The Tisza Party and Brussels’ candidates are still doing nothing but running away. They cannot reveal their real plans!
Did you see it? A few Tisza candidates dared to step out onto the streets—then they fled as soon as journalists tried to find them to ask questions. Here in North Pest, Anna Müller doesn’t dare to face the voters. She’s one of the worst Tisza candidates out of the 106, isn’t she—she never appears anywhere we voters could meet her. And yet we have questions: about the war, immigration, austerity measures, and Ukraine’s accession to the EU. Her bosses keep saying that Ukrainians must be admitted into the Union. So what does Anna Müller think?
🔴 1️⃣ “They are fleeing” narrative – a cowardice frame without evidence
Claims:
- “they are only fleeing”
- “they don’t dare to come out”
- “they ran away”
👉 Technique: labeling behavior instead of providing evidence
❌ What they do not provide:
- a specific location
- a specific time
- any footage
- any quotation
- any unanswered question
🎯 Effect:
The voter does not ask what the program is, but instead feels:
“whoever doesn’t come out must be afraid / hiding something.”
This is emotional conditioning, not information.
🔴 2️⃣ Discrediting an individual → collective guilt
Pattern:
- “a few Tisza candidates”
- ↓
- Müller Anna
- ↓
- “they are all like this”
👉 Technique: cherry-picking + generalization
From one alleged incident they extrapolate:
- 106 candidates
- an entire party
- a complete political alternative
👉 Consequence:
There is no need to debate programs, data, or the budget.
🔴 3️⃣ “We would have questions” – a false dialogue
Key sentence:
“We would have questions about war, immigration…”
❗ Reality:
- no actual questions listed
- no invitation
- no debate format
- no verifiable event
👉 This is not dialogue, but:
“we would ask questions, but they don’t dare”
— even when no one asked anything at all.
🔴 4️⃣ “Their bosses say so” – the external control narrative
Claim:
“their bosses keep saying…”
👉 Trick:
- “Brussels” presented as a hostile actor with intent
- “bosses” → subordination
- evidence = zero
❌ There is no:
- quotation
- document
- vote
- decision
- date
🎯 Goal:
To turn political debate into a question of treason vs. obedience.
🔴 5️⃣ The biggest contradiction: “no program” vs. “secret plans”
The text contradicts itself:
- 🔹 “there is no program”
- 🔹 “they are hiding their real plans”
👉 Both cannot be true at the same time.
This is the Schrödinger program:
- it doesn’t exist
- yet it is dangerous
🎯 Its function:
Not truth, but the constant maintenance of distrust.
🧠 Overall picture – what does this text actually do?
It does not inform. It:
- generates fear
- destroys character
- preempts debate
- shifts the burden of proof
- activates emotional reflexes
👉 This is not campaigning, but psychological pressure.