👉 The host of the Jólvanezígy program, Ádám Fókuszcsoport—who was also fattened up by the previously “rolling dollars”—has sunk to a new low with his arrogant, condescending remarks.
Perhaps never before has someone insulted so many people at once. According to him, women, the elderly, and people living in the countryside are the ones who are—he used a far more obscene expression—“ruining” his future.
💸 Yet his future is hardly threatened by anyone, considering his net revenue of 284 million forints last year, earned right here in Budapest. After all, if we were dragged into a war, or if migrants were let in and he didn’t like it, he could simply pack up and fly away.
For most Hungarians, however, the stakes are much higher. They love their country, they envision their future here, they worry about their children—and they want no part of war, no part of migration. They simply want to live in a peaceful and secure country.
🟠 Their party is Fidesz. Thanks to them, we have a peace-oriented and national government—so even Ádám Nagy and his family can live their lives in peace and security, just like everyone else, including those who do not vote for us.
There is no place for hatred and incitement—nor for anyone to look down on Hungarian people in this way.
✅ In April, we will show how many of us there are, and with our votes we will once again guarantee Hungary’s peaceful, secure, and developing future—even for those who would irresponsibly throw all of this in the trash.
Unfortunately, I have to quote what was said: “Listen up, this is how I always see it. These three types of people—the women, those from the countryside, and the elderly—are the ones who f** up our future in April, so they should get themselves together. These three types of people are the ones who usually vote for Fidesz.”*
So thank you very much for this extraordinarily arrogant, patronizing, and disgusting comment—and for yet another successful election victory. Because it is precisely this extremely rude, contemptuous style that ends up winning elections for Fidesz parliamentary candidates in every single constituency.
So thank you for adding to that just now. And it is no coincidence: the very people you referred to in such a demeaning way are the ones who, in recent years, kept Hungary out of the madness caused by migration in Western Europe. These are the people who contributed to the fact that today we can live safely in Hungary—and that we have stayed out of the war so far.
Szentkirályi Alexandra
→ pro-government political communicator
→ role: emotional mobilization + enemy construction + loyalty reinforcement, not factual clarification
🎯 Core Function (the real purpose)
The text is not about:
- media ethics,
- freedom of expression,
- or a nuanced interpretation of a controversial statement.
It is about:
1️⃣ manufacturing moral panic (“women, the elderly, rural people are being attacked”)
2️⃣ artificially opposing ‘elite’ vs. ‘the people’
3️⃣ dehumanizing the critic and excluding them morally
4️⃣ claiming monopoly over peace and security for Fidesz
👉 The conclusion is pre-written:
whoever criticizes → despises Hungarians → is dangerous → morally illegitimate
🧩 Main Propaganda Techniques
1️⃣ Collective offense framing
“Perhaps no one has ever offended so many people at once.”
🔹 An individual statement is inflated into a collective attack
🔹 Emotional identification: “if you are a woman / elderly / rural → this was about you”
🔹 Real debate → identity injury
2️⃣ Wealthy, mobile elite vs. ‘real Hungarians’ who stay
“284 million forints in net revenue… he could simply fly away”
🔹 Classic envy-based moral contrast
🔹 Financial success = moral disqualification
🔹 The critic “doesn’t suffer, therefore doesn’t count”
3️⃣ War and migration as universal fear triggers
🔹 Criticism is automatically linked to:
- war
- migration
- the “madness” of Western Europe
👉 No evidence, only fear stacking
4️⃣ Fidesz as the sole moral shield
“Their party is Fidesz.”
🔹 False dichotomy:
- Fidesz = peace, security, homeland
- everyone else = chaos, hatred, danger
🔹 Opposition voter → morally suspicious
5️⃣ Patronizing cynicism (the final twist)
“even Nagy Ádám and his family can live in peace and security”
🔹 Seemingly “generous,” but actually:
- condescending
- hierarchical
- “we protect you whether you want it or not”
🧠 Psychological Impact
✔️ Fear activation
✔️ Group identity reinforcement
✔️ Moral delegitimization of dissent
✔️ Emotional closure of debate
👉 It doesn’t persuade — it seals the bubble.
🧾 Short Conclusion
This is not a defense, but:
emotional mobilization against a designated enemy,
where “the Hungarian people” are treated as political property.
Anyone outside this frame becomes:
- contemptuous,
- dangerous,
- and “not one of us.”