
Everyone should calm down and not fall for the lies of the “agent media.”
The police officer who fled into the arms of Péter Magyar had no insight whatsoever into the counterintelligence operation involving individuals under foreign influence, and even by his own admission, he cannot substantiate his claims with any evidence.
He is objecting to what is the most natural thing in the world: intelligence services carry out counterintelligence tasks. The IT specialists working for the Tisza Party were trained by Ukrainians and maintained contact with them. They had infiltrated. It would have been a crime if the services had not dealt with them.
The police officer is trying to turn this counterintelligence case into a political issue. What is truly alarming is that Ukrainians are conducting such extensive operational activities in Hungary. Hungary’s security must be protected—not those who are carrying out this defensive work.
Everyone should calm down and not fall for the lies of the “agent media.” The police officer, who is moving toward a political career and has aligned himself with Péter Magyar, had no insight into the fact that this was a counterintelligence operation, and he could not substantiate his own claims with any evidence.
He is objecting to what is the most natural thing in the world—namely, that intelligence services perform counterintelligence tasks. On the other hand, what we do know is that the IT specialists working within the Tisza Party were trained by Ukrainians and are in contact with them. In other words, they had infiltrated. It would have been a crime if the services had not addressed this.
The police officer is now trying to turn this counterintelligence case into a political issue, likely without even understanding what is happening. What is truly alarming is that Ukrainians are conducting such extensive operational activities in Hungary. Hungary’s security must be protected, not those who are carrying out this counterintelligence work.
🧠 Quick Overview
👉 Main narrative:
- “Tisza = foreign (Ukrainian) influence + infiltration + danger”
- “Police officer = unreliable, manipulated”
- “Services = protectors”
- “Criticism = attack on national security”
👉 Underlying formula:
unproven claims + fear + enemy image + authority → “believe, don’t question”
🔍 Influence Techniques
1️⃣ Presenting unproven claims as facts
👉 “the IT specialists were trained by Ukrainians”
👉 “they infiltrated”
Technique:
➡️ claim presented as established fact
➡️ no source, no evidence
Goal:
👉 don’t examine it, just accept it
Effect:
👉 “if this is true, it’s a huge problem” → immediate emotional reaction
2️⃣ Building an enemy image (foreign threat)
👉 “extensive operational activity by Ukrainians”
Technique:
➡️ external enemy (classic political tool)
➡️ framed as a national security threat
Goal:
👉 generate fear
👉 create a sense that “protection is needed”
Effect:
👉 rational thinking is pushed aside → security becomes the priority
3️⃣ Appeal to authority (security services)
👉 “the services carry out counterintelligence tasks”
Technique:
➡️ state institution = automatically right
➡️ “if they do it, it must be justified”
Goal:
👉 legitimize all actions
👉 exclude criticism
Effect:
👉 anyone who questions it = “against the system”
4️⃣ Discrediting the critic
👉 “had no insight”
👉 “cannot prove his claims”
👉 “doesn’t even understand what’s happening”
Technique:
➡️ character assassination
➡️ portraying incompetence
Goal:
👉 shift focus from claims → to the person
Effect:
👉 personal attacks replace actual debate
5️⃣ False dilemma
👉 “either defend the country OR attack those defending it”
Technique:
➡️ reducing to two options
➡️ no middle ground
Goal:
👉 automatically frame criticism as “betrayal”
Effect:
👉 anyone who doubts = already on the “wrong side”
6️⃣ Repetition (mantra effect)
👉 same message repeated twice with slight variation
Technique:
➡️ repetition increases perceived truth
Goal:
👉 imprint the message
Effect:
👉 “if I hear it often → it must be true”
7️⃣ Emotional framing (calm + fear combined)
👉 “everyone should calm down”
👉 while describing a serious threat
Technique:
➡️ dual messaging:
- surface: calm
- content: alarm
Goal:
👉 controlled fear
👉 guided interpretation
Effect:
👉 reader doesn’t feel manipulated → but still becomes fearful
8️⃣ “We protect” – protector narrative
👉 “Hungary’s security must be defended”
Technique:
➡️ government/services = protectors
➡️ others = danger
Goal:
👉 trigger loyalty
Effect:
👉 emotional alignment with the “protectors”
⚠️ What’s especially important in this text
👉 it does not prove → it asserts
👉 it does not debate → it labels
👉 it does not explain → it builds fear
This combination is the classic:
national security panic + enemy construction + authority
🎯 Summary
This text is a textbook propaganda example that:
- constructs an external enemy (Ukrainian connection)
- defines internal enemies (Tisza + the police officer)
- legitimizes power actions (services)
- excludes criticism (questioning = attack)
👉 Final outcome:
“don’t think → fear → and side with the ‘protectors’”