🚨 Yet another aggressive TISZA-aligned “comedian” joked about the deaths of the elderly and claimed that, in his view, war poses no real threat. How can anyone say something like this? Didn’t he have elderly relatives of his own? How can someone show such a lack of respect toward our parents and grandparents? And when it comes to war—does he really think all Hungarians are that stupid?
Does he seriously believe people don’t read the news, don’t see what is happening in Europe? That they don’t hear the statements of Ursula von der Leyen and Manfred Weber, saying that “we must be prepared for a war with Russia”? 👉 And of course, surely the remarks of the French and German chiefs of staff have also escaped everyone’s attention, just like the reintroduction of conscription across Europe…
You can deceive yourself and choose to ignore the danger—that’s unwise, but possible. But treating people as fools and trivializing a real threat is enormous irresponsibility. 🟠 Today, there is one person in Hungary who is capable of keeping us out of Europe’s war madness, and that person is Orbán Viktor. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.
Now listen—this is what real TISZA “humor” looks like. Addressed to pensioners who, out of fear of war, are stocking up on medicines: “Don’t do it! Don’t worry about medicines! If there were a war, you’d die anyway. Now run along and play with your grandchildren while you still can… until the… boom! Nothing will happen—this is just what Orbán Viktor wants.”
So yes, we’ve reached the point where someone is envisioning and effectively wishing for the deaths of pensioners, saying that if there were a war, they would die anyway. In my view, this is a new low—beyond everything we’ve seen in this campaign so far. It’s utterly outrageous. And it’s just as outrageous that someone would relativize, to this extent, the danger that war represents today for Europe and for Hungary as well.
Does this person not read the news? Does he not hear what the British or French chiefs of staff are saying? Does he not hear what the Secretary General of NATO is saying? Honestly, does he think people are so stupid that we don’t read the news, that we don’t see what is happening in Europe?
There is one person in Hungary today whom we can truly trust to resist that Brussels-driven war hysteria and the pressure being placed on Hungary—and that person is Orbán Viktor.
🎯 Core Function (Real Objective)
The text is not:
- a discussion of the real risks of war,
- not a security policy analysis,
- not a contextual evaluation of media figures.
Instead, it is about:
- the moral demonization of TISZA (“joking about the death of the elderly”),
- creating moral panic (“threatening pensioners”),
- maximizing fear of war,
- constructing Viktor Orbán as the sole protector.
👉 The conclusion is not reached at the end, but is predefined:
“There is danger → everyone else is stupid or irresponsible → only Viktor Orbán can save us.”
🧩 Main Propaganda Techniques
1️⃣ Moral Shock (moral outrage framing)
“joking about the death of the elderly”
“you would die anyway”
🔹 From a cherry-picked, exaggerated, or retold sentence
→ moral indictment
→ emotional short-circuit: no debate, only outrage.
2️⃣ Fear Stacking (fear stacking)
Compressed into a single chain:
- war
- death of the elderly
- medicine shortages
- conscription
- military chiefs
- NATO
- Brussels
👉 The more threats stacked together → the less thinking remains.
3️⃣ Authority Invocation Without Context
References to:
- Ursula von der Leyen
- Manfred Weber
- “British and French chiefs of staff”
- the NATO Secretary General
🔹 No quotes, no dates, no context
🔹 The goal is not to inform, but: “if they say it, be afraid.”
4️⃣ False Dilemma
“We can deceive ourselves…
but there is one man who can protect us.”
👉 The choice is framed as:
- either you accept the narrative in fear,
- or you are irresponsible, stupid, and immoral.
There is no middle position.
5️⃣ Savior Narrative (savior framing)
“There is one man in Hungary today…”
This is not a political statement, but:
- a creed,
- a leader-cult formula,
- placing the leader beyond criticism.
👉 If he is the only protection,
then any criticism becomes a threat.
🧠 What Is This Text Actually Doing?
- It does not protect pensioners, it uses them to frighten others.
- It does not analyze war, it weaponizes fear.
- It does not debate, it delivers a verdict.
- It does not ask, it commands: be afraid and choose correctly.
🔚 Short, Brutally Clear Conclusion
This is not outrage, but exploitation.
Fear of the elderly → a political tool.
War → a rhetorical club.
And at the end, a single name, like a religious closing formula:
Orbán Viktor
If you want, in the next step I can write the one single comment
that doesn’t shout, doesn’t insult,
but cognitively dismantles this narrative,
in a way that makes people not even want to reply—just swallow it.