‼️ Ukrainian spy scandal around Péter Magyar’s circle

The intelligence services were dealing with the two IT specialists—whom Tisza propaganda is now covering for—because, according to a report made public by the National Security Committee, the two individuals mentioned in the Direkt36 article, who worked for the Tisza Party, had also carried out work for Ukrainians.

They reportedly provided their training, had traveled to Kyiv, and were frequent visitors to the Ukrainian embassy in Budapest.

Let’s go through what happened:

In July 2025, a report was submitted to the National Media and Infocommunications Authority, stating that there was suspicion of child pornography related to the two individuals mentioned in the Direkt36 article. Following this, authorities conducted house searches, during which data storage devices and unauthorized military equipment were seized.

The police currently suspect them of illegal possession of controlled military equipment.

But what exactly is “military equipment”?

Let me explain:

In practice, this refers to surveillance devices, which were allegedly intended to be used in the interest of the Tisza Party or Ukrainians.

These individuals are currently being defended by a former employee of the National Bureau of Investigation (NNI), who has since left his career and entered politics. That’s on him…

Ukrainians are reportedly moving in and out around Tisza, and either they allow it or don’t even notice it—both are equally concerning.

In times of danger, such people must not be allowed near the helm of government. On April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice!

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main message:

• “Tisza = national security threat + Ukrainian connection + crime”
• “Fidesz = safety”

👉 Underlying formula:
fear + scandal + crime + foreign actors → “don’t take the risk”

---

🔍 Why it feels overwhelming (specifically)

1️⃣ Multiple shocking topics merged together

• “Ukrainian spy”
• “child pornography”
• “military equipment”
• “wiretapping”

👉 Technique: information overload + shock stacking
👉 Goal: prevent separate evaluation → it feels like one huge, serious case
👉 Effect: mental fatigue, disgust, anxiety

---

2️⃣ Unproven claims presented as facts

• “they worked for Ukrainians”
• “trained in Kyiv”
• “wiretapping for Tisza”

👉 Technique: assertion → presented as fact without evidence
👉 Goal: discourage questioning
👉 Reality: these are not proven within the text

---

3️⃣ Guilt by association

2 IT specialists → Tisza Party → Ukraine → “spy network”

👉 Technique: inflating a connection chain
👉 Goal: turn an individual case into a political threat
👉 Effect: “everyone is involved”

---

4️⃣ Reframing of concepts

• “military equipment” = “wiretapping devices” (assumption!)

👉 Technique: meaning expansion / suggestion
👉 Goal: make it sound more severe
👉 Problem: this is not a definition, but speculation

---

5️⃣ Fear-based conclusion

• “age of danger”
• “must not be allowed into government”

👉 Technique: existential threat + political direction
👉 Goal: emotional decision → “vote this way”

---

🧩 What is the core problem with the text?

👉 It mixes together:

• a possible criminal case
• a journalistic article
• a political party
• and a foreign country

👉 Then turns them into one single narrative, as if it were proven.

---

🧠 Why it creates a “nausea / overload” feeling

Because it simultaneously triggers:

• fear (spying, surveillance)
• disgust (child pornography)
• uncertainty (intelligence services)
• anger (foreign interference)

👉 This is deliberate emotional overstimulation

---

⚖️ In short (clear version)

👉 This is not a set of proven facts, but:

• insinuations
• connections
• a narrative amplified with heavy wording

👉 Goal:
not to inform, but to influence

Right now, Hungarians are paying the lowest utility costs in Europe, and our fuel prices are also among the lowest. But if the Tisza Party were to come to power, that would come to an end.

Utility prices would triple, and fuel would cost 1,000 forints per liter.

This would not only affect motorists, but would also drive up food prices, among other things.

With the national government, we want Hungarians to benefit economically as much as possible, and for that, it is necessary to maintain access to cheap Russian energy.

We will protect the energy security of Hungarian families, but this requires that we all place our trust in the national government.

Fidesz is the safe choice!

If a Tisza government came to power, we would have to move away from cheap Russian energy. Just look at fuel prices in other European countries where they do not have access to Ural-type Russian crude oil—what prices do they pay there? And this is not just a problem for motorists.

When I go into a store to buy a loaf of bread, that price also includes energy costs and transportation costs. So prices would rise.

This is not just a theoretical or moral issue—although it is that too—but a very real, practical issue affecting people’s wallets.

The question is whether we stay on the path that is economically beneficial for Hungarians, because that is all that matters to us—what is best for Hungarians.

Right now, and in the foreseeable future, it is clearly in our interest—since we do not really have many alternatives—to provide Hungarian families and industry with the cheapest possible Russian energy, rather than seeking other options.

This is one of the key points of debate with the Tisza Party.

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main message:

Fidesz = cheap energy, security
Tisza = massive price increases, chaos

👉 Hidden formula:

fear (price explosion)
wallet impact (utilities, fuel, food)
no alternative
one single solution

---

🔍 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Fear appeal with concrete numbers

👉 “triple utility prices”
👉 “1000 HUF fuel price”

Technique: throwing in shocking numbers
Goal: trigger immediate emotional reaction (fear)
Effect: you don’t verify it → you believe it

➡️ These are not proven facts, but scenarios.

---

2️⃣ Domino effect (chain reaction)

👉 “fuel gets more expensive → food gets more expensive → everything gets more expensive”

Technique: oversimplified cause–effect
Goal: link all problems to one decision
Effect: it feels like everything points in the same direction

➡️ Reality: there is an effect, but not this linear or automatic at this scale.

---

3️⃣ “No alternative” narrative

👉 “we don’t really have alternatives”
👉 “only Russian energy is cheap”

Technique: false dilemma
Goal: narrow down thinking
Effect:
→ either this
→ or disaster

➡️ It ignores:

• diversification
• long-term investments
• market changes

---

4️⃣ Oversimplification (energy → everything)

👉 “even bread prices depend on this”

Technique: reducing everything to a single cause
Goal: turn a complex economy into one factor
Effect: easy to understand, but distorted

➡️ Reality:

• inflation is multi-factor
• energy is just one element

---

5️⃣ “We act for the people” framing

👉 “we want what’s best for Hungarians”
👉 “this is all we care about”

Technique: moral superiority framing
Goal: increase legitimacy
Effect: if you disagree → “you’re against Hungarian interests”

---

6️⃣ Future catastrophe vs present safety

👉 “now things are good”
👉 “if they come → things will be bad”

Technique: status quo bias + fear
Goal: reject change
Effect: risk aversion

---

7️⃣ Selective comparison

👉 “look at countries without Russian oil”

Technique: cherry-picking
Goal: show only supporting examples
Effect: distorted view of Europe

➡️ It ignores:

• wage differences
• subsidy systems
• tax structures

---

8️⃣ Omission (what you’re noticing)

👉 no mention of:

• budget subsidies
• tax-based financing
• long-term dependency

Technique: selective information
Goal: keep the narrative simple
Effect: incomplete picture → easier acceptance

---

🧩 Overall picture

This is a classic formula:

👉 cheap present + scary future + no alternative + we will protect you

---

⚠️ Why it works especially on older audiences

Not because they are “stupid”, but because:

👉 simple and clear
👉 directly affects personal finances
👉 repeated frequently
👉 less likely to fact-check
👉 strong emotional hooks

---

💡 In short (very briefly)

👉 Not analysis, but a campaign message
👉 Not proof, but assumptions + fear
👉 Not a full picture, but selective framing

For us, the energy security of the Hungarian people comes first!

As Viktor Orbán announced, we will halt gas shipments from Hungary to Ukraine.
We have two compelling reasons for this.

The first is that Ukraine has been maintaining an oil blockade against Hungary for more than a month.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in coordination with Péter Magyar, is continuing to try to influence the elections by jeopardizing the energy security of Hungarian families.

Despite this, the government has introduced a protected fuel price, so we do not have to pay more when refueling.

The second reason is that Hungary must build up reserves, as Ukraine is not only blocking our oil supply but is also continuously attacking the southern gas pipeline supplying Hungary with drones.

We will not allow Zelenskyy and his allies to continue blackmailing us. We stand with Hungarian families and will ensure their energy supply!

Only Fidesz is the safe choice!

---

The Prime Minister reported that we are halting gas shipments from Hungary toward Ukraine. We have two good reasons for this.

The first is that Ukraine has now been blocking crude oil shipments coming to us through Ukraine for more than a month—almost two. Despite this, we introduced a protected price domestically, so everyone can continue refueling at a safe and reasonable price. But let’s admit, this is not a very fair move from the Ukrainians.

The second reason is that we are stopping gas deliveries toward Ukraine because we also need to build up reserves. Quite simply, because on the one hand, Ukraine had already previously shut off Russian gas that reached us through their territory. On the other hand, they have started attacking the TurkStream pipeline with drones—not for the first time—which is another key route through which gas arrives in Hungary.

Therefore, we cannot be certain that if we continue supplying gas to Ukraine, Hungary’s energy security would remain adequately ensured.

Accordingly, we have chosen the Hungarian people and their energy security. That is why the government has decided to halt gas shipments to Ukraine.

For us, the energy security of Hungarian people and the protection of Hungarian families come first—even if Ukraine does not like it.

🧠 Quick overview (why this triggers such a reaction)

The text is simultaneously:

• very confident
• internally contradictory
• and strongly built on manipulative framing

👉 This creates cognitive dissonance in the brain
→ which leads to a feeling of nausea / cringe

---

🔍 Analysis (communication techniques)

1️⃣ “Us vs Them” + enemy construction

👉 “Ukrainians are blocking us”
👉 “Zelensky + Péter Magyar together”

Technique: enemy construction + forced association
Goal: create one unified “enemy”
Effect: increases the sense of threat

➡️ Separate events → merged into a single story

---

2️⃣ Victim → then strength position

👉 “they are blocking us”
👉 “they are blackmailing us”
👉 “we will defend ourselves”

Technique: victim-to-hero framing
Goal: establish moral superiority
Effect: a hard move (gas cutoff) appears as “self-defense”

---

3️⃣ Meaning inversion (very important)

👉 “they cannot blackmail us”
→ meanwhile: cutting gas supply to Ukraine

Technique: accusation inversion
Reality: pressure → reframed as “self-defense”

---

4️⃣ Repetition = feeling of truth

Repeated multiple times:

• energy security
• Hungarian families
• protection

Technique: repetition
Goal: embed key messages
Effect: it starts to feel true

---

5️⃣ Fear + uncertainty

👉 “drones are attacking”
👉 “we cannot be sure”
👉 “we must stockpile”

Technique: amplifying uncertainty
Goal: justify radical decisions
Effect: “better safe than sorry” mindset

---

6️⃣ Economic reassurance (contradiction!)

👉 “protected price → we don’t pay more”

Technique: reassurance messaging
Problem:

• if supply is at risk → prices would rise
• yet the message says everything is fine

➡️ This is a key dissonance point

---

7️⃣ Single-solution narrative

👉 “Only Fidesz is the safe choice”

Technique: false dilemma
Goal: eliminate alternatives
Effect: “there is no other option”

---

⚠️ Logical problems (why it feels ‘nauseating’)

👉 It claims at the same time:

• there is danger
• but everything is stable

👉 At the same time:

• they are blackmailing us
• but we are cutting off gas

👉 At the same time:

• war-level threat
• but framed as a campaign message

➡️ This is what the brain rejects

---

🧠 Why your reaction is so strong

Because you:

• notice the contradictions
• recognize the manipulation
• and see it presented with confidence and moral superiority

👉 Combined effect:
= cringe + anger + disgust

---

🧩 In short (concise summary)

This text follows a classic formula:

👉 external enemy
👉 internal traitor
👉 fear (energy, war)
👉 “we will protect you”
👉 “only we are the solution”

❌ No matter how hard they try to interfere in the Hungarian elections, we will not allow it!

The oil blockade and the Tisza “agent scandal” ultimately point to the same thing: they want to replace the national government that safeguards Hungary’s sovereignty. Tisza would form a pro-Ukrainian government that would detach from cheap Russian energy.

🚨 Let there be no doubt: this is something represented by Péter Magyar’s MEP, who voted for it in the European Parliament, and István Kapitány has also stated it openly. However, this would mean triple utility costs and fuel prices of 1,000 forints for Hungarians.

But we will not allow either Ukraine or the Brussels elite to interfere in Hungarian elections. The national government stands up for Hungarian interests—we will protect utility price reductions and preserve peace!

🟠 That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

Because both issues are about sovereignty—whether we Hungarians can decide what is good for us and represent that, or whether the country must operate according to foreign interests. That is precisely why they are trying to interfere in Hungarian elections, even using intelligence tools, and why there is an oil blockade against Hungary. Ukraine and the Brussels political elite are interested in undermining the sovereign Hungarian policy that says we will buy energy from whoever offers it at the lowest price—thereby protecting reduced utility costs and keeping fuel prices affordable.

They want to challenge this policy. The oil blockade itself is also about interfering in Hungarian elections, effectively trying to blackmail us during the campaign period, hoping to replace the current sovereign government with a pro-Ukrainian one represented by Tisza—one that would give up Russian oil and gas.

This is in Ukraine’s interest, as it is at war with Russia and seeks to cut off all Russian resources. However, it is not in Hungary’s interest. We should be clear: if what Tisza’s leading politicians advocate were to happen—what István Kapitány has said about abandoning Russian energy, what Péter Magyar’s MEP voted for three weeks ago in the European Parliament (to phase out all Russian energy), and what will be brought back onto the agenda in Brussels on April 15—then Hungarian families would face triple utility costs and fuel prices around 1,000 forints.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Foreign actors (Ukraine + Brussels) are interfering in the election”
👉 “Tisza = serving foreign interests”
👉 “Energy = a question of sovereignty”
👉 “If not Fidesz → drastic price increases (1000 HUF fuel, 3x utilities)”
👉 “Fidesz = protection, peace, cheap energy”

👉 Classic formula:
external enemy + betrayal + fear + one single solution

---

🧠 Manipulation Techniques

1️⃣ Conflation (separate issues → one story)

👉 “oil blockade” + “agent scandal” + “election” = one coordinated plan

Technique: false linking
Goal: make you see intentional attack behind everything
Effect: increased sense of threat

➡️ Reality: these are separate issues, not proven to be part of one plan

---

2️⃣ External enemy + internal traitor

👉 “Ukraine + Brussels” vs “Tisza”

Technique: enemy construction
Goal: create a “them vs us” divide
Effect: simplified worldview

➡️ One of the strongest mobilization tools in political communication

---

3️⃣ Fear through numbers

👉 “1000 HUF fuel”
👉 “3x utility costs”

Technique: shock numbers
Goal: trigger immediate emotional reaction
Effect: panic → reaction instead of thinking

➡️ What you feel (“disgust/nausea”) is a deliberately triggered response

---

4️⃣ False cause-and-effect

👉 “leaving Russian energy = instant 1000 HUF fuel”

Technique: oversimplified causal chain
Goal: explain a complex market in one sentence
Effect: sounds believable because it’s simple

➡️ Reality:
energy prices are shaped by global markets, geopolitics, taxes, exchange rates, and regulation

---

5️⃣ Sovereignty as a total framing

👉 “we decide or they decide”

Technique: false dilemma
Goal: present only two options
Effect: removes nuance and middle ground

➡️ Reality:
EU membership and energy policy are based on negotiation and compromise, not binary choices

---

6️⃣ Repetition and overloading

👉 the same message repeated over and over:

• oil
• sovereignty
• Ukrainians
• utilities
• 1000 HUF

Technique: repetition = illusion of truth
Effect: “if it’s repeated this much, it must be true”

---

🧩 Your Point (very important)

👉 “Fuel is not 1000 HUF anywhere else”
👉 “If it rises → it’s due to global factors (e.g. war)”

This aligns much more with real economic logic.

➡️ Fuel prices depend on:

• global oil prices
• refining capacity
• taxes
• exchange rates
• geopolitics (e.g. Middle East, Iran)

—not on a single political party’s decision.

---

⚖️ What’s actually happening here (communication level)

This text:

👉 is not trying to inform
👉 but to trigger emotions and mobilize

Specific goals:

• fear
• anger
• “defensive reflex”
• influence voting behavior

---

🧠 Short, raw summary

👉 Combines separate issues into one “attack narrative”
👉 Builds a foreign enemy + internal traitor
👉 Uses extreme numbers to shock
👉 Not outright provable lies, but exaggerated and manipulative
👉 Offers only one solution: “only us”

❗ The Tisza agent scandal is yet another piece of evidence that the left is trying to come to power by colluding with Brussels and Kyiv.

This is an entirely unprecedented case in Hungarian history: an individual calling himself a journalist not only contributed to the surveillance of the foreign minister, but actually handed over phone numbers himself.

🗣️ Moreover, on an audio recording, Szabolcs Panyi admitted that he has close ties to Anita Orbán—whom Péter Magyar has not been willing to condemn in a single word for what happened, nor remove from the stage.

They remain deeply silent. But what should we really expect, when even their IT specialists are trained in Ukraine and are familiar with even the smallest corners of the Ukrainian embassy?

❌ It is clear that within TISZA, only Zelensky’s orders can prevail, as they are simply incapable of saying no to demands. Wiretapping, agents, and scandals piling on top of each other—that is the left.

That is why in April we must place our trust in a government that resists spies and guarantees the security of our country. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

In Hungary’s modern democracy, it has never happened that someone—an individual calling himself a journalist—would contribute to the surveillance of the Hungarian foreign minister, thereby seriously endangering national security and, ultimately, the safety of every Hungarian citizen.

What makes this even more serious is that this person is in very close contact with the Tisza Party, which is preparing to govern. Since this information came to light, Péter Magyar has not provided a single sentence of explanation, has not distanced himself from it, and has not parted ways with Anita Orbán—he has remained completely silent.

And then there is the additional information: at yesterday’s session of the National Security Committee, it emerged that Tisza Party IT specialists received training in Ukraine and practically move in and out of the Ukrainian embassy.

So if, after all this, someone still does not see what forces stand behind the Tisza Party—namely Brussels and Ukraine, both working to replace Hungary’s sovereign government with a pro-Ukrainian one—then I don’t know what more would be needed.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Szabolcs Panyi = agent / part of a wiretapping case”
👉 “Tisza = a network controlled by foreign actors (Ukraine, Brussels)”
👉 “The opposition = a national security risk”
👉 “Fidesz = the only protection”

👉 Classic formula: betrayal + foreign interference + fear + savior

---

🧠 The Real Issue (as you also point out)

👉 The claims are not proven, but instead based on:

• insinuations
• connections
• “I heard that…” type arguments

👉 Meanwhile:

• a journalist’s job = gathering and publishing information
• this is not the same as participating in wiretapping

➡️ Key point: journalism ≠ operational involvement

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Labeling (agent)

👉 “an agent who calls himself a journalist”

Technique: stigmatization
Goal: discredit without evidence
Effect: the reader no longer sees a journalist, but an “enemy”

---

2️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 “he is connected to X → therefore he is part of it”

Technique: associative guilt
Goal: replace evidence with connections
Effect: connection creates the appearance of guilt

---

3️⃣ Claims without evidence

👉 “contributed to wiretapping”, “handed over phone numbers”

Technique: assertion without proof
Goal: present unverified claims as facts
Effect: the reader doesn’t question it (“it must be true”)

---

4️⃣ Conspiracy chain building

👉 Panyi → Tisza → Ukraine → Brussels → Zelensky

Technique: chained association
Goal: construct a large, all-encompassing narrative
Effect: creates the feeling that “everything is connected”

---

5️⃣ Fear framing (national security)

👉 “endangers the security of all Hungarians”

Technique: existential threat framing
Goal: trigger emotional response (fear)
Effect: reduces critical thinking

---

6️⃣ Silence = guilt framing

👉 “he didn’t respond → therefore he is guilty”

Technique: false inference
Goal: turn lack of evidence into “proof”
Effect: whatever happens → interpreted negatively

---

7️⃣ Imitation of intelligence credibility

👉 “National Security Committee”, “report”, “training in Ukraine”

Technique: appeal to authority
Goal: create the appearance of seriousness and credibility
Effect: the reader does not demand evidence

---

🧩 Key Logical Flaw

👉 What is implied:

“he wrote about it / is connected → therefore he participated in it”

👉 Reality:

• a journalist gathers information
• talks to sources
• publishes

➡️ This does not prove operational involvement

---

⚖️ Short, Clear Counter-Narrative

👉 “The fact that a journalist gathers and publishes information does not mean they participated in any intelligence or wiretapping operation. These accusations are built on unproven claims and loose associations rather than evidence.”

---

🎯 Summary

This text:

👉 does not prove anything
👉 instead it connects + exaggerates + labels

Its purpose:

influencing political choice

discrediting

fear-mongering

Share this so that Tisza supporters also face the truth! The Tisza agent scandal has escalated into a Ukrainian espionage scandal.

The report of the National Security Committee clearly states: the IT specialists of the Tisza Party did not work only for them – but for the Ukrainians as well.

• Regular contact with the Ukrainian Embassy in Budapest
• Foreign intelligence connections
• Cooperation with hacker groups
• Attempts to procure spyware and military technology

This goes far beyond a political debate — it is a serious national security issue.

One of those involved had previously been under investigation for blackmail and cybercrime.
Another was directed by a foreign intelligence operative and built connections in Ukraine.

They visited the Ukrainian Embassy in Budapest multiple times.
They communicated through encrypted channels.
Foreign actors were interested in Hungarian domestic political information.

This is unacceptable.

Hungary’s future cannot be a plaything of foreign interests.
Decisions about us cannot be made in Ukraine, in Brussels, or through intelligence backroom deals.

🇭🇺 Hungarians have the right to security.
🇭🇺 Hungarians have the right to sovereignty.

Anyone who builds on people with such connections is putting the country at risk.

The stakes of the election are clear: order, security, and national sovereignty — or chaos and foreign influence.

👉 That is why Fidesz and Viktor Orbán are the safe choice!

🔍 Main narrative

👉 “Tisza = Ukrainian spy network”
👉 “Foreign actors (Ukraine + intelligence services) are interfering”
👉 “Hungary is in danger”
👉 “Fidesz = the only protection”

---

🧩 Hidden formula (very clear)

“national security report”
→ claims without concrete evidence
→ “spy” labeling
→ exaggeration of foreign connections
→ intelligence-thriller elements (hackers, encrypted channels)
→ existential threat (the fate of the country)
→ moral panic (“this is unacceptable”)
→ single solution (“only Fidesz”)

👉 Classic: fear + betrayal + savior

---

🧠 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Enemy construction (external + internal)

👉 “Ukrainians”, “intelligence services”, “hacker groups”

Technique: enemy construction
Goal: fear + distrust
Effect: every opponent = potential “foreign interest”

---

2️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 “Ukrainian embassy” → “espionage”

Technique: associative labeling
Goal: normal contact = suspicious activity
Effect: even diplomatic contact appears as “evidence”

---

3️⃣ Secrecy + unfalsifiability

👉 “encrypted channels”, “connections”, “they were interested”

Technique: unfalsifiable claims
Goal: prevent verification
Effect: cannot be disproven → feels more believable

---

4️⃣ Thriller elements (dramaturgy)

👉 hackers, spyware, intelligence services

Technique: dramatization framing
Goal: emotional engagement
Effect: the story feels stronger than reality

---

5️⃣ Moral panic

👉 “this is unacceptable”, “the country’s fate”

Technique: fear / moral panic framing
Goal: urgency, bypass rational thinking
Effect: you react instead of analyze

---

6️⃣ False causality chain

👉 “connection → espionage → country in danger”

Technique: false causality
Goal: simple, easy-to-follow narrative
Effect: complex reality reduced → more believable

---

7️⃣ Sovereignty trigger

👉 “they cannot decide about us”

Technique: patriotic framing
Goal: activate identity
Effect: emotional identification over rational debate

---

8️⃣ False dilemma (most important)

👉 “order vs chaos”
👉 “sovereignty vs foreign influence”

Technique: false dilemma
Goal: reduce choice to two options
Effect: no middle ground → forced decision

---

9️⃣ Savior narrative

👉 “only Orbán / Fidesz”

Technique: savior framing
Goal: political monopoly
Effect: delegitimizing all alternatives

---

⚠️ Why it feels “nauseating”

Because multiple layers are working at once:

🧠 rational layer: no concrete evidence
😨 emotional layer: fear + betrayal
🧩 narrative: conspiracy-like structure
🎯 outcome: political control

👉 Your brain detects manipulation → triggers a physical rejection

---

🧠 In short (very clear)

This text is not trying to inform, but to:

👉 create an enemy
👉 generate fear
👉 provide a simple story
👉 and offer a single “solution”

Viktor Orbán announced:
As long as Ukraine does not provide oil, it will not receive gas from Hungary.
No one can blackmail Hungarians!

All reactions:
1.1K

Author – Alexandra Szentkirályi
The security of Hungarian families cannot be a bargaining chip! That is why, no matter how Zelensky and the Tisza Party coordinate, we will not allow ourselves to be blackmailed! As long as Ukraine does not provide oil, they will not receive gas from Hungary! Only the national government stands up for Hungarian interests, which is why Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the only safe choice on April 12! 🇭🇺

🔍 Baseline (what they are saying)

👉 “Ukraine does not supply oil → Hungary will not supply gas”
👉 “This is not blackmail → it is self-defense”
👉 “We are protecting Hungarians”

---

🧩 Actual communication logic (deeper layer)

1️⃣ Mutual punishment framing

👉 “if they do it → we do it too”

Technique: false equivalence / retaliatory framing
Reality:

• Ukraine is at war (existential situation)
• Hungary’s move is a political–energy tool

➡️ Effect: it creates the impression of two equal actors “playing a game,” even though the situation is not symmetrical

---

2️⃣ Reframing blackmail

👉 “no one can blackmail Hungarians”

Technique: accusation inversion

• what is actually pressure → is labeled as “self-defense”

➡️ Effect:
an offensive move appears defensive

---

3️⃣ Linking external enemy with internal traitor

👉 “Zelensky and Tisza are working together”

Technique: guilt by association

• external actor (Ukraine)
• internal opponent (Tisza)

➡️ Effect:
the opposition = anti-national actor

---

4️⃣ Raising the stakes to existential level

👉 “security of families”, “not up for negotiation”

Technique: fear framing + over-escalation

➡️ Effect:

• an energy policy issue → becomes a survival issue
• rational debate is pushed aside

---

5️⃣ Single-solution narrative

👉 “only Orbán Viktor and Fidesz”

Technique: false dilemma

➡️ Effect:

• no alternatives
• the election becomes a loyalty test

---

⚖️ Core of your question (very important)

👉 “cutting off gas from a country that is under military attack”

This is a critical moral and geopolitical point:

🔹 Without context:

👉 “we are just defending ourselves”

🔹 With context:

👉 restricting the energy supply of a country at war

➡️ This fundamentally changes how the action is perceived

---

🧠 What is happening on the communication level?

👉 Reality:

• energy dependency
• geopolitics
• war

👉 In the messaging:

• “they are blackmailing us”
• “we are defending ourselves”
• “the opposition is on their side”

➡️ Complex situation → simplified moral story

---

🎯 Summary

👉 The narrative is built like this:

external conflict (Ukraine)
→ claim of blackmail
→ legitimizing retaliation
→ linking in internal opposition
→ fear (families, energy)
→ single political solution

👉 Classic pattern:
conflict → fear → enemy → protection → vote

Roland Tseber, Zelensky’s Ukrainian spy and a good “friend” of Péter Magyar, is asking Ukrainian politicians not to reveal before the elections how much they are counting on a Tisza victory and how beneficial that would be for their war efforts and EU accession.

For them, Ukraine — for us, Hungary.
Whoever votes for Tisza is voting against their own wallet and their own future.

Viktor Orbán can say no to blackmail; he says no to both Brussels and Kyiv, because that is in the interest of Hungarians.
Péter Magyar cannot.

On April 12, Fidesz is the only safe choice!

By the way, did you hear what Roland Tseber, the Ukrainian spy, asked from Ukrainian experts and politicians? He asked them to hold back a bit — but only for the sake of the elections. I ask all Ukrainians, experts, academics, politicians — I don’t know, I can’t comment on everything — but if they do comment, then let’s take a look.

Because there are various discussions involving Hungary, and they have been quite revealing — and it only reinforces that they are essentially Orbán-focused “experts.” In fact, Tseber and his circle can also see, even from Ukraine, that Ukraine openly backing the Tisza Party, and the Tisza Party openly working toward Ukraine joining the European Union by 2027 and sending money to Ukraine to finance the war, actually reduces their electoral chances.

And they are right about that — because Hungarian people would not really welcome a government that is pro-Ukraine instead of pro-Hungary. But I think that by now both Ukrainian voices and pro-Tisza experts have already said enough for us to clearly see what we are up against.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Tisza = a network serving Ukrainian interests”
👉 “Péter Magyar = controlled by foreign actors / weak”
👉 “Ukraine + EU = interfering in Hungarian elections”
👉 “The election = Hungary vs. foreign powers”
👉 “Fidesz = the only protection”

---

🧩 Hidden Formula (very clear)

“Ukrainian actor” (Tseber)
→ labeled as a spy
→ linked to Péter Magyar
→ suggestion of a secret backroom deal
→ election manipulation narrative
→ tying in war + money + EU expansion
→ existential threat framing
→ single solution (“only Fidesz”)

👉 Classic: external enemy → betrayal → fear → savior

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Enemy Construction (external + internal merged)

👉 “Zelensky’s Ukrainian spy”
👉 “a good friend of Péter Magyar”

Goal:
Connect in one figure:

• Ukraine
• the opposition
• intelligence services

Effect:
Creates a simple, emotional “enemy package.”

---

2️⃣ Conspiracy Narrative

👉 “asks them… not to reveal”
👉 “how much they rely on a Tisza victory”

Goal:
Create the impression of a hidden deal.

Effect:
A sense of “exposure” without evidence.

---

3️⃣ Guilt by Association

👉 “Tseber → Zelensky → Tisza → Péter Magyar”

Goal:
Not to prove—just to connect.

Effect:
The opponent becomes “automatically suspicious.”

---

4️⃣ Building an Existential Threat

👉 “war and EU accession”
👉 “sending money to Ukraine”
👉 “voting against your own wallet and future”

Goal:
Turn the election into a matter of survival.

Effect:
Rational thinking → emotional reaction (fear).

---

5️⃣ False Dilemma (binary framing)

👉 “For them Ukraine, for us Hungary”
👉 “only Fidesz is the safe choice”

Goal:
Eliminate all middle options.

Effect:
The choice becomes:

• “betrayal”
• or “defense of the nation”

---

6️⃣ Leader = Nation (leader–nation fusion)

👉 “Orbán says no to Brussels and Kyiv”
👉 “this is in Hungary’s interest”

Goal:
Orbán = Hungary

Effect:
Criticism of him = attack on the nation.

---

7️⃣ Framing the Opponent as Incompetent

👉 “Péter Magyar cannot”

Goal:
Simple character attack.

Effect:
No need to prove → just assert.

---

8️⃣ Repetition and Noise (second part of the text)

👉 confusing, repetitive, hard-to-follow section

Goal:

• information overload
• create a sense that “a lot is happening”

Effect:
The audience doesn’t verify—only absorbs impressions.

---

9️⃣ “Everyone Already Knows” Narrative

👉 “it’s visible even from Ukraine”
👉 “they’ve already said enough”

Goal:
Create an illusion of consensus.

Effect:
Anyone who doubts feels “out of the loop.”

---

⚙️ Summary (core)

This text is a classic campaign weapon that:

👉 constructs an external enemy (Ukraine)
👉 assigns a domestic traitor (Tisza)
👉 suggests a hidden conspiracy
👉 creates financial + war-related fear
👉 then offers a single solution

---

🧠 In short

👉 It does not provide information
👉 it triggers an emotional reaction

Core mechanism:
“fear → identify an enemy → choose the protector”