Péter Magyar was exposed at his own march by the Soros-backed, Hungary-hating Brussels MEP. Among several large Ukrainian flags, Daniel Freund openly stated that the leader of the left stands fully behind Zelensky.

“He would allow the financing of Ukraine and its military support, and I think we need to get rid of fossil energy, especially if it is Russian energy.”

So, according to the statements of his own allies, the leader of the left would financially support Ukraine and send weapons into the war, while immediately scrapping the cheap energy that protects Hungarian families.

That is why Brussels sends its people here, and that is why their blue-and-yellow flags are present. Because they know perfectly well that Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to their expectations: he would drag Hungary into the war, send Hungarian taxpayers’ money to Ukraine, and phase out cheap Russian energy.

As long as Hungary has a national government, we will stay out of the war, we will not send Hungarians’ money to Ukraine, and we will not pay more for energy. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

Daniel Freund, one of George Soros’s favorite politicians, exposed Péter Magyar and his allies. Speaking as a participant at Péter Magyar’s march, he said that if Péter Magyar were in government, support would go to Ukraine, our money would also start flowing to Ukraine, and Hungary should break away from cheap Russian energy.

No matter how much Péter Magyar and his allies deny it, no matter how much they deny the Ukrainian flags at their march, and no matter how much they claim they would not do this, we know exactly that the Ukrainian flag is already flying at City Hall, and that they sat in the European Parliament wearing Ukrainian shirts. All of this proves that they would be a pro-Ukraine government.

We will not allow this. That is also why so many of us attended the Peace March. There we showed that we cannot be blackmailed. We know what Hungary’s interests are — and that is why on April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice.

Rhetorical / Propaganda Analysis

1️⃣ Construction of an Enemy Image

(external enemy framing / scapegoating)

Excerpt

“a Sorosist, Hungary-hating Brussels representative”
“Brussels sends its people here”
“stands with Zelensky”

Technique

The text connects several external actors into a single threatening bloc:

Brussels
George Soros
Ukraine
Zelensky

This is a classic political narrative:

➡️ external forces + internal political actors working together against the country.

Goal

to weaken the legitimacy of the opponent
to frame the political debate as a matter of “national defense”

Effect

The reader may easily feel that:

➡️ anyone who supports the opposition → serves foreign interests.

2️⃣ Internal Traitor Narrative

(traitor framing / internal enemy)

Excerpt

“Magyar Péter was exposed at his own march…”
“the leader of the left stands with Zelensky in everything”

Technique

The opposition politician is not presented simply as a political rival, but as:

➡️ someone serving foreign interests.

This rhetoric frames the political conflict as loyalty vs. betrayal.

Goal

moral delegitimization
portraying the opponent as unpatriotic

Effect

For the reader, the opposition becomes:

➡️ not an alternative
➡️ but a threat.

3️⃣ Fear-Based Scenario

(fear appeal / catastrophic framing)

Excerpt

“he would drag Hungary into the war”
“he would send Hungarians’ money to Ukraine”
“he would phase out cheap Russian energy”

Technique

The text chains together several negative consequences:

war
financial losses
expensive energy

This is worst-case scenario rhetoric.

Goal

mobilizing fear
turning the electoral decision into an existential issue

Effect

The reader may feel that:

➡️ if the opposition wins → serious losses will follow.

4️⃣ Energy Security Narrative

(economic security framing)

Excerpt

“he would phase out cheap Russian energy”
“cheap utility prices protecting Hungarian families”

Technique

The political debate is linked to household costs.

Key elements:

utility bills
energy prices
protection of families

Goal

to transform a geopolitical debate into an everyday cost-of-living issue.

Effect

The reader may conclude that:

➡️ opposition policy = higher utility costs.

5️⃣ Symbols Used as Evidence

(symbolic evidence framing)

Excerpt

“Ukrainian flags at their march”
“they sat in the European Parliament wearing Ukrainian T-shirts”

Technique

Symbols are presented as political evidence:

flags
clothing
demonstration imagery

This is the rhetoric of visual proof.

Goal

a simple and easily understandable message:

➡️ “look at the images → the proof is there.”

Effect

Instead of complex political arguments,

➡️ visual associations dominate the interpretation.

6️⃣ “We Protect the Country” Narrative

(protector narrative / leadership framing)

Excerpt

“As long as Hungary has a national government…”
“we will stay out of the war”

Technique

The government is portrayed as a protective force:

guarantor of peace
defender of energy prices
protector of national interests.

Goal

to frame the election as a security issue:

➡️ stability vs. risk.

Effect

The message suggests that:

➡️ the current government = security.

7️⃣ Campaign Mobilization

(electoral mobilization framing)

Excerpt

“that is why Fidesz is the safe choice”
“on April 12”

Technique

The entire narrative culminates in an electoral call.

This follows a classic campaign closing structure:

presenting the danger
identifying those responsible
offering the solution

➡️ “vote for us”.

Goal

political mobilization.

Effect

For the reader, the election appears as:

➡️ a strategic decision.

💡 Summary

The text follows a typical campaign rhetoric structure:

external enemy (Brussels, Ukraine, Soros)
internal actor as collaborator (Magyar Péter)
fear-based consequences (war, expensive energy)
government as protector
electoral mobilization.

This creates an election narrative framed as a national security issue.