According to Zelensky’s TV host, Viktor Orbán is the absolute “evil” for Ukraine because he does not want to detach from Russian energy, he urges peace, and he does not support Ukraine’s EU accession.
Well, that is exactly why they want to remove him from power—from both Kyiv and Brussels—and bring Tisza to power instead, as they would do the opposite.
We could say goodbye to utility cost protection, our money would be taken to Ukraine, they would let Ukraine into the EU, and they would ruin our economy. This is what Brussels and the pro-war Western leaders want, and Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to them.
In April, Fidesz is the safe choice!
Zelensky’s TV host said that for them, Viktor Orbán himself is evil. He bases this on the fact that Orbán does not want to give up cheap and predictable Russian gas, does not want Hungary to allow Ukraine into the European Union as soon as possible, and that we want peace. And that is the second point. A short break… and we will return. That is the second point. A short break… and we want peace. We do not want Hungary to let Ukraine into the European Union as soon as possible, and we want peace.
🔴 1️⃣ “Zelenskyy’s TV host” – credibility transfer and enemy construction
📌 Technique: association framing + external threat framing
A media figure is automatically linked to the Ukrainian president.
The criticism is thus framed not as the opinion of a journalist or commentator, but as “Zelenskyy’s position.”
The implicit message: Ukraine is officially attacking Orbán.
🎯 Effect:
The political debate is no longer presented as a difference of opinion, but as a geopolitical conflict.
🔴 2️⃣ “Orbán is evil” – moral black-and-white framing
📌 Technique: moral polarization
The word “evil” is an absolute moral category.
This is no longer a policy debate (energy, EU enlargement), but a good-versus-evil dichotomy.
🎯 Effect:
The audience reacts at the level of identity, not rational analysis.
🔴 3️⃣ Russian energy = cheap and predictable
📌 Technique: economic fear activation
Russian gas is framed not in geopolitical terms, but as a symbol of livelihood stability.
“Moving away from it” = uncertainty and rising prices.
🎯 Effect:
A foreign policy issue becomes a household issue (utility bills).
🔴 4️⃣ “Kyiv and Brussels want to remove him”
📌 Technique: conspiracy structure + sovereignty framing
Two separate actors (Ukraine and the EU) are merged into a single coordinated bloc.
The election is thus framed not as party competition, but as “national self-defense.”
🎯 Effect:
Voting becomes a patriotic act.
🔴 5️⃣ Tisza = executor
📌 Technique: proxy framing
Tisza is not portrayed as an autonomous political actor,
but as an instrument of external forces (“they wouldn’t be able to say no”).
🎯 Effect:
The election becomes a dilemma of sovereignty vs. subordination.
🔴 6️⃣ Fear stacking
The text layers multiple threats:
- the end of utility price protection
- “money being taken away”
- Ukraine’s EU accession
- economic collapse
- a war-supporting West
📌 Technique: fear stacking
🎯 Effect:
The audience becomes overloaded with negative future scenarios → seeks safety → chooses the “safe option.”
🔴 7️⃣ “In April, Fidesz is the safe choice”
📌 Technique: safety framing
It does not offer a program.
It does not engage in policy debate.
It promises security in a threatening world.
🎯 Effect:
Political decision-making turns into psychological shelter-seeking.
📌 Summary
The overall structure of the narrative:
- External attack (Kyiv + Brussels)
- Orbán as the obstacle
- Tisza as the instrument
- Economic and existential danger
- Safety = Fidesz
This is not a policy debate, but identity- and fear-based mobilization.