“Ask us anything. Anything goes — we’ll answer live on air!”
“In x years, when these videos resurface in front of your child — or your future employer — how will you look them in the eye? Deleting them from Facebook doesn’t mean they disappear everywhere.”
“Imagine that by the end of the year we have established the Hungarian Path Digital Civic Circle, with the aim of building a strong, cohesive community rooted in the traditions of the popular movement, for Hungarians who stand for the ideal of a nation-building state and who care about the future of the entire Hungarian nation.
💪🏻 We are counting on those who believe that serving the national cause is important in the digital space as well; who are willing to act for the interests of the community beyond their own personal success; and who consider it essential to take stock of our roots, preserve our national identity, and modernize the national idea.
👥 László Kéri is a regular visitor at the TISZA headquarters. According to the photos, the left-wing economist is a frequent guest at briefings held by Péter Magyar and his team. It is well known that Kéri has repeatedly advocated tax increases, the abolition of utility cost cuts, and he himself has admitted that TISZA is a left-wing party.
❌ Same left-wing gang, just in a different disguise. We know them — we don’t want them!
– Let me tell you the scandal of the week — even though it’s only Monday, I think this already deserves a prize. What happened is that László Kéri has been exposed: for months now, he has been regularly visiting TISZA’s central office, their campaign headquarters, for briefings.
– For example, here he is saying — forgive me — that a flat tax system is also nonsense. He calls it complete stupidity and says he doesn’t agree with it at all.
– Yes, you heard that right: this is the same László Kéri about whom Péter Magyar has repeatedly claimed that they have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
– They present people unknown to us as TISZA’s “experts.”
– And he asks for those talking points that attack the utility cost reduction policy.
– Regarding utility cost cuts, every “expert” says by now that it’s been the world’s biggest bluff for a long time.
– Or the statements that, for example, his wife, Mária Zita Pesti, is pushing in favor of tax increases.
– Anyone who talks about cutting VAT must also talk about raising taxes.
– And they claim the TISZA Party does all this independently.
Well, in my opinion, this is what a truly embarrassing and awkward exposure looks like.
1️⃣ “Exposure” as a presupposed crime
“Let me tell you about the exposure of the week…”
The opening frame already asserts guilt before any evidence is presented.
There is no legal violation, no secret, no prohibited act — yet it is still called an “exposure.”
👉 Framing: the event is not described; it is pre-judged and labeled.
2️⃣ Guilt by association (association fallacy)
“László Kéri regularly visits the Tisza Party’s central office…”
The implied logic is:
Kéri is present → Tisza is left-wing → therefore everything Tisza says is illegitimate
What is not examined:
what he actually said,
what he proposed,
whether he had any decision-making role.
👉 This is not argumentation but contamination: “Anyone in the same room must be the same.”
Péter Magyar posted that he, too, would be holding a year-opening international press conference.
This, of course, comes after Prime Minister Viktor Orbán held a genuinely international press conference earlier in the day. Journalists, correspondents, and news agency reporters came from all over the world—naturally so, because they are interested in what the Hungarian prime minister, a key and serious player in international politics, has to say.
And then this clown goes and writes on his own Facebook page that his press conference is also an international one.
Who is the supposedly intelligent person who seriously believes that the governance of Hungary could be entrusted to someone like this? This character is someone you can pity—or laugh at.
1️⃣ Presupposed Hierarchy (Authority Framing)
“…the Hungarian prime minister is a key player, a serious actor in international politics.”
Technique: 👉 Presupposed authority
No evidence is provided as to why he is a key player
No concrete international impact or results are shown
The status is treated as an axiom rather than an argument
Goal: To imprint in the listener’s mind:
Anyone who criticizes Orbán is attacking “world politics” itself.
2️⃣ False Exclusivity (False Monopoly)
“Obviously journalists came from all over the world…”
What is actually happening?
An “international press conference” is not a rank, but a format
It is not international because of who holds it, but because of:
the presence of foreign media
communication in foreign languages
international subject matter
👉 Logical distortion: Orbán → can be international Others → cannot be
3️⃣ Dehumanization and Personal Attacks
“this monkey” “this guy”
Technique: 👉 Dehumanization + ad hominem
The claim itself is not challenged
Political performance is not examined
Human status is symbolically withdrawn
This is not opinion, but character assassination.
Goal: To prevent the audience from:
examining arguments
comparing substance
4️⃣ Ridicule as Political Exclusion
“This guy can be pitied or laughed at.”
This is a key sentence.
👉 The sentence is not really about Magyar Péter, but about the listener:
If you take him seriously → you are ridiculous
If you think about him → you are outside the group
This is group-pressure rhetoric, not argumentation.
5️⃣ The “Unfit to Lead” Topos Without Evidence
“Who is the self-respecting, intelligent person who would seriously think…?”
Trick: 👉 Implied consensus
It never states why he is unfit
No examples, decisions, or failures are cited
The question itself functions as the accusation
This is a classic propaganda device:
“Everyone knows” → therefore no proof is required.
6️⃣ What the Text Does Not Say
❌ It does not compare political programs ❌ It does not debate political content ❌ It does not respond to specific claims ❌ It does not refute — it only labels
👉 This is not debate, but ritual humiliation.
Conclusion – What Is This, Really?
This statement is:
❌ not political analysis ❌ not media criticism ❌ not substantive debate
✔️ identity-protective propaganda:
“We are the serious ones. Anyone who thinks otherwise is ridiculous.”
What kind of exposure is this again? It turns out that László Kéri regularly works as an adviser to the Tisza Party? The very same László Kéri who pushes a textbook left-wing economic agenda with tax hikes, pension cuts, and utility price increases; whose circles consider immigration beneficial; and of course the same László Kéri whom Péter Magyar has been insisting for two years has absolutely nothing to do with Tisza. Uh-huh.
1️⃣ “Exposure” as a presupposed crime
“What kind of exposure is this again?”
This is framing:
the question itself already assumes that a crime has occurred,
while no legal or moral wrongdoing is identified.
👉 A classic propaganda trick: it doesn’t prove anything, it presupposes guilt.
2️⃣ Guilt by association through a person
“That László Kéri who…”
Here, László Kéri appears not as an adviser, but 👉 as an ideological totem.
The essence of the technique:
it does not examine what he actually does,
but what labels can be stuck onto him.
This is an association fallacy:
“If he is there → then everyone must be like him.”
Ukraine would present Europe with an $800 billion bill!
According to the Ukrainian Prime Minister, over the next ten years Ukraine will need an additional $800 billion just to maintain the country’s basic functioning. This figure alone is already staggering — but that is not the end of it. As announced by Yuliia Svyrydenko, this amount does not include military and defense expenditures.
The sum mentioned above is nearly ten times the loan granted at the end of last year. It is plainly evident that neither that loan nor the newly requested amount will ever be repaid — once again, Europe will be forced to pick up the bill.
Brussels would place every burden on the shoulders of the Hungarian people. They would introduce new taxes and raise existing ones — and they already have their man for this: Péter Magyar, who would finance the cost of the Ukrainian war with his austerity package.
“Happy New Year, Madam Prime Minister of Ukraine — and Happy New Year to Europe as well,” she announced, by declaring that Ukraine’s post-war economic maintenance alone will cost $800 billion. What do you think about this?
— This is a brutal figure. Let’s put it into context: it equals four times Hungary’s annual GDP. And if we also consider that Europe has already provided €180 billion to Ukraine, and that EU member states have now decided on an additional €90 billion military loan — which Hungary did not participate in — then we can clearly see just how enormous this $800 billion figure really is.
And this is exactly what we have been saying from the very beginning: this is what would happen. It will not be Ukrainians who pay the price of this war, but rather they want to make us Europeans pay for it.
We will not take part in this. We want to stay out of the war — not only in the sense that we will not send soldiers or weapons and will not fight in it, but also in economic terms.
We do not want Hungarian people’s money to be spent in Ukraine. We want Hungarian money to remain in Hungary and be spent on Hungarians.
We will not allow this. Hungarian money belongs to Hungarians.
1. The “brutal figure” as a shock-opening device
“Ukraine would present Europe with an $800 billion bill.”
This is not a bill, but a macroeconomic estimate of Ukraine’s ten-year basic state functioning, mentioned in context by Yuliia Svyrydenko.
Propaganda sleight of hand:
estimate → “bill”
long-term projection → immediate burden
multiple actors → “Brussels”
👉 The goal is not understanding, but emotional shock.
2. False linkage: estimate → EU tax → Hungarian families
“Brussels would place every burden on the shoulders of the Hungarian people.”
Here, three logical leaps are made without evidence:
Ukraine publishes an estimate
→ the EU automatically finances it
→ the money is directly taken from Hungarian taxpayers
⚠️ None of these steps are substantiated.
This is a slippery slope combined with a conspiracy narrative.
3. The “we already warned you” self-justification
“This is exactly what we said from the very beginning.”
This is not an argument, but:
retrospective self-absolution
debate-closing rhetoric
pre-emptive dismissal of criticism
👉 The question is no longer whether it is true, but who said it first.
4. The numbers game – distortion through comparison
“Four times Hungary’s GDP.”
This is a rhetorical trick:
comparing an absolute figure to an irrelevant national metric
omitting that the discussion concerns EU-level, decade-long, multi-channel financing
This is the same technique as:
comparing a state loan to a family household budget
5. The mandatory domestic enemy
“They already have their man: Péter Magyar.”
This is the most important point of the speech.
Ukraine → Brussels → taxes → Péter Magyar
👉 A classic external threat → internal traitor narrative.
Evidence:
❌ no quotation
❌ no policy proposal
❌ no decision-making mechanism
Only accusation by pointing.
6. “We will stay out” — while already being in
“We want to stay out economically as well.”
Reality:
Hungary is an EU member
the effects of collective decisions are not opt-out-based
some previous support already had indirect economic impacts
This is sovereignty rhetoric, not economic policy.
7. Closing line: ownership-based emotional appeal
“Hungarian money belongs to Hungarians!”
This is:
an identity slogan
an answer to nothing
an accountability-free statement
👉 A perfect campaign line with zero substantive content.
Summary — what is actually happening?
This is not about Ukraine. It is not about the numbers. It is not an economic debate.
It is about:
fear-mongering
enemy construction
domestic political mobilization
and the designation of a pre-fabricated scapegoat
This is not information, but a ready-made narrative into which reality is being forced.
The Ukrainian prime minister says they would need 800 billion dollars over the next ten years for the country to function. If the European Union were to take this on again — and Ursula von der Leyen is exactly the kind of person who does, when it comes to Ukraine — then, even among brothers, something like 3,000, or rather 3,500 billion forints would have to be sent to Ukraine. Never. Or more precisely, never as long as there is no Brussels puppet government in Hungary. If a puppet government comes, they will send away all our money.
The statement is a classic example of fear-mongering and scapegoating propaganda, using several layered techniques. Briefly, in bullet points:
1️⃣ Numbers warfare + shock effect
“They would need 800 billion dollars… 3,000–3,500 billion forints would have to be sent”
The purpose of large, unchecked numbers is not to inform, but to shock.
There is no source, no breakdown, no legal mechanism (who decides, when, from what funds, by what procedure).
The amount is automatically framed as “Hungary’s money”, which is misleading.
👉 Typical trick: “An EU debate = your money will be taken tomorrow.”
2️⃣ Personal scapegoat: Ursula von der Leyen
“Ursula von der Leyen is that eager to commit”
A complex decision-making process involving 27 member states is reduced to the “whim” of a single person.
This turns the EU institutional system into a malevolent, arbitrary actor.
👉 This is a personalized conspiracy narrative.
3️⃣ Conditional threat (blackmail logic)
“Never. Or rather, never as long as there is no puppet government here.”
This is the key sentence.
It is not a factual statement, but political blackmail:
If you don’t vote for us → your money will be taken.
The word “puppet government” pre-emptively delegitimizes all other political options.
👉 This is not debate, but a loyalty test.
4️⃣ Enemy construction tailored to domestic politics
“They would send away all our money”
No specific names → it can be applied to anyone (the opposition, NGOs, pro-EU actors).
The “us vs. them” tribal logic is reinforced:
we = protectors
they = traitors
5️⃣ The biggest distortion
The EU cannot simply “send away” Hungarian budget money:
there is no automatic mechanism,
no unilateral decision,
no “single button in Ursula’s hand”.
👉 This is deliberate simplification, not a mistake.
🎯 Overall picture
This is not about Ukraine, but about domestic political mobilization:
fear → anger → loyalty → votes
The core message in one sentence:
“If it’s not us, then Brussels will take your money.”
Breaking news for the Tisza agitators who are already squealing in advance that the country will grind to a halt because of snowfall: Hundreds of flights have been cancelled at Amsterdam Airport due to frost and heavy snow ❄️
I’m Balázs Németh. If Péter Magyar comes, even the ice won’t be slippery 🤷♂️☃️
This is what happened during the winter “break” ❗️
Left-wing agents (Brussels-controlled politicians, a Tisza-affiliated judge, and left-wing journalists) tried to prevent a publication detailing the Tisza Party’s austerity package from reaching the public. Once again, they showed what press freedom, freedom of expression, and liberal democracy really mean to them 🤡
Viktor Orbán saved Hungarian families from being dragged—like 24 other EU member states—closer to a major war against Russia. Hungary, like the Czech Republic and Slovakia, will not participate in financing the €90 billion military loan given to Ukraine.
The final days of Advent and the Christmas holidays proved that in Hungary we can still live according to our well-known Judeo-Christian traditions. No one set public Christmas trees on fire, destroyed nativity scenes, or disrupted Christmas market programs 🎄
New Year’s Eve unfolded across Europe in the now-familiar way seen since 2015 (and even earlier in France): in major Western cities, near–civil war conditions, street battles, injuries, deaths, and thousands of burning cars. In Hungary: good spirits, parties, toasts, and fireworks in the streets. This is why we must not allow millions of illegal migrants to enter.
The new year started well at home! Not with energy price hikes and brutal price increases, as we experienced before 2010 under left-wing governments, but with tax cuts, wage increases, pension increases, and new housing support measures.
Péter Magyar lied his way through the holiday season as well, with the nauseating Christmas PR interview as the low point. Meanwhile, he incites his supporters, hides his real plans, and tries to deny his left-wing connections—business as usual. Brussels and Péter Magyar’s candidate representatives still remain silent.
The Russian–Ukrainian war continued, with even more civilian bloodshed than before. The Americans are negotiating with Ukraine and Russia about peace, while the European Union and the leaders of its larger member states are interested in continuing the war. More and more often, they speak of deploying European troops to Ukraine under the EU flag. The next war council will be held in Paris on Tuesday.
The arrest of the Venezuelan presidential couple proves that the world has entered an era of danger and war. Major powers will defend their interests at any cost; our task is to stay on good terms with everyone. That requires an experienced leader—not a hot-headed clown who babbles nonsense.
☝️This is how we head into 2026 and another victorious campaign ✌️
