I bet you don’t even know what we’re eliminating from the DC.
Of course I do. And it’s better if everyone knows.
There are three things we can protest against through the national petitions.
First: we do not want to finance this war.
Second: we do not want to finance Ukraine in the coming years either.
And third: we do not want Hungarian families’ utility bills to rise because of the war.
👉 Today, the delivery of the national petition begins, giving everyone the opportunity to send a clear message to Brussels: we will not pay!
On three key issues, we can all express our opinion:
❌ We say NO to financing the Russian–Ukrainian war!
❌ We say NO to funding Ukraine with Hungarian taxpayers’ money!
❌ We say NO to rising utility prices caused by the war!
Let’s stand together for Hungarian interests!
Only Fidesz is the safe choice! 🟠
1️⃣ “Of course I know” – false display of competence
“Let’s bet you don’t know… Of course I know.”
This is not an answer, but role-playing:
- it does not explain,
- it does not clarify,
- it closes the issue in an authoritarian way: “I know, you don’t.”
👉 Function: to dominate the situation before anyone can ask questions.
2️⃣ The “three NOs” – emotional packaging, not public policy
The three points are deliberately merged, even though they belong to entirely different domains:
- financing the war
- supporting Ukraine
- household utility prices
🔴 These are not the same:
- different legal frameworks,
- different budget lines,
- different decision-making levels (EU, state, market).
👉 By compressing them into a single sentence, they become one unified fear package.
3️⃣ “We send a message to Brussels” – false addressee
A national petition is:
- not legally binding,
- not a decision-making tool,
- not a legal act.
Yet it is presented as if:
“Brussels sends the bill, and we write back.”
👉 This creates a symbolic enemy, not a real political process.
4️⃣ Utilities = war – deliberate causal distortion
“We say NO to rising utility prices caused by the war.”
This sentence presents a contested narrative as fact:
- utility prices are not determined exclusively by the war;
- they also depend on:
- market pricing,
- long-term contracts,
- domestic regulation,
- political decisions.
👉 All of this disappears, leaving a single scapegoat: “the war.”
5️⃣ “Everyone gets a chance” – psychological involvement
This is the classic formula:
“You are part of it.”
“You are deciding too.”
In reality:
- there is no alternative answer,
- no nuance,
- only a yes/no emotional reflex.
👉 This is mobilization, not consultation.
6️⃣ Closing: “Only Fidesz” – fear → loyalty
The logic chain:
- War
- Money
- Utility prices
- Brussels
- Fear
- 👉 “Only Fidesz”
This is not an argument, but the offer of a psychological escape route:
“If you’re afraid, stay with us.”
🎯 In short: what is happening here?
- ❌ Not a policy debate
- ❌ Not fact-based information
- ✅ Emotional coercion + enemy construction + demand for loyalty
This is campaign messaging, not a position paper.
This is framing, not a solution.