MEANWHILE 🎯
Imréné Kusovszky, a member of the Council of Seniors. 👵
A long-time active retiree who—also due to “workplace exposure”—believes strictly in numbers and facts. 🔢📈
She worked her whole life and now actively follows every government and opposition move that affects pensioners. 👀🏛️
Follow
Recommended post
It’s not Bors that should be banned, Peti.
What should be banned is the TISZA tax and the TISZA austerity package!
Or perhaps Zoltán Tarr as well…Anti-war rally, Szeged.
– It’s not Bors that should be banned, Peti. The Tisza tax and the Tisza austerity package should be banned. But if you absolutely insist on banning someone, then ban Zoltán Tarr! He’s the one who said that after the election, anything goes—and that if everything is said out loud, you’ll collapse. Ban Zoltán Tarr!
“We’re rubbing pepper under Péter Magyar’s nose: everyone has the right to know about the Tisza party’s tax-increase plans!”
❗ Major interview on Index: about Budapest’s untapped potential, the behind-the-scenes deals of Gergely Karácsony and Péter Magyar, government developments, and metropolitan and national poli… See more
Alexandra Szentkirályi:
That certain ring was kissed on Péter Magyar’s hand
(0:00) What was the book burning like in Brussels?
(0:02) Oh, it’s indescribable. I’d only ever seen something like that on TV before.
(0:06) It was as if you’d stepped into a war movie.
(0:08) The police practically appeared among us without any prior warning or announcement,
(0:14) and crowd dispersal began immediately. They were hitting and beating anyone they could reach.
(0:18) What would happen if, in 2026, Péter Magyar were prime minister and a Tisza majority formed the government?
(0:23) Immediately,
(0:28) we would give up a very small piece of sovereignty.
(0:28) We saw this giving up of a small piece of sovereignty in Brussels; we experienced their democracy.
(0:33) How do you think this would affect farmers?
(0:36) They would cut our budget by nearly 186 billion, and almost the same amount—
(0:41) in fact a bit more, 100 billion—
they want to give to Ukraine as support.
(0:45) And then they say this has nothing to do with each other.
(0:47) If I take money away from one place as a baseline and give it to another,
(0:50) especially to a non-EU member, then of course it does have something to do with it.
“The liberal-left media keeps shouting that we have stolen everything. In contrast, over the past 15 years Hungary’s public assets have grown enormously. Without any chest-beating, we can say that we have something to be proud of.”
(0:00) Which one would you choose?
(0:03) The answer seems obvious, but in Brussels they decided that this is what you must choose.
(0:09) This is because the European Parliament would, through an unlawful resolution, ban all member states from purchasing Russian gas and oil.
(0:16) For Hungary, this would mean the end of the utility cost reduction scheme.
(0:20) If it were up to Brussels, the utility costs of every Hungarian household could rise to as much as three times their current level.
(0:25) At the vote, representatives of Fidesz fought to protect the low utility prices that safeguard Hungarian families.
(0:32) Representatives of the Tisza Party, however, chose the most cowardly path: they sneaked away and did not even take part in the vote, because they cannot vote against Brussels’ plans.
(0:41) If it were up to them, would they let Brussels wipe out cheap utilities in Hungary with a single stroke of the pen?
(0:47) Does such a Hungarian person really exist who would want this?
(0:50) Yes: Bód and Krisztina.
Short answer: it’s a classic propaganda and psychological conditioning trick, not information.
The video opens with:
“Which one would you choose?”
You see two prices:
Your brain reacts instantly:
“Obviously the cheaper one.”
➡️ This is not reasoning — it’s an automatic reflex.
That instinctive choice is then emotionally transferred onto a political issue:
The implied message is:
“If you don’t support us, you want the 600 HUF option.”
⚠️ This is emotionally effective but logically false.
The real topic is complex:
Instead, it’s reduced to a supermarket-style choice between two bottles of water, so the viewer:
The video claims:
“The European Parliament would, through an unlawful resolution, ban all member states from buying Russian gas and oil.”
In reality:
➡️ This is political narrative, not legal fact.
At the end:
“Yes: Bódos Krisztina.”
This is a textbook scapegoating technique:
The 200 vs. 600 HUF water is not evidence — it’s an emotional lure designed to steer viewers toward a pre-selected political conclusion.
Comment Control and Cult Behavior in Hungarian Politics
Dezse-Zelenka Dóra, journalist
Unfortunately, we had to restrict comments again. You know how it goes: if we dare write anything negative about Péter, they immediately fire up the sect, who can hardly wait to defend their beloved leader from the nasty, evil publicists. The same faces comment everywhere — it’s a very funny phenomenon 😀
So I’m waiting for sensible comments from my dear followers, and if you’re not following yet, make sure you do ❤️❤️
How much has the NER cost us?
This is the question raised by journalist Dénes Csurgó, who then went on to write a comprehensive article about it. If you liked this video, you’ll like the article it’s based on as well — the link can be found in the comments.
🎥 Luca Krajnyák / Telex
“After the election, anything goes.” This is TISZA.
In their view, Hungarians are pigs waiting to be slaughtered. And if it’s up to them, the knife is coming — that is, the TISZA austerity package.
Link in the comments.
