Supporters of Tisza laugh while imagining Viktor Orbán being shot in the head. This is who they are — NoÁr and his associates.

They do this in light of the fact that both Donald Trump and Fico have been shot at, and Viktor Orbán and his family are being threatened with death on a daily basis by Ukrainians.

Anyone who votes for Tisza is voting for hatred. But you cannot build a nation or a homeland on hatred.

For us, Hungary is a shared passion: whoever votes for us votes for peace, security, and stable livelihoods.

In times of danger, we must all stand behind the national government. On April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice.

Members of NoÁr associated with Tisza were laughing in their show about what it would be like if Viktor Orbán were shot in the head. They were discussing where they would stand when firing. Which profile of mine would I be, I wonder? There is absolutely nothing funny about this for any person with good taste.

And it is especially not funny in light of what has happened in recent years. During the American campaign, Donald Trump was shot at, and only by chance — and by the grace of God — did he survive. Then Fico was also shot and seriously injured.

And in recent weeks, Viktor Orbán has been threatened by the Ukrainian president Zelensky, who said he would give his address to his “boys,” meaning his soldiers, so they could “have a talk” with him.

A Ukrainian lieutenant general even went so far as to threaten Viktor Orbán along with his children and grandchildren.

Such things have no place in politics — especially not in times as frightening and dangerous as the ones we are living through now.

I believe that this kind of anger, this dangerous anger, has absolutely no place anywhere near the Hungarian government — and that is exactly what Tisza would represent.

🔍 Main narrative

👉 “Tisza = violent, hate-driven side”
👉 “Orbán = threatened leader / target”
👉 “The world is dangerous → assassination attempts happen”
👉 “The election = peace vs violence”
👉 “Fidesz = security, stability, protection”

🧩 Hidden formula (very clear propaganda logic)

a selected scene / claim (“they laugh about shooting”)
→ moral outrage (“this is unacceptable”)
→ inclusion of real events (attacks on Trump and Fico)
→ emphasis on personal threat (Orbán + family)
→ generalization (“this is what they are like”)
→ existential danger (“dangerous emotions”)
→ binary choice (“they = hate / we = peace”)
→ mobilization (“stand behind us, vote”)

👉 Classic: incident → fear → moral judgment → political decision

🧠 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Fear appeal (existential threat)

👉 “Trump was shot at”, “Fico was shot at”
👉 “Orbán and his family are being threatened”

🎯 Goal:
don’t think → feel fear

💥 Effect:
the brain switches to threat mode → critical thinking decreases

2️⃣ Emotional chaining (association chaining)

👉 a humorous/tasteless scene
→ linked to real assassination attempts
→ then to Orbán’s personal danger

🎯 Goal:
everything gets categorized as violence in the viewer’s mind

3️⃣ Generalization (group labeling)

👉 “This is who they are”
👉 “Anyone who votes for Tisza votes for hate”

🎯 Goal:
reduce an entire political group to a single negative image

4️⃣ False dilemma (false binary)

👉 “hate vs peace”
👉 “Tisza vs Fidesz”

🎯 Reality:
politics is far more complex → here it is artificially simplified

5️⃣ “Protector leader” framing

👉 “stand behind the national government”
👉 “security, peace”

🎯 Goal:
power = protection
opponent = danger

6️⃣ Moral outrage trigger

👉 “there is nothing to laugh about”
👉 “unacceptable for any decent person”

🎯 Goal:
frame it not as politics → but as a moral violation

7️⃣ Enemy construction + demonization

👉 “hate”, “dangerous emotions”
👉 indirect association with violence

🎯 Effect:
the opponent is no longer political → but a threat

⚠️ What’s important

This text does not prove anything. Instead, it:

• triggers emotional reactions
• connects different events
• and suggests a conclusion from them

👉 This is not fact-based reasoning, but emotional narrative building

💥 Short, blunt evaluation

This is a textbook campaign message:

👉 fear + moral outrage + “us vs them” = votes

Its goal is not to help you decide what happened,
but to shape what you feel and who you vote for.

Supporters of Tisza have been commenting on the so-called “Tisza agent scandal,” saying “we were already missing Soros.” Well, we certainly didn’t miss him—but coming from a party where Orbán Anita sits in the same organization as little Soros, we can believe it…

But getting to the point: the case of Szabolcs Panyi is serious because until now it was only obvious—or at least suspected—by people with common sense that left-wing journalists are not paid from abroad just for their pretty eyes, but at the same time fulfill serious expectations from foreign intelligence services in order to weaken Hungary.

None of them had admitted this before; they avoided the topic like the plague. But Szabolcs Panyi was exposed by an audio recording, and then he admitted everything.

And why Soros? Let’s look at it on paper—who pays Szabolcs Panyi. He is a “journalist” at Direkt36, which is a pressure group funded from abroad. One of Direkt36’s main sources of income is funding from the Civitates Foundation. Civitates is an international funding hub—and guess who contributes money to it: the Soros Foundation, the Erste Bank foundation, and many others.

So if we strip away the makeup and reveal the financial flows hidden behind these foundations, in the end it is Soros’s dollars and Erste’s euros that land in Panyi’s account.

This globalist network has been trying to overthrow the sovereign government for over a decade—sometimes with Gordon Bajnai, sometimes with Gergely Karácsony, sometimes with Péter Márki-Zay, and now Péter Magyar is next. The difference is that this time Tisza is also receiving significant support from Ukrainian intelligence, and British intelligence is also highly active.

Because we remember: Péter Magyar was guided around Ukraine by a representative of Zelensky, an expelled Ukrainian spy from Hungary, who even called him a “friend.” We remember that in the Tisza data leak scandal, the personal data of hundreds of thousands of Hungarians was stored by Ukrainian developers.

And we remember that the autumn fake news scandal was “triggered” by agent Csaba Káncz, who is funded by British intelligence.

So before the elections in Hungary, Ukrainian services and global financial interest groups want to decide what kind of government we will have. Zelensky and Brussels want Péter Magyar, because he is their captured man who would not say no to them in anything.

But I believe that the fate of our country should be decided only by the Hungarian people. And Hungarians want peace and security—they do not want blackmail, war, soaring energy prices, or financing Ukraine.

That is why for Hungary and for every Hungarian, the safe choice is Fidesz and Viktor Orbán.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Tisza + journalists = foreign spy network”
👉 “Péter Magyar = puppet serving foreign interests”
👉 “Brussels + Ukraine + Soros = a unified background power”
👉 “Election = sovereignty vs. betrayal”
👉 “Fidesz = the only safe choice”

🧩 Hidden Formula (very clear propaganda)

a person / organization (Panyi, Tisza)
→ mention of foreign funding
→ reframing = espionage
→ merging multiple دشمنs (Soros + EU + Ukraine + British intelligence)
→ existential threat (“they will decide the election”)
→ binary choice (“us or them”)
→ political mobilization (“only Fidesz”)

👉 Classic: suggestion → merging → fear → political control

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 “Direkt36 → Civitates → Soros → Panyi → Tisza”

🎯 Goal:
no need to prove anything → just draw a chain of connections

💥 Effect:
👉 “if money comes from abroad → then they are spies”

2️⃣ Conspiracy stacking

👉 Soros + Erste + EU + Ukraine + British intelligence

🎯 Goal:
create an all-powerful enemy image

💥 Effect:
👉 “everything is controlled by the same network”

3️⃣ Presenting unproven claims as facts

👉 “he admitted it”
👉 “a recording exposed him”
👉 “a Ukrainian spy guided him”

🎯 Goal:
turn questions → into facts

💥 Effect:
👉 the reader stops questioning and accepts it

4️⃣ Enemy coalition building

👉 “Brussels + Zelensky + intelligence services”

🎯 Goal:
create a strong “them” bloc

💥 Effect:
👉 simplified worldview: “everyone is against us”

5️⃣ Existential threat (fear framing)

👉 “they will decide the election”
👉 “Hungary’s fate is at risk”

🎯 Goal:
don’t think → react

💥 Effect:
👉 anxiety → political loyalty

6️⃣ False causality

👉 foundation funding → journalist → espionage

🎯 Reality:
this is not a proven cause-effect relationship

💥 Effect:
👉 “it sounds logical → therefore it must be true”

7️⃣ Repetition + “we remember” technique

👉 repeated “we remember…”

🎯 Goal:
turn assumptions → into collective memory

💥 Effect:
👉 “if we remember it, it must have happened”

8️⃣ Moral panic

👉 “data being handed over”
👉 “foreign actors deciding for us”

🎯 Goal:
create moral shock

💥 Effect:
👉 “this is not politics anymore, this is betrayal”

9️⃣ Binary worldview (false dilemma)

👉 “Fidesz = security”
👉 “Tisza = chaos / spies”

🎯 Goal:
eliminate all middle options

💥 Effect:
👉 voting becomes a forced choice

🔟 Activation of national identity

👉 “only Hungarians can decide”

🎯 Goal:
emotional identification

💥 Effect:
👉 anyone choosing differently → “not truly Hungarian”

⚠️ Why is this so powerful (and dangerous)?

👉 It’s not based on a single claim
👉 but on layered manipulation techniques built on top of each other

This text simultaneously:

• constructs a conspiracy
• defines an enemy
• creates fear
• delivers a moral judgment
• and dictates a political choice

👉 This is no longer simple campaigning → it is full-scale reality framing

🎯 In short (brutally condensed)

👉 “foreign money → spies → betrayal → danger → only we can protect you”

They were shouting in an unacceptable manner at Viktor Orbán’s rally in Kecskemét.
The contrast couldn’t be clearer: they only want to destroy, while we want to build. They are held together by anger and hatred, while we are united by our love for our country. Tisza supporters are no longer raging only on social media, but also at our pro-peace gatherings.
We will not let ourselves be provoked—we are the peaceful majority, and on April 12 we will win! Because only Fidesz is the safe choice.

“Dirty Fidesz! In Kecskemét, the local Tisza guy really went all out. Did you see the footage? Dirty Fidesz! Tisza is the party of peace! Dirty Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz! May Fidesz die! Drop dead!”

Yes, I saw it—they tried, in a completely unacceptable manner, to ruin our gathering where we had come together and were preparing for the elections. I think it clearly shows the difference between the two sides. We focus on ourselves, on positive things—on what holds us together and what challenges lie ahead.
They, on the other hand, come there and try to spoil things. But as the footage shows, they didn’t succeed. The atmosphere was fantastic.

That is precisely why such people cannot be entrusted with governing the country—people who take pleasure in ruining others’ achievements. In my view, these people are incapable of building anything; they can only destroy, even if they were in government.

🔍 Core Narrative

👉 “We = peaceful, constructive, patriotic majority”
👉 “They (Tisza) = aggressive, hateful, destructive minority”
👉 “The difference is obvious → therefore only Fidesz is a viable choice”

👉 This is classic:
incident → emotional amplification → moral judgment → political conclusion

🧩 Underlying Formula

an event (shouting, protest)
→ selected extreme examples (“die”, etc.)
→ generalization (“they are like this”)
→ moral contrast (“we are good / they are bad”)
→ political conclusion (“they must not be trusted with the country”)

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Victim framing

👉 “they shouted in an unacceptable tone”
👉 “they tried to ruin it”

🎯 Goal:
– trigger empathy
– legitimize one’s own side

💥 Effect:
– the audience instinctively sides with the “attacked” party

👉 Important: it does not ask why protesters are there → it only presents them as a reaction

2️⃣ Moral polarization (good vs evil)

👉 “they destroy – we build”
👉 “they hate – we love our country”

🎯 Goal:
– create a black-and-white worldview
– simplify complex reality

💥 Effect:
– nuance disappears
– the choice becomes a moral decision

3️⃣ Demonization of the opponent

👉 “they are raging”
👉 “they are held together by hatred”
👉 “they cannot build, only destroy”

🎯 Goal:
– undermine the opponent’s legitimacy and humanity

💥 Effect:
– not a political opponent → but a dangerous group

4️⃣ Generalizing from extremes

👉 quoting extreme chants (“die”, etc.)

🎯 Goal:
– project the most extreme elements onto the whole group

💥 Effect:
– creates the impression that “all of them are like this”

👉 Classic distortion:
extreme case → entire group characterization

5️⃣ “We are the majority” framing (bandwagon)

👉 “we are the peaceful majority”

🎯 Goal:
– create social pressure
– “belong to this group”

💥 Effect:
– people tend to align with the perceived winning side

6️⃣ Provocation immunization

👉 “we won’t be provoked”
👉 “they failed to ruin it”

🎯 Goal:
– stabilize the base
– project strength and control

💥 Effect:
– reinforces followers: “we are disciplined and strong”

7️⃣ False dilemma (implicit)

👉 “they are like this → therefore they must not be trusted with the country”
👉 “only Fidesz is the safe choice”

🎯 Goal:
– eliminate alternatives

💥 Effect:
– creates the illusion that only two options exist

⚠️ What’s especially important (what you noticed)

👉 Completely missing:

– what triggered the situation
– what the protesters actually want
– what the criticism is about

👉 This is intentional.

🎯 Technique:
removal of context → pure emotional framing

🧠 Meta level (what you correctly saw)

👉 “posing in a victim role”

That’s accurate.

The structure:

– present provocation
– position own side as victim
– build moral superiority
– convert into political gain

👉 This is a classic political conversion pattern:
conflict → identity → vote

🎯 Summary

This text:

👉 does not describe events, but imposes an interpretation
👉 does not argue, but delivers a moral judgment
👉 does not ask questions, but shuts down thinking

👉 final message:
“they are bad → we are good → vote for us”

Brussels has made it clear that with Péter Magyar, they would immediately ban cheap Russian energy, which would effectively mean the end of utility cost reductions.

An EU pact has been concluded under which, just three days after the elections, cheap Russian oil would be completely banned from Hungary.

If anyone still had doubts about the cooperation between Zelenskyy and TISZA, they have now definitively proven that they are working together against Hungarian interests.

If their plan were to come true and they came to power, oil deliveries through the Druzhba pipeline—which guarantees Hungary’s secure and predictable supply—would never resume.

Péter Magyar would have no intention of maintaining reduced utility costs, as the energy crisis increases the value of their Shell shares every single day.

As long as the national government remains in power, we will always stand on the side of the Hungarian people and guarantee low utility costs that protect families. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

If there is no Orbán, there is no oil. Brussels, Zelenskyy, and Péter Magyar do not want cheap Russian oil.

Just three days after the elections, Brussels put the complete ban on cheap Russian oil on the agenda. This is no coincidence. They are counting on Péter Magyar—because if TISZA wins, the Druzhba pipeline will never be restarted.

This would mean that Hungary would no longer have access to cheap energy.

Péter Magyar has neither the strength nor the intention to prevent this, as the energy crisis continuously increases the value of their Shell shares.

If it were up to them, our annual utility bills could rise from 250,000 forints to as much as 1 million forints. The price of a liter of fuel would become more expensive than a bottle of average-quality wine.

The equation is clear: either TISZA and a Ukrainian oil blockade, or Viktor Orbán and cheap energy.

We stand for national interests—that is why Fidesz is the only safe choice.

1️⃣ False causal chain (distorting cause and effect)
👉 EU decision → Péter Magyar → higher utility costs → no oil
👉 Presented as if it were one single coordinated plan
🎯 Reality: these are separate processes with no proven direct link

2️⃣ Enemy coalition construction
👉 “Brussels + Zelenskyy + TISZA = common enemy”
👉 Multiple actors merged into one bloc
🎯 Goal: strengthen the “us vs them” mindset

3️⃣ Fear-mongering (existential panic)
👉 “1 million HUF utility bills”, “expensive fuel”, “no supply”
👉 Uses shocking numbers to create panic
🎯 Goal: stop thinking, trigger fear and reaction

4️⃣ False dilemma (illusion of two choices)
👉 “Either Orbán and cheap energy, or TISZA and disaster”
👉 Excludes all other possibilities
🎯 Reality: energy policy is not a binary choice

5️⃣ Leader = nation fusion
👉 “If there is no Orbán, there is no oil”
👉 Ties the country’s functioning to one person
🎯 Goal: create a leader = survival narrative

6️⃣ Assumptions presented as facts
👉 “it has been proven”, “it has been made clear”
👉 No concrete evidence behind these claims
🎯 Goal: shut down debate and exclude criticism

7️⃣ Repetition for imprinting (core propaganda tool)
👉 Same claim repeated in different forms:

• no cheap energy
• no Druzhba pipeline
• no utility price cuts
  🎯 Goal: repetition → feeling of truth

8️⃣ Economic oversimplification
👉 Energy prices = result of a single political decision
🎯 Reality: global markets, infrastructure, EU rules, and companies → complex system

9️⃣ Scapegoating
👉 Péter Magyar framed as the main cause of a future crisis
🎯 Goal: assign complex problems to one person

🔟 Emotional escalation + moral framing
👉 “national interest”, “betrayal”, “we will not allow it”
🎯 Goal: replace rational debate with emotional alignment

🧠 Overall structure (very concise):
👉 EU energy policy
→ reframed as an “attack”
→ linked to domestic political actors
→ inflated into an existential threat
→ closed with a binary choice narrative

It is unacceptable that intelligence services are carrying out actions against the government in the interest of the Tisza Party and through the Tisza Party!

We have reached a crossroads: Europe is preparing for war, Ukrainians want to join the EU, and they are demanding that Hungary cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, send weapons and money to Ukraine, and join the ranks of countries at war. You will decide whether our country will have a national government or a Ukraine-friendly government supported by Brussels. Hungary cannot be blackmailed or humiliated. It is unacceptable that intelligence services are carrying out actions against the government in the interest of the Tisza Party and through the Tisza Party! We stand before a historic responsibility, therefore we must achieve a historic victory! Hungary cannot be blackmailed or humiliated!

Yesterday, the Tisza agent scandal erupted. It was revealed that Péter Magyar and his circle are cooperating with spies disguised as journalists, who are supported by intelligence services working against Hungary. The Tisza Party and foreign spies are jointly laying the foundations of a Ukraine-friendly foreign ministry. Brussels and Zelensky want an agent government in Hungary. But Hungarians want a national government! We will not allow it!

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Tisza = a spy network backed by intelligence services”
👉 “Péter Magyar = serving foreign interests”
👉 “Brussels + Ukraine = a pressure-exerting background power”
👉 “Europe is drifting toward war”
👉 “Fidesz = national protection / the only alternative”
👉 “The election = a historic turning point”

🧩 Hidden Formula (very clear propaganda logic)

an unproven claim (“spies, intelligence services”)
→ presented as fact (“it has been revealed”)
→ external enemies (Brussels, Ukraine, intelligence services)
→ internal traitors (Tisza)
→ existential threat (“war”, “loss of sovereignty”)
→ binary choice (“national vs pro-Ukraine government”)
→ mobilization (“we must achieve a historic victory”)

👉 Classic: accusation → presented as fact → fear → electoral message

🧠 Influence Techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Repetition (mantra technique)

👉 “Unacceptable…” repeated multiple times

Goal: imprint an emotional reaction
Effect: you don’t think—you just feel “this is wrong”

2️⃣ Enemy Construction (external + internal combined)

👉 external: “Brussels”, “Ukraine”, “intelligence services”
👉 internal: “Tisza”

Goal: simplify a complex world
Effect: everything can be traced back to one “enemy coalition”

3️⃣ Conspiracy Framing

👉 “intelligence services operating through Tisza”

Goal: create the sense of a hidden network
Effect: anything fits → no proof required

4️⃣ Fear Appeal (war narrative)

👉 “Europe is preparing for war”
👉 “we must send weapons and money”

Goal: create an existential threat
Effect: irrational decisions → gravitating toward “security”

5️⃣ False Dilemma (binary framing)

👉 “national government” vs “pro-Ukraine government”

Goal: eliminate all middle options
Effect: narrow the perceived choice

6️⃣ National Sovereignty Trigger

👉 “Hungary cannot be blackmailed”

Goal: activate identity
Effect: criticism = attack on the nation

7️⃣ “Historic Moment” Amplification

👉 “historic responsibility”
👉 “historic victory”

Goal: maximize perceived importance
Effect: urgency + emotional escalation

8️⃣ “It has been revealed” = false evidencing

👉 “It has been revealed that…” (without proof)

Goal: shut down debate
Effect: accepted as fact by the audience

9️⃣ Moral Panic

👉 “spies”, “betrayal”, “agent government”

Goal: generate outrage
Effect: emotion overrides rational thinking

🔟 Total Mobilization

👉 “We will not allow it!”
👉 “We must win!”

Goal: activate political action
Effect: creates a sense of collective struggle

⚠️ Why this text is powerful

This is not just simple propaganda—it’s a complete narrative system:

• there is an enemy (external + internal)
• there is a threat (war)
• there is betrayal (spies)
• there is identity (the nation)
• there is a mission (historic victory)

👉 Together: a full psychological framework

💣 In short (essence)

This text is not meant to inform. It aims to:

👉 create fear
👉 define an enemy
👉 simplify the choice
👉 and mobilize voters

❗️The Tisza “agent scandal” has caused a huge uproar. ❗️
They have admitted that Péter Magyar and his circle are cooperating with spies posing as journalists, who are supported by intelligence services working against Hungary.

Tisza and foreign spies are jointly laying the foundations of a pro-Ukraine Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the involvement of Anita Orbán.

Brussels and Zelensky want an agent government in Hungary.
But Hungarians want a national government! We will not allow this!

Good morning, Szandra! What are you doing, what are you preparing for? A committee meeting—but there is something much more important that broke yesterday.

The Tisza Party has been exposed: they teamed up with someone posing as a journalist—who is in fact a spy/agent—and together they would effectively hand Hungary over to foreign powers. This is because the Tisza Party is preparing to establish a Ukraine-friendly “agent government.”

And this is exactly what we must not allow. I believe Hungarians want a government that represents Hungarian national interests at the head of the country—not an agent government directed from Ukraine.

🔍 Main narrative

👉 “Tisza = foreign spy network”
👉 “Péter Magyar’s circle = treason”
👉 “Brussels + Zelensky = background power”
👉 “The election = nation vs foreign control”
👉 “Fidesz = protection / the only option”

🧩 Hidden formula (very clear propaganda logic)

an unproven claim
→ presented as fact (“they admitted it”, “they were exposed”)
→ external enemy (intelligence services, Ukraine, Brussels)
→ internal traitors (Tisza)
→ existential threat (“they would hand over the country”)
→ binary choice (“us vs them”)
→ mobilization (“we will not allow it”)

👉 This is classic: accusation → turned into fact → panic → electoral message

🧠 Influence techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Labeling + demonization

“spies”, “agents”, “traitors”

👉 Goal:
not a political opponent → a national security threat

👉 Effect:
not a debate → moral rejection

2️⃣ Illusion of proof (core element of the lie)

“they admitted it”, “they were exposed”

👉 Reality: not proven
👉 Communication: presented as established fact

👉 Effect:
the audience doesn’t question → automatically believes it

3️⃣ Building a conspiracy network

Brussels + Zelensky + intelligence services + journalists + Tisza

👉 Goal:
a massive, all-encompassing enemy image

👉 Effect:
➡️ everything becomes connected
➡️ sense of threat increases

4️⃣ External enemy + internal traitor combo

👉 One of the strongest propaganda formulas

external: “Ukraine”, “Brussels”
internal: “Tisza”

👉 Effect:
➡️ “the country is under siege” feeling
➡️ internal opponent = traitor

5️⃣ Fear appeal (existential level)

“they would hand over Hungary”

👉 Not a concrete threat
👉 but a vision of total collapse

👉 Effect:
➡️ irrational decisions
➡️ defensive reflex

6️⃣ False dilemma (binary framing)

“national government vs Ukrainian agent government”

👉 No middle ground

👉 Effect:
➡️ oversimplifies the choice
➡️ “if not us → then betrayal”

7️⃣ Projection (very important)

👉 What they claim:

“serving foreign interests”
“handing over the country”

👉 This is often exactly the accusation
others make about them

👉 Effect:
➡️ confusion
➡️ narrative reversal

8️⃣ Patriotic framing

“the Hungarian people want a national government”

👉 implicit message:

if you’re not with them → you’re not “Hungarian”

👉 Effect:
➡️ identity pressure
➡️ exclusion

9️⃣ Propaganda disguised as conversation

“Good morning, Szandra!”

👉 Goal:
informality → sense of authenticity

👉 Reality:
a scripted political message

🔟 Repetition (key!)

Same pattern as in previous texts:

spies
Tisza
Brussels
treason
nation

👉 This is deliberate:
➡️ repetition = it gets embedded in the mind

⚠️ Overall picture

This is no longer simple campaigning, but:

👉 full reality distortion + emotional manipulation

Main goal:

don’t think
don’t verify
feel (fear + anger)
and choose

🎯 In short (essence)

👉 This communication is not about what is true
👉 it is about:

who the enemy is
who to hate
who to vote for