Many people take for granted everything that surrounds us today: family support schemes, reduced utility costs, wage increases, pensions. Yet none of this is self-evident.
If people with a multinational background were running the country, Hungarian families would not come first. Then it would not be livelihoods, wages, or utility bills that matter, but foreign profit, share prices, and corporate results.
This is a zero-sum game: either Hungarian people are put at the center, or multinational corporations are. You cannot have both at the same time.
Today, the Hungarian government stands on the side of families. That is what we are working for, and that is why we all need to stay clear-headed on April 12, so that this remains the case.
Fidesz is the safe choice!
My conviction is that if people were to come into power who fundamentally come from a multinational, globalist background—who belong to that world, are loyal to it, and think with that mindset—then the focus would shift in an instant from families, from people’s everyday problems and livelihoods, straight to profit: how Q4 turned out, what the share price looks like, and similar terms would dominate the conversation. And the reality is that this is a zero-sum game: there is no scenario in which money remains both with families and with foreign multinationals. Either you focus here, or you focus there.
And now the Hungarian government has chosen the path of standing with Hungarian families, with people: we talk about pensions, family support benefits, wages, minimum-wage increases, utilities. On the other side, different words appear—the ones I mentioned earlier. There, those magic words immediately come up: corporate profit. So on our side there is the family; on the other, the corporation. On our side there are wages, utilities, fuel; on the other, the share price. That, in my view, is the crucial difference.
🧠 What is actually happening?
🔴 1️⃣ Pre-legitimized decline
This text is not about the present, but about morally pre-excusing an upcoming deterioration.
Message:
“What exists now is not natural — it can disappear at any moment.”
This is psychological preconditioning:
- if there is less → it’s not a failure
- if things worsen → it’s not a government mistake
- if it hurts → you simply weren’t alert enough
👉 Technique: loss normalization + anticipatory blame shift
🔴 2️⃣ The false zero-sum trap
“This is a zero-sum game: either families or multinationals.”
Economically false — but perfect for propaganda.
❌ What is deliberately omitted:
- multinationals produce here
- they pay taxes here (or don’t)
- state redistribution lives off economic performance
👉 Technique: false dilemma framing
It leaves only two options:
- with us
- against us
What’s missing entirely:
- efficiency
- growth
- institutional quality
- long-term sustainability
🔴 3️⃣ Vocabulary swap = reality swap
Watch the artificially constructed oppositions:
| “Us” | “Them” |
|---|---|
| family | corporation |
| wages | profit |
| utility bills | share price |
| pensions | Q4 |
This is not a debate — it’s linguistic conditioning.
👉 Technique: semantic poisoning
Certain words are made emotionally “toxic”:
- profit
- growth
- performance
- enterprise
Exactly the things without which there is nothing to redistribute.
🔴 4️⃣ The “not natural” trick
“Many people take for granted everything that surrounds us today…”
This is not gratitude — it’s a threat.
The real message:
“What you received is not something you’re entitled to.”
👉 Technique: conditional entitlement framing
Right → favor
Legitimate expectation → loyalty reward
🔴 5️⃣ Timing: not accidental
This speech appears precisely when:
- the economy is stagnating
- growth has vanished
- the minister openly says: “it’s not that important”
This is no longer an explanation — it’s an escape narrative:
if there is no growth → it’s because “we chose different values”
🎯 The big picture — what’s being prepared?
This is a pre-manufactured moral buffer:
- if you get less → you’re still “on the right side”
- if things deteriorate → that’s the price of “not letting multinationals rule”
- if it hurts → someone else would have it even worse
👉 Normalization is underway.
Not the normalization of prosperity — but the normalization of decline.
🧨 The core message in one sentence
This text is not about families —
it’s about getting people to accept in advance that less is enough, as long as it’s “in the right hands.”