The Ukrainians want to seize power at any cost. Even bloodshed is not an obstacle for them. Let’s stop them!
They’ve completely lost their minds. I was reading on Reddit — it’s an important platform for this Tisza-affiliated hate sect, where they are recruiting “watchers.” If you want to do the most harm to Fidesz, you should sign up as a watcher. The role assigned to them is to travel to rural towns, and on the 12th they are supposed to identify people they believe are Fidesz supporters who are on their way to vote. These people are then to be stopped and prevented from entering polling stations. This is what Tisza’s “democracy” looks like.
What we’ve seen over the past weeks and months — the incitement, the agitation, the hysteria — is dangerous. Because on the evening of the 12th, it will become clear that Tisza has suffered a huge defeat and Fidesz will win again. And these people — they want blood, they want civil war. They want to take power by force. They have been training for this for some time. And it’s clear they are capable of it. In fact, they can hardly wait for blood to flow in the streets.
Someone must stop them in the next two weeks.
👉 Main narrative:
“Opposition/Tisza = violent, wants blood”
“Ukraine = hidden background threat”
“We (Fidesz) = protection, order”
“Election = peace vs. civil war”
👉 Underlying formula:
fear + enemy image + vision of violence + urgency
→ “if we don’t stop them → chaos will follow”
🔍 Manipulation techniques
1️⃣ Total threat framing (fear escalation / apocalyptic framing)
👉 Example:
“blood will be shed”, “they want civil war”
👉 Technique:
➡️ projecting the worst possible outcome
➡️ not a “problem,” but total collapse
👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger immediate emotional reaction (fear, panic)
👉 Effect:
➡️ rational thinking shuts down
➡️ “anything but this”
2️⃣ Demonization of the enemy (dehumanization)
👉 Example:
“they’ve gone insane”, “they want blood”, “they can’t wait”
👉 Technique:
➡️ opponent framed not as a political actor, but as a dangerous, irrational mass
➡️ suggestion of moral inferiority
👉 Goal:
➡️ justify rejection / harsh response
👉 Effect:
➡️ increased hatred and acceptance of stronger measures
3️⃣ Conspiracy framing
👉 Example:
“they are recruiting watchers”, “sending them to rural areas to block voters”
👉 Technique:
➡️ detailed story without concrete evidence
➡️ creates a sense of “secret organization”
👉 Goal:
➡️ increase perceived credibility (“too specific to be false”)
👉 Effect:
➡️ growing distrust + paranoia
4️⃣ Foreign threat amplification
👉 Example:
“Ukrainians at ANY cost”
👉 Technique:
➡️ reframing domestic politics as foreign interference
👉 Goal:
➡️ activate national fear
➡️ shift from politics → national defense
👉 Effect:
➡️ stronger emotional identification
5️⃣ False credibility + source illusion
👉 Example:
“I read it on Reddit”
👉 Technique:
➡️ weak source presented as evidence
👉 Goal:
➡️ “it’s not just me saying it—it’s out there”
👉 Effect:
➡️ reduced critical thinking
6️⃣ Urgency + mobilization
👉 Example:
“Someone must stop them in the next two weeks”
👉 Technique:
➡️ creating time pressure
➡️ forcing action
👉 Goal:
➡️ quick decision → reflex voting
👉 Effect:
➡️ no time to verify or think
7️⃣ False dilemma
👉 Hidden message:
➡️ “either us → or civil war”
👉 Technique:
➡️ eliminating all middle options
👉 Goal:
➡️ simplifying the choice
👉 Effect:
➡️ narrowed thinking
8️⃣ Projection
👉 Example:
“hate-mongering, agitation, hysteria”
👉 Technique:
➡️ projecting one’s own communication style onto the opponent
👉 Goal:
➡️ create moral superiority
👉 Effect:
➡️ audience fails to recognize manipulation
🔥 Summary (core point)
➡️ From an unproven story
➡️ a violent civil war scenario is constructed
👉 The goal of the text is not to inform, but to:
- create fear
- strengthen the enemy image
- emotionally mobilize voters
🎯 In one sentence:
👉 This is a maximum fear-based, demonizing propaganda, transforming an unverified story into an “imminent civil war” narrative to influence voters on an emotional level.