Well, here it is — the “Ukraine-loving country.” These video thumbnails can be seen on a Ukrainian YouTube channel with more than half a million subscribers.

Péter Magyar is shouting, while behind him Zelensky is watching with satisfaction.
There’s constantly a crosshair on Viktor Orbán’s head.
Elsewhere, Péter Magyar is shouting a battle cry together with Ursula, and again there’s a crosshair on the prime minister’s head.

So, I think there are no more questions.

According to the Ukrainians themselves, Péter Magyar is a man of Brussels and Zelensky, while Viktor Orbán — even according to the Ukrainians — will never allow Hungary’s money to be taken to Ukraine.

This is what we are deciding on April 12. If we get dragged into financing Ukraine and the war, Hungarian young people will be paying the price for decades.

Unless Viktor Orbán remains in power. That’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.

Here is a Ukrainian news channel with roughly half a million subscribers. I collected some thumbnails for you to show how they illustrate their videos. You can see Orbán Viktor with a crosshair on his head, a smiling Zelensky, the “favorite candidate,” the Ukrainian candidate Péter Magyar, and once again a crosshair on Orbán’s forehead.

So after this, I don’t think anyone can really have questions about who the Ukrainians are rooting for in this election. So what if, on April 12, we vote instead to keep a Hungarian government — not one directed from Ukraine?

🧠 Quick Situation Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza / Péter Magyar = Ukrainian / Brussels puppet”
“Ukraine = danger, money drain, war”
“Orbán = protector who stops this”
“Election = a matter of national survival”

👉 Underlying formula:

fear + external enemy + betrayal + savior
→ “if you don’t vote for us, the country will be in danger”

---

🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Visual manipulation → illusion of “evidence”

👉 Example:
“YouTube thumbnails… crosshair on Orbán’s head”

Technique:

• cherry-picked images
• no context
• visual shock (crosshair = violence, threat)

Goal:
👉 trigger emotional reaction (outrage, fear)

Effect:
👉 “if they do this to him → they are enemies”

➡️ This is not evidence, but an emotional trigger

---

2️⃣ False generalization

👉 Example:
“according to the Ukrainians…”
“who Ukrainians support”

Technique:

• one YouTube channel → “all Ukrainians”
• homogenizing an entire nation

Goal:
👉 create a simple black-and-white picture

Effect:
👉 critical thinking shuts down
👉 “they are all on the same side”

---

3️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 Example:
“Péter Magyar behind Zelensky”
“together with Ursula”

Technique:

• linking people through images, not facts
• presenting political actors as “one bloc”

Goal:
👉 “if he’s with them → he’s against us”

Effect:
👉 you don’t evaluate programs → you look at “who they stand with”

---

4️⃣ Construction of an external enemy

👉 Example:
“a government controlled from Ukraine”

Technique:

• threat to sovereignty
• image of foreign control

Goal:
👉 activate national defense reflex

Effect:
👉 fear + anger
👉 “we must defend ourselves”

---

5️⃣ Fearmongering (economic + war)

👉 Example:
“Hungarian youth will be paying for decades”

Technique:

• projecting a future catastrophe
• without concrete evidence

Goal:
👉 generate anxiety

Effect:
👉 “this is too risky → better not change anything”

---

6️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Example:
“Hungarian government OR Ukrainian control”

Technique:

• presenting only two options
• eliminating all alternatives

Goal:
👉 force a simple choice

Effect:
👉 “if not A → then B (bad)”

---

7️⃣ Savior narrative (protector framing)

👉 Example:
“Orbán won’t allow it…”
“only he can protect”

Technique:

• leader = shield
• person = nation

Goal:
👉 tie sense of safety to one person

Effect:
👉 stronger loyalty, less criticism

---

8️⃣ Repetition + reinforcement

👉 keywords:

• Ukraine
• crosshair
• war
• money

Technique:

• repeating the same frame multiple times

Goal:
👉 imprinting

Effect:
👉 “familiar → feels true”

---

⚠️ What really matters

This text does not prove anything, it:

• suggests through images
• generalizes
• creates fear
• tells a simple story

👉 it doesn’t tell you what is true
👉 it tells you what to feel

---

🧩 Why it still works

It is effective on people who:

• feel uncertain (war, money, future)
• don’t verify sources
• want quick, simple answers

👉 in this state, the brain:
doesn’t analyze → it defends

---

💬 Short, raw summary

👉 This is a textbook propaganda mix:

• visual shock (crosshair)
• external enemy (Ukraine)
• betrayal narrative (Tisza)
• fear (money + war)
• savior (Orbán)

→ it doesn’t inform, it directs

More and more, and increasingly disturbing, recordings are emerging in connection with the drug-fueled house parties of Péter Magyar and Márk Radnai.

At a time when the question is who should govern our country in an era of dangers, crises, and wars, we must choose someone who is calm, experienced, and reliable. That person is Viktor Orbán.

The leadership of Tisza proves every day that they cannot maintain order even in their own lives and within their own party.

How could we entrust the country to them?

LSD, cocaine, each other, three-way surveillance, shady cases — these recordings about the president of Tisza and Radnai are spreading. Why is this important? It was good, wasn’t it? It was good, right, so more and more. Because I feel like it was good. Because I don’t think that people like this should be leading the country in such turbulent times, when there are two wars ongoing, when there is an energy crisis, when there is migration pressure on us, when we are being blackmailed from Ukraine.

So I don’t think that people like this should be leading the country — people who, on the one hand, are unreliable, because let’s face it, someone who uses drugs is not a stable person, and on the other hand, drug use makes a person vulnerable to blackmail.

We can see even now what kinds of attempts at interference are coming from abroad toward Hungary. I don’t think this will decrease in the coming years, so we should not entrust our country and our lives to people who are unable to keep their own lives in order.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = drug users + blackmailable + unreliable”
• “World = crisis, war, danger”
• “Leadership = only stable, controlled individuals are fit”
• “They = unfit → should not gain power”

👉 Underlying formula:

scandal + fear + national security + moral judgment
→ “they must not be trusted with the country”

---

🔍 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Unproven claims presented as facts

👉 “LSD, cocaine, recordings, wiretapping”

Technique:

• presented as established facts without concrete evidence
• “recordings are circulating” → vague sourcing

Goal:
👉 don’t question → accept immediately

Effect:
👉 shock + instant distrust

---

2️⃣ Scandal + moral labeling (character assassination)

👉 “anyone who uses drugs is not a stable person”

Technique:

• behavior → projected onto the entire personality
• no nuance, no context

Goal:
👉 morally disqualify the opponent

Effect:
👉 you don’t judge policies → you judge a “bad person”

---

3️⃣ Blackmail narrative (security fear framing)

👉 “if someone uses drugs, they are blackmailable”

Technique:

• personal claim → escalated into a national security risk

Goal:
👉 turn a personal issue into a state-level threat

Effect:
👉 “this is not just about them, it affects all of us”

---

4️⃣ Crisis stacking (fear amplification)

👉 “two wars + energy crisis + migration + pressure from Ukraine”

Technique:

• multiple global crises layered together

Goal:
👉 maximize the sense of threat

Effect:
👉 “this is not the time for risk”

---

5️⃣ False causality (logical leap)

👉 “drugs → unreliable → unfit to lead the country”

Technique:

• linear conclusion from a single claim
• no evidence for the connection

Goal:
👉 simplify the decision

Effect:
👉 “this is obvious, no need to think further”

---

6️⃣ “Our lives depend on it” framing

👉 “don’t entrust them with our country and our lives”

Technique:

• elevates the decision to an existential level

Goal:
👉 dramatize the stakes

Effect:
👉 fear + urgency

---

7️⃣ Competence = ability to manage private life

👉 “those who can’t manage their own lives…”

Technique:

• private life → political competence

Goal:
👉 create a simple, intuitive rule

Effect:
👉 easy identification (“yes, that sounds logical”)

---

⚠️ Overall picture (very important)

This text:

👉 does not prove → it implies
👉 does not debate → it labels
👉 does not nuance → it simplifies

---

🎯 Why it works

Because it combines:

• 🔥 scandal (drugs, wiretapping)
• 😨 fear (war, crisis)
• 🛡️ security (leadership suitability)
• ⚖️ moral judgment (good vs bad person)

👉 Together this is very powerful:
emotion → judgment → decision

---

🧩 In short (concise summary)

👉 This is a classic campaign message that:

• starts with scandal
• builds fear
• applies a moral label
• then draws a “seemingly logical” conclusion

➡️ it doesn’t want you to evaluate
➡️ it wants you to feel: they must not be trusted with power

👥 Tisza is crawling with Ukrainian spies!
Hungary’s election is decisive from the perspective of the pro-war camp. They will do everything they can to bring down Viktor Orbán, because he is the only one who can say no to Brussels’ and Ukraine’s financial demands.

🚨 Hungary is a dangerous example to them, because it has shown that it is possible — and worthwhile — to resist this madness. That is exactly why they are doing everything they can to replace the national government in Hungary. They know perfectly well: if Viktor Orbán wins again, Brussels and Zelensky lose.

The Hungarian people do not want a Ukrainian agent government imposed on them. That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

We are swarming with spies, especially in the Tisza Party, though other intelligence services are also active. Hungary’s election is also decisive from the perspective of the pro-war camp, because they know perfectly well that Viktor Orbán is the one resisting Brussels’ madness and also resisting Ukraine’s financial demands. That is why they are doing everything they can to remove the national government from power. Orbán Viktor is a dangerous example for Europe’s pro-war leaders, because he has shown that it is possible — and necessary — to resist the war pressure coming from Brussels. If Viktor Orbán wins, then Brussels and Zelensky lose. That is why only Fidesz is the safe choice if we do not want a foreign agent government imposed on us.

---

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza = Ukrainian spies / foreign interests”
“The world = pro-war pressure (Brussels + Ukraine)”
“Orbán = the only one resisting”
“The election = a decisive battle”

👉 Hidden formula:
fear + foreign enemy + betrayal + savior leader
→ “only Fidesz can save you”

---

🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Unproven claims presented as facts

👉 “Tisza is swarming with Ukrainian spies”

Technique:

• no evidence
• no sources
• yet stated as a proven fact

Goal:
👉 don’t think → accept immediately

Effect:
👉 shock + distrust toward the opponent

---

2️⃣ Enemy construction (foreign = danger)

👉 “Ukrainian financial demands”
👉 “Brussels”
👉 “pro-war leaders”

Technique:

• external enemy + internal “agents”
• classic “besieged fortress” narrative

Goal:
👉 create a “us vs. them” divide

Effect:
👉 fear + internal cohesion on one side

---

3️⃣ Conspiracy chaining

👉 “Brussels + Zelenskyy + Tisza + intelligence services”

Technique:

• linking unrelated actors together
• presenting it as a “hidden plan”

Goal:
👉 simplify a complex world into an evil network

Effect:
👉 everything gets an “explanation” → critical thinking shuts down

---

4️⃣ Fear appeal + existential stakes

👉 “decisive election”
👉 “a puppet government forced on us”

Technique:

• exaggerated consequences
• apocalyptic tone

Goal:
👉 create urgency (“you must decide now!”)

Effect:
👉 emotional, irrational decision-making

---

5️⃣ False dilemma

👉 “Fidesz or a foreign puppet government”

Technique:

• presenting only two options
• excluding all alternatives

Goal:
👉 narrow down perceived choices

Effect:
👉 forced decision

---

6️⃣ Protector framing (savior leader)

👉 “only he can say no”

Technique:

• leader = nation
• leader = protection

Goal:
👉 tie safety to a single person

Effect:
👉 loyalty increases, criticism decreases

---

7️⃣ Repetition (very important!)

The text repeats the same elements:

• “decisive”
• “resistance”
• “Brussels”
• “Ukrainian”

Technique:
➡️ repetition = feeling of truth

Effect:
👉 over time it starts to feel like “obvious reality”

---

⚠️ Reality vs. claims

👉 The text provides no concrete evidence:

• no names
• no documents
• no verifiable data

👉 Therefore, this is not factual reporting, but:
➡️ emotional influence

---

🧩 Why does this work on people?

Because it combines:

• fear (“spies”)
• anger (“foreign interference”)
• identity (“we Hungarians”)
• security (“only he protects us”)

👉 This is a very powerful psychological mix

---

💬 In short (concise summary)

This text:

• doesn’t prove → it asserts
• doesn’t explain → it suggests
• doesn’t debate → it labels

👉 its goal is not to inform, but:
➡️ emotional mobilization + gaining votes

Everyone should calm down and not fall for the lies of the “agent media.”

The police officer who fled into the arms of Péter Magyar had no insight whatsoever into the counterintelligence operation involving individuals under foreign influence, and even by his own admission, he cannot substantiate his claims with any evidence.

He is objecting to what is the most natural thing in the world: intelligence services carry out counterintelligence tasks. The IT specialists working for the Tisza Party were trained by Ukrainians and maintained contact with them. They had infiltrated. It would have been a crime if the services had not dealt with them.

The police officer is trying to turn this counterintelligence case into a political issue. What is truly alarming is that Ukrainians are conducting such extensive operational activities in Hungary. Hungary’s security must be protected—not those who are carrying out this defensive work.

---

Everyone should calm down and not fall for the lies of the “agent media.” The police officer, who is moving toward a political career and has aligned himself with Péter Magyar, had no insight into the fact that this was a counterintelligence operation, and he could not substantiate his own claims with any evidence.

He is objecting to what is the most natural thing in the world—namely, that intelligence services perform counterintelligence tasks. On the other hand, what we do know is that the IT specialists working within the Tisza Party were trained by Ukrainians and are in contact with them. In other words, they had infiltrated. It would have been a crime if the services had not addressed this.

The police officer is now trying to turn this counterintelligence case into a political issue, likely without even understanding what is happening. What is truly alarming is that Ukrainians are conducting such extensive operational activities in Hungary. Hungary’s security must be protected, not those who are carrying out this counterintelligence work.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = foreign (Ukrainian) influence + infiltration + danger”
• “Police officer = unreliable, manipulated”
• “Services = protectors”
• “Criticism = attack on national security”

👉 Underlying formula:

unproven claims + fear + enemy image + authority → “believe, don’t question”

---

🔍 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Presenting unproven claims as facts

👉 “the IT specialists were trained by Ukrainians”
👉 “they infiltrated”

Technique:
➡️ claim presented as established fact
➡️ no source, no evidence

Goal:
👉 don’t examine it, just accept it

Effect:
👉 “if this is true, it’s a huge problem” → immediate emotional reaction

---

2️⃣ Building an enemy image (foreign threat)

👉 “extensive operational activity by Ukrainians”

Technique:
➡️ external enemy (classic political tool)
➡️ framed as a national security threat

Goal:
👉 generate fear
👉 create a sense that “protection is needed”

Effect:
👉 rational thinking is pushed aside → security becomes the priority

---

3️⃣ Appeal to authority (security services)

👉 “the services carry out counterintelligence tasks”

Technique:
➡️ state institution = automatically right
➡️ “if they do it, it must be justified”

Goal:
👉 legitimize all actions
👉 exclude criticism

Effect:
👉 anyone who questions it = “against the system”

---

4️⃣ Discrediting the critic

👉 “had no insight”
👉 “cannot prove his claims”
👉 “doesn’t even understand what’s happening”

Technique:
➡️ character assassination
➡️ portraying incompetence

Goal:
👉 shift focus from claims → to the person

Effect:
👉 personal attacks replace actual debate

---

5️⃣ False dilemma

👉 “either defend the country OR attack those defending it”

Technique:
➡️ reducing to two options
➡️ no middle ground

Goal:
👉 automatically frame criticism as “betrayal”

Effect:
👉 anyone who doubts = already on the “wrong side”

---

6️⃣ Repetition (mantra effect)

👉 same message repeated twice with slight variation

Technique:
➡️ repetition increases perceived truth

Goal:
👉 imprint the message

Effect:
👉 “if I hear it often → it must be true”

---

7️⃣ Emotional framing (calm + fear combined)

👉 “everyone should calm down”
👉 while describing a serious threat

Technique:
➡️ dual messaging:

• surface: calm
• content: alarm

Goal:
👉 controlled fear
👉 guided interpretation

Effect:
👉 reader doesn’t feel manipulated → but still becomes fearful

---

8️⃣ “We protect” – protector narrative

👉 “Hungary’s security must be defended”

Technique:
➡️ government/services = protectors
➡️ others = danger

Goal:
👉 trigger loyalty

Effect:
👉 emotional alignment with the “protectors”

---

⚠️ What’s especially important in this text

👉 it does not prove → it asserts
👉 it does not debate → it labels
👉 it does not explain → it builds fear

This combination is the classic:

national security panic + enemy construction + authority

---

🎯 Summary

This text is a textbook propaganda example that:

• constructs an external enemy (Ukrainian connection)
• defines internal enemies (Tisza + the police officer)
• legitimizes power actions (services)
• excludes criticism (questioning = attack)

👉 Final outcome:

“don’t think → fear → and side with the ‘protectors’”

You cannot build a الوطن and a future on hatred, hostility, and incitement. Yet these are exactly what hold the Tisza camp together.

Now, when wars are raging around the world, a new wave of migration is threatening, and there is a global energy crisis, we cannot afford to take risks.

We need a government that does not give in either to foreign multinationals or to Ukrainian blackmail.

We need a government that is calm, proven, and always makes decisions based on the interests of Hungarians. That is why only Fidesz is the safe choice.

Go, Tisza! Go, Tisza! The Tisza is flooding! Tisza! Tisza! Tisza! The Tisza is flooding! Only now Fidesz! Death to Fidesz! Rot in hell! In times like these, it is better for the government to remain in safe hands. Two wars are underway, there is a global energy crisis, and only Fidesz is the safe choice.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main Narrative:

• “They (Tisza) = hatred, aggression, chaos”
• “The world = danger (war, migration, crisis)”
• “We (Fidesz) = stability, security, experience”
• “The choice = risk vs. safety”

👉 Hidden Formula:

fear + moral superiority + image of chaos + promise of stability → “don’t take risks” reflex

---

🔍 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Moral framing + hypocritical contrast

👉 “You cannot build a country on hatred and hostility…”

Technique:
➡️ adopting moral superiority
➡️ own side = “good”, other side = “bad”

Goal:
👉 define from the start who is “moral”
👉 avoid program-based debate

Effect:
👉 the reader doesn’t analyze → they identify
👉 “I’m not hateful → I belong here”

---

2️⃣ Enemy construction + simplification

👉 “This is what holds the Tisza camp together”

Technique:
➡️ labeling an entire group
➡️ complex political reality → reduced to one word: “hatred”

Goal:
👉 delegitimize the opponent without debate

Effect:
👉 no need to counter arguments
👉 enough to label them as “bad”

---

3️⃣ Fear stacking (classic campaign weapon)

👉 “wars… migration wave… energy crisis”

Technique:
➡️ layering multiple global threats
➡️ increasing intensity

Goal:
👉 maximize uncertainty
👉 create a “this is not the time to experiment” mindset

Effect:
👉 anxiety → search for safety
👉 reduced rational thinking

➡️ This is one of the strongest elements.

---

4️⃣ False causality (hidden manipulation)

👉 “in times like these we cannot take risks → therefore Fidesz”

Technique:
➡️ global crises → directly tied to a political choice

Goal:
👉 make it seem like a logical conclusion

Effect:
👉 “if there is danger → we need them”
👉 exclusion of alternatives

---

5️⃣ External enemy + sovereignty narrative

👉 “foreign multinationals”, “Ukrainian pressure”

Technique:
➡️ introducing external forces
➡️ framing as national defense

Goal:
👉 emotional identification (defending the homeland)
👉 opponent = “not in national interest”

Effect:
👉 strong “us vs. them” dynamic
👉 moral pressure

---

6️⃣ “Safe choice” framing (risk aversion)

👉 “only Fidesz is the safe choice”

Technique:
➡️ safety vs. risk dichotomy
➡️ false dilemma

Goal:
👉 simplify decision-making
👉 don’t evaluate → choose “safety”

Effect:
👉 especially powerful for undecided voters

---

7️⃣ Visualization of chaos (amplified shouting)

👉 “Death to Fidesz! Die!”

Technique:
➡️ highlighting extreme examples
➡️ opponent = aggressive mob

Goal:
👉 emotional shock
👉 evoke disgust

Effect:
👉 “I don’t want to belong to this group”

➡️ This is framing: not representative → but presented as such.

---

8️⃣ Repetition (hypnotic effect)

👉 “war… energy crisis… safe choice” repeated

Technique:
➡️ repeating key messages

Goal:
👉 embed the message
👉 create automatic responses

Effect:
👉 familiarity = perceived truth

---

⚠️ Overall Picture

This text is no longer classic persuasion, but:

👉 “endgame campaign mode”

Characteristics:

• no program
• no specifics
• pure emotion
• strong polarization
• forced decision

---

🧩 What does this actually show?

👉 it’s not about what they offer
👉 it’s about:

• generating fear
• shutting down critical thinking
• activating the “don’t change anything” reflex

---

💡 In short

This is:

👉 a fear-based stability narrative
👉 reinforced by moral superiority
👉 combined with an artificially simplified choice

= classic “don’t take risks” propaganda