helyen.
❗Since the outbreak of the war, Viktor Orbán has been the only leader in all of Europe who has consistently stood for peace and has been able to say no to Ukrainian demands as well.
This is what irritates Brussels and Kyiv, which is why they want a change in Hungary.
They would like to impose someone on us who would, without objection, allow Ukraine into the European Union or vote for billions of euros to continue the war—because Péter Magyar would not be able to say no anyway.
❗In an era of dangers, we must place our trust in a responsible and experienced leader who can guarantee Hungary’s peace and security even in the most difficult times. That is why only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.
Viktor Orbán was the only European leader who had the foresight and the courage to say what no one else dared to say at the time—and Hungary has benefited greatly from it. I believe something similar is happening again now, as we are almost the only country in Europe firmly saying no to funding Ukraine with our own money, no to sending weapons into this war and thereby getting involved in it, and no to Ukraine becoming a member of the European Union by 2027.
Because make no mistake—despite attempts to deny it, this effort is indeed underway. And at present, one of the main obstacles preventing this—such as approving multi-billion-euro loans to Ukraine, even while Ukraine has blocked the Druzhba pipeline toward Hungary—is Viktor Orbán himself.
They know that over the past 16 years, Orbán has never given up even a single inch of Hungarian interests, and they know this will remain the case in the future. That is why forces in Brussels, together with their allies in Hungary, have formed an alliance to remove the sovereign national government—if necessary through manipulation, pressure, tricks, interference, force, or threats.
Because they know exactly that as long as Viktor Orbán is Prime Minister, it will never be Ukraine’s or Brussels’ interests that come first—but yours. Your interests will always come first.
🔍 Main Narrative (briefly)
👉 “We = peace, security”
👉 “They = war, Brussels, Ukraine”
👉 “Orbán = the only obstacle”
👉 “If he’s gone → trouble comes”
➡️ Classic formula:
fear + external enemy + savior leader + exclusive choice
🧠 Persuasion Techniques
1️⃣ Exclusivity (“only him”)
Example:
“the only leader in all of Europe…”
Technique:
➡️ delegitimizing all other options
➡️ creating a false “no alternative” scenario
Goal:
➡️ shut down critical thinking
➡️ don’t compare, just choose
Effect:
➡️ gives uncertain voters a sense of certainty
2️⃣ Constructing an external enemy
Example:
“Brussels and Kyiv… want change”
Technique:
➡️ framing political debate as foreign interference
➡️ oversimplifying complex realities
Goal:
➡️ create a “us vs. them” mindset
➡️ trigger emotional identification
Effect:
➡️ increases distrust toward all opponents
3️⃣ Fear appeal (future fear)
Example:
“continuation of the war”, “billions for war”, “drag us in”
Technique:
➡️ presenting negative future scenarios as certain
➡️ removing nuance and uncertainty
Goal:
➡️ provoke anxiety
➡️ force quick, emotional decisions
Effect:
➡️ emotional rather than rational decision-making
4️⃣ Enemy + internal traitor combo
Example:
“their parachuted agents in Hungary”
Technique:
➡️ portraying the opposition as servants of foreign powers
➡️ moral delegitimization
Goal:
➡️ discredit the opponent
➡️ replace debate with character attacks
Effect:
➡️ increased polarization
5️⃣ Savior leader myth
Example:
“the main obstacle is called Viktor Orbán”
Technique:
➡️ building everything around a single person
➡️ “without him → collapse” narrative
Goal:
➡️ create personal loyalty
➡️ shift focus away from systems or policies
Effect:
➡️ emotional attachment to the leader
6️⃣ “We came out well” – retrospective justification
Example:
“we Hungarians came out of this very well”
Technique:
➡️ framing the past as a success (without evidence)
Goal:
➡️ legitimize current decisions
Effect:
➡️ “it worked before → it will work again” thinking
7️⃣ Total threat narrative
Example:
“with tricks, blackmail… they will remove them”
Technique:
➡️ quasi-conspiracy framing
➡️ stacking negative terms (emotional overload)
Goal:
➡️ create a sense of paranoia / threat
Effect:
➡️ reduces critical thinking
🧩 Overall picture (very briefly)
This text:
👉 does NOT aim to inform
👉 aims to create an emotional state
Specifically:
- fear
- threat
- loyalty
- exclusion
🧠 Quick “vaccine” against it
Next time you see something like this, just check:
👉 Are there concrete facts? (usually no)
👉 Is there evidence? (no)
👉 Is it mostly emotion? (yes)
➡️ Then it’s propaganda.