Hajós András has admitted that he was wrong when he downplayed the consequences of migration.
The former key member of Heti Hetes acknowledged in a podcast that the national government made the right decision when it said no to illegal migration ten years ago.
Today, he also recognizes that Orbán Viktor was right: the consistently upheld migration policy protected our country from the crisis experienced in the West.
Hungary continues to need a prime minister who raises his voice and acts when there is trouble—not when it is already too late, but when resistance is still possible. Even if other European politicians want something different.
In times of danger, we must think several steps ahead and make responsible decisions. This is not the time for experimentation.
Fidesz and Viktor Orbán are the safe choice.
Now imagine this: a well-known actor visited the former Heti Hetes legend, András Hajós, and together they talked about how badly they had misjudged migration back then. Looking back now, he said it was a “***** huge mistake” to even argue about it.
He explained that even within his own circles, he has to be very cautious when speaking about this issue—an issue about which he himself had once written an article in a magazine, accusing Viktor Orbán of exaggeration and mocking him for imagining himself as the hero of Nándorfehérvár, claiming to be the defender of Christianity.
But over the years, his opinion inevitably changed, because he saw what actually happened. He admitted that in certain circles he still cannot openly say that when Viktor Orbán claims he was right on this issue, then yes—he was right.
He said he watched the video and believes it is a very good thing that there are people who are capable of saying this out loud. Because in life, it happens that someone does not recognize a problem at the time, or thinks things are different—only for reality to later prove that the person who raised his voice and warned early was right.
Hungary, he said, must not end up in the same dead end that Western Europe entered during the migration crisis.
In his view, this situation is very similar to the present one. Once again, Hungary has a leader—in Viktor Orbán’s case—who is capable of thinking several steps ahead and understanding the consequences of decisions before they unfold.
🎭 Narrative: “Even the critics have admitted that Orbán was right”
The core claim of the text is that Hajós András—a well-known former face of Heti Hetes—has retrospectively admitted that he was wrong about migration, and that Orbán Viktor ultimately proved to be right.
This is a classic legitimation trick:
if a well-known figure perceived as being from “the other side” supposedly “converts,” the message presents it as irrefutable proof.
1️⃣ “He regretted it, he realized it, he admitted it” – the conversion narrative
🔹 Technique: a story of moral purification
🔹 Effect:
- arguments do not win—repentance does
- the debate is declared closed: “anyone who still criticizes is behind the times”
👉 Propaganda function:
It does not prove that Orbán was right; it suggests that the issue is no longer even worth debating.
2️⃣ “Western Europe went into a dead end” – fear by contrast
🔹 Technique: deterrent example (West = chaos)
🔹 Trick:
- no data
- no country-by-country distinction
- no cause-and-effect analysis
👉 Message:
if not Orbán’s path → Western collapse.
3️⃣ “Someone who thinks ahead” – the leader myth
🔹 Technique: constructing a prophetic leader
🔹 Key phrase:
“capable of thinking several steps ahead”
👉 Reality:
retrospective justification = ex post rationalization.
Past decisions are not analyzed through their consequences—only morally glorified.
4️⃣ “This is not the time for experimentation” – status-quo blackmail
🔹 Technique: false dilemma
- either Orbán
- or chaos
👉 Propaganda function:
every alternative is framed as irresponsible risk.
5️⃣ The role of Hajós András – the showcase critic
A crucial trick:
Hajós appears not as a political expert, but as an “honest civilian.”
👉 This is how it works:
- “not a Fidesz supporter”
- “not a politician”
- “yet he admitted it”
This is emotional authentication, not professional credibility.
⚠️ Conclusion – what is really happening?
This text is not about migration. It is about:
🔒 Closing the debate
🔒 Making the leader unquestionable
🔒 Delegitimizing criticism of the present
And the final sentence says it all:
“Fidesz and Viktor Orbán are the safe choice.”
→ not a conclusion, but a campaign slogan.