent is Balázs Barkóczi—might be one of those Tisza candidates stepping down in the final days.
And unfortunately, this would mean that, as we know, pro-Brussels voters are in the majority in Budapest. If opposition votes are not split between the strong DK candidate Balázs Barkóczi and the weaker Tisza candidate Anna Müller, then I have no chance of winning the individual mandate. I only have a chance if Tisza takes some votes away from Barkóczi.
And indeed, we are seeing this in more and more places—we’ll show a few examples here—that Anna Müller could be one of the Tisza candidates stepping down. From Kyiv’s or Brussels’ perspective, this might be a logical move, but from the perspective of North Pest, it would be nothing short of a tragedy if Balázs Barkóczi remained a Member of Parliament for another four years.
In any case, we are still campaigning as if there is a chance for a patriotic victory in North Pest—although, of course, in the final four days we will campaign in a more restrained manner. I’ll include below the latest figures from the North Pest election barometer. This still does not include Péter Magyar’s alleged violent sex scandal. A new barometer will be released on Sunday—I’m curious to see whether there will be any change as a result of that scandal.
🧠 Quick overview
👉 Main narrative:
“TISZA withdraws → Fidesz loses” “opposition = pro-Brussels majority” “vote splitting = key to victory” “election = patriots vs. Brussels”
👉 Underlying formula:
fear + tactical voting + rumor + external enemy → “if this happens → we have no chance”
🔍 What is actually happening here?
1️⃣ Spreading rumors / unverified information
👉 Excerpt: “it can be read in more and more places…” “Müller Anna may be one of those withdrawing”
👉 Technique:
no concrete source
“more and more places” → illusion of credibility
conditional phrasing (“may”) → still feels like a fact
👉 Goal:
➡️ create uncertainty ➡️ prepare a narrative even if it’s not true
👉 Effect:
➡️ feeling that “something is happening in the background”
2️⃣ Manipulating tactical voting
👉 Excerpt: “I only have a chance if Tisza takes votes away”
👉 Technique:
explicit vote-calculation
not about programs, but about distribution
👉 Goal:
➡️ influence voter behavior ➡️ “don’t vote like that, or we lose”
👉 Effect:
➡️ voters decide out of fear, not conviction
3️⃣ Bringing in an external enemy (Brussels / Kyiv)
👉 Excerpt: “from Brussels’ perspective, this would be logical” “from Kyiv’s perspective…”
👉 Technique:
links a domestic political event to foreign actors
without evidence
👉 Goal:
➡️ shift narrative from domestic politics to foreign interference ➡️ strengthen enemy framing
👉 Effect:
➡️ distrust toward the opposition ➡️ “they are not independent”
4️⃣ False inevitability
👉 Excerpt: “if votes are not split → there is no chance”
👉 Technique:
oversimplified cause-effect
reduces political reality to a single variable
👉 Goal:
➡️ create a sense of forced choice ➡️ “this is the only path”
👉 Effect:
➡️ narrowed thinking ➡️ exclusion of alternatives
5️⃣ Discrediting the opponent
👉 Excerpt: “weak Tisza candidate” “DK strongman”
👉 Technique:
labeling
emotional qualification instead of facts
👉 Goal:
➡️ distort perception of actors ➡️ strengthen own position
👉 Effect:
➡️ simple “good vs. bad” framing
6️⃣ Fear framing (loss narrative)
👉 Excerpt: “I have no chance” “it would be a tragedy”
👉 Technique:
exaggerated consequences
emotional amplification
👉 Goal:
➡️ create urgency ➡️ mobilize through fear
👉 Effect:
➡️ panic-like political reaction
7️⃣ Majority illusion
👉 Excerpt: “in Budapest, pro-Brussels voters are in the majority”
👉 Technique:
unsupported generalization
“everyone thinks this” feeling
👉 Goal:
➡️ normalize a claim ➡️ pressure the voter
👉 Effect:
➡️ “then it must be true”
8️⃣ Introducing a scandal without evidence
👉 Excerpt: “Magyar Péter’s violent sex scandal”
👉 Technique:
mentioning a scandal without context
timing: right before the election
👉 Goal:
➡️ character assassination ➡️ agenda-setting
👉 Effect:
➡️ fixation of negative associations
⚠️ Overall picture (short)
This is a classic campaign message that:
relies on rumors
creates fear
pushes toward tactical voting
introduces an external enemy
simplifies reality
👉 Real goal:
not to inform, but to ➡️ influence behavior (how you vote)
💥 Key sentence (essence)
👉 “What matters is not who represents what — but how the votes are distributed.”
