Fill out the National Petition and protest against brutal price hikes!

With Shell Captain’s leaked program today, an average Hungarian family would lose nearly 2 million forints a year.

We have entered the final two weeks, but nothing has changed on the left — it is still one austerity measure after another.

The energy-austerity plan associated with Captain that came to light today clearly sets out what the TISZA Party is preparing for.

The program itself states that Péter Magyar and his allies must “immediately begin,” among other things, banning cheap Russian energy and abolishing the protected price.

In the following lines, the package even details that they would impose a 600 billion forint special tax on all Hungarians as early as this year, and would also tax savings for another 360 billion forints.

And they themselves are fully aware of the consequences.

In black and white, they write that the bills of families, pensioners, and young people could immediately rise to as much as three times their current level, meaning they would make all of us pay an extra 800,000 forints a year.

Well, this is exactly what we do not want to hear about. We understand that István Kapitány and his people want to make huge profits from punishing Hungarians, but we will not let them empty our pockets!

As long as the national government remains in place, we will stand by low taxes and low utility costs, which is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

How much would a TISZA government cost you? Well then, let’s calculate it!

First, if there were no utility-price protection because we moved away from cheap Russian energy, that would mean your current annual utility bill of 250,000–350,000 forints would immediately rise to 1 million forints, so you would lose about 700,000 forints a year right there.

Then, if there were no protected fuel price at petrol stations and Russian oil were phased out, instead of the current 595 forint petrol price, you would be looking at 1,000 forint petrol and about the same for diesel. That would take another 600,000–900,000 forints a year out of the family budget.

Then István Kapitány also said they would abolish all kinds of special taxes, margin caps, and price-reduction measures, which would again mean losing roughly 180,000–360,000 forints per year.

And then, from the Captain material released today by a former TISZA expert who broke away from the party, it also emerged that they would introduce a so-called energy-independence tax. Other European Union countries have already done this, especially those with EPP-style leadership similar to Péter Magyar. This would mean introducing an annual tax of 1.5 percent on all savings — on your securities or any savings you hold in forints.

So if we assume that you have, say, 10 million forints in savings, that alone would mean a loss of 150,000 forints per year, year after year.

So, all in all… calculate it this way: if TISZA came to power, it would mean a loss of nearly 2 million forints every single year for you and your family.

Are you ready to hand that over to Péter Magyar and his people?

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“TISZA = brutal price increases, taxes, impoverishment”
“Fidesz = protection, cheap utilities, security”
“Election = protect your wallet vs. being stripped of your money”

👉 Hidden formula:

fear + concrete numbers + “calculated loss” + enemy image
→ “if not us → you’ll lose millions every year”

👉 🔥 Core message:

➡️ an unverifiable “leaked plan”
➡️ aggregated, shocking numbers (~2 million HUF/year)
➡️ ending with forced immediate political decision-making

🔍 Manipulation techniques

1️⃣ “Leaked document” = false credibility

👉 Example:
“leaked program”, “revealed by a defected expert”

Technique:
➡️ no source, no verifiability
➡️ yet presented as “insider information”

Goal:
➡️ preempt criticism (“this is already proven”)
➡️ create an illusion of credibility

2️⃣ Shock through extreme numbers (shock economics)

👉 Example:

“2 million HUF loss per year”
“utilities 3× higher”
“1000 HUF fuel”

Technique:
➡️ multiple separate items added together
➡️ worst-case scenarios presented as facts

Goal:
➡️ trigger immediate emotional reaction (panic)
➡️ bypass rational thinking

3️⃣ False causality

👉 Example:
“phasing out Russian energy → automatically 3× utility costs”

Technique:
➡️ complex market → simplified linear cause-effect
➡️ no intermediate factors (market dynamics, subsidies, EU, etc.)

Goal:
➡️ create a simple “cause → catastrophe” narrative
➡️ make fear easy to understand

4️⃣ Additive manipulation (“calculation trick”)

👉 Example:

700k utilities
600–900k fuel
+180–360k other
+150k savings tax

= “~2 million”

Technique:
➡️ individually uncertain figures
➡️ combined into a “certain loss”

Goal:
➡️ create a personal, tangible sense of loss
➡️ present it as a “calculated fact”

5️⃣ Enemy framing + attribution of intent

👉 Example:
“they would strip us of our money”, “they would punish Hungarians”

Technique:
➡️ economic policy debate → framed as deliberate harm

Goal:
➡️ generate anger
➡️ moral rejection of the opponent

6️⃣ Wallet fear framing

👉 Key line:
“how much would it cost YOU”

Technique:
➡️ national policy → translated into personal financial loss

Goal:
➡️ make everyone feel directly affected
➡️ create a direct personal threat

7️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Message:

Fidesz → affordable life
TISZA → collapse

Technique:
➡️ no alternatives
➡️ no nuance

Goal:
➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ force a binary choice

⚠️ Biggest red flags

👉 Multiple issues at once:

❌ no verifiable source
❌ all numbers are assumptions / maximum estimates
❌ complex economics → reduced to one-line causality
❌ aggregation → “guaranteed 2 million loss”

👉 This is campaign-style calculation, not economic analysis.

🧩 In short

👉 This text is not about what will happen, but about making you:

➡️ fear
➡️ calculate (incorrectly)
➡️ get angry
➡️ vote