According to Zelensky’s TV host, Viktor Orbán is the absolute “evil” for Ukraine because he does not want to detach from Russian energy, he urges peace, and he does not support Ukraine’s EU accession.

Well, that is exactly why they want to remove him from power—from both Kyiv and Brussels—and bring Tisza to power instead, as they would do the opposite.

We could say goodbye to utility cost protection, our money would be taken to Ukraine, they would let Ukraine into the EU, and they would ruin our economy. This is what Brussels and the pro-war Western leaders want, and Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to them.

In April, Fidesz is the safe choice!

Zelensky’s TV host said that for them, Viktor Orbán himself is evil. He bases this on the fact that Orbán does not want to give up cheap and predictable Russian gas, does not want Hungary to allow Ukraine into the European Union as soon as possible, and that we want peace. And that is the second point. A short break… and we will return. That is the second point. A short break… and we want peace. We do not want Hungary to let Ukraine into the European Union as soon as possible, and we want peace.

🔴 1️⃣ “Zelenskyy’s TV host” – credibility transfer and enemy construction

📌 Technique: association framing + external threat framing

A media figure is automatically linked to the Ukrainian president.

The criticism is thus framed not as the opinion of a journalist or commentator, but as “Zelenskyy’s position.”

The implicit message: Ukraine is officially attacking Orbán.

🎯 Effect:
The political debate is no longer presented as a difference of opinion, but as a geopolitical conflict.

---

🔴 2️⃣ “Orbán is evil” – moral black-and-white framing

📌 Technique: moral polarization

The word “evil” is an absolute moral category.

This is no longer a policy debate (energy, EU enlargement), but a good-versus-evil dichotomy.

🎯 Effect:
The audience reacts at the level of identity, not rational analysis.

---

🔴 3️⃣ Russian energy = cheap and predictable

📌 Technique: economic fear activation

Russian gas is framed not in geopolitical terms, but as a symbol of livelihood stability.

“Moving away from it” = uncertainty and rising prices.

🎯 Effect:
A foreign policy issue becomes a household issue (utility bills).

---

🔴 4️⃣ “Kyiv and Brussels want to remove him”

📌 Technique: conspiracy structure + sovereignty framing

Two separate actors (Ukraine and the EU) are merged into a single coordinated bloc.

The election is thus framed not as party competition, but as “national self-defense.”

🎯 Effect:
Voting becomes a patriotic act.

---

🔴 5️⃣ Tisza = executor

📌 Technique: proxy framing

Tisza is not portrayed as an autonomous political actor,

but as an instrument of external forces (“they wouldn’t be able to say no”).

🎯 Effect:
The election becomes a dilemma of sovereignty vs. subordination.

---

🔴 6️⃣ Fear stacking

The text layers multiple threats:

• the end of utility price protection
• “money being taken away”
• Ukraine’s EU accession
• economic collapse
• a war-supporting West

📌 Technique: fear stacking

🎯 Effect:
The audience becomes overloaded with negative future scenarios → seeks safety → chooses the “safe option.”

---

🔴 7️⃣ “In April, Fidesz is the safe choice”

📌 Technique: safety framing

It does not offer a program.

It does not engage in policy debate.

It promises security in a threatening world.

🎯 Effect:
Political decision-making turns into psychological shelter-seeking.

---

📌 Summary

The overall structure of the narrative:

• External attack (Kyiv + Brussels)
• Orbán as the obstacle
• Tisza as the instrument
• Economic and existential danger
• Safety = Fidesz

This is not a policy debate, but identity- and fear-based mobilization.

❗ Before the two world wars, people sat just as calmly in the cafés of Budapest as they do today. Yet it only takes one wrong decision to be drawn into a war.

The stakes will be enormous in the April election. If Tisza were to come to power, they would not be able to say no to Brussels’ demands and we would be swept into war hysteria. By contrast, Fidesz and Viktor Orbán will do everything to keep Hungary out of the war and on the path of peace.

🟠 In an age of dangers, we cannot afford to take risks — that is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

It may seem as though everything is becoming more crowded and hectic, and yet the horizon still appears calm. Before the two world wars, people were having coffee just as peacefully in Budapest cafés as we do today. And yet, to be drawn into a serious war, all it takes is one bad decision — or one bad choice at the ballot box.

1️⃣ Historical Parallel – Constructing a Pre-Catastrophe Mood

📌 Technique: historical analogy + implicit fear priming

Key sentence:

“Before the two world wars, people were sitting just as calmly in the cafés of Budapest as we are today…”

👉 What does this do?

• It draws a parallel between today’s everyday calm and the “apparent peace” before the world wars.
• It does not claim a concrete war threat, but subtly suggests that “we may now be in a similar pre-war moment.”

🎯 Effect:

• Creates a subconscious sense of looming danger.
• Gives the election existential weight.
• Makes the present “calm” suddenly feel fragile.

This is classic pre-catastrophe framing.

---

2️⃣ “It only takes one bad decision” – Minimizing the Trigger

📌 Technique: conditional fear framing

Key sentence:

“It only takes one bad decision to drag us into war.”

👉 What does this do?

• It presents war not as a complex geopolitical process, but as the consequence of a single electoral decision.
• The election becomes a binary choice: war or peace.

🎯 Effect:

• Intensifies the sense of personal responsibility.
• Turns the political alternative into a risk factor.
• Transforms uncertainty into anxiety.

---

3️⃣ Brussels + Tisza – Merged Enemy Image

📌 Technique: coalition framing + sovereignty activation

Key element:

“Tisza would not be able to say no to Brussels’ demands.”

👉 What does this do?

• Portrays Tisza as subordinate and serving external interests.
• “Brussels” appears as a faceless external power.
• The decision is framed not as party competition, but as a sovereignty struggle.

🎯 Effect:

• Activates the “us vs. them” identity reflex.
• The political opponent is framed not merely as different, but as dangerous.

---

4️⃣ Orbán as a Guarantee of Peace

📌 Technique: leader-as-shield framing

Key sentence:

“Viktor Orbán will do everything to keep us out of the war.”

👉 What does this do?

• Ties complex foreign policy processes to a single individual.
• The leader becomes a personal protective shield.

🎯 Effect:

• Provides a simple emotional anchor.
• Voting becomes a matter of trust in the leader.

---

5️⃣ “In times of danger, we cannot take risks” – Risk-Minimization Psychology

📌 Technique: risk aversion appeal

👉 What does this do?

• Frames political change as a risk.
• Presents the status quo as safety.

🎯 Effect:

• Appeals to people’s natural risk aversion.
• Repeats the mantra of the “safe choice.”

---

📌 Summary

Main elements of the text:

• Historical catastrophe analogy
• Conditional war threat
• External intervention narrative
• Sovereignty struggle framing
• Leader as protective shield
• Risk-minimization psychology

This is a classic campaign strategy built on fear and the need for security, where:

👉 The election is not about policy programs
👉 But about survival, war, and national defense

Share this so that the message of peace reaches everyone!

With the symbol of peace, we can all stand up against war.

Through the national petition, we can send a message to Brussels that we will not pay! We will not give Hungarians’ money for war, we will not give it to Ukraine, and we will not allow families’ utility costs to skyrocket.

Let’s all fill it out!

What are you doing? I’m putting up this little peace dove, because I believe the most important stake of our election is whether a time of war awaits us and whether we get dragged into a war that turns everything upside down above our heads — or whether peace remains in Hungary.

And what can we do for peace? In the coming weeks, we can do a lot. For example, we can fill out the national petition, where we can say that we do not want to pay Ukraine, we do not want Hungarian families’ utility costs to rise, and we do not want to spend or pour the Hungarian people’s money into war.

And then the most we can do is to put the X in the right place on April 12.

🔴 1️⃣ “Share it so that the message of peace reaches everyone!”

📌 Technique: viral mobilization + moral duty framing

👉 What is happening?

Sharing is not presented as a simple online activity, but as a moral act.

“The message of peace” is a positive, unquestionable concept — anyone who does not share it is implicitly portrayed as not supporting peace.

🎯 Effect:

• Activates followers.
• Creates moral pressure (“if peace matters to you, share it”).

---

🔴 2️⃣ “With the symbol of peace, we can all stand up”

📌 Technique: symbolic politics + identity fusion

👉 What is happening?

The dove (peace symbol) is a simple, emotional visual sign.

A political stance becomes a visual community identity.

🎯 Effect:

• Reduces a complex geopolitical issue to a simple symbol.
• Anyone who posts it is positioned as being “on the side of peace.”

---

🔴 3️⃣ “We won’t pay! We won’t give it! We won’t allow it!”

📌 Technique: repetition + ownership activation

👉 What is happening?

Short, emotional, repeated negations.

“The Hungarian people’s money” → strong sense of ownership.

Instead of discussing EU or international mechanisms, the message presents a simple moral formula:
“Us” vs. “Them.”

🎯 Effect:

• Triggers an existential defensive reflex.
• Transforms a budgetary debate into moral self-defense.

---

🔴 4️⃣ “Are we heading into a time of war?”

📌 Technique: fear escalation + apocalyptic election framing

👉 What is happening?

The stakes of the election are framed not as economic policy, but as:

• war
• being dragged into conflict
• “things collapsing over our heads”

🎯 Effect:

• The political decision becomes an existential survival issue.
• Voting is simplified into a binary dilemma: peace vs. war.

---

🔴 5️⃣ “National petition”

📌 Technique: participatory legitimization + pseudo-direct democracy framing

👉 What is happening?

The petition creates the impression that:

• citizens are directly sending a message to “Brussels.”

A complex geopolitical process is reduced to filling out a questionnaire.

🎯 Effect:

• Provides a sense of control.
• Presents the political position as “national will.”

---

🔴 6️⃣ “On April 12, let’s put the X in the right place”

📌 Technique: implicit party signaling + single-solution framing

👉 What is happening?

The party is not explicitly named.

But the entire message leaves only one alternative:
If you want peace → you know where to put the X.

🎯 Effect:

• Turns voting into a moral obligation.
• The alternative is implicitly framed as: war, financial loss, rising utility costs.

---

🎯 Summary – What communication toolkit appears?

• Fear appeal (being dragged into war)
• Ownership activation (“Hungarians’ money”)
• External enemy framing (“Brussels,” “Ukraine”)
• Binary framing (peace vs. war)
• Moral superiority positioning (“we choose peace”)
• Community mobilization (share, petition, vote)

❄️ Although it’s snowing again, the political visibility is becoming clearer and clearer: according to the latest data, the strength of the pro-peace community is unquestionable!

If the elections were held now, Fidesz would receive 49 percent and Tisza 42 percent — this was revealed by the latest public opinion poll of the Center for Fundamental Rights.

🟠 But it can get even better in our favor. For that, all of us must stand together. In April, Fidesz is the only safe choice!

Are we leaving the snowfall behind? Apparently. Let’s hope that snow removal will be handled better this time, if needed, than during the previous two major snowfalls on the part of the Mayor’s Office.

So where do we stand, what are we doing here? National board meeting and framework announcement, officially. We are preparing very seriously for April 12, and that is why we are meeting here together now. And we are in a very strong position, because another poll came out today as well: 49 for us, 42 for our opponent — but as I’ve said before, this will become even more favorable for us.

1️⃣ “Political visibility is becoming clearer” – metaphorical framing

📌 Technique: weather metaphor framing + clarity illusion

It turns snowfall into a metaphor for political “clarity.”

👉 What does this do?

It converts a natural phenomenon (snowfall) into a political message.

It suggests that it is now “obvious” which side is stronger.

🎯 Effect:
It replaces uncertainty with a sense of stability.

---

2️⃣ “49–42” – numbers as a tool of legitimacy

📌 Technique: bandwagon effect + authority borrowing

Reference:
Alapjogokért Központ

👉 What is happening?

A concrete figure (49% vs 42%) creates the appearance of objectivity.

The source has political alignment, but this is not emphasized.

The phrase “latest data” suggests urgency.

🎯 Effect:

“We are leading.”

“Victory is realistic.”

It may steer undecided voters toward the perceived winning side.

This is classic bandwagon dynamics: people like to belong to the winner.

---

3️⃣ “Peace-supporting community” – identity fusion

📌 Technique: identity fusion + moral framing

It does not say “Fidesz camp.”
It says: “peace-supporting community.”

👉 With this:

The political choice becomes a moral choice.

The other side is implicitly framed as “not peace-supporting.”

🎯 Effect:
Voting appears as a moral stance.

---

4️⃣ “It will be even better for us” – optimistic future projection

📌 Technique: momentum projection

Not only are they leading — they will lead by even more.

🎯 Effect:

It energizes.

It mobilizes.

It suggests upward momentum.

---

5️⃣ Snow removal reference – local attack

📌 Technique: opportunistic issue linking

Criticism of snow removal in the capital is inserted into the campaign message.

👉 What is happening?

A practical issue (handling snowfall)

is linked to political competence.

🎯 Effect:
Local dissatisfaction is transformed into national political argumentation.

---

6️⃣ “In April, only Fidesz is the safe choice” – security framing

📌 Technique: security framing + exclusivity

The key word: “safe.”

👉 The election is not framed as a competition of programs,
but as:

stability vs. risk.

🎯 Effect:
It nudges undecided voters toward risk avoidance.

---

Summary – what propaganda tools appear?

• Weather metaphor
• Bandwagon effect based on polling numbers
• Moral identity framing (“peace-supporting community”)
• Optimistic momentum projection
• Linking a local issue to national politics
• Stability vs. uncertainty framing

This is a classic mobilizing campaign text that suggests:

• stability
• moral superiority
• a sense of victory
• and imminent success.

❗ I can’t find the words!

A Ukrainian analyst said that only Ukrainian intelligence forces could remove Viktor Orbán from power — and that they would be willing to do so. He says this because, in his view, it is completely obvious that the left-wing pollsters paid from Brussels are lying.

Brussels and Kyiv are increasingly and more openly trying to interfere in the Hungarian elections. It has never been more important for us to stand together for Hungary!

🟠 The Fidesz camp is united, leading in the race, and on April 12 we will win together!

They would replace the Hungarian government using Ukrainian intelligence tools — this is what a Ukrainian analyst spoke about. He also claimed that they can clearly see that the opinion polls financed from abroad, which suggest a supposed victory of Tisza, are simply not true. Therefore, if it came to that, they would be ready to use even intelligence means to remove the Hungarian government.

🔴 1️⃣ “They would remove Viktor Orbán using Ukrainian intelligence forces” – external interference narrative

📌 Technique: external threat framing + sovereignty activation

👉 What is happening?

The statement refers to an alleged “Ukrainian analyst,” but:

• no name is given
• no institute is identified
• no concrete quote is provided

The phrase “intelligence tools” is strong, dramatic, and threatening.

🎯 Effect:

The election is framed not as a political competition, but as a national security attack.

Voting becomes a form of moral self-defense.

---

🔴 2️⃣ “Brussels and Kyiv are intervening” – merged enemy image

📌 Technique: coalition framing + us vs. them

👉 Two separate actors:

European Union (“Brussels”)

Kyiv

→ are fused into a single, coordinated intervention bloc.

🎯 Effect:

Domestic political debate is no longer presented as competition between parties,

but reframed as “Hungarians vs. foreign forces.”

---

🔴 3️⃣ “Foreign-funded left-wing pollsters are lying” – delegitimization

📌 Technique: delegitimization + poisoning the well

👉 What is happening?

Public opinion polls are rejected not through methodological critique, but through moral attack.

“Foreign-funded” → triggers suspicion about sovereignty

“They are lying” → moral condemnation

🎯 Effect:

If polling numbers are unfavorable, they can automatically be dismissed as manipulated.

Perception of reality shifts into a parallel narrative space.

---

🔴 4️⃣ “It has never been this important” – maximization of stakes

📌 Technique: urgency framing + fear escalation

👉 The election is elevated to an existential moment.

🎯 Effect:

Mobilizes the base.

Reduces rational deliberation.

Strengthens the “now or never” mindset.

---

🔴 5️⃣ “The Fidesz camp is united and winning” – bandwagon effect

📌 Technique: bandwagon effect

👉 Victory is declared in advance.

🎯 Effect:

Creates a sense of stability for undecided voters.

Mobilizes the existing base.

---

📌 Summary

Main rhetorical tools used in the text:

• Dramatization of external interference
• Construction of an enemy coalition (“Brussels + Kyiv”)
• Delegitimization of public opinion polling
• Emphasis on existential stakes
• Reinforcement of the governing camp’s victory narrative

This is a classic sovereignty-defense, siege-style campaign framework, where political competition is not presented as a choice between policy alternatives, but as an act of national self-preservation.

Budapest is the center of the world!

Last week the Chinese foreign minister visited our country, and now the American one has arrived. The world’s largest and richest countries oppose the war and support Viktor Orbán! 💪

Good morning to everyone — especially to the American pro-peace foreign minister who is meeting with Viktor Orbán today.