There are no more questions.
The Tisza IT specialist admitted that he had been recruited by the Ukrainians.
His testimony is public; anyone can listen to it. The Hungarian counterintelligence services did what they were supposed to do. We will protect Hungary’s peace and security.

In my opinion, what should the Hungarian authorities do when they learn that a foreign country is trying to recruit someone, to use a Hungarian citizen to gain access to materials that are important to our national security? Well, I think they should act. And something like that happened, because a one-hour audio recording was released of the hearing of the former Tisza IT specialist, where a сотрудник of the Constitution Protection Office conducted the interrogation. He himself talks about how he was drawn in and was likely being prepared for such an operation, for an attack against another IT system.

The situation is that, in light of this, the Hungarian authorities and counterintelligence acted completely correctly when they tried to uncover this case, because a country cannot allow a foreign state to attempt to interfere and launch an attack against its IT networks and to obtain sensitive information.

Szabó Bence could not have known this in recent days when he was making statements, as he could not have been in possession of this information, since it has only just been made public.

So I hope that this will now be enough for Tisza to finally stop the false and slanderous campaign they have been conducting in recent days.

👉 Claimed narrative:

• “The IT specialist admitted → Ukrainian recruitment”
• “The espionage case is proven”
• “The state acted correctly”
• “The opposition is lying”

👉 Actual structure (based on the transcripts):

• conditional, uncertain statements
• recollections, “feelings,” “suspicions”
• no concrete operation, no specific task
• strongly leading / suggestive interrogation

👉 🔥 Core point:

➡️ an uncertain story → rewritten as a certain, closed espionage case

🔍 Manipulation techniques (broken down)

1️⃣ “He admitted” = false certainty

👉 Excerpt:
“he admitted that he was recruited by the Ukrainians”

👉 Reality:

• “he felt like”
• “it could be”
• “recruitment-like”

👉 Technique:
➡️ conditional → presented as fact

👉 Goal:
➡️ to shut down debate (“no more questions”)

👉 Effect:
➡️ the reader believes: this is already proven

2️⃣ “No more questions” = forceful closure of debate

👉 Technique:
➡️ authoritarian statement, not an argument

👉 Goal:
➡️ prevent doubt or analysis

👉 Effect:
➡️ psychological pressure: “if you question it, you’re stupid or malicious”

3️⃣ Security panic framing (fear framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“attack against IT systems”
“national security-sensitive materials”

👉 Technique:
➡️ building a maximum threat scenario

👉 Reality:

• no concrete attack
• no specific target

👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger fear → disable rational thinking

4️⃣ Hypothetical scenario = presented as real event

👉 Excerpt:
“what happens if a country tries to recruit someone…”

👉 Technique:
➡️ general theoretical scenario → applied to a specific case

👉 Goal:
➡️ logical trap:

• if this happened → action is needed
• therefore it must have happened

👉 This is classic:
➡️ false causality

5️⃣ Authority = automatically correct (authority framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“counterintelligence did its job”

👉 Technique:
➡️ institution = truth

👉 Goal:
➡️ exclude critical examination

👉 Effect:
➡️ “if the state did it → it must be true”

6️⃣ “Public recording” = false credibility

👉 Excerpt:
“anyone can listen to it”

👉 Technique:
➡️ accessibility = proof

👉 Reality:

• a recording ≠ proven fact
• especially if questions are leading

👉 Goal:
➡️ increase perceived credibility

7️⃣ Discrediting the opposition (character attack)

👉 Excerpt:
“a lying smear campaign”

👉 Technique:
➡️ attacks the actor instead of the claim

👉 Goal:
➡️ avoid addressing the substance

8️⃣ Exploiting information asymmetry

👉 Excerpt:
“Bence Szabó could not have known this”

👉 Technique:
➡️ alternative view = ignorance

👉 Goal:
➡️ eliminate competing interpretations

🔥 Overall picture

👉 What is happening:

uncertain testimony
→ emotional and security framing
→ simplification
→ fully formed espionage narrative

🧩 In short (very concise)

👉 This text:

• does not prove anything
• it imposes an interpretation
• and presents it as fact

⚠️ Key difference

👉 What the propaganda says:
“he admitted → case closed”

👉 What the transcript shows:
“uncertain, suggestive, conditional story”

The weak stream of lies from Tisza over the past two days is over!
It is truly disgusting, though not surprising from Péter Magyar and the pro-Ukrainian agent media, that they are capable of making a fool out of a police officer and exploiting him for political purposes to cover themselves in the Ukrainian espionage scandal.

Bence Szabó could not have known anything about the counterintelligence operation, so his assessment of the whole case is completely false.

Meanwhile, Tisza’s IT specialist himself admitted that he had been recruited by the Ukrainians.

Thus, the Constitution Protection Office Hungary was simply doing its job. In contrast, Péter Magyar allowed Ukrainian services into the party’s systems.

Too irresponsible, too amateur, too risky.

In two weeks, Fidesz is the safe choice!

Those who have listened to Bence Szabó’s interviews in recent days, I would now ask to listen to what the former Tisza IT specialist, identified by the initials H.D., actually says word for word about how at one point he himself had the feeling that he had essentially been recruited.

Something resembling recruitment, some kind of preparation for a later operation, because several suspicious things had come up. And he was being prepared for a later action.

When Bence Szabó gave his statements, he could not have known that this interview existed, or that the state security authorities were carrying out this kind of work. So I assume nothing else than that he simply did not possess this information.

However, those who, in my opinion, tried to exploit Bence Szabó’s situation—his lack of knowledge in this sense—are the Tisza Party Hungary, who are still working to cover up how deeply and closely they are actually cooperating with the Ukrainian state apparatus.

🧠 Quick Situation Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = Ukrainian spy network”
• “Magyar Péter = irresponsible / let them in”
• “The state = acted correctly”
• “Election = security vs. danger”

👉 Actual structure:

• uncertain, conditional statements
• rewritten → as a certain, proven espionage case

🔍 Manipulation techniques (exactly where it distorts)

1️⃣ “He admitted it” = false certainty

👉 Excerpt:
“he himself admitted that he was recruited by the Ukrainians”

👉 Actual content (even based on the text!):

• “he had a feeling”
• “recruitment-like”
• “suspicious things”

👉 Technique:
➡️ feeling → presented as fact

👉 Goal:
👉 turn an unproven situation → into a “closed spy case”

👉 Effect:
👉 the reader thinks: “he admitted it → case closed”

2️⃣ Conditional → declarative rewrite (core distortion)

👉 Excerpt:
“he was prepared for a later operation”

👉 Reality:

• no concrete operation
• no concrete task
• no concrete evidence

👉 Technique:
➡️ possibility → presented as a completed fact

👉 Goal:
👉 reinforce the narrative

👉 Effect:
👉 “this definitely happened”

3️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“pro-Ukrainian agency media”
“Ukrainian state machinery”

👉 Technique:
➡️ labeling without evidence
➡️ all actors merged into one block

👉 Goal:
👉 complex situation → simple “enemy”

👉 Effect:
👉 automatic rejection

4️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 Excerpt:
“Magyar Péter… let Ukrainian services into the systems”

👉 Problem:

• no concrete evidence
• no concrete action

👉 Technique:
➡️ connection → presented as guilt

👉 Goal:
👉 political discrediting

👉 Effect:
👉 “he is involved too”

5️⃣ Exploiting information asymmetry

👉 Excerpt:
“Szabó Bence could not have known anything”

👉 Technique:
➡️ “we know something others don’t”

👉 Goal:
👉 speaker = insider, credible

👉 Effect:
👉 criticism is automatically weakened

6️⃣ Premature closure of the narrative

👉 Excerpt:
“Thus the Constitutional Protection Office simply did its job”

👉 Technique:
➡️ closing the debate without proof

👉 Goal:
👉 prevent further questions

👉 Effect:
👉 “then everything is fine”

7️⃣ Repetition + emotional loading (propaganda engine)

👉 Excerpt:
“too irresponsible, too amateur, too risky”

👉 Technique:
➡️ emotional stacking (not information!)

👉 Goal:
👉 fix a negative impression

👉 Effect:
👉 rational thinking is pushed aside

8️⃣ Accusation inversion

👉 Excerpt:
“they are exploiting the police officer”

👉 Technique:
➡️ flips the criticism

👉 Goal:
👉 clean up own side

👉 Effect:
👉 “they are not the ones at fault”

9️⃣ Conspiracy chaining

👉 Structure of the claim:

• Ukrainians
• IT specialist
• media
• politicians
  → everything is connected

👉 Technique:
➡️ linking separate, unproven elements

👉 Goal:
👉 create a large, threatening story

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is too much to be a coincidence”

🔟 Election closing (call-to-action propaganda)

👉 Excerpt:
“In two weeks, Fidesz is the safe choice”

👉 Technique:
➡️ fear → political decision

👉 Goal:
👉 mobilization

👉 Effect:
👉 “if I’m afraid → I vote for them”

🔥 Core distortion (summary)

👉 The biggest manipulation in the text:

➡️ an uncertain, feeling-based story
→ rewritten as a concrete, proven espionage case

⚠️ In short: where it “lies”

• no concrete evidence → yet presented as fact
• no concrete operation → yet framed as a “future operation”
• no concrete connection → yet “he let them in”
• no proven network → yet “deep cooperation”

🧠 In one sentence

👉 This is not proof, but:
👉 feeling + suggestion + fear = a ready-made spy narrative

Confession from the Tisza Party. Ukrainian services are deeply involved in the Hungarian elections, and they are also swarming around Péter Magyar and his circle.

This is what the counterintelligence operation was about—something the police officer now fundraising in Ukrainian propaganda media understandably could not have known about.

Hungary’s sovereignty is crucial for the integrity of the elections, and the Hungarian authorities guarantee this.

Let us preserve the peace and security of our country!

Who was involved? Who did he meet? Who was this person? How did they stay in contact? How did they establish contact? Where did he have to check in—how did that work?

There was essentially a handler who led this group for him. His name was Davidov—well, it could be real, but of course we don’t know.

— Did he introduce himself as Davidov?
— As Davidov, yes. I met him in person as well.

— What did he look like, roughly?
— I’d describe him as something like a heavyweight boxer, maybe with short… He looked a bit like a stereotypical mafioso: very closely cropped hair, and even that short hair wasn’t very dense. Big head, big body, muscular guy, and so on. He had a relatively deep voice—you could hear that too.

But otherwise he wasn’t rude or anything like that, not what you might assume at first glance.

And he was basically a kind of handler who… I also tried to look into this—apparently he was some kind of liaison for a Ukrainian state body, at least according to what could be inferred.

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza = Ukrainian infiltration / spy network”
“Ukraine = intelligence threat”
“We = protection, sovereignty”
“Election = security vs. foreign influence”

👉 Actual content (based on the transcript):

a vague, partly memory-based story
no concrete evidence
no concrete task, no concrete action
even the identity of the contact person is uncertain

👉 🔥 Key point:

➡️ a weak, uncertain testimony
➡️ reframed into a strong, clear spy narrative

🔍 Manipulation techniques

1️⃣ “Confession” = false certainty

👉 Excerpt:
“Confession from the Tisza Party… Ukrainian services are deeply involved”

👉 Technique:

the word “confession” = creates a sense of evidence
but in reality:

• no concrete proof
• no verifiable data

👉 Goal:
👉 make it appear as a settled fact

👉 Effect:
👉 the reader does not question it

2️⃣ Removing uncertainty (certainty distortion)

👉 In the transcript:

“we don’t know”
“maybe”
“I tried to look it up”
“supposedly”

👉 In the narrative:

“they are deeply involved”
“it’s clear”

👉 Technique:
➡️ conditional → turned into definitive statements

👉 Goal:
👉 eliminate doubt

👉 Effect:
👉 creates a sense of certainty

3️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Excerpt:

“Ukrainian services”
“mafia-like appearance”
“infiltrated”

👉 Technique:

instead of evidence → visual and emotional imagery
“big, muscular, mafia-like” → cinematic stereotype

👉 Goal:
👉 fear + distrust

👉 Effect:
👉 the reader can “picture it” → feels more believable

4️⃣ Narrative fabrication

👉 Reality:

one person describes a vague meeting

👉 Propaganda:

a full network
organized infiltration
state-level operation

👉 Technique:
➡️ turning a single episode into a systemic story

👉 Goal:
👉 create a sense of large-scale threat

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is serious”

5️⃣ “Secret service” aura (fake credibility)

👉 Excerpt:
“counterintelligence operation”

👉 Technique:

use of intelligence terminology
not verifiable, but suggests authority

👉 Goal:
👉 create an illusion of credibility

👉 Effect:
👉 “if intelligence is involved, it must be true”

6️⃣ Double-layer messaging

👉 Surface layer:
“sovereignty, security”

👉 Deeper layer:
“Tisza = foreign agents”

👉 Technique:
➡️ accusation wrapped in positive framing

👉 Goal:
👉 make it appear defensive, not aggressive

👉 Effect:
👉 more acceptable propaganda

7️⃣ Fear framing

👉 Excerpt:

“deeply involved”
“influencing elections”

👉 Technique:
➡️ vague threat → total threat

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger existential fear

👉 Effect:
👉 reduces rational thinking, increases emotional reaction

8️⃣ Covering lack of evidence

👉 MISSING:

• date
• specific organization
• proven connection
• documents

👉 INSTEAD:

• story
• impressions
• descriptions

👉 Technique:
➡️ anecdote instead of evidence

👉 Effect:
👉 “something must have happened”

⚖️ Summary

👉 This text:

does not prove
it creates an impression

👉 Core trick:
➡️ uncertain personal experience → national security threat

👉 In one sentence:
👉 “maybe, we don’t know” → “definite, organized interference”

🔥 Why it feels like “they are lying”

Because the pattern is clear:

✔ uncertainty exists in the source
✔ but disappears in communication
✔ replaced by strong claims

👉 This is classic:
distortion + exaggeration + simplification

Pest is with us! 🇭🇺

A Ukraine-friendly government would destroy Hungary—and the future of our children and grandchildren. We will not allow that!

We know that the Tisza Party’s Kyiv-backed puppet government would let Ukraine into the EU, dragging us into the war, taking Hungarians’ money, and ruining Hungarian farmers.

A Tisza government would also push our country into financing Brussels’ Ukrainian war loans, turning Hungarians into debt slaves and draining their resources. They would also phase out cheap Russian energy. If that happens, fuel prices would rise above 1,000 forints per liter, and the utility cost reduction scheme would be abolished—costing every Hungarian a month’s income.

The leaders of the Tisza Party cannot say no to either Brussels or Kyiv, because the party is supported by both.

On April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice!

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza = Ukrainian + Brussels puppet”
“Ukraine = war + financial loss”
“We = protection, security”
“Election = destruction vs. survival”

👉 Hidden formula:
fear + enemy image + economic panic + exaggeration
→ “if you don’t vote for us → everything collapses”

🔍 Manipulation techniques

1️⃣ Total threat framing (fear overload)

👉 Excerpt:
“would destroy Hungary”, “our children’s future as well”

👉 Technique:

• maximum outcome (not “it would worsen”, but “it collapses”)
• extended across multiple generations

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger existential fear

👉 Effect:
👉 rational thinking shuts down

2️⃣ Enemy coalition framing

👉 Excerpt:
“Brussels + Kyiv + Tisza”

👉 Technique:

• merging separate actors into one “big enemy”
• no evidence, only labeling

👉 Goal:
👉 all opponents = the same threat

👉 Effect:
👉 simplified worldview (“they are all the same”)

3️⃣ Puppet government framing

👉 Excerpt:
“Kyiv puppet government”

👉 Technique:

• removing legitimacy
• suggests lack of independent decision-making

👉 Goal:
👉 discredit the political opponent

👉 Effect:
👉 no need to debate → just reject

4️⃣ False causality

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukraine joins EU → leads to war → money is taken away”

👉 Technique:

• multi-step chain without proof
• assumption presented as certainty

👉 Goal:
👉 turn complex processes into a simple, scary story

👉 Effect:
👉 “sounds logical” but lacks evidence

5️⃣ Economic fear framing

👉 Excerpt:
“1000 HUF fuel price”, “losing a month’s income”

👉 Technique:

• specific numbers → illusion of credibility
• worst-case scenario

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger personal financial fear

👉 Effect:
👉 “this affects me” → strong emotional reaction

6️⃣ Repetition + overload (overload technique)

👉 What happens:

• war
• money
• energy
• farmers
• debt

👉 Technique:

• stacking multiple fears in one message

👉 Goal:
👉 information overload

👉 Effect:
👉 “too many bad things → must be true”

7️⃣ Protector framing (“we will protect you”)

👉 Excerpt:
“We won’t allow this!”, “safe choice”

👉 Technique:

• hero vs. threat narrative

👉 Goal:
👉 create emotional attachment

👉 Effect:
👉 you don’t vote for a program → you vote for “protection”

8️⃣ False dichotomy

👉 Core message:

• either Fidesz
• or collapse

👉 Technique:

• excludes all other options

👉 Goal:
👉 simplify the decision

👉 Effect:
👉 narrowed thinking

🔥 Why it feels “nauseating”

Because:

👉 too many manipulative elements at once
👉 no real evidence
👉 appeals to emotions, not facts
👉 exaggerated and apocalyptic
👉 repeats the same patterns

This is a classic “panic + enemy + savior” propaganda package.

🧩 Short summary

👉 This text is not trying to inform
👉 it is trying to influence emotionally

Main tools:

false causality

fear

enemy construction

exaggeration

economic panic

The intervention of the Ukrainian mafia state in favor of the Tisza Party in the April elections is now очевидent. Former judge Adrienn Laczó is no longer only the lawyer of the personnel of the Ukrainian gold convoy, but also of the Tisza Party’s Ukrainian “spy IT specialist.” She is the same person who, as a judge, controversially released a contract killer linked to Tamás Portik in the Prisztás case. A strange coincidence? Hardly.

The same “Tisza-linked” judge is defending both the gold convoy personnel and now the Tisza Party’s Ukrainian “spy IT specialist.” Is this a coincidence? There are no coincidences—this isn’t one either. Clearly, what we are seeing once again is Ukrainian interference and a deliberate Ukrainian intent to influence the Hungarian elections, aiming to replace the government of Viktor Orbán with a Ukraine-friendly government that would do everything for Ukraine—send our money, provide weapons, and even support admitting this corrupt mafia state into the European Union in 2027. As for us, we continue to say no.

👉 Main narrative:

• “Ukraine = mafia + interference”
• “Tisza = Ukrainian tool / spy network”
• “We = defending ourselves”
• “Election = sovereignty vs. foreign control”

👉 Underlying formula:
conspiracy + personal smearing + repetition + fear
→ “everything is connected → therefore it must be true”

🔍 Manipulation techniques

1️⃣ Conspiracy chaining

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukrainian mafia state… interference… spy IT specialist… gold convoy…”

👉 Technique:

• links together separate, unproven elements
• builds one big story: everything is connected

👉 Goal:
👉 complex world → simple explanation

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is too much to be a coincidence”

2️⃣ “There are no coincidences” = false certainty

👉 Excerpt:
“Strange coincidence? Hardly.”
“There are no coincidences, this isn’t one either.”

👉 Technique:

• excludes all alternative explanations
• asserts instead of proving

👉 Goal:
👉 shut down thinking

👉 Effect:
👉 audience stops questioning → accepts

3️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 Excerpt:
Laczó Adrienn
Portik Tamás
“hitman… Prisztás case…”

👉 Technique:

• links a person to a notorious crime
• then extends that to political actors

👉 Goal:
👉 moral discrediting

👉 Effect:
👉 “if they’re connected → they must be bad”

4️⃣ Repetition framing

👉 Excerpt:

• “Ukrainian”
• “mafia”
• “interference”

👉 Technique:

• constant repetition of keywords
• no new information → just reinforcement

👉 Goal:
👉 imprinting

👉 Effect:
👉 automatic association:
“Ukraine = danger”

5️⃣ Enemy framing

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukrainian mafia state”

👉 Technique:

• demonizes an entire country
• oversimplification: no nuance

👉 Goal:
👉 trigger emotional reaction

👉 Effect:
👉 fear + rejection

6️⃣ False causality

👉 Excerpt:
“lawyer → gold convoy → spy IT specialist → election interference”

👉 Technique:

• creates cause-and-effect from unrelated facts

👉 Goal:
👉 make the narrative seem logical

👉 Effect:
👉 “it all fits together” (even though unproven)

7️⃣ Fear escalation

👉 Excerpt:
“they will send our money, weapons… admit a mafia state into the EU”

👉 Technique:

• future, unproven consequences
• chained catastrophe

👉 Goal:
👉 maximize fear

👉 Effect:
👉 “if we don’t act → disaster”

8️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Hidden message:

• either Orbán
• or “Ukrainian mafia + war”

👉 Technique:

• no middle ground

👉 Goal:
👉 force a choice

👉 Effect:
👉 emotional decision instead of rational one

🔥 Why this is “flailing”

👉 signs of it:

• too many unrelated stories merged together
• constant repetition → no new evidence
• extreme labels (“mafia state”, “spy”)
• logical leaps (lawyer → geopolitical conspiracy)

👉 this usually appears when:

• there is no strong, provable claim
• but the sense of threat must be maintained

🎯 Core takeaway

👉 This text doesn’t prove — it manufactures a feeling:

• connects → to seem credible
• repeats → to feel true
• dramatizes → to create fear

➡️ Key trick:
it doesn’t prove that something is true,
it suggests that “it can’t be a coincidence.”

Yesterday, new details emerged about the Ukrainian “gold convoy” case: a former Ukrainian intelligence agent said that significant amounts of black money passed through Hungary, and some of it may have remained in the country. This is the Ukrainian army’s black money, “used to solve everything that is important to the president.”

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is clearly interfering in the Hungarian elections—he wants to see a pro-Ukrainian government, one that supports the war, gives money to Ukraine, and gives up cheap Russian energy. Let’s not allow Zelenskyy to have the last laugh—let’s unite against the war!

It was Zelenskyy’s former intelligence operative who exposed how the Ukrainian president is interfering in the Hungarian elections. This is a scandal. Just watch!

A former Ukrainian secret agent gave an exclusive interview to Tények. The man knows everything about Ukraine’s plans regarding Hungary. He asked that his face not be shown, because if he is recognized, he could pay with his life for what he is now revealing.

The personnel of a Ukrainian money transport convoy were handcuffed behind their backs and forced to the ground when authorities raided them a few weeks ago. The so-called Ukrainian “gold convoy” was transporting 40 million dollars, 35 million euros, and 9 kilograms of gold from Austria to Ukraine through Hungary.

But who does all this money belong to, and what was it intended for?

According to the man, this money is used by Ukrainians for activities where it is important that the transactions leave no trace. As he put it, this money “solves everything.”

It also emerged that the convoy was accompanied by a certain Hennagy Ivanovych Kuznyetsov, who for a long time was one of the most influential leaders of the Ukrainian security services. According to the Ukrainian man interviewed by our team, this is no coincidence.

He also found it suspicious that these funds were transported through Hungary in a completely irregular and primitive manner, secured only with rubber straps.

Our interviewee also said that this was not the first “gold convoy” to pass through Hungary—and that part of the money regularly remained here.

But who did the money end up with?

The answer will soon be revealed in Saturday’s broadcast of Napló.

👉 Main narrative:

“Ukraine = mafia + black money + manipulation”
“Zelenskyy = interfering in Hungarian elections”
“We = defending against an external attack”
“Election = war vs. peace”

👉 Hidden formula:
conspiracy + “secret evidence” + fear + political conclusion
→ “there is a real threat → therefore there is only one correct choice”

🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ “Secret agent” = fake credibility framing

👉 Excerpt:
“a former Ukrainian intelligence agent”, “we cannot show his face”

👉 Technique:

anonymous source → not verifiable
“his life is in danger” → dramatic validation
no evidence, only a story

👉 Goal:
👉 make you believe it’s insider information

👉 Effect:
👉 disables critical thinking (“if it’s secret, it must be true”)

2️⃣ Conspiracy chaining

👉 Excerpt:
“black money → stays in Hungary → influences elections”

👉 Technique:

linking separate elements without proof
no concrete connection → only suggestion

👉 Goal:
👉 “everything is connected in the background”

👉 Effect:
👉 paranoia + distrust

3️⃣ Specific numbers = illusion of credibility

👉 Excerpt:
“40 million dollars, 35 million euros, 9 kg of gold”

👉 Technique:

precise numbers → “this must be real”
but no source, no verification

👉 Goal:
👉 make the story feel real

👉 Effect:
👉 easier to accept the full narrative

4️⃣ Enemy framing (demonization)

👉 Excerpt:
“black money of the Ukrainian army”, “mafia-like”

👉 Technique:

Ukraine = criminal organization
political actor → criminalized

👉 Goal:
👉 shift from political debate → to crime narrative

👉 Effect:
👉 emotional rejection, fear

5️⃣ Foreign interference framing

👉 Excerpt:
“Zelenskyy interferes in Hungarian elections”

👉 Technique:

no evidence
yet a very strong claim

👉 Goal:
👉 delegitimize the opponent

👉 Effect:
👉 “this wouldn’t even be a Hungarian decision”

6️⃣ Fear framing + war narrative

👉 Excerpt:
“pro-war government”, “we must not allow it”

👉 Technique:

political choice = life-or-death issue
linked to war

👉 Goal:
👉 emotional mobilization

👉 Effect:
👉 panic-based decision-making

7️⃣ Serial “reveal” tactic

👉 Excerpt:
“it will soon be revealed”, “in Saturday’s program”

👉 Technique:

cliffhanger
story continues in episodes

👉 Goal:
👉 maintain continuous attention

👉 Effect:
👉 audience engagement + deeper narrative immersion

8️⃣ Claims without evidence + assertive tone

👉 Technique:

all statements presented as facts
no “allegedly”, no sources

👉 Goal:
👉 prevent questioning

👉 Effect:
👉 creates the feeling that “this is already proven”

⚠️ Key problem (what you’re sensing)

👉 No verifiable evidence:

no names, no documents, no independent sources
anonymous “agent” = not evidence

👉 Conclusion first → story later:

states the conclusion (interference) first
then builds a narrative around it

👉 Timing:

if the case is already “closed”
→ this is not new information, but post-hoc narrative building

🧠 Summary (short)

This text is:

➡️ not factual reporting
➡️ but a constructed propaganda narrative

Main elements:

anonymous “secret source”
seemingly concrete but unverifiable details
conspiracy chaining
external enemy (Ukraine)
election fear-mongering

👉 Real goal:
not to inform, but
➡️ to create an emotional state: fear + anger + distrust

No more evasion—today, in a recording declassified from secrecy, a former IT specialist of the Tisza Party, H.D., personally admits to the Constitution Protection Office that he was recruited.

From the testimony, it turns out that:

• the process began with a cyber training in Estonia, which turned out not to physically exist,
• he took part in a mandatory trip to Kyiv, where he met contacts who looked like Ukrainian mobsters,
• at first he was prepared for defensive actions, but later also for offensive operations;

The man admitted: “they pulled me in,” and it is clear that he was recruited for a later operation.

Therefore, the counterintelligence acted correctly when it intervened. The police officer, on the other hand, did not and could not know about all this.

For us, one thing matters: to protect Hungary’s peace and security!

Their cyber defense situation in Ukraine is not exactly outstanding, so I wanted to support them a bit, and also to collect donations for Ukraine. In this context, I carried out some volunteer activities—let me add that I never accepted any money for what I did. What I did was simply that we conducted defensive operations in Ukraine against Russian cyberattacks. We updated systems against cyberattacks by Russian hacker groups, installed and configured IDS and IPS systems, monitored and analyzed incoming network traffic, and improved the systems. Quite a few SCADA specialists didn’t really know their own systems, even though SCADA systems are quite frequently attacked, as far as I understand. And obviously, I’m not that knowledgeable about SCADA myself, but I wanted to somehow help the Ukrainian cause to defend their country.

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = Ukrainian infiltration / espionage”
• “Ukraine = mafia + attack + manipulation”
• “We = protection, security, counterintelligence”
• “Election = security vs. betrayal”

👉 Hidden formula:

fear + appearance of “evidence” + enemy framing + legitimization
→ “there is a real threat → strong action is justified → only we can protect you”

🔍 Influence techniques

1️⃣ “Secret recording” = fake credibility framing

👉 Excerpt:
“declassified recording”, “admits it”

👉 Technique:

• “secret”, “declassified”, “confession” → illusion of credibility
• no source, no verifiability
• one person → generalization

👉 Goal:
👉 make it seem like undeniable proof

👉 Effect:
👉 “if there’s a recording, it must be true” reflex

2️⃣ Single case → entire political camp (generalization)

👉 Excerpt:
“former IT specialist of the Tisza Party…”

👉 Technique:

• one person → whole party
• no proportion, no context

👉 Goal:
👉 build collective guilt

👉 Effect:
👉 “if one is like this, they all are”

3️⃣ Enemy demonization (enemy framing + dehumanization)

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukrainian mafia-looking handlers”

👉 Technique:

• “mafia” = criminal, dangerous
• judging based on appearance (visual trigger)

👉 Goal:
👉 emotional rejection, fear

👉 Effect:
👉 you don’t think → you reject

4️⃣ Gradual story-building (narrative arc)

👉 Excerpt:

• “cyber training”
• “trip to Kyiv”
• “offensive operations”

👉 Technique:

• step-by-step story → cinematic credibility
• the more detailed → the more believable it feels

👉 Goal:
👉 create the feeling: “this is too detailed to be fake”

👉 Effect:
👉 reduced critical thinking

5️⃣ Defense → attack shift (threat escalation framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“initially defensive, later offensive actions”

👉 Technique:

• morally acceptable → dangerous
• gradual escalation

👉 Goal:
👉 increase perceived threat

👉 Effect:
👉 “this is no longer help, this is aggression”

6️⃣ “They sucked him in” = psychological authentication

👉 Excerpt:
“they sucked him in”

👉 Technique:

• everyday language → human, relatable
• informal tone → “honest confession” effect

👉 Goal:
👉 make the story feel more authentic

👉 Effect:
👉 easier identification

7️⃣ Justifying counterintelligence (authority legitimization)

👉 Excerpt:
“counterintelligence acted correctly”

👉 Technique:

• retroactive justification of state action
• preempting criticism

👉 Goal:
👉 legitimize measures

👉 Effect:
👉 “then it must have been necessary”

8️⃣ “The police didn’t know” = detaching responsibility

👉 Technique:

• softening potential abuse
• keeping the system “clean”

👉 Goal:
👉 avoid questioning execution

9️⃣ Security closing line (protector framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“we protect Hungary’s peace and security”

👉 Technique:

• classic “we protect you” narrative

👉 Goal:
👉 emotional closure

👉 Effect:
👉 fear → relief → support

🔟 Technical detail injection (technical credibility trick)

👉 Excerpt:
“IDS, IPS, network traffic analysis”

👉 Technique:

• technical jargon → increased credibility

👉 Goal:
👉 “this must be true because it sounds technical”

👉 Effect:
👉 non-experts can’t verify → accept it

⚠️ Why it feels “disgusting” (and why it’s typical)

This text:

➡️ does not aim to prove
➡️ aims to create an emotional state

Specifically:

• too many strong claims
• “secret evidence”
• enemy + mafia + spies
• detailed but unverifiable story
• ends with “we will protect you”

👉 This is a classic:

👉 “fear campaign disguised as evidence”

🧩 Why they push it even if “people don’t believe it”?

This is the key:

👉 they don’t want to convince everyone

but to:

• reinforce their own base
• destabilize the uncertain
• dominate the agenda

👉 propaganda logic:

“it’s not about whether it’s true
but whether it stays in people’s minds”