🤡 I envy the members of the Tisza camp! They learn very quickly. Just yesterday, for example, they trained themselves into “false flag operation” experts in half an hour.
They know exactly — and have been shouting it with unwavering confidence ever since — that the planned attack on the gas pipeline heading to Hungary must be fake.
It’s obviously the Russians behind it, because that’s how they want to help Viktor Orbán.
🤡 Tisza supporters are smart, they just have short memories 🤷♂️
☝️ In 2022, the Nord Stream gas pipeline was blown up by UKRAINIAN terrorists.
After the explosion, the pro-Ukrainian Western and domestic (!) media also tried to push the story that the Russians had sabotaged the pipeline.
Even though this would have been completely unrealistic, it didn’t bother liberals, since the fake news “Putin did it” perfectly reinforced the “evil Russians” vs. “poor Ukrainians” narrative.
❗️This is what they were pushing here as well — for example, 444 wrote things like this in September 2022:
📍 “A Russian submarine may have fired at the pipeline.”
📍 “Ships of the Russian navy were observed in the part of the Baltic Sea where the mysterious explosion occurred.”
☝️ Then they were badly exposed, because it turned out that their friend Zelensky was behind the explosion, pushing the German — and the entire EU — economy into the abyss.
So, I would be a bit more cautious in the place of the Tisza ‘Columbos’ 🤷♂️ Maybe they should wait for the end of the Serbian investigation!
📸 The image shows the gas leak in the Baltic Sea after the 2022 explosion.
Poor Tisza supporters will swallow anything that Péter Magyar and “journalist” agents feed them. If there were an unexpected change of government, they would just as happily applaud even triple utility prices — because that would be “good” 🤡
🧠 What is actually happening in this message?
👉 Main narrative:
- “the opponent is stupid and manipulated”
- “we see the truth”
- “they are lying (media + opposition)”
- “we are the rational side”
👉 Hidden formula:
ridicule + enemy framing + alternative “truth” + rewriting the past
→ “don’t think → laugh at them → believe us”
🔍 Influence techniques
1️⃣ Ridicule and dehumanization (ridicule framing)
👉 Example:
“🤡 I envy the Tisza camp members”
“Tisza Columbos”
👉 Technique:
- turns the opponent into a clown
- mocks them → they don’t need to be taken seriously
👉 Goal:
➡️ delegitimization (don’t even listen to them)
👉 Effect:
➡️ no debate → only contempt
2️⃣ Undermining expertise
👉 Example:
“they became experts in half an hour”
👉 Technique:
- portrays the opponent as incompetent
- doesn’t refute → just discredits
👉 Goal:
➡️ “they don’t understand → we do”
👉 Effect:
➡️ automatic rejection of criticism
3️⃣ Building an alternative narrative (counter-narrative)
👉 Example:
“the Nord Stream pipeline was blown up by Ukrainian terrorists”
👉 Technique:
- simplifies a complex, disputed issue
- presents it as a single “certain truth”
👉 Goal:
➡️ create uncertainty → then “we tell the real truth”
👉 Effect:
➡️ real complexity disappears
4️⃣ “Us vs them” (polarization)
👉 Example:
“liberals”, “pro-Ukrainian media”, “Tisza supporters”
👉 Technique:
- sharp division into opposing camps
- identity-based thinking
👉 Goal:
➡️ strengthen the in-group
👉 Effect:
➡️ arguments don’t matter → only who says them
5️⃣ Hindsight bias (“we told you so” narrative)
👉 Example:
“then it turned out that…”
👉 Technique:
- reframes past events as obvious proof
- presents uncertainty as certainty
👉 Goal:
➡️ retroactive credibility
👉 Effect:
➡️ “they are always wrong, we are always right”
6️⃣ Undermining trust in media
👉 Example:
“444 wrote things like this… then they were embarrassed”
👉 Technique:
- generalizes from one example
- discredits the entire media
👉 Goal:
➡️ build an alternative information bubble
👉 Effect:
➡️ only the “own side” remains credible
7️⃣ Conspiracy-style thinking
👉 Example:
“Magyar Péter and ‘agent’ journalists are feeding them”
👉 Technique:
- assumes hidden manipulation
- without evidence
👉 Goal:
➡️ maximize distrust
👉 Effect:
➡️ all opposing information = manipulation
8️⃣ Fear + economic threat
👉 Example:
“triple utility costs”
👉 Technique:
- concrete, painful consequence
- no evidence provided
👉 Goal:
➡️ existential fear
👉 Effect:
➡️ you don’t analyze → you react defensively
⚠️ Critical point (fact vs claim)
One of the key claims:
👉 “it was definitely Ukrainians who blew up Nord Stream”
This is not proven, not settled, and still disputed.
Multiple hypotheses exist (Russian, Ukrainian, mixed, etc.), and official investigations have not produced a clear, final conclusion.
➡️ So here:
- opinion is presented as fact
- uncertainty is omitted
🧠 Overall picture
This text is not trying to inform, but to:
👉 trigger emotional reactions:
- ridicule
- anger
- fear
👉 while:
- offering a simple story
- assigning an enemy
- creating a sense that “we are the smart ones”
💬 In short
This is a classic propaganda mix:
➡️ ridicule + polarization + fear + alternative “truth” + anti-media framing
The goal is not understanding, but:
👉 to make you choose a side — and stay there.