❗After the Two-Tailed Dog Party announced that they would legalize marijuana, I told them to get lost. In response, their lead candidate, Dávid Nagy, replied.
🗣 You see, this is the huge difference in how we view the world. You treat this as a fact—indeed, you accept it… and so your child will do the same, because their father considers it inevitable.
I, on the other hand, sit down with my daughter and talk to her about never doing it, because it’s not worth it. Not even once.
– Just like it’s not worth drinking yourself unconscious, because it can lead to trouble.
– It’s not worth speeding at 200, because at that speed, if anything happens, it’s hard to get out of the car alive.
– It’s not worth driving under the influence either, even though nearly 10,000 people are caught on the roads every year.
These are just a few examples of things we must talk about with our children, and we should never resign ourselves to “they’ll do it anyway.”
But it’s very clear how you liberals see the world. There are things you consider normal. The fact is, you are in the minority on this… yet you still try to normalize and legalize them—because it would make your lives more comfortable.
This is what drug legalization is about, as well as pushing migration, forcing gender ideology onto the majority, or supporting war hysteria.
But the sober, peaceful majority rejects this—and rightly so.
On April 12, we will reaffirm this again—we, the sober, peaceful majority.
We are the safe choice.
Our children will most likely try marijuana. And then comes the argument: “oh, it’s a gateway drug.” The Dog Party’s lead candidate is basically telling me that I should accept that my daughter will definitely try weed. And he says this as a father himself. I honestly don’t understand how a normal adult parent can accept it as a given that their child will try drugs.
I’m sorry, but I am not willing to accept that my daughter will try weed. Maybe these dangers exist in the world, but I believe that as a parent I am capable of protecting her from them—and I expect the same from my government.
I refuse to accept that this is simply part of big-city life. Just like I refuse to accept many other kinds of nonsense that are being pushed in Western Europe. We’ve heard it before during the migration crisis—people said terrorism is just part of life in big cities; that statement even came from London.
Here in Hungary, we have shown that it is possible to say no to this kind of nonsense coming from the West. And drugs are a terrible form of nonsense that is poisoning Western societies one after another.
I would also recommend that the lead candidate take a look at what’s happening in American cities—how people wander the streets like zombies, piled on top of each other.
And I am not willing to accept the relativization that weed isn’t that harmful, that it’s not so bad, that it doesn’t necessarily lead to harder drugs. In my view, it’s a gateway you should never step through, because you don’t know what the consequences will be.
The fact that Hungary is still not where we want to be regarding the drug situation—that there are still people for whom drugs are a problem—does not mean we should accept it. We and the government are constantly working to eliminate this problem. Will this struggle ever end? I don’t think so—just like many other struggles, it requires daily effort.
But does that mean we should give up and accept that our children will use drugs, that they will try weed?
I am not willing to accept that.
🔍 Main narrative
👉 “We = responsible parents, the sober majority”
👉 “They = liberals who normalize danger”
👉 “The world is declining (the West), we are defending ourselves”
👉 “The election = protecting children vs. moral decay”
➡️ This is classic:
moral panic + parental fear + linking it to political choice
🧠 Influence techniques
1️⃣ Maximizing parental fear
Example:
“your child will do it too”
Technique:
➡️ makes it personal (not an abstract debate)
➡️ puts the child at stake
➡️ deterministic framing (“it will happen anyway”)
Goal:
➡️ trigger emotional reaction (not rational debate)
➡️ activate protective instincts
Effect:
➡️ narrows thinking
➡️ “we don’t take risks → we ban”
2️⃣ False dilemma
Framing:
👉 accept it → your child will use drugs
👉 reject it → you protect them
Reality:
➡️ there are middle-ground options (prevention, education, regulated policy)
Goal:
➡️ oversimplify a complex issue
➡️ leave only one “correct” choice
3️⃣ Moral superiority framing
Key phrase:
“the sober, peaceful majority”
Technique:
➡️ own side = morally right
➡️ other side = irresponsible / corrupt
Goal:
➡️ identity building
➡️ “good people belong here”
Effect:
➡️ debate turns into a belief system
➡️ criticism = being on the “wrong side”
4️⃣ Bandwagon effect (majority illusion)
Example:
“you are in the minority”
Technique:
➡️ no evidence
➡️ presented as fact
Goal:
➡️ conformity
➡️ “don’t stay in the minority”
5️⃣ Slippery slope
Chain:
👉 weed → drugs → decay → Western chaos
Imagery:
“zombies on American streets”
Technique:
➡️ extreme examples
➡️ emotional shock
Goal:
➡️ fear
➡️ “if you allow this → this is what happens”
Reality:
➡️ heavily oversimplified, not a proven causal chain
6️⃣ Issue bundling
Grouped together:
- drugs
- migration
- gender
- war
Technique:
➡️ all “bad things” merged into one block
➡️ emotional transfer between issues
Goal:
➡️ reject one → reject all
7️⃣ Enemy image + culture war
Key idea:
“Western nonsense”
Technique:
➡️ external threat
➡️ narrative of cultural decline
Goal:
➡️ defensive identity
➡️ “us vs. them”
8️⃣ Personal experience = universal truth
Example:
“with my daughter…”
Technique:
➡️ personal story → general rule
Goal:
➡️ increase credibility
➡️ emotional identification
⚠️ Deeper contradiction (very important)
👉 It says both:
- “we must not accept that it will happen”
- BUT: “this is a continuous fight that will never end”
➡️ Meaning:
it actually admits the phenomenon exists and cannot be eliminated,
yet politically sells the narrative that
“zero tolerance = solution”
🎯 Overall picture
This text is not really about drugs.
➡️ It’s about:
political mobilization (“April 12”)
identity (“good parent vs. bad parent”)
fear (“your child is at risk”)