Péter Magyar and his allies are working with foreign agents to wiretap members of the government. No one has ever been exposed this clearly before!

Colluding with foreign intelligence services is perhaps one of the most serious crimes a person can commit against their own country.

Now an audio recording proves that Szabolcs Panyi, a “journalist” from Direkt36, actively participated in the wiretapping of Péter Szijjártó.

Moreover, he speaks proudly about how, if Tisza comes to power, he would gain access to confidential foreign affairs information, and how he would decide who should be fired from the ministry and who could continue working there. His liaison in this would be his good friend, Anita Orbán from Tisza.

Such a person is called an agent—but the politicians who cooperate with agents in the interest of other countries are no better.

It is absolutely astonishing what a broad international intelligence operation is underway to ensure Hungary has a pro-Ukrainian government.

The next 20 days will be tough—everyone should fasten their seatbelts, because Tisza will stop at nothing, and all the sleeper agents have been activated for their success.

“What do you think, Szabolcs Panyi, after hearing the news this morning? I gave us two numbers. They said they also had those two numbers. Maybe I asked for your numbers. You shared your number and Péter’s as well. And in your opinion, what kind of people are those who are now being promoted? Like that ‘captain,’ and Orbán—well, someone you might be on good terms with?”

“Well, I don’t know the captain, but they wouldn’t say bad things. Anita is my friend. I found myself in a situation where I can suggest to her who she should keep and who she should fire. There are services, foreign services, that support this. It’s quite shocking. Essentially, it contains things people had already suspected earlier. That this journalist supporting Tisza is in contact with foreign services. But what is even more shocking from this recording is that he channels these connections toward Anita Orbán, a frontline politician of the Tisza party. To such an extent that he says they are very close—so close that it already pushes or crosses the boundaries of journalistic ethics. In the event of a change of government, under a Tisza administration, this journalist would, as I understand it, have easy access to all kinds of documents. In fact, he even mentions that he could tell Anita Orbán who should remain working in the ministry and who should be dismissed. I assume the criterion would be how pro-Brussels or pro-Ukrainian someone is. This is exactly what we are talking about when we say that the Tisza party does not represent the interests of the Hungarian people, but rather foreign interests—Brussels and Ukrainian interests.”

🔍 Main narrative

👉 “The opponent (Tisza + journalists) = foreign agents”
👉 “An intelligence conspiracy is unfolding against Hungary”
👉 “The government = victim / protector”
👉 “The election = national sovereignty vs treason”
👉 “An extraordinary situation → all means are justified”

🧩 Hidden formula

scandal (Szijjártó case)
→ narrative reversal
→ enemy image (agents, foreign forces)
→ fear + paranoia
→ mobilization (“3 weeks left, buckle up”)

👉 This is classic damage control turned into offense

🧠 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Projection (mirror technique – very strong here)

Actual situation:
➡️ accusation: government member → Russian ties / leak

Communication:
➡️ “not us → they are working for foreign powers”

Goal:
➡️ redirect attention

Effect:
➡️ the scandal “disappears,” replaced by a new enemy

2️⃣ Maximizing the enemy image

Keywords:

“agent”
“intelligence services”
“international operation”
“sleeper agents”

Technique:
➡️ elevates it from political debate to spy-thriller level

Goal:
➡️ create moral panic

Effect:
➡️ “this is no longer a disagreement, but treason”

3️⃣ Illusion of evidence (“audio recording proves it”)

Technique:
➡️ refers to concrete evidence
➡️ but without context or verification

Goal:
➡️ create a sense of credibility

Effect:
➡️ people stop questioning → “if there’s a recording, it must be true”

4️⃣ Guilt by association

Example:

journalist → intelligence services
journalist → Tisza → foreign powers → Ukraine

Technique:
➡️ linking separate actors into one chain

Goal:
➡️ delegitimize the entire opposition

5️⃣ Fear + urgency

“Hard 20 days are coming”
“everyone fasten your seatbelts”

Technique:
➡️ sense of imminent crisis

Goal:
➡️ immediate mobilization

Effect:
➡️ reduced rational thinking

6️⃣ Moral framing (treason vs homeland)

Claim:
➡️ “cooperating with foreign services = one of the gravest crimes”

Technique:
➡️ moral absolutism

Goal:
➡️ exclude the opponent from legitimate politics

7️⃣ Informal “exposé” tone (dialogue section)

At the end, the conversation:

➡️ “as if it were a secretly leaked discussion”

Technique:
➡️ dramatization + reality effect

Goal:
➡️ “this is not propaganda, this is proof”

⚠️ What is actually happening (meta level)

Your sentence captures it perfectly:

“the problem is not what happened, but that it became public”

👉 The essence of this communication:

not managing the scandal
but reversing the narrative

🧠 Strategic level (very important)

This is no longer “normal propaganda,” but:

👉 ELECTION ENDGAME COMMUNICATION

Characteristics:

extreme claims (agents, intelligence services)
rapid escalation
emotional overload
“war-like” atmosphere

👉 Goals:

maximize own base
scare undecided voters
delegitimize the opponent

🔥 In short (brutally honest summary)

This message:

➡️ is not trying to prove anything
➡️ is not clarifying facts

👉 instead:

it builds a spy-movie narrative where the opponent = a traitorous network