At the anti-war gathering in Hatvan, we also made it clear: we do not want the globalist Tisza crowd; Hungary needs a national government that keeps the interests of Hungarians in focus!
As long as Fidesz and Viktor Orbán are governing, cheap utilities and peace will remain — we will not settle for anything less than that!
The respected president’s speech by Zseni Elis was brilliant. Which part was your favorite, József?
Well, it’s very hard to choose, because I think it was very strong when she spoke a bit longer about what this globalist world means for us — the one represented by Captain Sel and Anita Orbán — that we do not want to become mere outsourced people for these multinationals and global forces, sent here by Tisza leaders. We want to remain on the Hungarian path we have followed so far.
I was also very glad that she corrected that twisted statement they use to claim that Fidesz is not the party of workers and manual laborers — because yes, it absolutely is. We work precisely so that everyone who wants to get ahead in life has the opportunity to do so, and many people have experienced this over the past years.
I think the statement about utility price reductions was also important. You can see the concern in people — what would happen if a government came that wanted to detach us from cheap, stable, predictable gas, and instead we got people like István Kapitány and Anita Orbán, and companies like Dobrizna, LNG suppliers, and Shell. So it was important that she set that straight too: as long as there is a Hungarian government, a government with Hungarian national sentiment rather than a globalist one, people can rely on this.
Overall, the whole event was very good, and those who weren’t here should really come next time.
And let me ask one more thing — “Is there rap for the duck in ’60?”
Sorry, what?
“Is there rap for the duck in ’60?”
No, I don’t know, is that some local saying?
Yes.
Unfortunately I don’t know it. Hopefully we’ll shape our own “rap” in April.
🎭 1️⃣ “We don’t want globalist Tisza people” – enemy image construction
This is not about programs clashing, but identities.
What we don’t hear:
– what decisions they made
– what laws they propose
– what numbers they work with
Instead, we hear:
“globalist”
“people of multinational corporations”
“leaders sent here”
This is the foreign-controlled agent narrative.
👉 Its function: to frame the opponent not as a legitimate Hungarian political actor, but as a servant of foreign interests.
Emotionally, this is far stronger than any professional policy debate.
🧠 2️⃣ “Hungarian path” vs. “globalist world” – a civilizational frame
This is no longer party politics, but a worldview war.
Formula:
| US | THEM |
|---|---|
| Hungarian path | globalist world |
| national government | sent-in leaders |
| people’s interests | multinational interests |
This is called moral bifurcation.
If you are not with “us,” you are against the “Hungarian path.”
At this point, voting stops being a rational decision and becomes a loyalty test.
🔥 3️⃣ Utility prices = survival panic button
When it’s said:
“cheap utilities and peace will remain”
“they would disconnect us from cheap gas”
This is one of the strongest voter triggers in Hungary.
This is not energy policy. This is:
💡 “If they come → your life gets more expensive.”
No one proves who would cancel what, how, or when.
Only the emotional equation remains:
opponent in power = your bills go up
This builds on loss aversion (which is psychologically stronger than promises of gain).
🧩 4️⃣ “We are the party of manual workers” – reclaiming social legitimacy
This is defensive propaganda.
It sounds like a response to an accusation:
“not the party of workers”
But the answer is not data — it’s feeling:
“we work for them”
“many have experienced this”
👉 Referring to personal experience = emotional reinforcement instead of proof.
🕊️ 5️⃣ “Cheap utilities AND peace” – double security package
This is crucial.
Utilities = material security
Peace = physical security
Together:
“If we leave → your security is damaged in two directions”
This is no longer an economic debate but an existential fear frame.
🎤 6️⃣ The conversational format trick
“What was your favorite part?”
This is not an interview, but:
➡️ community reinforcement
➡️ enthusiastic echo
➡️ maintaining emotional momentum
In campaign communication, this is the supporter conversation model.
🧠 So what is happening overall?
This speech:
✔ does not inform
✔ does not debate
✔ does not prove
Instead, it:
provides identity + manages fear + asks for loyalty
The deep structure:
“Us = safety, Hungarian identity, peace, livelihood”
“Them = foreign, globalist, expensive life, danger”
This is classic defensive propaganda.
Target audience: people who fear uncertainty.