❌ Let’s not allow them to rob us!

With the introduction of the Tisza energy plan, every Hungarian family would have to dig deep into their pockets. By cutting off Russian energy, utility bills would increase 2.5 times, and with the removal of price caps, fuel costs would rise by 48,600 forints per month. Altogether, this would mean an extra one million forints per year for an average household under Tisza’s energy plan.

🟠 The national government is capable of preserving reduced utility costs and regulated prices. Let’s not take risks! On April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice!

What would this Tisza-style energy plan look like? Well, it would look something like this: if there is no Russian energy, then there is no utility cost reduction. You don’t have to look far for examples—just take a look at the Czech Republic or Poland. There, annual utility costs for a family are around 800,000 to 900,000 forints, even up to 1 million. In Hungary, the average annual household utility cost is around 250,000 forints.

So anyone who thinks it’s a good idea to vote for Tisza should start putting money into an envelope right now as I’m speaking. Go ahead and put about 700–750 thousand forints into that envelope.

Then let’s go a bit further and see what happens if there is no Russian crude oil and market prices must be paid for petrol and diesel. Right now, you would only have to pay a little more—but if we completely cut it off, just look at Western countries. Fuel prices there can reach 1,000 forints per liter. So let’s calmly calculate with a price of 1,000 forints per liter.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“TISZA = brutal financial loss”
“without Russian energy = collapse”
“Fidesz = protection + affordable living”
“election = survival of your wallet”

👉 Underlying formula:
specific numbers + fear + simplification + repetition
→ “if you don’t vote for them → you will suffer financially”

---

🔍 Manipulation Techniques

1️⃣ Financial fearmongering (fear framing)

👉 Excerpt:

“2.5x utility costs”
“+48,600 HUF/month”
“+1 million HUF/year”
“put 700–750 thousand HUF in an envelope”

👉 Technique:

• large, seemingly precise numbers
• directly targets household finances
• “imagine it right now” (envelope example)

👉 Goal:
➡️ immediate anxiety
➡️ “I can’t risk this”

👉 Reality:
❗ no calculations shown
❗ no model or source provided

---

2️⃣ False causality

👉 Claim:
“no Russian energy → no price caps”

👉 Technique:

• links two complex issues into a simple cause-effect
• excludes all other factors (market, diversification, policy)

👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify reality
➡️ create a single scapegoat

👉 Reality:
❗ energy prices depend on multiple factors (market, contracts, policy)
❗ not a binary system

---

3️⃣ Cherry-picked international examples

👉 Excerpt:
“Czech Republic, Poland: 800,000 – 1,000,000 HUF yearly utilities”

👉 Technique:

• selectively chosen foreign examples
• no context:
  • incomes
  • subsidies
  • consumption
  • energy mix

👉 Goal:
➡️ “look, it’s bad elsewhere → it will be bad here too”

👉 Reality:
❗ comparing apples to oranges
❗ no consistent benchmark

---

4️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Message:

• either Russian energy + cheap living
• or no Russian energy + high costs

👉 Technique:

• presents two extreme options
• eliminates all middle-ground solutions

👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ “there is only one safe choice”

---

5️⃣ Catastrophizing (extreme future scenario)

👉 Excerpt:
“1,000 HUF fuel prices”

👉 Technique:

• extreme, shocking projection
• no timeframe, no conditions

👉 Goal:
➡️ shock + fear
➡️ “this is too much”

👉 Reality:
❗ speculative
❗ unsupported

---

6️⃣ Repetition and stacking

👉 Multiple numbers listed:

48,600 HUF
31,000 HUF
16,000 HUF
1,000,000 HUF

👉 Technique:

• stacking numbers on top of each other
• cognitive overload → reduces critical thinking

👉 Goal:
➡️ create a sense of massive loss
➡️ push emotional decision-making

---

7️⃣ Protector framing

👉 Excerpt:
“the national government will preserve it”

👉 Technique:

• government = protector
• opposition = threat

👉 Goal:
➡️ create a sense of safety
➡️ build loyalty

---

⚠️ Overall Picture

This text is not trying to inform, but to:

👉 create fear (financial loss)
👉 present a simple narrative (Russian energy = solution)
👉 push a political choice

---

🎯 In short

👉 This is a textbook economic fear campaign, where:

• numbers = illusion of credibility
• examples = cherry-picked
• causality = oversimplified
• future = exaggerated

➡️ end result:
“if you don’t vote for them → you will be worse off financially”

Szabolcs Panyi colluded with Péter Magyar and three foreign intelligence services.

Another outrageous audio recording has been made public about the “journalist” agent who also wiretapped Péter Szijjártó!

The bomb has exploded again: Szabolcs Panyi also coordinated with Péter Magyar regarding foreign interference! The Soros-linked journalist no longer even denies how he is scheming. The self-proclaimed journalist agent is not working with just one, but specifically three foreign intelligence services in order to bring a pro-Ukraine government to power in Hungary.

Szabolcs Panyi is not only working together with Anita Orbán, TISZA’s globalist foreign minister candidate, but also held extensive discussions with Péter Magyar about how materials obtained from intelligence services could be used in the final phase of the campaign.

It is now clearly visible what we have been hearing for weeks and months: TISZA has been completely infiltrated by Ukrainian and other foreign intelligence services. No matter how Péter Magyar denies it, his own associate has exposed him. Just imagine—if such a person came to power, how could he possibly say no to the world of agents and spies, or to orders from Brussels and Kyiv…

If TISZA were to form a government, nothing would stand in the way of financing the war or continuing it, and we could also say goodbye to cheap utility costs.

Without cheap energy, they would immediately abolish the protected fuel price—which ensures some of the lowest fuel prices in Europe—as well as the utility price cuts, causing every Hungarian family to lose up to 1 million forints per year.

We cannot allow a pro-Ukraine government to replace a national one! We will not let Hungarian people be stripped of their money, and we stand for low utility costs—this is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

---

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “journalist = intelligence agent”
• Magyar Péter = under foreign influence
• “TISZA = national security risk”
• “election = sovereignty vs. foreign control”

👉 Underlying formula:

conspiracy + character assassination + fear + financial threat + political closure
→ “be afraid → become distrustful → vote for ‘protection’”

---

🔍 What is actually happening here?

1️⃣ Conspiracy framing

👉 Excerpt:
“colluded with three foreign intelligence services”

👉 Technique:

• specific number (3) → illusion of credibility
• but:
  • no evidence
  • no services named

👉 Goal:
➡️ “this is not politics → this is a national security threat”

👉 Reality:
➡️ not a proven claim, but suggestion + dramatization

---

2️⃣ Reality inversion

👉 Key point:

Panyi Szabolcs
👉 exposed the Pegasus-ügy

👉 What the text does:
➡️ portrays him as an intelligence agent

👉 Technique:

“the one who exposed → becomes the culprit”

👉 Goal:

➡️ destroy credibility
➡️ “don’t trust those who revealed something”

👉 This is one of the strongest manipulations in the text.

---

3️⃣ Smear campaign (character assassination)

👉 Keywords:

• “agent”
• “Soros-linked”
• “scheming”

👉 Technique:

• labeling without evidence
• moral discrediting

👉 Goal:

➡️ don’t think about the content
➡️ form a negative image of the person

---

4️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 Excerpt:

• “with Magyar Péter”
• “Anita Orbán”
• “foreign services”

👉 Technique:

• linking multiple actors
  → building the image of a “network”

👉 Goal:

➡️ “everyone is part of something”

👉 Effect:

➡️ paranoid system narrative (“they are infiltrated”)

---

5️⃣ Fake urgency (evidence-free “explosion”)

👉 Excerpt:

“new audio recording”, “the bomb has exploded”

👉 Technique:

• sensational framing
• but no:
  • source
  • content
  • verifiability

👉 Goal:

➡️ urgency + emotional shock
➡️ “no time to verify”

---

6️⃣ Enemy framing (external threat)

👉 Excerpt:

• “Ukrainian”
• “Brussels”
• “foreign intelligence services”

👉 Technique:

• external actors = unified threat

👉 Goal:

➡️ “not just opponents → enemies”

---

7️⃣ Fear escalation

👉 Excerpt:

• “financing the war”
• “continuing the war”

👉 Technique:

• political choice → framed as life-or-death issue

👉 Goal:

➡️ existential fear

---

8️⃣ Financial fear framing

👉 Excerpt:

“1 million HUF annual loss”

👉 Technique:

• concrete number → illusion of credibility
• no calculation provided

👉 Goal:

➡️ “this hits your wallet”

---

9️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Excerpt:

“national vs. pro-Ukraine government”

👉 Technique:

• reduces to two options
• no middle ground

👉 Goal:

➡️ simplify decision-making

---

🔟 Political closure (call to action)

👉 Excerpt:

“only Fidesz is the safe choice”

👉 Technique:

• fear → solution

👉 Classic formula:

➡️ “problem → panic → savior”

---

⚠️ The key contradiction

👉 Logic of the text:

• “journalist = intelligence agent”
• “he leaked materials”

👉 But:

the Pegasus-ügy revealed that
➡️ journalists were targets of surveillance

👉 So:

➡️ the same person is portrayed as both:

• “surveilled”
• and “surveilling”

👉 This is a logical contradiction, but it works emotionally.

---

🧩 Summary

This text:

• does not provide evidence
• it builds a narrative

👉 main tools:

• conspiracy
• character assassination
• fear
• financial threat
• “us vs. them”

👉 strongest trick:

➡️ reversing the roles of real actors

Politico reported that there is strong confidence within the EU in the victory of Péter Magyar, as they want a pro-Ukraine government in Hungary. It is not surprising that they are hoping for this, since Péter Magyar would not say no to any demands coming from Brussels or Kyiv.

However, I suggest they take a look at how many people attended each stop of Viktor Orbán’s nationwide tour! Hungarians do not want a pro-Ukraine government imposed on them—they want peace and freedom.

That is why Fidesz will win on April 12!

---

Hi Andra! Hello! Politico wrote that the European Union would like to see a pro-Ukraine government in Hungary and that they are hopeful about Péter Magyar. Well, I understand their optimism, because they can reasonably expect that if Péter Magyar came to power, he would be pro-Ukraine.

What I don’t understand, however, is their optimism if they look around and see how many people are attending Viktor Orbán’s nationwide tour. Based on that, I think Péter Magyar will have no chance on April 12.

👉 Main narrative:

• “EU = external interference” (European Union)
• “Magyar Péter = pro-Ukraine” (Magyar Péter)
• “Fidesz = popular will + majority” (Fidesz)
• “Election = national will vs. external forces”

👉 Hidden formula:
external enemy + assumption + crowd effect + emotional closure
→ “they want it → we don’t → therefore we will win”

---

🔍 What is actually happening here?

1️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“The EU wants a pro-Ukrainian government in Hungary”

👉 Technique:

• a complex institution (European Union) is presented as a single, intentional actor
• “they want” → implies coordinated, deliberate interference

👉 Goal:
➡️ create a “us vs. them” framework
➡️ evoke a sense of external threat

---

2️⃣ Speculation presented as fact

👉 Excerpt:
“Magyar Péter would not say no to any demand from Brussels or Kyiv”

👉 Technique:

• no evidence → yet stated as certainty
• future behavior treated as a fact

👉 Actor:
Magyar Péter

👉 Goal:
➡️ build distrust
➡️ weaken credibility

---

3️⃣ Crowd = truth (bandwagon / majority illusion)

👉 Excerpt:
“Look at how many people attended Viktor Orbán’s tour”

👉 Technique:

• attendance = support = election outcome (implicitly)
• visual mass → legitimacy

👉 Actor:
Orbán Viktor

👉 Goal:
➡️ create the feeling that “everyone wants this”
➡️ reduce uncertainty among supporters

---

4️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Excerpt:
“pro-Ukrainian government vs. peace and freedom”

👉 Technique:

• reduces reality to two options
• excludes all middle ground

👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ push emotional, not rational choice

---

5️⃣ Inevitability framing

👉 Excerpt:
“That’s why Fidesz will win on April 12”

👉 Technique:

• future stated as a fact
• no “if,” no conditions

👉 Goal:
➡️ mobilization (“join the winner”)
➡️ demoralize the opposition

---

⚠️ What matters

This text does not prove, it:

• assumes
• simplifies
• triggers emotional reactions

And your first reaction (“we’re lying… I’d beat them”) shows exactly how it works:
👉 it provokes → generates anger → forces a reaction

---

🔧 How to handle it effectively

Don’t react emotionally—respond like this instead:

👉 Short, controlled counter-messages:

• “This is a claim, not evidence.”
• “Where is the proof that anyone ‘would not say no’?”
• “Crowds are not the same as election results.”

👉 Or stronger, but still clean:

“This is a classic ‘external enemy + fear + crowd’ narrative.”

It is shocking to see the level of hostility already driving the left. Together with Csilla Fazekas, we have heard several such stories; most recently, a man told us that even while commuting, he overheard passengers saying, “Why hasn’t Viktor Orbán been shot yet?”

It is unacceptable that public discourse has sunk to this level, and the hateful rhetoric of Péter Magyar has also set an example for this.

Let us remain calm and not be intimidated by this outrage. We stand with Viktor Orbán, a stable and composed leader who is capable of saying no to any foreign interference in order to protect Hungarian interests. Fidesz is the only safe choice!

I was on my way home on the suburban railway (HÉV), and I heard two women—just ordinary people—talking about why Viktor Orbán hasn’t been shot yet. I heard it with my own ears. So this isn’t some kind of conspiracy theory. I was truly shocked hearing this from our own side. That’s not what I ever wanted to say. That they should shoot Péter Magyar, or… Yes, yes. I would never say anything like that, no matter what kind of opposition content I watch.

👉 Main narrative:

• “opposition = hatred, violence”
• “public discourse = has reached a dangerous level”
• “Fidesz = calm, stability, protection”
• “election = order vs. chaos”

👉 Hidden formula:

anecdote + shock + generalization + scapegoating + reassuring closure
→ “fear → then choose safety”

---

🔍 What is actually happening here?

1️⃣ Anecdotal “evidence” (anecdotal evidence)

👉 Excerpt:
“two women on the HÉV were talking about why Orbán Viktor hasn’t been shot yet”

👉 Technique:

• a single story = presented as a general phenomenon
• no evidence, no context
• “I heard it with my own ears” → illusion of credibility

👉 Goal:

➡️ make it seem like this is a widespread attitude
➡️ personal experience → stronger than data

👉 Reality:

➡️ an isolated case (if it’s even true)
➡️ says nothing about society as a whole

---

2️⃣ Shock framing (violent imagery)

👉 Excerpt:
“why hasn’t Orbán Viktor been shot”

👉 Technique:

• extreme, taboo-breaking statement
• triggers immediate emotional reaction (shock, fear)

👉 Goal:

➡️ disrupt rational thinking
➡️ push the audience into an emotional state

👉 Effect:

➡️ you don’t analyze → you react

---

3️⃣ Overgeneralization

👉 Excerpt:
“this is the kind of anger driving the left”

👉 Technique:

• 2 people → entire “left”
• whole political side lumped together

👉 Goal:

➡️ create a sense of collective guilt
➡️ “they are all like this”

👉 Reality:

➡️ logical leap
➡️ no representativeness

---

4️⃣ Scapegoating

👉 Excerpt:
“Magyar Péter’s hateful tone also set the example for this”

👉 Technique:

• naming a specific person as the cause
• indirectly assigning responsibility for an extreme statement

👉 Goal:

➡️ simple cause-effect: “this is because of him”
➡️ demonize a political opponent

👉 Reality:

➡️ no proven connection
➡️ narrative linkage

---

5️⃣ Moral panic

👉 Excerpt:
“it is unacceptable that public discourse has sunk to this level”

👉 Technique:

• framing social decline
• “we are in danger” atmosphere

👉 Goal:

➡️ increase tension
➡️ create urgency (“something must be done”)

---

6️⃣ Protector framing

👉 Excerpt:
“Orbán Viktor is a stable, calm leader…”

👉 Technique:

• contrast: chaos vs. order
• leader = protection

👉 Goal:

➡️ create emotional sense of safety
➡️ “he will protect us”

---

7️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Hidden message:

• either Fidesz → safety
• or opposition → hatred + violence

👉 Technique:

• no middle ground
• simplified choice

👉 Goal:

➡️ force a decision
➡️ reduce uncertainty

---

⚙️ The full mechanism

1. Shock (violent statement)
2. Personal story (illusion of credibility)
3. Expansion (→ “the left is like this”)
4. Enemy assignment (Magyar Péter)
5. Fear building (public discourse is collapsing)
6. Offering a solution (Orbán = stability)

👉 This is a classic:

“problem → fear → solution = vote for us” model

---

🧩 In short

This text:

• does not prove
• does not analyze
• but manufactures an emotional state

👉 goal:
➡️ fear + outrage + desire for safety

👉 end result:
➡️ strengthening political loyalty

❌ Let’s not allow them to rob us!
With the introduction of the TISZA energy plan, every Hungarian family would have to dig deep into their pockets. By cutting off Russian energy, utility bills would increase by 2.5 times, and with the abolition of the protected price, fuel costs would rise by 48,600 forints per month. Altogether, the TISZA energy plan would cost an average family an extra one million forints per year.

🟠 The national government is capable of preserving utility price reductions and protected prices. Let’s not take the risk! On April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice!

What would this TISZA-style energy plan look like? Well, it would look something like this: if there is no Russian energy, then there is no utility price reduction. You don’t have to look far for examples—just look at the Czech Republic and Poland. There, annual household utility costs are around 800,000 to 900,000 forints, even up to 1 million forints. In Hungary, the average annual household utility cost is about 250,000 forints.

So anyone who thinks it’s a good idea to vote for TISZA should start putting money into an envelope right now as I speak—about 700,000 to 750,000 forints. Then let’s go a bit further and see what happens if there is no Russian crude oil and we have to pay market prices for gasoline and diesel. Right now, we would only have to pay a little more, but if we completely cut off from it, just look at Western countries—fuel prices are around 1,000 forints per liter. So let’s calmly calculate with a price of 1,000 forints per liter.

👉 Main narrative:

• “TISZA = massive financial loss”
• “without Russian energy = collapse”
• “Fidesz = protection + cheap living”
• “election = survival of your wallet”

---

👉 Hidden formula:

specific numbers + fear + simplification + repetition + urgency
→ “if you don’t vote for them → you’ll go broke”

---

🔍 What’s actually happening here?

1️⃣ Financial fear-mongering (fear framing)

👉 Example:
“2.5x utility costs”, “+48,600 HUF/month”, “+1 million per year”

👉 Technique:

• large, seemingly concrete numbers
• directly targets household finances

👉 Goal:
➡️ immediate anxiety
➡️ “I can’t risk this”

👉 Reality:

• no calculation shown
• no model, just claims

---

2️⃣ False precision

👉 Example:
“48,600 HUF”, “700–750 thousand HUF”

👉 Technique:

• overly precise numbers → illusion of accuracy

👉 Goal:
➡️ “this must be calculated”

👉 Reality:

• not verifiable, no sources
• communication tool, not an economic model

---

3️⃣ False causality

👉 Example:
“no Russian energy → no utility price cuts”

👉 Technique:

• reduces a complex energy system to a single statement

👉 Goal:
➡️ simple but misleading cause-effect link

👉 Reality:

• energy prices depend on multiple factors (market, regulation, sourcing, energy mix)
• this is a political claim, not a law of nature

---

4️⃣ Cherry-picking foreign examples

👉 Example:
“Czech Republic, Poland: 800k–1M yearly utility costs”

👉 Technique:

• isolated numbers without context

👉 Goal:
➡️ “look, it’s worse elsewhere → we’re better”

👉 Reality:

• no comparable data (income, consumption, subsidies)
• no sources

---

5️⃣ Catastrophic projection

👉 Example:
“1,000 HUF fuel price”

👉 Technique:

• presents worst-case scenario as certainty

👉 Goal:
➡️ shock + fear

👉 Reality:

• speculation, not a forecast

---

6️⃣ Urgency + forced action

👉 Example:
“put money in an envelope right now”

👉 Technique:

• physical visualization of action

👉 Goal:
➡️ emotional involvement
➡️ rushed decision-making

👉 Effect:
➡️ you react instead of thinking

---

7️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Message:

• Fidesz → safety
• others → financial collapse

👉 Reality:
➡️ artificially narrowed choice

---

🎯 Summary (core point)

This text is not trying to inform, but to:

➡️ scare you with money
➡️ reduce complex issues to simple (often false) claims
➡️ push you into a quick decision
➡️ leave only one “safe” option

---

💡 Why it works

fear → overrides rational thinking

money → affects everyone

concrete numbers → feel credible

simple narrative → no thinking required

This is probably an as-yet undiagnosed illness. Anything that is good for Hungarians, Brussels immediately wants to abolish.

The European Commission has called on the government to immediately suspend the application of the protected fuel price.

Just like István Kapitány, who said in his own words that they would immediately abolish the protected price, the utility cost reductions, and the price margin caps if they seize power.

The government rejects this demand, just as the Hungarian people do. And we will continue to do so after April 12, if we all go out and vote, so that it is not Brussels’ puppets but Hungarians who form a national government.

Fidesz is the safe choice!

👉 Main narrative:

• “Brussels = an enemy that takes away what is good”
• “Hungarian government = protection”
• “Opposition = puppets of Brussels”
• “Election = national sovereignty vs. external control”

👉 Hidden formula:

enemy construction + emotional exaggeration + simplification + repetition + mobilization
→ “if you don’t vote for them → you will lose what is good for you”

---

🔍 What is actually happening here?

1️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“Anything that is good for Hungarians, Brussels immediately wants to abolish.”

👉 Technique:

• total generalization (“anything”)
• simplifies a complex institution (the EU) into a single malicious actor

👉 Goal:

➡️ create a clear “us vs. them”
➡️ trigger emotional identification

👉 Effect:

➡️ you don’t examine individual decisions
➡️ you automatically treat “Brussels” as the enemy

---

2️⃣ Pathologization / dehumanizing framing

👉 Excerpt:
“an as-yet undiagnosed disease”

👉 Technique:

• frames political disagreement as a “disease”
• presents the opponent as irrational or abnormal

👉 Goal:

➡️ delegitimize the other side
➡️ exclude rational debate

👉 Effect:

➡️ you see them not as partners, but as a “problem”

---

3️⃣ Selective facts + distortion (selective framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“The European Commission has called on…”

👉 Technique:

• uses a real element (EU criticism)
• removes context (why, under what rules)

👉 Goal:

➡️ create an appearance of credibility (“this really happened”)
➡️ but steer interpretation

👉 Effect:

➡️ you feel it is “proven”
➡️ you don’t look for the full picture

---

4️⃣ Demonizing the opposition (guilt by association)

👉 Excerpt:
“puppets of Brussels”

👉 Technique:

• equates opposition with serving foreign interests
• denies them independent agency

👉 Goal:

➡️ discredit them
➡️ evoke a sense of betrayal

👉 Effect:

➡️ you don’t judge based on policies
➡️ but on perceived loyalty

---

5️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Excerpt:
“not puppets of Brussels, but a government formed by Hungarians”

👉 Technique:

• reduces reality to two options:
  • national government
  • foreign-controlled government

👉 Reality:

• political reality is far more complex

👉 Goal:

➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ bypass critical thinking

👉 Effect:

➡️ creates a “no third option” mindset

---

6️⃣ Fear framing + loss framing

👉 Excerpt:
“they will abolish price caps, utility reductions…”

👉 Technique:

• introduces concrete financial losses
• ties it to everyday life

👉 Goal:

➡️ trigger immediate emotional reaction
➡️ “I can’t risk this”

👉 Effect:

➡️ financial security becomes a political choice

---

7️⃣ Authority anchoring

👉 Excerpt:
“István Kapitány said it himself…”

👉 Technique:

• introduces a specific person
• “he said it → therefore it’s true”

👉 Goal:

➡️ increase credibility
➡️ reinforce the claim

👉 Effect:

➡️ you question it less

---

8️⃣ Mobilization framing

👉 Excerpt:
“let’s go vote”

👉 Technique:

• direct call to action
• emphasizes collective participation

👉 Goal:

➡️ activate political participation
➡️ convert emotion into action

👉 Effect:

➡️ decision driven by emotion

---

🧠 Overall picture

This is a classic, well-structured propaganda message that:

• offers a simple worldview (good vs. bad)
• relies on emotions (fear + protection)
• threatens concrete financial loss
• creates an external enemy + internal “traitor”
• ends with a direct call to action

👉 Core mechanism:

➡️ “what you value (cheap energy) → is under threat → there is an enemy → we will protect you → vote for us”

🌍 Hungarians living abroad also support Fidesz! Some are coming home from England to vote for Fidesz, while others from Austria and Sweden support the national government! 🇭🇺

Hungarians living abroad clearly see what it’s like when a country gives up its sovereignty, when gender ideology and mass migration become part of everyday life. That’s why many are returning home to vote for Fidesz—so that the same thing cannot happen here.

They also know that only Viktor Orbán is capable of saying no to pressure from the Brussels elite and protecting Hungary’s peace and freedom.

This is the kind of country we want—and this is what the people of Budapest we visited together with Gyepes Ádám also confirmed.

🟠 For every Hungarian, no matter where they live, Fidesz is the only safe choice on April 12!

---

My godchild living in England plans to come home and will definitely vote for Fidesz. And my cousin living in Austria sent me an email recently, describing in detail how they follow Hungarian Facebook, and said that if they could vote here, they would vote only for Orbán.

It’s quite telling that even people abroad, after seeing things for themselves, say this. I also have a cousin in Sweden who constantly complains that Swedish newspapers criticize Orbán. But they come home every summer and see what reality is like here.

Of course, over there they probably portray Hungary as some kind of dictatorship where uniformed police beat people all day and no one can speak freely—everything is painted as terrible. But they know what the real situation is.

And they always ask me to write more so they can stay informed. Yes, that’s good—it’s important that they stay updated from here.

👉 Main narrative:

• “Hungarians living abroad also support Fidesz”
• “West = decline (migration, gender, oppression)”
• “Hungary = safety, freedom”
• “Orbán Viktor = the only protector”
• “Election = survival vs. decline”

---

👉 Hidden formula:

anecdote + fear + generalization + authority + repetition
→ “even people abroad see it → therefore it’s true”

---

🔍 What is actually happening here?

1️⃣ Anecdotal “evidence” (anecdotal evidence)

👉 Example:
“my godmother from England… my cousin from Austria… a relative from Sweden…”

👉 Technique:

• a few personal stories → presented as “proof”
• family connections → create a sense of credibility

👉 Goal:
➡️ “this is real because specific people say it”

👉 Effect:
➡️ you don’t question it → because it feels “realistic”

📌 Reality:
This is not representative. 2–3 people ≠ the entire Hungarian diaspora.

---

2️⃣ Bandwagon / illusion of majority

👉 Example:
“Hungarians abroad also support Fidesz”

👉 Technique:

• minority examples → framed as majority opinion
• creates a “everyone thinks this way” feeling

👉 Goal:
➡️ don’t stand out
➡️ “if others think this → it must be true”

👉 Effect:
➡️ conformity (you align with the “majority”)

---

3️⃣ Demonizing the West (fear framing + enemy construction)

👉 Example:
“gender madness,” “migration flood,” “giving up sovereignty”

👉 Technique:

• simplified, negative labels
• complex social issues → reduced to alarming slogans

👉 Goal:
➡️ fear of the “foreign example”
➡️ “this must not happen here”

👉 Effect:
➡️ emotional rejection instead of analysis

---

4️⃣ “Us vs. Them” (binary polarization)

👉 Division:

• Us: Hungarians, Fidesz, safety
• Them: the West, Brussels, media

👉 Technique:

• splitting the world into two sides
• no nuance

👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ strengthen loyalty

👉 Effect:
➡️ black-and-white thinking

---

5️⃣ Protector narrative (protector framing)

👉 Example:
“only Orbán Viktor can protect…”

👉 Technique:

• safety tied to a single ব্যক্তি
• “no alternative” framing

👉 Goal:
➡️ create dependency
➡️ simplify the choice

👉 Effect:
➡️ “if not him → danger”

---

6️⃣ Discrediting media (reality control)

👉 Example:
“Swedish media criticizes Orbán… but that’s not reality”

👉 Technique:

• foreign media = distortion
• “reality” = own narrative

👉 Goal:
➡️ exclude opposing information

👉 Effect:
➡️ closed information bubble

---

7️⃣ Repetition + emotional reinforcement

👉 Example:
“Of course… they know… that’s right…”

👉 Technique:

• constant reinforcement
• conversational, “friendly” tone

👉 Goal:
➡️ make it feel natural
➡️ avoid the feeling of propaganda

👉 Effect:
➡️ subconscious internalization

---

🎯 Summary (short):

👉 This text:

• does not prove → it tells stories
• does not analyze → it simplifies
• does not debate → it frames

👉 Its strongest tools:

• personal stories (illusion of credibility)
• fear of the “West”
• “everyone thinks this” effect
• presenting a single solution (Orbán)

---

⚠️ In one sentence:

👉 “Even people abroad see it → therefore it’s true → so vote accordingly.”

👉 If the Tisza energy plan were implemented, Hungarian families would pay 48,000 forints more per month for fuel, 31,000 forints more for gas, and 16,000 forints more for electricity.
We will not let ourselves be robbed, so let’s choose the safe option and vote for Fidesz!

Everyone should get their wallet ready and imagine taking out well over a hundred thousand forints every month just to cover the rising fuel and utility prices!

If we don’t want Hungary to be drained of its money, we need a national government!

The stakes of the election are whether we will have a national government or a pro-Ukrainian one. In April, we must decide where Hungarians’ money should go: should it be sent to Ukraine or remain in Hungary? If we allow a pro-Ukrainian government to take power, they will burden Hungary with Ukrainian war loans to such an extent that even our children and grandchildren will be paying for it.

We know they want to cut us off from cheap Russian energy as well. If the Ukrainians backing and funding TISZA succeed, then triple utility bills and 1,000-forint fuel prices will follow.

Kyiv, Brussels, and the TISZA Party must understand: we will not give our sons, we will not give weapons, and we will not give our money either!

In April, Fidesz is the safe choice.

👉 Main narrative:

• “They’re stealing your money”
• “TISZA + Ukraine + Brussels = loss + danger”
• “Fidesz = protection + security”
• “Election = financial survival + national survival”

👉 Hidden formula:

financial fear + enemy construction + simplification + repetition
→ “if you don’t vote for them → you’ll get poorer + you’ll be in danger”

---

🔍 What is actually happening in it?

1️⃣ Financial fearmongering (fear framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“well over 100,000 per month”, “triple utility bills”, “1,000 forint fuel”

👉 Technique:

• large, easy-to-imagine amounts
• specific numbers → illusion of credibility

👉 Reality:

• no explanation of where the numbers come from
• no model, no source

👉 Goal:

➡️ immediate anxiety
➡️ “I can’t risk this” feeling

👉 Effect:

➡️ you don’t check → you believe it

---

2️⃣ Enemy coalition construction (enemy coalition framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“pro-Ukraine government”, “Ukrainians behind Tisza”, “Brussels”

👉 Technique:

• merging multiple actors into one enemy
• combining external + internal enemies

👉 Goal:

➡️ simplify the world into “them vs us”
➡️ reduce complex politics to a single threat

👉 Effect:

➡️ you stop differentiating → everyone becomes “the enemy”

---

3️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Excerpt:
“Hungarians’ money goes to Ukraine or stays at home”

👉 Technique:

• presenting only two options
• excluding all real or intermediate alternatives

👉 Reality:

• economic policy is not binary
• it’s not “everything goes here or there”

👉 Goal:

➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ force a quick choice

---

4️⃣ Generational fear (long-term threat framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“our children and grandchildren will pay for it”

👉 Technique:

• dramatizing long-term consequences
• adding moral weight

👉 Goal:

➡️ guilt + responsibility
➡️ “if you choose wrong now → your family will suffer”

👉 Effect:

➡️ emotional pressure → not a rational decision

---

5️⃣ Brutal oversimplification of energy policy

👉 Excerpt:
“they’ll cut us off from cheap Russian energy → prices will rise”

👉 Technique:

• complex geopolitics → one-line cause-effect
• everything reduced to a single factor

👉 Reality:

• energy prices depend on many variables
• not determined by one political decision

👉 Goal:

➡️ simple (but misleading) explanation
➡️ reduce uncertainty → false sense of clarity

---

6️⃣ War threat injection

👉 Excerpt:
“we won’t give our sons”, “we won’t give weapons”

👉 Technique:

• introducing direct physical danger
• escalating from money → life

👉 Goal:

➡️ maximize fear
➡️ turn the election into a life-or-death issue

👉 Effect:

➡️ full emotional dominance

---

7️⃣ Fixing the solution (protector framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“Fidesz is the safe choice”

👉 Technique:

• fear first → then “the only solution”
• no alternatives presented

👉 Goal:

➡️ shut down thinking
➡️ automate the decision

---

🧠 Overall picture

This is a textbook propaganda mix, where:

• 💰 financial fear
• 🌍 geopolitical enemy construction
• 👨‍👩‍👧 family + future threat
• ⚔️ war rhetoric

are all compressed into a single message

👉 end result:

you don’t think → you want protection → you vote

---

⚡ Short, blunt version

This text does not inform.

👉 It manufactures anxiety
👉 It manufactures enemies
👉 It tries to force a decision on you