Roland Tseber, Zelensky’s Ukrainian spy and a good “friend” of Péter Magyar, is asking Ukrainian politicians not to reveal before the elections how much they are counting on a Tisza victory and how beneficial that would be for their war efforts and EU accession.
For them, Ukraine — for us, Hungary.
Whoever votes for Tisza is voting against their own wallet and their own future.
Viktor Orbán can say no to blackmail; he says no to both Brussels and Kyiv, because that is in the interest of Hungarians.
Péter Magyar cannot.
On April 12, Fidesz is the only safe choice!
By the way, did you hear what Roland Tseber, the Ukrainian spy, asked from Ukrainian experts and politicians? He asked them to hold back a bit — but only for the sake of the elections. I ask all Ukrainians, experts, academics, politicians — I don’t know, I can’t comment on everything — but if they do comment, then let’s take a look.
Because there are various discussions involving Hungary, and they have been quite revealing — and it only reinforces that they are essentially Orbán-focused “experts.” In fact, Tseber and his circle can also see, even from Ukraine, that Ukraine openly backing the Tisza Party, and the Tisza Party openly working toward Ukraine joining the European Union by 2027 and sending money to Ukraine to finance the war, actually reduces their electoral chances.
And they are right about that — because Hungarian people would not really welcome a government that is pro-Ukraine instead of pro-Hungary. But I think that by now both Ukrainian voices and pro-Tisza experts have already said enough for us to clearly see what we are up against.
🔍 Main Narrative
👉 “Tisza = a network serving Ukrainian interests”
👉 “Péter Magyar = controlled by foreign actors / weak”
👉 “Ukraine + EU = interfering in Hungarian elections”
👉 “The election = Hungary vs. foreign powers”
👉 “Fidesz = the only protection”
🧩 Hidden Formula (very clear)
“Ukrainian actor” (Tseber)
→ labeled as a spy
→ linked to Péter Magyar
→ suggestion of a secret backroom deal
→ election manipulation narrative
→ tying in war + money + EU expansion
→ existential threat framing
→ single solution (“only Fidesz”)
👉 Classic: external enemy → betrayal → fear → savior
🧠 Influence Techniques
1️⃣ Enemy Construction (external + internal merged)
👉 “Zelensky’s Ukrainian spy”
👉 “a good friend of Péter Magyar”
Goal:
Connect in one figure:
- Ukraine
- the opposition
- intelligence services
Effect:
Creates a simple, emotional “enemy package.”
2️⃣ Conspiracy Narrative
👉 “asks them… not to reveal”
👉 “how much they rely on a Tisza victory”
Goal:
Create the impression of a hidden deal.
Effect:
A sense of “exposure” without evidence.
3️⃣ Guilt by Association
👉 “Tseber → Zelensky → Tisza → Péter Magyar”
Goal:
Not to prove—just to connect.
Effect:
The opponent becomes “automatically suspicious.”
4️⃣ Building an Existential Threat
👉 “war and EU accession”
👉 “sending money to Ukraine”
👉 “voting against your own wallet and future”
Goal:
Turn the election into a matter of survival.
Effect:
Rational thinking → emotional reaction (fear).
5️⃣ False Dilemma (binary framing)
👉 “For them Ukraine, for us Hungary”
👉 “only Fidesz is the safe choice”
Goal:
Eliminate all middle options.
Effect:
The choice becomes:
- “betrayal”
- or “defense of the nation”
6️⃣ Leader = Nation (leader–nation fusion)
👉 “Orbán says no to Brussels and Kyiv”
👉 “this is in Hungary’s interest”
Goal:
Orbán = Hungary
Effect:
Criticism of him = attack on the nation.
7️⃣ Framing the Opponent as Incompetent
👉 “Péter Magyar cannot”
Goal:
Simple character attack.
Effect:
No need to prove → just assert.
8️⃣ Repetition and Noise (second part of the text)
👉 confusing, repetitive, hard-to-follow section
Goal:
- information overload
- create a sense that “a lot is happening”
Effect:
The audience doesn’t verify—only absorbs impressions.
9️⃣ “Everyone Already Knows” Narrative
👉 “it’s visible even from Ukraine”
👉 “they’ve already said enough”
Goal:
Create an illusion of consensus.
Effect:
Anyone who doubts feels “out of the loop.”
⚙️ Summary (core)
This text is a classic campaign weapon that:
👉 constructs an external enemy (Ukraine)
👉 assigns a domestic traitor (Tisza)
👉 suggests a hidden conspiracy
👉 creates financial + war-related fear
👉 then offers a single solution
🧠 In short
👉 It does not provide information
👉 it triggers an emotional reaction
Core mechanism:
“fear → identify an enemy → choose the protector”