Bad news for the Tisza supporters, good news for patriots: the digital conquest is working. Even here, on my small Facebook page, we’ll reach 90,000 within minutes. After 15 years, Fidesz is still capable of renewal — and this is exactly what we’re seeing now in the digital space. We were significantly behind, but we’re taking control here as well. And in April, we’ll wipe the smug looks off their faces at the ballot boxes. This is the plan for the next three months. Let’s go!
1. Camp logic + emotional polarization
“Bad news for the Tisza supporters, good news for patriots.”
A us–them division, without any argument.
“Patriot” functions as a positive moral label, while “Tisza supporter” is implicitly negative. 👉 Goal: instant emotional identification, not thinking.
2. False mass validation (bandwagon effect)
“We’ll be 90,000 within minutes.”
There is no verifiable context (organic growth? paid promotion? followers vs. reach?).
The number is not an argument, but psychological pressure: “if this many people are there, they must be right.”
3. Self-mythologizing and historical posing
“Digital conquest.”
A militarized, historical metaphor → movement euphoria.
It conceals the reality that this is platform algorithms + campaign technique, not a “national mission.”
4. Pre-emptive neutralization of criticism
“We were significantly behind, but…”
The delay is admitted in advance, then reframed as a success story.
Past failure is no longer a problem — it becomes a “turnaround.”
5. Dominance fantasy + veiled aggression
“We will take control.” “We’ll smear their mouths.”
This is not political debate, but displays of power.
The election is framed as a showdown, not a democratic choice.
6. Mobilizing closing line without content
“This is the plan for the next three months.”
No program, no public policy, no concrete proposals.
The “plan” itself is simply turning up the volume.
Overall picture
This is not analysis, not strategy, not governance, but:
mass psychology,
identity-based agitation,
an algorithm-optimized victory announcement.
The text does not communicate what they want to do with the country, but who the enemy is and which side you are expected to belong to.
The Momentum thugs have really made themselves comfortable in the velvet seats of Parliament. Since they are incapable of doing any actual political work—something they have been proving consistently since 2018—they instead pick fights with opinion leaders and columnists. Frankly, they could do this alongside some kind of civilian job, and then the government could spend taxpayers’ money on something useful instead of on their salaries. 🫢🫢
– Ah, I see the Momentum thugs have arrived, who have now come up with the brilliant idea of bursting back into public attention by plastering the country with posters of Dániel Bohár, Dániel Deák, and Zsolt Bayer. Very brave kids, these ones—behind whom there has been practically zero real political achievement since the moment they came into existence. There is exactly one reason why they are sitting in Parliament today: because back then they managed to prevent Hungary from hosting the Olympics.
So now these shop-window puppets are trying to draw the attention of opposition voters to themselves—and most likely the attention of Péter Magyar as well—so that he won’t forget about them when he puts together the Tisza list. Because, in my view, there are still quite a few people in Momentum who would very much like to continue living very well for another four years, just as they do now, off taxpayers’ money, while doing absolutely no real work.
According to the Momentum crowd, Bohár Dániel, Deák Dániel, and Zsolt Bayer are lying. About what exactly—they don’t specify. What the lies supposedly are—they don’t say that either. Facts don’t really belong to this poster campaign anyway, but by now we already know that facts won’t really be part of this election campaign at all.
What I would actually be curious about is whether the orange star will only have to be worn after the election by everyone who has ever voted for the right, or who is openly a Fidesz supporter, or who has liked a right-wing post—or whether they’ll start handing them out already somewhere in Belpest, maybe around the Inga Café. Because plastering the city with posters of opinion leaders and columnists is just the first step. After that will come branding all those people who dare to openly hold an opinion, or who dare to believe in complex thinking—that things are not black and white but consist of many components—and who are willing to stand by that view. In the eyes of the opposition sectarians, such people will be labeled as dangerous.
And by the way, if they are already talking about lies, they might want to ask their current messiah what’s going on with the fact that he isn’t taking up his mandate. Or what’s going on with that EP document that bore Péter Magyar’s signature, which stated that the European People’s Party would support Ukraine until it defeats Russia. What about that signature—how did it suddenly appear there and then disappear? Because we all know that signatures don’t just randomly appear and vanish on official documents like that.
So what’s going on with these issues, and with the idea of early elections? Bohár Dániel and the others are supposedly lying—but every single word of Péter Magyar is true? Or how exactly is this supposed to work?
☃️ “THE TOTAL COLLAPSE OF THE HUNGARIAN STATE IS GUARANTEED.” This is how the Tisza-affiliated agitator Vilmos Bábel is already whipping up hysteria on 444 over the winter weather expected next week.
☝️ We know the story: according to the “independent” clowns at 444, Orbánistan has been dysfunctional since 2010 — but then Péter Magyar will arrive, and with a magic wand we’ll suddenly have a “Functioning Hungary” 🤡 (As a bonus, he’ll also bring left-wing austerity, war, migrants, and gender madness — but that’s not the subject of this piece…)
🤡 Vilmos Bábel and the other Tisza agitators were conspicuously silent on New Year’s Eve, when 4 cm of fresh snow turned Gergely Karácsony’s metropolis into an ice rink. Even though the big middle-finger-waving mayor was supposedly “prepared for winter.”
🇩🇪 Let’s not forget either that Viktor Orbán has now apparently rendered Germany dysfunctional as well!! Over the weekend, there was a record number of accidents there due to icy roads. And in Berlin, around 100,000 people are currently sitting in dark, freezing apartments, because in Germany it apparently takes four days to fix an electrical failure caused by far-left vandals.
🇬🇧🇫🇷 I would also recommend that Tisza agitators take note that just a few days ago, during the holiday peak travel period, trains got stuck in the Channel Tunnel under the English Channel due to a technical failure. It took several hours to evacuate the passengers. Damn Lázár!! Right, 444?
🇬🇷 And the cherry on top: due to a telecommunications failure, air traffic in Greece collapsed today. Maybe 444 should send Péter Magyar there! After all, during a summer rainstorm he already proved at Ferihegy that he’s an expert in this too ✈️
☃️ The bottom line: no one should listen to the Tisza agitators! The Hungarian state functions — even though, of course, there may still be disruptions due to snowfall.
Enjoy the winter! We haven’t really had the chance in recent years anyway. It was stolen! 🤡
Wishing everyone a happy new year, free from Tisza agitators 🥂❄️☃️
1. Strawman + hyperbole
“THE TOTAL COLLAPSE OF THE HUNGARIAN STATE IS GUARANTEED.”
This is not a quote, but an exaggerated paraphrase that the author puts into Bábel Vilmos’s mouth. The trick works like this:
a realistic risk assessment (“there may be disruptions in winter”)
is transformed into an apocalyptic prophecy,
and then that distorted claim is attacked.
👉 A classic propaganda move: the author does not refute the original statement, but a caricature of it.
2. Enemy construction and labeling
“Tisza agitators” “independent clowns” “444”
This is not argumentation, but identity-based exclusion:
anyone who is not “us” is assumed to be acting in bad faith,
whatever they say is automatically framed as lies or agitation.
👉 This makes examining the actual content unnecessary.
3. Whataboutism with international scenery
Germany, France, Greece, the Channel Tunnel…
The logic is:
“Problems happen elsewhere too” ⇒ “therefore there is no problem here”
This is a logical fallacy:
failures in other countries do not invalidate domestic risks,
they only serve emotional relativization.
👉 Classic diversion, not refutation.
4. Self-contradiction at the end
“The Hungarian state functions, but there may be disruptions.”
This is exactly what the alleged “agitators” are saying — except that:
at the beginning it is framed as panic-mongering,
at the end it is openly acknowledged.
👉 This exposes the core issue: the problem is not what is said, but who says it.
5. Scapegoating and mocking delegitimization
Karácsony Gergely Magyar Péter “gender madness,” “left-wing austerity,” “war”
These have no direct connection to winter weather, yet they are pulled in to:
keep the reader emotionally overheated,
ensure that any criticism feels like an “opposition attack.”
6. The author’s role
The post does not inform. It:
demands loyalty,
channels anger,
replaces thinking with ridicule.
In this role, Németh Balázs is not an analyst but a reaction manager:
he does not solve problems,
he dulls, relativizes, and redirects.
7. What is completely missing?
concrete data,
a chain of responsibility,
preparedness indicators,
a risk-management plan.
👉 There is only narrative — no operational mode.
🎯 One-sentence summary
This text is not about winter at all; it is about declaring that every criticism equals hostile agitation, while ultimately admitting the same thing itself: there may be disruptions.
We have always been the only ones on the national side who consistently stood up for Hungarians living beyond the borders. Even when it was not fashionable. Even when we were attacked for it. And even when others turned their backs on them.
And what do we see now? Outrageous left-wing hypocrisy.
The very same people are now trying to use Hungarians beyond the borders for political purposes who would take away their citizenship, their right to vote, and their support. What staggering double standards!
Let us have no illusions: Hungarians living beyond the borders cannot count on the left, nor on Tisza, nor on DK. They have already proven themselves — against them.
The Hungarian communities beyond the borders have only one reliable ally: the national government, which stands by them with actions, not empty words.
We do not see them as campaign tools, but as part of the nation. Because only the country has borders — the nation does not. 🇭🇺
🧠 Rhetorical Outline – What Is Actually Happening?
1. The Myth of Exclusivity
“We have always been the only ones, on the national side, who consistently stood up…”
This is a historical and political oversimplification. It does not claim they also stood up — it claims that others never did.
👉 A classic false monopoly:
only one moral actor exists,
all other political forces are pre-emptively excluded from the category of “the good”.
2. Martyrdom + Moral Superiority
“Even when we were attacked for it.”
This is a self-heroising narrative:
we do not see a debate,
we see “we = victims”, “they = attackers”.
👉 The goal is not argument, but the forced emotional identification of the audience.
3. Hypocrisy Accusation Without Evidence
“Outrageous left-wing hypocrisy.”
This is moral labelling, not proof:
no quotation,
no concrete decision,
no date or context.
👉 The word “outrageous” functions as an emotional short-circuit, not an argument.
4. Guilt by Association
“The very same people are trying to use them for political purposes…”
This is where the key trick happens:
different actors (the left, Tisza, DK) are merged into a single mass,
all nuance disappears.
👉 The goal: to create one unified, threatening enemy image.
5. Pre-Written Verdict
“They have already proven themselves — against them.”
This shuts down thinking:
no “let’s examine”,
no “distinction”,
only a final moral judgment.
👉 A classic thought-terminating cliché.
6. Promise of Exclusive Protection
“They have only one reliable ally: the national government.”
This is a dependency narrative:
alternatives = danger,
loyalty = safety.
👉 Not pluralism, but political appropriation.
7. Closing Line as an Emotional Seal
“Only the country has borders — the nation does not.”
This is a symbolic truth, but:
it functions as emotional closure,
it leaves no room for questions or debate.
👉 The 🇭🇺 emoji is not decoration — it is an emotional full stop.
🎯 One-Sentence Summary
This text is not really about Hungarians living beyond the borders, but about claiming political ownership over them — deciding who is allowed to speak about them “legitimately” and who is excluded in advance.
If you want, I can:
sharpen this into a media-critique or academic tone,
compress it into a short exposé or op-ed,
or adapt it for international readers unfamiliar with Hungarian politics.
If Péter Magyar comes to power, it will certainly hurt—just as it hurt every Hungarian family under the left, including the pre-2010 record of Gordon Bajnai. Two paths lie before Hungary: either the family-supporting, pensioner-supporting, utility price-cutting economic policy known since 2010 continues, or the pre-2010 world returns—with austerity measures, support for multinationals, and the squeezing of families, and…
1. False dilemma (“there are only two paths”)
“Either the policy known since 2010 continues… or the pre-2010 world returns.”
👉 As if no third, fourth, or new model could exist. 👉 The choice is forced into an emotional straitjacket: security vs. pain.
This is not analysis; it is decision pre-programming.
2. Pre-assigned pain (“it will certainly hurt”)
“If Péter Magyar comes, it will certainly hurt.”
👉 No measures, no figures, no program. 👉 Just anticipated suffering — classic fear-based framing.
Psychologically, this is anticipatory loss (projected future loss).
3. Shifting blame onto a past figure
“…just as it hurt under the left, including the pre-2010 record of Gordon Bajnai.”
👉 Péter Magyar = the left = Bajnai = austerity 👉 Temporal and personal slippage, without evidence.
This is guilt by association, not causal reasoning.
👉 These are not metrics, but identity slogans. 👉 The question is not how much it costs, how long it is sustainable, or who pays the price — only whether the words are spoken.
🤡 Magnificent how liberal propagandists are suddenly defending Maduro 🤡
Two days ago, Maduro was the evil dictator, Putin’s evil puppet. Today? He’s the sovereign, democratically elected leader of Venezuela — allegedly kidnapped by the evil dictator Trump.
Meanwhile, Robert Fico has magically become a hero, simply because he posted on Facebook condemning the U.S. action. Yesterday Fico was evil too — after all, he’s a friend of the evil dictatorOrbán Viktor.
And of course! Now Vlagyimir Putyin must also be a hero — and so is the Iranian Ayatollah — since they’re Maduro’s friends, meaning they don’t like Donald Trump.
Sure, sure! The Iranian Ayatollah has actually been “one of the good guys” for a while now — after all, he dislikes the evil dictatorBenjamin Netanyahu, who happens to be a friend of the evil Trump and the evil Orbán.
Perfectly logical, right?!?!
Long live the progressive, liberal geniuses! 🤡
1. Double-key morality (situational ethics)
The core logic of the text is not what happened, but who did it.
The same actor is labeled:
yesterday as an “evil dictator,”
today as a “sovereign, democratically elected leader,”
depending on whether they:
are opposed to Donald Trump, or
temporarily align with the interests of the current “enemy’s enemy.”
👉 This is not inconsistency but a deliberate switch: the moral standard is not universal, but camp-dependent.
2. Enemy relabeling
The text ironically exposes a common propaganda pattern:
Nicolás Maduro
Vlagyimir Putyin
the Iranian ayatollah
are not judged based on their own actions, but on who they are currently opposing.
“If he doesn’t like Trump → he’s suddenly acceptable.”
This creates a binary worldview:
Trump / Orbán Viktor / Benjamin Netanyahu = absolute evil
anyone opposing them = automatically relativized, excused, or rehabilitated
3. Moral cascade (chain legitimization)
The text deliberately sketches an exaggerated chain:
Maduro → good
because he’s a friend of Putin → Putin becomes “less bad”
because the Iranian ayatollah is on the same side → he too becomes acceptable
This is logical contamination:
if A is good, and B is A’s ally, then B must also be “less bad.”
👉 This is not reasoning — it is emotional contagion.
4. Selective memory (motivated forgetting)
The phrase “yesterday he was still evil” is crucial.
Propaganda does not deny the earlier claim — it simply treats it as no longer relevant.
Psychologically this means:
cognitive dissonance → not resolved, but skipped
the audience is conditioned not to remember consistently
5. Facebook diplomacy as a moral stamp
The example of Robert Fico is particularly revealing:
A single Facebook post:
“condemning the U.S. action” → moral absolution → status change: from “villain” to “king”
👉 This is the overvaluation of symbolic gestures, where a statement matters more than actual political conduct.
6. Tribalism (us vs. them)
Throughout the text, the underlying mindset is shown to be:
not value-based,
not law-based,
not fact-based,
but tribal:
“The enemy of my enemy is morally usable.”
This is not liberalism — it is an identity-political reflex.
7. The function of the clown emoji 🤡
The clown emoji is not decoration; it is a rhetorical device:
ridicule → shutdown of thinking
creation of a sense of moral superiority
infantilization of the opponent
👉 The final message is not “they are wrong,” but: “they are ridiculous, therefore not worth taking seriously.”
Conclusion – what is exposed?
This text does not attack an opinion; it exposes a mode of thinking:
momentary interest → moral judgment
actors are interchangeable
principles are not stable
labels of “good” and “evil” are transferable
That is why it is effective — and that is why it is dangerous.
We have entered an era of wars and conflicts, where everyone relentlessly pursues their own national interests. Only those countries can successfully overcome the challenges ahead that are members of well-functioning alliance systems.
Venezuela possesses the largest oil reserves in the world. Any conflict that affects global oil production also affects fuel prices. In recent years, Hungary has strengthened its resilience to energy crises. However, no one can fully shield themselves from the effects of global processes, so even with all the measures taken so far, it is in our interest that the conflict does not drag on, that the situation in Venezuela is stabilized as soon as possible, and that energy prices do not rise in Hungary.
From the hundreds of Hungarians who were evacuated from Venezuela years ago, we know what kind of oppressive, dictatorial system operated there. We hope that one day they will be able to return home.
Brussels and its Hungarian allies once again fail to understand any of this, and as usual, no one even consulted them about the situation.
The Hungarian government is in contact with all parties involved. The Hungarian people can be reassured that we will preserve Hungary’s peace and security, and that even in the most uncertain times we will fight against rising energy prices.
As if it weren’t enough that on New Year’s Eve migrants rampaged through major German cities and deliberately attacked police officers, yesterday the radical left also sprang into action!
🔥 Nearly 100,000 people were left without electricity and heating in Berlin after the power grid was damaged due to deliberate arson. There is no power, no heating, mobile networks are disrupted, the situation in nursing homes is critical, and hospitals have switched to emergency power. Repairs are expected to take until Thursday (!).
So the situation is far from rosy, especially as Berlin is facing harsh winter cold.
☝️ The attack was claimed by far-left extremists, who have been terrorizing the residents of the German capital for more than 10 years. They have previously used radical methods to protest, for example, the construction of the Tesla factory in Germany, while at the same time being strong supporters of the Greta Thunberg–style climate protests.
❗️ Pro-war leaders, violent migrants, left-wing radicals terrorizing their own fellow citizens, declining prosperity, and a struggling economy. That’s what Germany looks like today — and this is true for much of the European Union.
This must change! In the meantime, let us appreciate the peace and calm in Hungary.
📸 Photo: complete darkness will remain in several districts of Berlin until Thursday.
1. Apocalyptic framing (“Germany is very sick”)
This is not a statement of fact, but an emotional trigger.
👉 The goal is to:
create a state of fear,
push the reader into an immediate sense of danger,
replace thinking with a reflex reaction.
No metrics, context, or proportionality are provided.
2. Artificial merging of unrelated events
Three separate phenomena are fused into a single “collapse narrative”:
New Year’s Eve riots
a power outage in Berlin
left-wing / climate activist protests
👉 No causal link is demonstrated, yet they are presented as one continuous chain of threat.
This is classic narrative fusion:
“everything is connected, and everything is bad.”
3. Enemy-bloc construction (collective guilt)
The text deliberately lumps together:
“immigrants”
“the radical left”
“far-left lunatics”
climate activists (with Greta Thunberg’s name thrown in)
EU leaders
👉 This is the collective guilt technique. 👉 Individual responsibility disappears, leaving only a “threatening mass.”
Greta Thunberg is used here purely as an emotional trigger, not as a relevant fact.
4. “Source-free certainty”
Key phrases:
“INTENTIONAL arson”
“FAR-LEFT LUNATICS claimed responsibility”
“they have terrorized the city for more than 10 years”
👉 No investigating authority is named 👉 No official statement is linked 👉 No date, no procedural status is provided
This is speculation presented as fact.
5. Image manipulation (visual deception)
“📸 Photo: total darkness will remain in several districts of Berlin until Thursday”
👉 A static image proves neither:
duration,
cause,
nor scale.
This is the classic illustration ≠ evidence trap.
6. Contrast propaganda: “they are chaos, we are order”
The final message is not about Germany, but about this:
“And what did Péter Magyar say about immigrants wreaking havoc across Western Europe on New Year’s Eve?” “Nothing. What would he have said? It doesn’t bother him — it can’t bother him, because he’s pro-Brussels.”
This is a classic case of offended propaganda whining that ends up exposing itself. Let’s briefly break down what’s actually happening.
“Németh Balázs sulks because he wasn’t fed” — meaning:
he expected the mandatory reaction,
he didn’t get it,
so he turned that absence into a so-called “exposé”.
The logic goes like this:
– What did Péter Magyar say about the riots in Western Europe? – Nothing. – Aha! See? That means he’s pro-Brussels!
This is not a question. It’s a pre-decided verdict.
So what’s the trick?
Forced speech trap If he speaks → “he’s inciting.” If he doesn’t speak → “he’s silent because Brussels.” 👉 There is no correct answer — only guilt.
“Brussels” as a magic word Not a claim. Not evidence. Just an identity stamp. Once it’s slapped on, argumentation is no longer required.
The offended tone (“why isn’t he saying what we want him to say?”) This isn’t political debate — it’s a tantrum born from the failure to control the narrative.
The essence in one sentence
Németh Balázs isn’t upset about what Péter Magyar said — he’s upset about what Péter Magyar didn’t say.
This is not a question. Not a debate. Not analysis.
