Category: dezse propaganda : Words vs. Facts

😬 I can’t help it if I keep bringing news that drives the sectarians crazy. My apologies to them in advance. But I’m reading that the Fidesz–KDNP lead appears to be becoming permanent as we rapidly approach the elections.

According to a survey by the Alapjogokért Központ, if an election were held this Sunday, the governing parties would receive 49 percent of the vote, while Tisza would stand at only 41 percent — a confident lead, well beyond the margin of error. And this was most likely measured before Tisza openly began spreading the idea that it wouldn’t be such a bad thing if Hungarians chipped in to the $800 billion aid package for Ukraine. After all, according to Tisza supporters, there are enormous financial opportunities in Ukraine.

“A more realistic analysis acknowledges the massive costs of reconstruction, but also the huge opportunities it contains,” Tarr said about Ukraine, basing all of this on an expected Russian defeat.

Now, I think many of us would strongly disagree with the vice president of Tisza, because rebuilding a country that is endlessly corrupt and in many places practically reduced to rubble is not a market, but a financial black hole — one we have no intention of throwing our money into. But it’s clear that the directive from the Brussels elite has arrived, and they are expecting performance from Magyar Péter and his team.

So I’m very curious to see just how much further Tisza will fall behind Fidesz after introducing this narrative.

---

If you want, I can also:

---

🎭 Central Narrative

“Fidesz is leading, Tisza is losing — and on Brussels’ orders, they would send Hungarians’ money to Ukraine.”

The text does not aim to inform, but to pre-emptively shut down thinking and steer the reader, on an emotional basis, toward a single political conclusion.

---

1️⃣ Pre-emptive stigmatization (“sect labeling”)

“…I keep driving the sectarians crazy.”

🔹 Technique: labeling, dehumanization
🔹 Effect:

• anyone who disagrees → not rational, but a “sectarian”
• the opposing side’s arguments are invalid by default
  👉 Trick: excluding debate before facts are even discussed.

---

2️⃣ “Independent polling” as a substitute for authority

“According to a survey by the Center for Fundamental Rights…”

🔹 Technique: appeal to authority
🔹 Problem:

• the Center for Fundamental Rights is openly pro-government
• no methodology, sample size, or timing is disclosed
  👉 Trick: political messaging disguised as “objective data.”

---

3️⃣ Margin-of-error magic and the illusion of finality

“…a confident lead well beyond the margin of error.”

🔹 Technique: simulated statistical authority
🔹 Effect:

• “the race is already decided”
• psychological pressure on undecided voters
  👉 Goal: bandwagon effect (gravitating toward the perceived winner).

---

4️⃣ Cause-and-effect manipulation (“even before…”)

“…measured even before Tisza openly began spreading…”

🔹 Technique: pre-fabricated explanation
🔹 In reality:

• it is not proven this is an actual Tisza narrative
• it is not proven this affects voter support
  👉 Trick: retroactively justifying a future defeat.

---

5️⃣ Straw-man Ukraine narrative (“financial black hole”)

“…not a market, but a financial black hole…”

🔹 Technique: reductive demonization
🔹 Problem:

• no concrete plan is mentioned
• no concrete amount is specified
• no distinction between investment, aid, or loans
  👉 Goal: instinctive rejection instead of rational debate.

---

6️⃣ Quote-mining + bad-faith interpretation

Tarr’s quote about “huge opportunities”

🔹 Technique: cherry-picking
🔹 What’s missing:

• conditions
• risks
• a national-interest-based position
  👉 Trick: turning a nuanced statement into “national betrayal.”

---

7️⃣ “Brussels orders” — conspiracy without evidence

“…the order from the Brussels elite has arrived…”

🔹 Technique: conspiracy framing
🔹 Effect:

• every counterargument becomes a “foreign command”
• the idea of domestic political autonomy disappears
  👉 Goal: provoking fear over sovereignty.

---

8️⃣ Announced defeat as a self-fulfilling prophecy

“…how much further behind Fidesz they will fall.”

🔹 Technique: predictive framing
🔹 Effect:

• discouragement
• increased passivity on the opposition side
  👉 This is not analysis — it is a campaign message.

---

🧩 Summary — what is actually happening?

This text:

❌ provides no verifiable data
❌ does not allow for nuanced debate
❌ does not separate fact from opinion

✅ Yet it effectively:

• appeals to emotions (fear, ridicule, anger),
• legitimizes a pre-determined political position,
• and delivers propaganda disguised as analysis.

It’s becoming harder and harder to deny Uncle Laci Kéri’s role — especially while Uncle Laci Kéri keeps talking. And not a little. Uncle Laci talks a lot; he even speaks on behalf of the Tisza candidates who have been put under a gag order. On top of that, Uncle Laci frequently drops by the Tisza headquarters for coffee. But of course, Uncle Laci has nothing to do with Tisza 🤣

Now watch this! It’s completely obvious that Tisza is open not only to joining the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, but also to a whole range of measures that, if it were governing, it would be willing to carry out — measures that the Orbán government has been unwilling to take for 3–4–5–6 years.

So Uncle Laci Kéri, who “only” goes for coffee at the Tisza headquarters several times a week, and Márk Radnai, who “only” calls Uncle Laci the first Tisza member, do so simply because he supposedly has nothing to do with the party.

According to this Uncle Laci, then, a Tisza government would be willing to do all those things that the Orbán government has refused to do for many years. Here Uncle Laci is bringing up issues that you usually talk about in connection with the economy: why the 13th–14th month pension is unsustainable; why family benefits are unsustainable; why the retirement age should be raised; why young people, families, and mothers should not be helped; and why instead we should move toward a welfare-based society where work is not supported, but rather living off benefits is.

These are the things Uncle Laci is talking about — Uncle Laci, who, supposedly, has absolutely nothing to do with Tisza.

1️⃣ Soft denial (plausible deniability)

“Kéri ‘Uncle Laci’ has nothing to do with Tisza 😂”

🔹 Technique: ironic denial
🔹 Real function:
– while constantly hammering the alleged connection between László Kéri and the Tisza Party,
– it denies it in a legal/formal sense.

👉 This isn’t a rebuttal—it’s preemptive cover: “we’re just asking questions.”

---

2️⃣ Mocking infantilization (“Uncle Laci”)

🔹 Technique: belittling, patronizing nickname
🔹 Effect:
– discredits the analyst/intellectual role
– drags the message down to an emotional level (“don’t take him seriously—he’s just an old guy”)

👉 The goal is to make the person ridiculous, not to engage the arguments.

---

3️⃣ Strawman economics

The text puts into Kéri’s mouth that he allegedly wants to:

• abolish the 13th–14th month pension
• scrap family benefits
• raise the retirement age
• build a “welfare-dependent society”

🔹 Technique: strawman + exaggeration
🔹 Trick:
– no quotation
– no program
– no decision-making role
→ yet it’s presented as a ready-made government program.

👉 An analyst’s commentary → an apocalyptic future scenario.

---

4️⃣ Guilt by association

“If Kéri says this, then Tisza would do it.”

🔹 Technique: projecting indirect responsibility
🔹 False logic:
– no official position
– no mandate
– no party program document
→ yet it’s charged to the party’s political account.

👉 That’s how you manufacture an opponent’s ‘program’ without evidence.

---

5️⃣ Fear-based final takeaway

The narrative lands on:

“Tisza = taking away pensions, anti-family, welfare dependency”

🔹 Technique: emotional blackmail
🔹 Target:
– pensioners
– families
– young people, turned against each other

👉 Not a debate—an alarm bell.

---

🎯 Summary — what’s really happening?

This text isn’t really about László Kéri, and it isn’t really about Tisza either. It’s about:

• attaching pre-manufactured fears to a new political actor
• without evidence
• wrapped in humor
• hidden behind deniability

While avoiding discussion of the governing side’s own long-unchanged decisions (economy, pensions, family policy).

👉 A classic propaganda punchline could go here, but this is enough:

This isn’t analysis. It’s preemptive character assassination.

We’re all going to prison, because “Maidan Peti” has decided that only what he allows may be talked about. For example, it’s forbidden to talk about their tax-related plans, because that would be uncomfortable for him. And then, I suppose, little by little, everyone else will follow too—anyone who doesn’t lick his statue every morning on the city’s main square.

But one thing is certain: if Petike were prime minister, life in prison would be much better than life in Hungary.

Péter Magyar has announced one of his main election programs, namely that after April 12 we will all be going to prison. Because “Maidan Petike” came up with the idea that he will not only jail Viktor Orbán, the members of the Hungarian government, and Fidesz politicians, but also those journalists who reported on the more than 600-page document that contains their austerity package.

So this is more or less what the Tisza-style “country of love,” press freedom, and European values look like—right? Well, actually, European values really are exactly like this nowadays. In great Germany, voices that even slightly support the AfD are being suppressed, and one of the largest opposition parties is being barred from running.

So in fact, Péter Magyar is simply following the European mainstream: if you report on reality, or God forbid you dare to write something critical about the opposition’s messiah, or you voice anti-war opinions, that’s considered dangerous. And the people who do this, well, they have to be put in prison. That will be the great rule of law.

Tisza supporters will be very happy about this—except that the situation is that we will be living in a country where you, dear Tisza supporters, will have to produce all the tax revenue that we’ll be living off while sitting in prison. Just saying.

By the way, this “Maidan Petike” is incredibly stupid. Really stupid. Because there won’t be a single journalist left at liberty in Hungary. And the reason is that 444 and Telex also reported on this austerity package. Sure, from the very beginning they framed it as propaganda and a big lie—but regardless, it still appeared on their portals. So technically, we can say they also promoted the whole thing, which means they’ll go to prison too, along with the people from HVG.

And what about non-journalists? What about influencers who reported on it? There are plenty of them as well. Is there even enough prison capacity in Hungary for all this?

We can joke about it, but “Maidan Petike” is not joking at all. Just look at what happened with Bors. Simply because it talked about exactly this.

Let’s have no illusions: these are bloodthirsty, disgusting communists whose only goal is to silence those who disagree with them. So-called democrats.

Believe me, dear Tisza supporters, you don’t want to live in a country like this either. First we’ll be here, then they’ll throw us in prison, and then they’ll tax you like animals. You’ll be slaving away for the rest of your lives, and you’ll have no freedom left. You can sell your Teslas and your duplex houses. A damn miserable life awaits you too. We warned you in advance.

But let’s joke a bit in the end: if Péter Magyar comes to power in Hungary, we’ll be much better off in prison. We won’t have to pay for heating, we won’t have to buy food at outrageous prices. Plus, our friends will be there too.

And yes, we’ll finally be living indoors.

🎭 Central Narrative

“If Péter Magyar comes to power, dictatorship, prison, repression, and misery will follow.”

This is not a factual claim, but an apocalyptic future vision whose purpose is:

• fear-mongering
• moral demonization of the opponent
• shutting down critical thinking

---

1️⃣ Apocalyptic exaggeration (“we’ll all go to prison”)

“…after April 12, we will all go to prison.”

🔹 Technique: catastrophe framing
🔹 Effect: existential fear
🔹 Trick:

• no law cited
• no quotation
• no concrete statement

→ yet it is presented as a certain future

👉 This is classic panic-mongering, not analysis.

---

2️⃣ Enemy construction + mocking infantilization

“Maidan Petike,” “so incredibly stupid”

🔹 Technique: personal humiliation (ad hominem)
🔹 Goal:

• to present Péter Magyar not as a political actor,
• but as a ridiculous and dangerous figure

👉 If we ridicule him, there’s no need to refute him.

---

3️⃣ Inversion of free speech (projection)

“…only what he allows can be talked about”

🔹 Technique: projection
🔹 Essence:

• criticism of current media conditions
• is preemptively projected onto the opponent

👉 What the speaker actually fears is used as a preemptive accusation.

---

4️⃣ “Rule of law = communist dictatorship” narrative

“bloodthirsty, disgusting communists”

🔹 Technique: moral demonization
🔹 Effect:

• the opponent is dehumanized,
• anything becomes permissible against them

👉 Dehumanizing language is always dangerous.

---

5️⃣ Manipulation of external examples (Germany, AfD)

“In Germany, AfD is being suppressed”

🔹 Technique: false analogy
🔹 Affected entity: Alternative für Deutschland

🔹 Trick:

• conflates legal procedures
• with the claim that “opinions are being banned”

👉 A complex legal issue is turned into a simple horror story.

---

6️⃣ Involving the press as “criminals”

“444, Telex, HVG will also go to prison”

🔹 Technique: collective intimidation
🔹 Affected media outlets:

• 444
• Telex
• HVG

👉 An absurd exaggeration, but psychologically effective:
“if even they would be jailed, then anyone could be.”

---

7️⃣ “We warned you” – self-absolution

“We warned you.”

🔹 Technique: prophetic self-justification
🔹 Goal:

• so that whatever happens later appears to confirm the claim,
• even if it never actually occurs

---

8️⃣ Cynical “joking” → normalization

“life will be better in prison”

🔹 Technique: threat masked as humor
🔹 Effect:

• the idea of dictatorship becomes trivialized
• fear is made “funny,” and therefore easier to accept

---

🧠 Summary – what is really happening?

This text:

❌ does not provide evidence
❌ does not quote sources
❌ does not analyze

✅ creates fear
✅ generates hatred
✅ manufactures an enemy image

👉 It is not information — it is emotional mobilization.

“So, if Péter Magyar’s people come to power and we submit to everything Ursula and her circle say from Brussels, then among other things we would be investing 1.3 million forints per family into Ukraine. That’s what it would cost Hungarians if we agreed to the demand Ukraine submitted to Ursula’s people. This is that 800-billion-dollar financing program, with which we could play the good guys and with which the European Union’s member states would rebuild a country that isn’t even part of the EU and has nothing to do with it.

No words are needed — she is one of Hungary’s shames.

🤢 Hadházy has done it again — once again revealing the tasteless, lowbrow side of himself that gets irritated whenever others have standards. What really bothers Hadházy is when someone else chooses to spend their own money the way they want — say, on a nice watch or a beautiful bag. But someone really should explain to Hadházy that, first of all, good taste is not a matter of money, and second, he himself could also buy nice things from the tens of millions of forints he has earned over just the past four years as a so-called “member of parliament.”

Péter Hajdu responded to Ákos Hadházy, who recently posted about a TV host starting a Bohár Dániel interview while wearing a Rolex worth several million forints. You know how much I dislike it when someone rummages through another person’s wallet. I find it extremely tasteless to run a campaign based on who owns what kind of bag or what clothes they wear. This is nothing more than crude rabble-rousing, and Ákos Hadházy is particularly good at it.

But the problem is that this is not what Ákos Hadházy’s job should be. Ákos Hadházy is a member of parliament who recently announced that he is running again and once more asking for the support of the people of Zugló — and now also Erzsébetváros — to represent them in parliament. Except that even now, he is not representing those he is supposed to represent.

Péter Hajdu also pointed out in his video that in 2025, Ákos Hadházy has not spoken once in parliament — despite the fact that this is literally his job, the one for which he receives a very substantial salary. His parliamentary remuneration is easy to calculate, since the data is public, and it clearly shows that over these four years, he earned close to 100 million forints from this very job — a job he did not do, given that he spoke in parliament only twice during those four years. And that doesn’t even include the profits from his highly successful veterinary clinic in Szekszárd.

So Ákos Hadházy has money — plenty of it — yet he chooses to campaign by criticizing how others spend their money: on watches, bags, coats, and clothes. He does all this while receiving a salary for work he does not perform. There is a serious problem with the mindset of those who believe that a member of parliament’s only job is to post on Facebook and stir up resentment against others, rather than actually achieving something for the people they represent.

For example, working to make life better in Zugló, or now in Erzsébetváros; improving the living environment; or at the very least assessing what the people who live there actually need. But no — Ákos Hadházy has repeatedly proven himself completely incapable of this. And now he is asking his followers to transfer money to him because he is running in the election and therefore “needs funds.”

Well, no — that’s a bit disgusting.

So it’s not my job to defend Péter Hajdu, but in this case, I think he is largely right. Péter Hajdu should host shows, and Ákos Hadházy should become a private investigator or look for some other job — because he is completely unfit for the role of a member of parliament.

1️⃣ “I don’t like looking into other people’s wallets” – False moral high ground

“I really don’t like it when someone looks into another person’s wallet…”

🔹 Technique: performative neutrality
🔹 Function:
The speaker claims moral distance from wealth-shaming, then immediately builds the entire argument on it.

👉 Contradiction:
While condemning “judging luxury items,” the text spends the rest of the speech listing incomes, salaries, businesses, and profits.

---

2️⃣ “Proli-hergelés” – Class contempt framing

“This is simple rabble-rousing, and Hadházy is very good at it.”

🔹 Technique:

• elitist language
• delegitimizing public criticism as “low-class agitation”

👉 Effect:
Public concern about corruption or conflicts of interest is reframed as vulgar jealousy, not civic oversight.

---

3️⃣ “That’s not his job” – Role policing

🔹 Claim:
An MP’s job is not to expose corruption, but to behave “properly.”

🔹 Technique:
Redefining political responsibility to exclude:

• investigations
• whistleblowing
• public accountability

👉 Reality:
In democratic systems, oversight and exposure are core parliamentary functions, not deviations.

---

4️⃣ “He didn’t speak in Parliament” – Selective performance metrics

“In 2025 he didn’t speak once in Parliament…”

🔹 Technique:
Cherry-picked indicators of “work”
🔹 What’s omitted:

• committee work
• investigations
• parliamentary questions
• reports, complaints, legal actions

👉 Manipulation:
Political activity is reduced to microphone time, because that is the easiest metric to weaponize.

---

5️⃣ Salary arithmetic – Resentment engineering

“Nearly 100 million forints in four years…”

🔹 Technique:

• raw numbers without context
• moral shock framing

👉 Goal:
To turn voters against an opposition MP by provoking financial resentment, not policy disagreement.

---

6️⃣ Private business attack – Double standard

“…and we haven’t even talked about his profitable veterinary clinic.”

🔹 Technique:
Weaponizing private income only when it belongs to an opponent

👉 Contrast:
Pro-government figures’ wealth is framed as:

• success
• merit
• private matter

Opposition wealth = hypocrisy.

---

7️⃣ “He begs for donations” – Delegitimizing grassroots funding

🔹 Technique:
Reframing voluntary political donations as:

• begging
• immorality
• personal enrichment

👉 Irony:
Grassroots funding is attacked precisely because it bypasses state-aligned financial structures.

---

8️⃣ Final insult – Occupational humiliation

“He should become a private detective or find another job.”

🔹 Technique:

• ridicule
• deprofessionalization
• symbolic expulsion from politics

👉 Purpose:
To signal that certain types of opposition behavior should not exist in politics at all.

---

🧠 Overall pattern – what is this really about?

This text is not a defense of ethics or parliamentary standards. It is about:

• shifting attention away from corruption questions (Rolex, interviews, power proximity),
• reframing oversight as harassment,
• redefining “real political work” to exclude accountability,
• and portraying opposition figures as lazy, greedy, and socially illegitimate.

👉 Classic propaganda move:
When you can’t refute the question, destroy the questioner.

😤 I am always astonished by the kind of people who make up that so-called “other side,” with whom we stand in complete political opposition. But it now seems we have reached a point where it is no longer only our political views that separate us, but also our way of life and our behavior.
Of course, this is not necessarily true of everyone who openly identifies as anti-Fidesz; among them there are people who are capable of thinking and, in some cases, even of being reasonable debate partners. And that is a good thing.

The problem, however, is that there exists a massive group of people who are least objectionable to me not because we stand on different political platforms. For example, I am now reading the news that those Hadházy supporters who, back when the weather was nicer, gathered in relatively larger numbers to shout weekly across Ferenciek Square under the leadership of our country’s “zebra commissioner,” will now have to pay—quite literally—for blasphemy.

Four people were fined for entering the church located at Ferenciek Square during one of Ákos Hadházy’s demonstrations last September. During the protest, while speeches were being delivered, the church bells rang continuously for 17 minutes, and several protesters entered the church through its main gate to demonstrate. These four individuals were charged with violating the right to freedom of religion and were fined. According to the newspaper, proceedings for disorderly conduct are ongoing against three other individuals.

And here I could also include all those who, assigned to the pages of right-wing content creators, engage daily in smearing, slander, and threats while hiding behind the safe protection of the virtual world. You see, these people—who engage in filth, blasphemy, slander, and threats against our children—are still our fellow citizens. We live together in this wonderful country; in the best case, we build it together and keep it running together, both during campaign periods and beyond.

Until now, we merely disagreed. But encouraged by the leader of Tisza, these people now want our blood, because in their view we deserve retribution. Yet disagreement does not mean that one must destroy the other, nor does it mean humiliating God’s house with a vulgar protest. There should be a minimum standard, a basic line, of what we do not do to one another, what we do not wish upon our fellow citizens.

I sincerely hope that at least some of these people will, after April, reflect even slightly on what they have done over the past year and a half, whether in reality or in the virtual world. And those who do not will at least be a little less proud of having wanted to spill Hungarian blood as Hungarians.
Only 91 days left.

---

This is not a moral stance, but the manufacturing of an enemy image.

1️⃣ Construction of moral superiority

The author begins by making an “exception” (“not everyone is like this”), then immediately proceeds to collectively stigmatize an entire political side.
👉 This is classic “sensible us vs. immoral them” framing.

2️⃣ Instrumentalization of religion

A specific legal case—linked to one of Ákos Hadházy’s demonstrations—is presented as a civilizational attack.
The church at Ferenciek Square is not treated as a religious space, but as a political bludgeon.

👉 The concern is not freedom of religion, but symbolic outrage.

3️⃣ Deliberate emotional escalation

The text progresses step by step:

• “unpleasant”
• “blasphemers”
• “slanderers”
• “they threaten our children”
• “they want our blood”

👉 This is not description; it is a chain designed to inflame emotions.

4️⃣ Presumption of guilt and collective responsibility

From the actions of a handful of individuals, an entire political community is declared guilty.
This is not rule-of-law thinking, but mass-psychological incitement.

5️⃣ Veiled threat at the end

“Only 91 days left.”
This is not hope, but campaign-level intimidation:
👉 you may speak now, but judgment is coming.

---

Short, publishable summary

This is not public debate; it is propaganda.
The text uses religion, legal cases, and isolated incidents to morally dehumanize a political community and then present it as a collective threat.
The “we are peaceful – they want blood” narrative is not about social coexistence, but about fear-mongering and mobilization.
This is the point where political communication crosses the boundary of civilized debate.

today 2026.01.09…

Good morning everyone, covered in beautiful snow!
Have you read that Trump wrote a letter to Viktor Orbán? That’s pretty cool, isn’t it? Especially since the President of the United States may soon visit our small country.
(Warning: intense cult-like excitement expected!!!) 💪🇭🇺🇺🇸

---

Dear Mr. Prime Minister,

Thank you for your thoughtful letter and for the friendly sentiments you shared regarding our most recent meeting at the White House. It was a pleasure to host you and your delegation as we celebrated the golden age of U.S.–Hungarian relations together.

I look forward to further deepening our cooperation in the areas of defense, energy, and illegal migration.

Your firm leadership serves as an example to the rest of the world. You have always stood resolutely in defense of the principles that make Hungary such a great place—faith, family, and sovereignty. America greatly appreciates this kind of courage.

I am grateful for your invitation to visit Hungary. My team will be in touch regarding scheduling. Once again, thank you for your friendship and support. I also wish you great success in the Hungarian election campaign.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Trump
President of the United States of America