Brussels has made it clear that with Péter Magyar, they would immediately ban cheap Russian energy, which would effectively mean the end of utility cost reductions.
An EU pact has been concluded under which, just three days after the elections, cheap Russian oil would be completely banned from Hungary.
If anyone still had doubts about the cooperation between Zelenskyy and TISZA, they have now definitively proven that they are working together against Hungarian interests.
If their plan were to come true and they came to power, oil deliveries through the Druzhba pipeline—which guarantees Hungary’s secure and predictable supply—would never resume.
Péter Magyar would have no intention of maintaining reduced utility costs, as the energy crisis increases the value of their Shell shares every single day.
As long as the national government remains in power, we will always stand on the side of the Hungarian people and guarantee low utility costs that protect families. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.
If there is no Orbán, there is no oil. Brussels, Zelenskyy, and Péter Magyar do not want cheap Russian oil.
Just three days after the elections, Brussels put the complete ban on cheap Russian oil on the agenda. This is no coincidence. They are counting on Péter Magyar—because if TISZA wins, the Druzhba pipeline will never be restarted.
This would mean that Hungary would no longer have access to cheap energy.
Péter Magyar has neither the strength nor the intention to prevent this, as the energy crisis continuously increases the value of their Shell shares.
If it were up to them, our annual utility bills could rise from 250,000 forints to as much as 1 million forints. The price of a liter of fuel would become more expensive than a bottle of average-quality wine.
The equation is clear: either TISZA and a Ukrainian oil blockade, or Viktor Orbán and cheap energy.
We stand for national interests—that is why Fidesz is the only safe choice.
1️⃣ False causal chain (distorting cause and effect)
👉 EU decision → Péter Magyar → higher utility costs → no oil
👉 Presented as if it were one single coordinated plan
🎯 Reality: these are separate processes with no proven direct link
2️⃣ Enemy coalition construction
👉 “Brussels + Zelenskyy + TISZA = common enemy”
👉 Multiple actors merged into one bloc
🎯 Goal: strengthen the “us vs them” mindset
3️⃣ Fear-mongering (existential panic)
👉 “1 million HUF utility bills”, “expensive fuel”, “no supply”
👉 Uses shocking numbers to create panic
🎯 Goal: stop thinking, trigger fear and reaction
4️⃣ False dilemma (illusion of two choices)
👉 “Either Orbán and cheap energy, or TISZA and disaster”
👉 Excludes all other possibilities
🎯 Reality: energy policy is not a binary choice
5️⃣ Leader = nation fusion
👉 “If there is no Orbán, there is no oil”
👉 Ties the country’s functioning to one person
🎯 Goal: create a leader = survival narrative
6️⃣ Assumptions presented as facts
👉 “it has been proven”, “it has been made clear”
👉 No concrete evidence behind these claims
🎯 Goal: shut down debate and exclude criticism
7️⃣ Repetition for imprinting (core propaganda tool)
👉 Same claim repeated in different forms:
- no cheap energy
- no Druzhba pipeline
- no utility price cuts
🎯 Goal: repetition → feeling of truth
8️⃣ Economic oversimplification
👉 Energy prices = result of a single political decision
🎯 Reality: global markets, infrastructure, EU rules, and companies → complex system
9️⃣ Scapegoating
👉 Péter Magyar framed as the main cause of a future crisis
🎯 Goal: assign complex problems to one person
🔟 Emotional escalation + moral framing
👉 “national interest”, “betrayal”, “we will not allow it”
🎯 Goal: replace rational debate with emotional alignment
🧠 Overall structure (very concise):
👉 EU energy policy
→ reframed as an “attack”
→ linked to domestic political actors
→ inflated into an existential threat
→ closed with a binary choice narrative