A new study has come out, and we’re already closer to reality!
Yesterday, Endre Hann’s fake research surpassed every previous joke, but today we can finally see the truth as well.
The latest survey from the Nézőpont Institute has been released, showing that 17 days before the election, the national side is leading 46–40.
Although we are ahead, we must not stop here! We still have reserves, and now we must give everything we have to achieve success.
In April, everyone is needed—go Fidesz, onward to victory!
Another poll from Nézőpont has also come out. Which one is more credible? Definitely not the one that “Uncle Hann Banni” is allegedly rigging and manipulating in favor of Tisza. So I think Nézőpont is closer to reality, but I also believe that even this still leaves a few percentage points of untapped support for Fidesz.
That’s what we’ll be working on over the next two weeks: making sure every voter who wants to continue living in a safe country turns out to vote.
🧠 Quick Situation Overview
👉 Main narrative:
“We (Fidesz) = reality, strength, victory”
“They = lie and manipulate”
“Polls = political weapon”
“Election = a question of mobilization”
👉 Hidden formula:
delegitimization + own “truth” + numbers as proof + mobilization
→ “we are leading, but we still need your vote”
🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)
1️⃣ Source delegitimization
👉 Excerpt:
“Hann Endre’s fake poll… a joke”
Technique:
➡️ attacking the person + the institution
➡️ not refuting the data, but the source
Goal:
👉 automatic rejection of opposing information
Effect:
👉 the reader doesn’t evaluate → “it’s fake, period”
➡️ Classic: no debate → discrediting
2️⃣ Presenting own source as “truth”
👉 Excerpt:
“now we can finally see the truth”
“Nézőpont… 46–40”
Technique:
➡️ own poll = presented as objective reality
➡️ legitimized through numbers
Goal:
👉 authority + illusion of rationality
Effect:
👉 “this is no longer opinion, this is fact”
➡️ even though the poll itself is politically aligned
3️⃣ Selective reality (reinforcing confirmation bias)
👉 Excerpt:
“which one is more credible? … definitely not the one that is being falsified”
Technique:
➡️ only accepting favorable data
➡️ everything else automatically labeled false
Goal:
👉 reinforcing the base
Effect:
👉 echo chamber → no alternative interpretation
4️⃣ Ridicule + belittling (ridicule framing)
👉 Excerpt:
“Han Banni bácsi… joke”
Technique:
➡️ infantilization, mocking nicknames
➡️ making the opponent look ridiculous
Goal:
👉 make the opponent not worth taking seriously
Effect:
👉 you don’t analyze → you laugh
5️⃣ “We are leading, but…” – mobilization paradox
👉 Excerpt:
“we are ahead, but we must not stop”
Technique:
➡️ dual message:
victory is close ✅
but danger still exists ❗
Goal:
👉 prevent complacency
Effect:
👉 activation (very strong campaign tool)
➡️ One of the strongest mobilization patterns
6️⃣ Hidden majority framing
👉 Excerpt:
“there is still a few percent of reserve”
Technique:
➡️ “there are actually even more of us”
Goal:
👉 strengthening the illusion of majority
Effect:
👉 bandwagon effect:
“if everyone supports this → I should too”
7️⃣ Fear framing (implicit)
👉 Excerpt:
“those who want to live in a safe country”
Technique:
➡️ not stated directly, but implied:
the other side = danger
Goal:
👉 safety vs. risk dichotomy
Effect:
👉 instinctive (non-rational) decision-making
8️⃣ Full reframing: poll → political battle
👉 What actually happens:
poll = data ❌
here it becomes:
👉 a weapon
👉 an identity marker
👉 a question of “who tells the truth”
Goal:
👉 don’t evaluate the data → decide who you trust
🧩 Overall picture
This text is a classic campaign package:
- delegitimizing the opponent
- legitimizing own numbers
- majority illusion
- subtle fear framing
- strong mobilization
👉 The goal is not to inform
👉 but to activate and reinforce
⚡ Short summary
👉 “Our poll is the truth”
👉 “The other side is lying”
👉 “We are already winning”
👉 “But we still need you”
= maximum mobilization propaganda formula