We opened the red mailbox! Here are the messages, uncensored! We’re putting North Pest into motion.
I’m Balázs Németh — my face is shining with grease. Thank you, that was a really useful message. Now let’s see the first week’s harvest, what kinds of messages came into the red mailbox. Of course, the gloves are justified — rubber gloves — because in the first days the Tisza supporters surprised us with dog excrement.
“Dear Balázs Németh, as a resident of Újpalota, I really miss the swimming pool.”
“Dear Balázs, replacing the old No. 69 tram is the most important task.”
Here they’re mentioning my mother — this is disgusting.
“Get the hell out of public life, you disgusting, stinking peasant.”
Of course, we thank everyone who sent sensible and useful messages. It seems many people did.
Go Fidesz, go Balázs Németh! We must finally sweep away this useless left-wing district leadership. We’re on it!
1️⃣ Pre-written narrative, post-hoc “evidence”
“We opened the red mailbox! Here are the messages, uncensored!”
This is a self-authenticating trick:
- no public access
- no independent verification
- no counts, ratios, or documentation
👉 Whoever controls the box controls reality.
2️⃣ Dog feces + vulgarity = demonization of the opponent
“The Tisza supporters surprised us with dog excrement.”
This is not information, but moral contamination:
- the opponent = filth
- the opponent = stench
- the opponent = non-human
👉 Classic dehumanization, designed to shut down debate instantly.
3️⃣ “Mixed harvest” – carefully edited
The dramaturgy of the scene:
- a disgusting message
- an insulting message
- one or two “normal” requests
- and finally, the flag-waving:
“Go Fidesz, go Balázs Németh!”
👉 The implied message:
- “See, the majority is with us”
- “Criticism is just vulgar abuse”
This is false proportional framing.
4️⃣ Victim role + moral superiority
“We thank everyone who sent sensible and useful messages.”
He is portrayed as:
- patient
- civilized
- working
Others are framed as:
- smelly
- hateful
- destructive
👉 This is a performance of moral superiority.
5️⃣ Open incitement at the end
“This useless left-wing district leadership must be removed once and for all.”
This is no longer an opinion, but political violence language:
- collective stigmatization
- closure of the enemy image
- “we are order”
🧠 Why is it fair to say “he’s writing it to himself”?
Because:
- there is no control
- there is no trace
- there is no transparency
- there is only a camera
This is not participation — it’s theater.
In short
This scene is:
- not dialogue
- not community involvement
- not representation
👉 It is a one-man propaganda ritual, where the same person is simultaneously:
- the people
- the victim
- the judge
- and the savior