The Tisza supporters are hate-mongering, barbaric savages. They filled the red mailbox—where we collect development ideas from people living in North Pest—with dog feces. I’ll show you.
They stuffed the entire mailbox with dog feces. They filled it with dog feces.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the so-called “country of Tisza love.”
They smeared dog feces all over the red mailbox that we placed two days ago on the main square in Újpalota, because we are waiting for feedback from North Pest residents about what should be developed in this part of the city.
We will now clean it, and of course they will not be able to sabotage our red mailbox initiative.
Down below is what we have taken out of the mailbox so far—here it is as I find it. A huge number of messages came in, truly. The people of Újpalota are genuinely concerned about what should be developed in the district.
And what concerns the Tisza supporters? Being barbaric animals. I’ll show you.
They filled the entire mailbox with dog feces. They filled the mailbox with dog feces.
This is who they are. They cannot sabotage the red mailbox initiative—but everyone should remember this image. This is the country of “Tisza love.” This is what we can expect from them after April as well.
🔥 1️⃣ Scapegoating without evidence
“Tisza supporters filled it with dog excrement.”
❗ There is no evidence.
What we do not hear about:
- camera footage
- witnesses
- a police report
- a recording
- an identified person
👉 Yet it is presented as a proven fact.
This is one of propaganda’s basic rules:
state it first → later nobody asks for proof.
🧠 2️⃣ One act → demonizing an entire group
From one unknown perpetrator we immediately get:
“Tisza supporters = barbaric animals”
This is classic collective stigmatization.
The goal is not to solve the incident.
The goal is to manufacture an enemy image.
The logic:
one mailbox → excrement → opposition voters = animals
This is dehumanization.
This is the step after which anything can be blamed on someone.
🎭 3️⃣ Disgust as a political weapon
The dog excrement is not accidental.
It activates one of the strongest human reflexes:
👉 biological disgust
Disgust:
- shuts down rational thinking
- triggers immediate emotional rejection
- links the opponent to images of “dirty, contaminating, low”
This is not debate — it’s a nervous system trigger.
🧱 4️⃣ Constructing the victim role
Narrative:
“We are collecting residents’ opinions.”
“They attack with filth.”
So the frame becomes:
| Them | Us |
|---|---|
| barbarians | builders |
| hatred | care |
| destruction | community |
This is a moral stage where the roles are pre-assigned.
🗳️ 5️⃣ Hidden electoral message
Then comes the key line:
“This is what we can expect from them after April as well.”
This is not about a mailbox.
It means:
👉 If they come to power, chaos, aggression, and low behavior will come.
This is a fear-based future scenario, without evidence.
🎯 What actually happened (summary)
| Technique | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Accusation without proof | Designating an enemy |
| Disgust trigger | Emotional shock |
| Dehumanization | Moral permission for hatred |
| Victim positioning | Moral superiority |
| Future threat projection | Activating voter fear |
⚠️ Most important:
This is not political debate.
This is emotional conditioning.
The goal of this kind of speech is not to make you believe what happened.
It is to make you feel who you should hate.
And that is the difference between democracy and propaganda.