But how can we be sure that he is lying? Not only because his mouth is moving, but also because these very ideas are openly discussed by experts of the Tisza Party, because Brussels is demanding their implementation, and because the same discredited and compromised left-wing experts and politicians who now support the Tisza Party have already carried them out in the past.
So how can we be sure that our concerns are justified? Because we know the plans of the left-wing opposition, laid out in more than 600 pages. Péter Magyar, of course, claims that they have nothing to do with this document. But how can we be sure that he is lying? Not only because his mouth is moving, but also because Tisza Party experts talk about these measures, Brussels demands their implementation, and because from László Lengyel through Surányi and Bokros to János Kóka, these same figures carried them out when they and their ideological allies came to power.
They impoverished and made not only the people but the entire country vulnerable. They dismantled the state, drove it into debt, and stripped it of its assets. Let us not forget what they did after 2002, what we lost under the governments of Medgyessy, Gyurcsány, and Bajnai, when they merely pretended to govern.
Secondly, we could lose the freedom we regained over three and a half decades ago: democracy, the rule of law, and our sovereignty. Why can we think this? Fortunately—or unfortunately—in this regard, neither the words nor the actions and behavior of Péter Magyar and his neo-Bolshevik shock troops leave any doubt about how they think about constitutional institutions and rules, the independence of the judiciary and freedom of the press, the rights and human dignity of those who disagree with them, the national interest, and the permissibility of foreign influence bought with money.
We could lose our way of life, our culture, our freedom to define ourselves and to raise our children. We could lose our homeland, because Brussels is increasingly openly and shamelessly trying to degrade the European Union’s theoretically equal and independent member states into subordinate provinces.
🎭 Core Narrative
“There is no need to prove that he is lying — it is enough that we say so.”
The purpose of the text is not persuasion, but the total destruction of trust in the opponent, while carefully avoiding any concrete evidence.
1️⃣ “How can we be sure that he is lying?” — Self-Justifying Loop
🔹 Technique: circular reasoning
🔹 How it works:
The accusation of lying is not derived from facts, but from presumed intent.
“He is lying because he is left-wing” → “He is left-wing because he is lying.”
👉 Propaganda function:
Eliminates the need for proof.
No data is required — identity alone is sufficient.
2️⃣ “Not only because his mouth is moving” — Dehumanization
🔹 Technique: linguistic degradation
🔹 Effect:
The opponent is no longer a rational actor, but a biological reflex.
Lying is not a decision, but a “natural state.”
👉 A classic enemy-construction method that excludes debate.
3️⃣ “A 600-page document” — The Myth of the Secret Plan
🔹 Technique: phantom evidence
🔹 The trick:
The document is never quoted, never shown.
Denial (“we had nothing to do with it”) becomes proof of lying in itself.
👉 Conspiracy logic:
- If you deny it → you’re guilty
- If you stay silent → you’re guilty
4️⃣ “Brussels demands it” — The External Control Narrative
🔹 Technique: sovereignty-threat framing
🔹 Claim:
There are no domestic decisions.
The opponent is a puppet, not a political actor.
👉 Goal:
Transform the election into a choice not between programs, but between treason vs. homeland.
5️⃣ Listing Names — Collective Guilt
Named figures:
- László Lengyel
- György Surányi
- Lajos Bokros
- János Kóka
🔹 Technique: historical guilt transfer
🔹 False logic:
If someone once belonged to a political camp,
they are forever and universally responsible.
👉 This is not analysis, but a weapon of memory politics.
6️⃣ Demonizing 2002–2010 — Temporal Panic
Named prime ministers:
- Péter Medgyessy
- Ferenc Gyurcsány
- Gordon Bajnai
🔹 Technique: activation of historical trauma
🔹 Problem:
No evaluation.
No context.
No distinction between policy and myth.
👉 Message:
“If it’s not us, it’s them — and then everything will be lost.”
7️⃣ “We could lose our freedom” — Total Fear-Mongering
🔹 Technique: existential panic narrative
Threat list:
- democracy
- rule of law
- press freedom
- culture
- child-rearing
- national existence
👉 Trick:
Threaten everything at once → prove nothing at all.
8️⃣ “Brussels reduces us to provinces” — Imperial Metaphor
🔹 Technique: colonization narrative
🔹 Effect:
The EU is framed not as a political community, but as a hostile empire.
👉 This is not EU criticism — it is the preparation of exit logic.
🎯 Conclusion — What Is Actually Happening?
This text:
❌ does not debate
❌ does not prove
❌ does not analyze
✅ programs emotion
✅ manufactures enemies
✅ labels criticism as treason
The unspoken core message:
“Don’t think. Be afraid. And vote.”
